Chapter 30 Normal muscle strength is defined as the maximum force a muscle can generate in a specified movement pattern (Knuttgen and Kraemer 1987). Muscle weakness being interpreted as the inability to generate sufficient force to complete a task in a given context. In other words the muscle itself may be able to recruit sufficient force under certain circumstances but not in others when it will present as weak. As well as the context and the task itself, force production in a muscle is influenced by many factors associated with the anatomy and physiology of the muscle and the nervous system controlling it: • Motor unit (an alpha motor neuron and the muscle fibres supplied by it) • Number recruited. The greater the number, the greater the force • Order of recruitment. To produce a smooth coordinated muscle contraction, small motor units are recruited before larger units. This is termed the size principle or Henneman principle • Size of motor unit. This relates to muscle fibre type, with larger motor units comprised of type IIx (fast glycolytic) fibres and smaller units made up of type I (slow oxidative) fibres • Frequency of the firing rate. An increased frequency of muscle action potentials to the neuromuscular junction results in summation (S2.6) of the signals. • Psychological factors such as motivation and mood also affect force production • Cross-sectional area: The greater the cross-sectional area of the muscle, the greater the number of muscle fibres, motor units and ultimately sarcomeres that can be recruited in parallel and therefore the greater the force generated. Compare the force produced when pulling a car using a single rope with the force generated when 10 ropes are used (in parallel). However, the cross-sectional area includes both contractile and non-contractile tissue, the latter of which does not contribute to force production. • Neural control: The force production of a given muscle is governed by the task requirements in terms of: • The length tension relationship within the muscle relates to the potential for actin and myosin cross-bridge formation. Working in middle range of the muscle provides the optimum number of available cross-bridges and hence the greatest force production • The anatomical alignment of muscle fibre within an individual muscle also influences force production (Palastanga et al. 2006) • The type of muscle work, concentric eccentric or isometric. Muscle weakness may occur as a result of: • Partial or complete lesion of a peripheral nerve • Injury to the musculoskeletal system resulting in inflammation, oedema and pain • Pain which may cause the inhibition of muscle contraction (S3.29) • A change in role of a muscle imposed by damage to the musculoskeletal or nervous systems may lead to a change in muscle fibre type • Altered neural control affecting the recruitment of motor units • Decreased use of the muscle which causes: Disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system such as Guillain–Barré syndrome and motor neuron disease often present with weakness as a primary symptom. Damage to the alpha motor neurons interferes with the nerve conduction, which ultimately means that insufficient motor units are recruited and muscle weakness presents. Secondary to this, further weakness may occur as a result of disuse, leading to a loss of sarcomeres and therefore muscle mass (atrophy) (Ryan et al. 2002). Following damage to the peripheral nervous system, motor units can be re-innervated via regeneration of the damaged neuron. However, if the nerve lesion is a long distance from a completely denervated motor unit it may be re-innervated as a result of axonal sprouting from adjacent alpha motor neurons. If this sprouting is heterotypic (not from the same muscle fibre type) the patient may present with dysfunctional incoordinated movement (Lieber 2002). This is a consequence of a disruption in the order of recruitment of motor units (the size principle). The recruitment of small units (type I) followed by the larger units (type IIx) ensures that the force of contraction is built up slowly and smoothly. However, if sprouting occurs from a neuron innervating a type I motor unit to re-innervate a type IIx motor unit the outcome will be large increases in force production too early in the sequence of recruitment and hence an incoordinated movement. In disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis, the mechanism underlying muscle weakness is a consequence of damage to higher centres or the pathways involved in motor control. This results in altered signalling down the descending tracts to the alpha motor neuron pool in the spinal cord, the outcome of which is a dysfunction in the timing or pattern of motor unit recruitment or the number of units being recruited. However, ultimately these factors may lead to insufficient or inappropriate recruitment of motor units in a given context and consequently insufficient force to overcome the resistance of the task, or weakness (paresis). Over time, the reduced force production will also be contributed to by a loss of sarcomeres and therefore muscle mass (atrophy) as a consequence of disuse (Ryan et al. 2002). This secondary onset muscle weakness is a common symptom in neurologically impaired patients and may present in any circumstance which leads to movement dysfunction and disuse, e.g. motor impairments but also sensory impairment (S3.23) and cognitive/perceptual deficits (S3.33). In CNS lesions, muscle weakness is evident in association with both hypotonia (reduced muscle tone) and hypertonia (increased muscle tone; S3.21). The relationship between these concepts is complex but it appears likely that both altered tone states are contributory factors that negatively influence force production (weakness). The pathophysiology which defines alterations in muscle tone also leads to a dysfunction in the timing or pattern of motor unit recruitment or the number of units able to be recruited. Therefore, muscle weakness during movement may be apparent. In terms of assessment a comparison of the conceptual definitions of tone and weakness gives the therapist a simplified tool by which to differentiate. Muscle tone is defined as the resistance to passive movement, representing the background level of tension or stiffness in a muscle (Moore and Kowalske 2000). Therefore it should be assessed in a muscle at rest. Muscle weakness on the other hand is defined as the inability to generate sufficient force to overcome the resistance of a task and therefore by definition should be assessed during movement activities. In CVA, muscle weakness has been shown to be the major contributor to limits in functional ability (Chae et al. 2002; Kim and Eng 2003; Mercier and Bourbonnais 2004). However, it is still widely believed that resistance strength training increases muscle tone and is therefore avoided in patients with central nervous disorders. However, this belief appears unwarranted when considering the evidence to the contrary. Several studies have now reported significant gains in strength without detrimental increases in spasticity in CVA (Sharp and Brouwer 1997
Strength
What is muscle strength?
Muscle weakness
Weakness in neurological conditions
Why do I need to assess muscle strength?
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree