Spinal Cord Imaging





10.8.1 X-Ray Imaging


This is an X-ray image of EH post spine surgery. You can clearly see her vertebrae, as well as the metal screws and rod that were inserted between the fourth and sixth cervical vertebra to stabilize her spine. The overall goal of this surgery is to preserve or improve neurological function, provide stability, and decrease pain. The vertebrae and other bony structures are clearly depicted, whereas the spinal cord and any evidence of neurological changes are not visible.

A323639_1_En_10_Figb_HTML.jpg


10.8.2 Anatomical MRI


Here we show a T 2-weighted fast spin echo imaging of EH’s head and neck, in a midline sagittal slice. This MRI method has low sensitivity to magnetic field distortions that are often caused by metallic spinal fixation devices. Signal voids at the positions of the screws and plate across the C4–C6 vertebrae are clearly visible. The disruption to the spinal cord tissue at the same level is also clearly demonstrated. Although the cord tissue is clearly visible and the tissue disruption is evident in this image, there is no evidence of how neurological functions have been altered by the injury.

A323639_1_En_10_Figc_HTML.jpg


10.8.3 Functional MRI


EH volunteered for research functional MRI studies with thermal stimulation on the right and left hands, on the little finger side of the palm, corresponding to the eighth cervical spinal cord segment, below the level of injury. The top panels show corresponding results from an age- and gender-matched person with no previous injury. Areas of the spinal cord and brainstem that responded to thermal stimulation of each hand are indicated on the anatomical images in red for positive responses and blue for negative responses. Transverse sections through the cord and brainstem are also shown for selected locations to illustrate the cross-sectional distribution of the responses detected with fMRI. These results demonstrate neural communication from below the level of injury to the brainstem, for both right-side and left-side stimulation. The activity detected on both sides is altered relative to the control participant example, but is nonetheless present. This is one of the few techniques that can be applied noninvasively in people that can show the neurological changes in the spinal cord as a result of injury.



10.9 Summary


Routine clinical imaging primarily consists of plain film X-ray, and, if there is evidence of neurological deficit, CT is often used. MRI is less commonly used, but is known to provide important supplementary information. While X-ray-based imaging methods clearly depict disruption to the bony structures, they only give evidence for or against suspected neurological damage. MRI can demonstrate tissue damage to the spinal cord, whereas to obtain any information about neurological changes as a result of traumatic spinal cord injury, functional MRI is needed. However, current fMRI methods are entirely experimental and are useful for clinical research but have not yet reached the stage of clinical use.


References



1.

Agosta F, Valsasina P, Caputo D, Rocca MA, Filippi M (2009) Tactile-associated fMRI recruitment of the cervical cord in healthy subjects. Hum Brain Mapp 30:340–345CrossRefPubMed


2.

Agosta F, Valsasina P, Rocca MA, Caputo D, Sala S, Judica E, Stroman PW, Filippi M (2008) Evidence for enhanced functional activity of cervical cord in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med : Off J Soc Magn Reson Med/Soc Magn Reson Med 59:1035–1042CrossRef


3.

Basser PJ, Jones DK (2002) Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review. NMR Biomed 15:456–467CrossRefPubMed


4.

Bosma R, Stroman PW (2012) Diffusion tensor imaging in the human spinal cord: development, limitations, and clinical applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:1–20CrossRefPubMed


5.

Bosma RL, Stroman PW (2014) Assessment of data acquisition parameters, and analysis techniques for noise reduction in spinal cord fMRI data. Magn Reson Imaging 32(5):473–481CrossRefPubMed


6.

Cadotte DW, Bosma R, Mikulis D, Nugaeva N, Smith K, Pokrupa R, Islam O, Stroman PW, Fehlings MG (2012) Plasticity of the injured human spinal cord: insights revealed by spinal cord functional MRI. PLoS One 7:e45560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral


7.

Castillo M, Thurnher M (2014) Spinal cord tumors: anatomic and advanced imaging. In: Luna A, Vilanova J, Hygino Da Cruz C, Rossi S (eds) Functional imaging in oncology. Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg, pp 683–702CrossRef


8.

Choudhri AF, Whitehead MT, Klimo P Jr, Montgomery BK, Boop FA (2014) Diffusion tensor imaging to guide surgical planning in intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children. Neuroradiology 56:169–174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral


9.

Deoni SC, Rutt BK, Arun T, Pierpaoli C, Jones DK (2008) Gleaning multicomponent T1 and T2 information from steady-state imaging data. Magn Reson Med : Off J Soc Magn Reson Med/Soc Magn Reson Med 60:1372–1387CrossRef


10.

Figley CR, Stroman PW (2007) Investigation of human cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord motion: implications for imaging spinal cord structure and function. Magn Reson Med : Off J Soc Magn Reson Med/Soc Magn Reson Med 58:185–189CrossRef


11.

Figley CR, Stroman PW (2011) The role(s) of astrocytes and astrocyte activity in neurometabolism, neurovascular coupling, and the production of functional neuroimaging signals. Eur J Neurosci 33:577–588CrossRefPubMed


12.

Filippi M, Agosta F (2010) Imaging biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 31:770–788


13.

Freund P, Schneider T, Nagy Z, Hutton C, Weiskopf N, Friston K, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Thompson AJ (2012) Degeneration of the injured cervical cord is associated with remote changes in corticospinal tract integrity and upper limb impairment. PLoS One 7:e51729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aug 25, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Spinal Cord Imaging

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access