In December 2008, CDC published Revised Surveillance Case Definitions for HIV Infection Among Adults, Adolescents, and Children Aged < 18 Months and for HIV Infection and AIDS Among Children Aged 18 Months to < 13 Years—United States, 2008 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5710a1.htm). For adults and adolescents (i.e., persons aged ≥ 13 years), the surveillance case definitions for HIV infection and AIDS were revised into a single case definition for HIV infection that includes AIDS and incorporates the HIV infection staging classification system. In addition, the HIV infection case definition for children aged < 13 years and the AIDS case definition for children aged 18 months to < 13 years were revised. No changes were made to the HIV infection classification system, the 24 AIDS-defining conditions for children aged < 13 years, or the AIDS case definition for children aged < 18 months. These case definitions are intended for public health surveillance only and not as a guide for clinical diagnosis
A confirmed case meets the laboratory criteria for diagnosis of HIV infection and one of the four HIV infection stages (stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, or stage unknown)
HIV infection, stage 1: No AIDS-defining condition and either CD4 + T-lymphocyte count of ≥ 500 cells/μL or CD4 + T-lymphocyte percentage of total lymphocytes of ≥ 29
HIV infection, stage 2: No AIDS-defining condition and either CD4 + T-lymphocyte count of 200–499 cells/μL or CD4 + T-lymphocyte percentage of total lymphocytes of 14–28
HIV infection, stage 3 (AIDS): CD4 + T-lymphocyte count of < 200 cells/μL or CD4 + T-lymphocyte percentage of total lymphocytes of < 14, or documentation of an AIDS-defining condition. Documentation of an AIDS-defining condition supersedes a CD4 + T-lymphocyte count of ≥ 200 cells/μL and a CD4 + T-lymphocyte percentage of total lymphocytes of ≥ 14
HIV infection, stage unknown: No information available on CD4 + T-lymphocyte count or percentage and no information available on AIDS-defining conditions
Insomnia has been reported in all stages of HIV/AIDS [25] and has been consistently significantly associated with depression and fatigue [26] . Phillips and colleagues examined the relationships among sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the dimensions of health-related quality of life (SF-36) in a sample of HIV-infected women ( n = 144). Controlling for stage of illness and whether a woman had a paying job or not, global sleep quality explained significant levels of variance in bodily pain , mental health, physical functioning, role physical, social functioning, and vitality. Sleep quality accounted for 20 % of the variance in the mental component score, but for none of the variance in the physical component score [27].
Sleep and Immunity
Besedovsky, Lange, and Born provide a thorough synthesis of the evidence supporting the relationships between sleep, circadian rhythm, and immunity [28]. The following section summarizes key conclusion drawn in their article that support the relationships between sleep and immunity. The onset of sleep is associated with downregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). During that same period, growth hormone , prolactin, melatonin , and leptin steeply rise. These hormones participate in the regulation of the immune response, by stimulating activation, proliferation, and differentiation of immune cells, which then produce proinflammatory cytokines. Proinflammatory cytokines include interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and interferon (IFN-gamma). When the HPPA (increasing production of cortisol) and the SNS (increasing the production of catecholamines) are upregulated, proinflammatory immune functions are suppressed. Therefore, during sleep, particularly during slow-wave sleep (SWS) , proinflammatory functions peak and during wakefulness anti-inflammatory activity becomes apparent. It has also been demonstrated that immune cell numbers in early differentiation peak during the early sleep period. Production of IL-12, a proinflammatory cytokine, increases and there is a shift of the Th1/Th2 balance toward the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Downregulation of the stress hormones during early sleep may lead to increased proliferation of T helper cell proliferation and migration of naïve T cells to the lymph nodes. Wakefulness is associated with an increase in cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells.
Sleep and Immunity in HIV Disease
An inverse relationship was found between frequency of sleep complaint and CD4 + cells which suggests that sleep disturbances may increase as the disease progresses. Relationships between SWS and certain immune variables (i.e., NKCA, antibody production, T cell proliferation and differentiation, and cytotoxic T cell proliferation and differentiation) have been observed. These findings suggest that insomnia adversely affects immunity. Darko et al. hypothesize that IL-1-β and TNF-α may be responsible for the changes in SWS in PWHA [29].
Cruess and colleagues examined the relationship between psychological distress (Impact of Event Scale), subjective sleep disturbance (PSQI) and immune status (CD3 + CD4 + [T helper/inducer cells] and CD3 + CD8 + [T suppressor cells]) in 57 PWHA. The sample consisted of both men ( n = 41) and women ( n = 16) with a mean age 38.8 ± 8.5. Neither psychological distress nor sleep quality was significantly related to T helper/inducer cells, but both were significantly associated with T suppressor cell even after controlling for age, T helper/inducer cells, and viral load. They concluded that sleep quality mediated the relationship between psychological distress and T suppressor cells [30].
Insomnia and Quality of Life in HIV Infection
HIV/AIDS-related insomnia is associated with a significant burden for PWHA in that it further adds to functional impairment and reduces quality of life (QOL) [19, 27]. Insomnia contributes to fatigue , disability, eventual unemployment, and decreased QOL in PWHIV [8]. Insomnia occurs frequently in PWHIV prior to diagnosis and continues throughout the course of the disease. In fact, excessive daytime sleepiness may be one of the presenting symptoms of HIV disease , [31] and insomnia may even serve as an early marker of HIV disease [13].
Sleep Architecture and HIV/AIDS
Changes in sleep architecture in HIV/AIDS have been studied in small samples. Most of these studies did not include seronegative case controls. Little attention was given to the HIV stage of illness in these small studies. Therefore, the changes in sleep architecture have not been clearly characterized.
Early studies demonstrated an increase in SWS , particularly during the latter half of the sleep period. Norman and colleagues [32] examined sleep architecture in a sample of eight asymptomatic HIV-positive men and compared their sleep to three HIV-negative men. They reported an increase in total percentage of SWS, with most of the SWS occurring in the latter half of the sleep period. This finding has not been replicated in any other study.
A subsequent study by Norman and colleagues compared the sleep architecture of ten HIV-positive men to that of five HIV-negative men. They reported a significant difference (8 % more) in the amount of delta (slow wave) sleep in the HIV-positive men [31] . In another study of six asymptomatic HIV-positive men, they reported that alpha-delta patterns were consistently observed throughout the sleep period [33].
Kubicki and colleagues examined sleep architecture in five men with AIDS . They reported a greater number of awakenings and arousals, reduced REM sleep, and a decrease in sleep efficiency in persons who have progressed to AIDS [34].
Wiegand and colleagues [14, 35] on the other hand, found no SWS disruptions in PWHA. Using nocturnal sleep encephalography, they found more frequent shifts to stage 1 sleep equated to a reduction in stage 2 sleep. Sleep-onset latency increased, but total sleep time and sleep efficiency decreased. The number of REM periods increased, but the average duration of a REM episode decreased.
Ferini-Strambi et al. examined sleep architecture in nine HIV-positive men and eight age matched controls. Their study showed a significant reduction in SWS and higher cyclic alternating patterns (CAP), representing the stability of sleep in PWHA compared to controls [36]. A significant relationship was found between a higher CAP rate and poor subjective sleep quality. Unlike Norman and colleagues, this group of researchers did not find a higher percentage of SWS in the second half of the night [36].
Wheatley and Smith found that HIV + patients reported greater delay in sleep onset, earlier morning awakening, more frequent nocturnal awakenings, and poorer well-being on waking. A higher degree of insomnia was observed in individuals who were not taking antiretroviral therapy. They suggested that the observed sleep architecture changes might be related to depression .
Pharmacological Factors Related to Insomnia in HIV/AIDS
Many medications used to treat HIV/AIDS and its complications have insomnia as a side effect.
Adherence to Medications
A high degree of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV/AIDS is necessary to decrease viral replication and to achieve viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per milliliter) [37, 38]. With monitoring and adjustment of combinations of antiretroviral agents, it is possible to decrease the rate of viral mutation and the evolution of drug resistance [39]. Further benefits of viral suppression include: slowing disease progression [40], prolonging life [41], and possibly decreasing the risk of transmitting HIV to others [42]. Viral suppression is also important in reducing overall health care costs.
Many improvements to drug regimens have been made. The number of medications and frequency of medications through the day have decreased by several agents into fewer pills. There are not as many food restrictions as before and it is easier to store medications. However, many barriers to adherence persist. These barriers include stigma, limited access to qualified providers, travel distances to receive care, and limited access to mental health and substance-abuse care. Symptom burden, which is the sum of the severity and impact of symptoms, predict nonadherence to antiretroviral drugs. Depression has been identified in various studies as barriers that decrease adherence to antiretroviral therapy [10, 43−45]. A cross-sectional analysis conducted by Phillips and colleagues demonstrated that HIV-infected women who reported more depressive symptoms and poorer sleep quality also reported lower adherence to medications [44]. Associations between sleep quality and adherence have been demonstrated by others since that study [43, 46].
People who have difficulty sleeping report impaired daytime functioning, which includes decreased attention and concentration, greater fatigue , impaired memory, and decreased ability to carry out daily tasks [10, 47, 48].
In a cross-sectional study of HIV-infected women living in the southeastern USA, Phillips and colleagues [44] found that two thirds of the participants endured severe sleep disturbance and that sleep disturbance was significantly related to adherence to antiretroviral therapy due to daytime dysfunction.
Gay and colleagues, in a study of 350 women and men with HIV infection, found that overall symptom burden was related to medication adherence. Troubling sleep was strongly associated with nonadherence to medications in that study. “Forgetting” and “sleeping through the dose time” were the most frequent reasons identified for failing to take a prescribed dose [49].
Saberi and colleagues [10] conducted a large cross-sectional study ( n = 2.846) of HIV-infected men and women to determine the prevalence of sleep disturbance and to identify the relationship between sleep quality and medication nonadherence. Together, these findings support that sleep disturbances are associated with nonadherence, and future studies of interventions for improving sleep quality should include medication adherence outcome measures.
Correlates of Sleep in HIV/AIDS
In studies involving the general population, researchers recognize the major correlates of diminished quality of sleep as (a) fatigue , (b) excessive daytime sleepiness , (c) perceived stress, and (d) depression. All of these exist in PWHA in addition to anxiety and pain [3, 6, 17] . In an integrated literature review examining insomnia in PWHA, Reid and Dwyer noted that all of the associated correlates are entangled due to “overlap at both measurement and conceptual levels” (p. 267) [9]. Similarly, Nokes and Kendrew [17] reported that the intercorrelations between symptom severity, excessive sleepiness , depression , state anxiety, and functional status precluded attempts to statistically “untangle the effects of the variables” (p. 21). The fact that PWHA usually present with multiple symptoms [50] compounds the difficulty. While both physiologic and psychological variables affect quality of sleep in PWHA, the latter (depression, stress, and anxiety) display strongest statistical correlation. For the PWHA, this manifests as marked delays in sleep onset, more awakenings during the night, and less transition into non-REM sleep [3]. In turn, the resultant insomnia exacerbates the psychological distress of the chronically ill [51].
While existing data sources do not allow calculation of incidence [52], fatigue leads as the most prevalent complaint of PWHA with estimates ranging from less than 50 % to more than 80 %. Whereas Lerdal et al. [53] simply define fatigue as a “sense of exhaustion, lack of energy, tiredness unrelieved by a night of good quality sleep” (p. 2204), other authors capture a more graphic characterization. In what is considered a classic analysis of the phenomenon, Ream and Richardson, as cited in Barroso and Voss [52], described fatigue as a “subjective, unpleasant symptom that incorporates total feelings ranging from tiredness to exhaustion, creating an unrelenting overall condition that interferes with individuals’ ability to function to their normal capacities” (p. S5). Asked to explain it, PWHA attribute their fatigue to either the disease itself or existing physical attributes (e.g., being overweight), overexertion, or medication side effects [54]. Despite instrument scores indicating significant pathology, respondents have been known to rate the quality of their sleep as “fairly good” [3].
Diminished quality of life arises from the awareness of the imbalance of resources, capacity, and performance [52, 55]. Significantly correlated with quality of sleep, fatigue is a constant across all stages of the disease [56] resulting in persistent impaired daytime functioning [10, 47, 48] and, somewhat paradoxically, increased sleep-onset difficulties [20]. In turn, daytime dysfunction has been significantly related to adherence to antiretroviral therapy regimens [27, 55]. Studying fatigue and insomnia in homosexual men (62 HIV + and 50 HIV −), Darko et al. [8] found that HIV + subjects were more likely to: be unemployed, feel fatigued throughout the day, sleep more, nap more, and have diminished alertness. Both fatigue and insomnia significantly contributed to morbidity and mortality in the HIV + subjects. They concluded that the cognitive dysfunction seen in early HIV infection (asymptomatic) is related more to loss of sleep than to actual neurological impairment.
Twenty years later, Harmon et al. documented that the fatigue PWHA experience differs in both quality and severity than that experienced before becoming infected [57]. HIV-Related Fatigue Scale (HRFS) scores from their study sample ( N = 128) indicated that fatigue interfered with cognition (mental clarity and facility), task performance (activities of daily living), and socialization (work and leisure). The researchers determined that those who have lived the longest with the diagnosis have lower self-reported rates of fatigue attributed to learned coping mechanisms . From this study’s findings, increased rates of fatigue can be predicted both in the presence of lower monthly income and pharmacologic treatment of depression . In 2009, Lee et al. [5] reported on clinical characteristics of symptom experiences among PWHA ( N = 350 adults) noting that most prevalent were “lack of energy” and “feeling drowsy” due to “trouble sleeping.” These states resulted in difficulty concentrating as well as mild symptoms of depression and anxiety.
A more recent study by Lerdal et al. [53] began exploring patterns of fatigue among PWHA. A sample of 318 PWHA completed self-report questionnaires related to symptoms Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), fatigue (Lee Fatigue Scale; Fatigue Severity Scale 7), sleep quality (PSQI), depression (CES-D), anxiety (POMS), and quality of life (Medical Outcome Study Health Related QOL). Participants were asked to complete the assessments 30 min after awakening and again 30 min before going to sleep for three consecutive days. Overall, evening fatigue level scores were significantly higher than morning fatigue level scores. While 30 % reported fatigue either in the morning or in the evening only, it was noted that those who reported high fatigue in the morning were likely also to report high fatigue in the evening. Using those who reported low levels of fatigue both in the morning and evening (35 % of respondents) as a reference group, three patterns were identified: (a) high-fatigue levels only in the morning; (b) high-fatigue levels only in the evening; and (c) high-fatigue levels both morning and evening. High-fatigue levels only reported in the morning were associated with higher anxiety and depression scores; while high-fatigue levels reported only in the evening were associated with high-anxiety scores. Labeled the most debilitating and distressing, high-fatigue levels in both the morning and evening were associated with high-anxiety scores, high-depression scores, and significant sleep disturbances. It is important to note that anxiety is an important antecedent of fatigue regardless of diurnal patterns. Acknowledging the cyclical interaction of psychological variables and quality of sleep suggests once again that mental health states are more predictive of fatigue than the HIV/AIDS disease state. And in turn, while psychological correlates affect sleep, only fatigue maintains statistical significance when exploring the association with sleep quality [3].
EDS is an inability to stay awake in quiet, sedentary situations (such as when reading, watching television, or even driving). While drowsiness (a milder form of daytime sleepiness) may be a by-product of lack of sleep or medication, EDS is usually associated with pathological sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) [5, 51]. Prevalence of OSA in PWHA has not been explored or documented despite the presence of several risk factors such as ART-associated lipodystrophy and opioid dependence [51]. In the majority of the studies examining sleep correlates, EDS is determined using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) , an 8-item self-administered questionnaire validated in obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy , and idiopathic hypersomnia . Using this instrument, EDS is defined using a standard cut-point of ESS ≥ 10.
Crum-Cianflone and colleagues examined sleep quality (PSQI) and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Daytime Sleepiness Scale) in 193 HIV-infected participants and compared them with 50 HIV-negative participants. The HIV-infected group did not differ from the HIV-negative group by mean age, gender, race, rank, or duty status, but they did differ in that the HIV-infected group was slightly better educated, more depressed (Beck Depression Inventory), and were more likely to be hypertensive than the HIV-negative group. No differences were found between the HIV-infected group and the HIV-negative group on the total sleep quality score, any of the seven sleep quality component scores, or on daytime sleepiness. The authors concluded that HIV-infected patients who are diagnosed and treated early may have similar rates of sleep disturbances as the general population [12].
In a similar study examining correlates of sleep in 58 PWHA, Nokes and Kendrew noted that the majority of the participants were unemployed and 79 % reported taking daytime naps at varying frequency [17]. Wanting to determine if sleep quality mediated the stress–fatigue relationship, Salahuddin et al. examined levels of fatigue, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness in 128 PWHA (majority African-American males; median age 44 years) most of whom had lived with the infection for 10 or more years [58]. Using scores from the HIV-Related Fatigue Scale (HRFS), PSQI, ESS , and a checklist of possibly stressful life events, they found weak correlations between EDS and both fatigue and sleep quality despite the fact that PSQI scores indicated pathological problems. While there was a significant relationship between and among sleep quality, fatigue, and daytime functioning, excessive sleepiness did not add to symptom. Furthermore, Salahuddin et al. found that the association between stress and fatigue-related daytime dysfunction was only marginally explained by EDS and sleep quality yet remains significant when examining daytime dysfunction [58].
The relationship between fatigue and depression is well documented in both the general population and PWHA. Indeed, Lerdal et al. [53] observes that “tiredness” is the second most prevalent symptom among depressed adults while Harmon et al. [57] cites depression as the most influential concomitant accompanying fatigue. Reid and Dwyer noted that the most notable finding of their integrated review of research literature is that the prevalence of depression in PWHA is markedly and significantly related to quality of sleep rather than CD4 count or disease stage [9]. Moneyham et al. observe that it is possible that many of the symptoms manifested in PWHA are manifestations of depression [59].
Working with a sample ( N = 278) of predominantly African-American women, Moneyham and colleagues found that depressive symptoms vary significantly with education, income levels, and living arrangements [59]. These findings are similar to those from studies examining the role of fatigue in the lives of PWHA and support the observed interrelationship between and among the correlates of sleep quality. In this case, analysis of data from a longitudinal study supported their hypothesis that social support and coping strategies can intervene in the relationship between stress (symptom burden and daily functioning) and depression . Indeed, the intensity of symptom burden plus its impact on ability to function in performance of daily activities becomes a significant predictor of depression. These findings are supported by Low et al. who reported that, if present, depression is the central companion of fatigue [60].
Noting that depression levels may decrease as years living with the diagnosis increase [57, 58], contemporary researchers advocate studies that include lifestyle, environmental, cultural, and health belief factors in order to identify and implement interventions leading to effective symptom management [9, 55, 59]. Such interventions might serve to break the patterns of anxiety that have been shown to be associated with therapeutic regimen adherence and quality of life [5, 61].
As life expectancy of PWHA increases, more attention is being given to quality of life. In 2009, Lee et al. reported that reported prevalence of pain in PWHA ranged from 30 to 90 %. The wide range was attributed to varying stages of disease among research participants and the use of different measurement instruments by the researchers. In one of the few studies examining the relationship of pain and sleep quality, Aouizerat and colleagues compared differences in fatigue, sleep disturbances , anxiety, and depression in PWHA with and without pain [50]. They reported significantly greater problems across all variables in the group experiencing pain than in participants reporting no pain. The concern is that providers have been underestimating the relationship between pain and sleep, and therefore, not effectively intervening. From findings of their study of the experience of pain in PWHA, Kowal et al. concluded that interventions strengthening effective coping strategies and improving daily functioning will result in decreased vulnerability to depressive symptoms [62].
Nonpharmacological Treatments for Insomnia
Psychological interventions for PWHA with chronic insomnia offer many benefits when compared to sedative hypnotics [63, 64]. Therefore, it is reasonable and prudent that the first line of treatment should be a psychological intervention.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
CBT is the current standard of care for first-line treatment of insomnia in the general population. The National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference on insomnia has listed CBT as a safe and effective means of managing chronic insomnia [65]. Cognitive behavioral therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy with relaxation for insomnia are supported by research. Cognitive behavioral therapy may produce moderate to large effect sizes for sleep-onset latency and sleep quality, and it produces small to moderate effects sizes for number of awakenings, duration of awakenings, and total sleep time [66−74].
Cognitive therapy is based on these premises (1) that cognitive activity (e.g., thoughts, attitudes, and beliefs) affects behavior; (2) cognitive activity can be changed; and (3) behavior and emotions can be monitored and changed [75, 76]. Cognitive activity is part of the adaptive process; however, sometimes cognitions become distorted and lead to maladaptation. Examples of cognitive distortions about sleep include: (1) a person’s belief that he or she will not be able to sleep without a medication, (2) a person’s belief that if he or she is unable to sleep, it is better to just stay in bed and rest, (3) a person’s belief that there is nothing he or she can do to improve sleep, and (4) they will have to deal with insomnia forever. Maladaptative cognitions such as these can lead to chronic insomnia. When cognitive distortions are identified, the goal of therapy is to help the person replace cognitive distortions with adaptive cognitions.
Cognitive behavioral therapy combines cognitive therapy and specific behavioral treatments [77]. Research findings support the efficacy of CBT for primary and comorbid insomnia (associated with a physiological or psychological condition) [78−83]. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 63 young and middle-aged adults with chronic insomnia. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three of three groups: CBT alone, pharmacotherapy alone (zolpidem), or combined CBT and pharmacotherapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy produced greater improvements in sleep-onset latency and sleep efficiency, resulted in the greatest number of normal sleepers following treatment, and maintained these beneficial changes longer [84]. In an earlier clinical trial, 78 adults with chronic and primary insomnia completed an intervention of CBT, pharmacotherapy (temazepam), combined CBT and pharmacotherapy, or a placebo. Treatment outcomes were time awake after sleep onset as measured by sleep diaries and polysomnography and clinical ratings from subjects, significant others, and clinicians. All three active intervention arms resulted in improvements in sleep. The researchers concluded that both CBT and pharmacological interventions were effective for the short time, but the beneficial gains were maintained longer following CBT alone or in or in combination with behavioral treatment [81].
A small pilot study of eight female survivors of breast cancer demonstrated efficacy of CBT by a reduction in total wake time and increased sleep efficiency as measured by a sleep diary and by polysomnography [85] . In a subsequent more adequately powered study, this group of researchers provided 8 weekly sessions of CBT to small groups of participants and compared them to participants in a waitlist control group. They found that CBT effectively increased sleep efficiency, decreased total wake time, decreased sleep onset latency, and decreased wake after sleep onset as measured by polysomnography. Significant reductions in the number of hypnotic medicated nights, insomnia severity, anxiety, and depression were also observed [86].
Many questions about CBT for the treatment of insomnia remain unexplored. These include the number and length of sessions needed to obtain beneficial results.
Sleep Hygiene
Sleep hygiene is a self-managed behavioral intervention that is the most commonly recommended intervention to promote good sleep [87]. Sleep hygiene education can be done easily in a clinician’s office .
Sleep hygiene refers to sleep-related behaviors and environmental factors that can be altered to improve sleep quality [88, 89]. The principles of sleep hygiene include eating a healthy diet, limiting the amount of caffeine intake, and going to bed and getting out of bed at consistent times, sleeping in a quiet, dark, temperature-controlled room on a comfortable mattress and pillow. Daytime naps and exercise within 4 h of bedtime are avoided. Eating, drinking (both alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages), and smoking before going to bed should be avoided. The bed should be used only for sleep and sexual intercourse. The use of electronic devices near bedtime should be avoided [90, 91].
Only two studies have examined the effectiveness of sleep hygiene education for improving the sleep of PWHA [92, 93]. Webel and colleagues tested a sleep hygiene intervention in 40 PWHA. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups, with the intervention group receiving a sleep hygiene intervention known as System CHANGE-HIV. Participants in the intervention group had increased sleep efficiency and decreased sleep fragmentation when compared to the control group [93]. Dreher examined the effects of caffeine reduction in an international sample of 88 HIV-positive men and women who experienced insomnia or any other sleeping problem on an occasional or frequent basis. All participants had a total score greater than five on the PSQI at baseline [92]. Participants were randomized to one of two groups . The experimental group was instructed to withdraw from caffeine gradually and then to avoid all caffeine sources for 30 days. In that study, participants in the experimental group reduced their caffeine intake by 90 % compared to a 6 % reduction of caffeine intake in the control group. No difference in the change in sleep quality from pretest to posttest between the groups was observed. However, a 35 % improvement in sleep quality was observed in the experimental group when sleep quality was controlled for health status [92].
Even though sleep hygiene is commonly recommended in clinical practice, randomized studies that are sufficiently powered to demonstrate the efficacy of this intervention do not exist. There is little consensus about which sleep hygiene principles should be included in a treatment plan, and no two studies have used the same set of sleep hygiene principles. Small sample sizes, the inclusion of other interventions, and examining only one aspect of sleep hygiene fail to provide sufficient evidence for the efficacy of sleep hygiene in improving sleep quality [74, 94]. However, sleep hygiene is a common sense approach and the principles of sleep hygiene can be easily taught; therefore, it is one of the most frequently used clinical interventions for disrupted sleep quality .
Relaxation Training
Relaxation training exercises have been used successfully to promote sleep. Relaxation techniques include progressive muscle relaxation and autogenic training (used to reduce somatic tension), and guided imagery and meditation (used to reduce intrusive thoughts at bedtime).
Progressive Muscle Relaxation
Progressive muscle relaxation involves alternately tensing (5 s) and relaxing successive muscle groups (25 s) . The person is guided to discriminate between how the muscle feels when contracted and when tensed. As the person becomes more experienced with progressive muscle relaxation over time, the difference between tenseness and relaxation can be discerned without actually having to contract the muscles [95]. Progressive muscle relaxation is a recommended intervention for the treatment of chronic insomnia [74, 78, 96]. Autogenic training uses autosuggestions, very similar to self-hypnosis. Autogenic training helps a person to experience relaxation, heaviness, and warmth in the limbs, while at the same time recognizing a calm heart beat and slower respirations [97, 98]. Autogenic training is recommended by the American Association of Sleep Medicine [74, 81, 99]. Guided imagery refers to a mind–body technique in which a person is guided to imagine a place that is safe and comfortable to them. During that time the person is imaging this safe and comfortable place, they are instructed to visualize muscle relaxation, to breathe in and out of the nose, and to feel how relaxed they are. Guided imagery is recommended by the Association of Sleep Medicine [74, 81, 99]. Meditation, as taught by Benson, [100] uses a word, a prayer, or movement to induce the relaxation response. These inductions are repeated continuously over 10–20 min and are often linked mentally with one’s breathing pattern. During this relaxation response, other thoughts may occur, but the person is instructed to not judge the thoughts or respond to them. While learning to meditate, a person is instructed to select the induction behavior, to sit still in comfortable place, to close their eyes, to feel their muscles relax, to focus on their breathing patterns, and to meditate for 10–20 min. When the mind wanders during meditation, the person is taught to return to a focus on the induction behavior [74, 81, 99].

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

