The Intercultural Psychiatric Program at Oregon Health and Science University




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Laura Weiss Roberts, Daryn Reicherter, Steven Adelsheim and Shashank V. Joshi (eds.)Partnerships for Mental Health10.1007/978-3-319-18884-3_12


12. The Intercultural Psychiatric Program at Oregon Health and Science University



James K. Boehnlein , J. David Kinzie , Paul K. Leung , Margaret Cary , Keith Cheng  and Behjat Sedighi 


(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

(2)
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

 



 

James K. Boehnlein (Corresponding author)



 

J. David Kinzie



 

Paul K. Leung



 

Margaret Cary



 

Keith Cheng



 

Behjat Sedighi



Keywords
RefugeesImmigrantsMental healthClinical carePsychiatric educationCross-cultural psychiatryCommunity psychiatryPsychiatric researchCommunity-based clinicsRefugee and immigrant families


This is the story of a longstanding community-based clinic in Oregon that serves refugees and immigrants from around the world, with the clinical mission of excellence in cross-cultural mental health care and training.


Introduction


It began as the war in Indochina ended. When Saigon fell in 1975, refugees started coming to the United States. Some were sent to Oregon, which traditionally has been receptive to refugees. The first group of refugees was Vietnamese, and among them was a Vietnamese doctor who was admitted to the psychiatry residency program at what was then called the University of Oregon Health Sciences Center in Portland. He and the psychiatry training director, Dr. David Kinzie, began seeing refugee patients in 1978.

Soon refugees from Cambodia and Laos also began to settle in Oregon. A community cultural counseling service as part of refugee support in Portland was started in 1979, and counselors there from Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos referred psychiatric patients to our nascent clinic, then called the Indochinese Psychiatric Program. The referred patients were brought by the counselor, who served as an interpreter, with the psychiatrist providing evaluation and treatment. The support of the counseling center ended in 1986, and subsequently the counselors joined our psychiatry department as full-time employees. In those early years of the program when funding was scarce and the future of the program was tenuous, a particularly important central moment occurred that has driven the program and its clinicians ever since.


Central Moment


When we started seeing Cambodians during the first several years, they seemed especially numbed. During a period when continued funding appeared particularly bleak, we told a few of them that we might have to close the clinic. Although their affect and behavior previously had not indicated any particular feelings towards the clinic, that news had a major impact on the patients. They cried and seemed very lost and adrift, acting as if their final support had been taken away from them. Two of them presented to the emergency room with exacerbations of hypertension. The patients later told us, despite their numbness, how much they valued the treatment and how devastating it was to potentially lose this support. We made a decision at that point that we would do everything possible to continuously maintain clinic funding so that we would never have to put our patients through this type of ambiguity that replicated the years of unpredictability and ambiguity during migration and resettlement. Fortunately, we have been able to maintain the clinic for the past 35 years.

Many of the program’s original clinicians continue to actively work in administrative and clinical positions. Among the program’s original counselors are Kham One Keopraseuth, a senior Laotian counselor who recently retired, and Rath Ben, a senior Cambodian counselor. Dr. Paul Leung began working in the program as a resident in 1981 and has continued through the years as a faculty member, now as professor. Dr. Leung became program director in 1994, a position he has held now for 20 years. Dr. James Boehnlein also began working in the program as a resident in 1983, and continuously has worked in the program as a faculty member since 1987, also now as a professor. Dr. Kinzie, now an emeritus professor, has worked continuously since founding the program in 1978 and has mentored each faculty psychiatrist as they have entered the program.

The model of the program is unique and contributes to its long duration. Each psychiatrist (and faculty member) works with one counselor with one cultural group. The counselor serves as interpreter, case manager, and, with some patients, as a weekly group therapist. Currently the program has 9 part-time psychiatrists and 13 counselors fluent in 16 different languages.

The various cultural groups in the clinic have arrived in the United States following civil war, “ethnic cleansing,” and genocide. Refugees come from Bosnia, Somalia, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Latin America, Russia, and more recently from Burma and Nepal. As more cultural groups entered the clinic, the name was changed from Indochinese Psychiatric Program to Intercultural Psychiatric Program (IPP).

IPP received a grant from the Office of Refugee Resettlement in 2000 for the treatment of torture survivors. This grant has continued to the present time and has centered a focus on the treatment of torture survivors in some of the program’s cultural clinics. From 2002 to 2005, the program received a grant for treatment of traumatized refugee children. This helped to develop the ongoing child psychiatry program within IPP, which will be described in more detail in one of the following sections as an example of IPP’s comprehensive treatment.


Research


Academic writing and research has been a major activity at IPP and has contributed to the literature in refugee mental health. We initially published papers on the development of the program, its treatment model, complicated staffing issues, and our initial years of clinical experience [15]. Early on we became aware of major depressive disorders among Vietnamese, and with the Vietnamese counseling staff developed the Vietnamese Depression Inventory (VDI) [6], which is still being used in epidemiological studies. When Cambodian refugees arrived, we became aware of the appalling conditions that occurred during the Pol Pot regime and were the first research group to describe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (which had just been defined in DSM III) among Cambodian refugees [7]. We followed most of the patients after one year and saw much improvement [8]. Unfortunately, most relapsed later and we contributed to the literature showing that PTSD is often a chronic, relapsing disorder in severely traumatized refugees [9]. The central moment described earlier involving the reaction of Cambodian refugees to the tenuous nature of the clinic’s survival in its early years strongly influenced our appreciation of the pain suffered by Cambodian survivors of the Pol Pot regime and the direction of our PTSD research over the ensuing decades. This illustrates a recurring pattern in our work—combining research and clinical care to enhance the care of refugee and immigrant patients.

We have continued our clinical research across a number of topics in biological, psychotherapeutic, and social aspects of treatment. It became apparent that many patients, although compliant with appointments, were not taking their prescribed medications. Antidepressant blood levels showed very poor compliance among the Vietnamese and Mien patients and only moderate compliance with Cambodians [10]. This improved among Vietnamese and Cambodians with education, but not among Mien. Group therapy of a special type emphasizing socialization, learning skills, and maintaining cultural events proved to bring improved social functioning among patients [11].

We continued our interest in PTSD and its comorbidities among refugees and identified seven patients with acute psychosis among the initial one hundred Cambodian patients with PTSD [12]. PTSD originally was missed in most non-Cambodian patients until we re-interviewed patients with a formal scale for PTSD and found a highly overlooked prevalence [13].

Over the years it became apparent that all refugee groups had a high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, and in a study of over 500 of our patients this was further documented [14]. We clearly demonstrated that medical problems represent a significant public health issue for refugees.

A major focus of IPP also has been defining effective treatment for refugees and torture survivors, including pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions. This has included describing effective pharmacological treatment for PTSD hyperarousal symptoms such as nightmares [1517]. Another important element of our treatment approach has been dealing with ongoing stress of patients and helping staff handle complicated countertransference issues [18, 19]. The most important aspects of treatment are the personal qualities of the therapist [20]. Our clinic has demonstrated that with ethnic counselors, supportive psychotherapy, and medication we can greatly reduce symptoms at follow-up [21].


Clinical Care


We will illustrate the foundation of our clinical care and our comprehensive approach to refugee assessment and treatment first by presenting three clinical vignettes that we have crafted from our experiences in the youth and family program. The vignettes presented here and later in the narrative represent composites of several patients and are typical of individuals in the clinic.


Vignettes


Maahir, a 5-year-old Somali boy, born in Portland, was referred to the youth and family clinic by his mother, due to concerns about his anger. His mother, a refugee from the Somali civil war, receives psychiatric care at the IPP adult clinic. His father is still living in a Kenyan refugee camp.

Mya, a 15-year-old Burmese girl, born in a Thai refugee camp and living in Portland since she was 3 years old, was referred to the clinic by a psychiatric hospital for outpatient care after a suicide attempt. Her parents are not involved with the IPP.

Farzad, a 14-year-old boy born and raised in Afghanistan, was referred to the clinic by his English-as-a-second-language (ESL) teacher, after he had lived in Portland for one year, due to concerns about his distractibility and impulsivity. His mother receives care from the IPP adult clinic.


The Story


The youth and family clinic dovetails with the individual services provided to parents who participate in IPP, further explores the systemic dynamics that promote resilience and contribute to stress, and expands community collaboration through coordination of services with schools, child welfare services, and youth social service programs [22]. Youth and families access the IPP clinic for a diverse range of services including explicit trauma-related symptoms, neurodevelopmental and general psychiatric disorders, and intergenerational cultural conflict. Furthermore, given the sociocentric stance of the families accessing IPP services, attention to family welfare is an expected and integral part of individual care. School staff is always involved to provide collateral information, perspective on the effectiveness of treatment, and additional data on youth function. Primary care providers are included to coordinate health care services. Youth social service agencies are often recruited to provide extra support after school. Finally, Oregon Child Protective Services (CPS) becomes involved when there is concern about the capacity of parents to provide specialized care to children with high needs due to neurodevelopmental disorders, and when there is concern about the appropriateness of parenting practices. While this collaboration with community providers is not unique to the IPP youth and family clinic, the IPP tends to have a greater role in facilitating these collaborations for youth and families due to language, cultural, and educational barriers.

In addition, the generational dynamics of cultural expectations, acculturation differences, parent–child role reversals, and unique trauma experiences complicate the position of the children of refugees.
Because many of these additional specialized services typically do not exist in the families’ home countries, and most of them carry significant social stigma, refugee families warrant even stronger collaboration and support than required for average US families.

Because many of these additional specialized services typically do not exist in the families’ home countries, and most of them carry significant social stigma, refugee families warrant even stronger collaboration and support than required for average US families. Our youth and family program relies upon existing community programs and services for primary care, academic support, after-school programs, parenting groups, and therapy groups for youth. Because of the trusted relationships formed in IPP, we often know more about the home dynamics, the family stresses, family cultural practices, and the family capabilities than other service providers who have less intimate relationships. Sharing this information is essential for facilitating coordinated and effective support, and linking the perspectives creates solutions. Furthermore, these collaborations can have significant impact on the health of the family. The work with each family exemplifies the reciprocal benefit for both CPS and the family for working collaboratively.
The close collaboration between the therapist and the psychiatrist provides continuity for both the families and community partners. The primary challenge is creating the time to engage in these collaborations.

The IPP youth and family clinic, similar to our adult clinics, has two primary providers who collaborate in a multidisciplinary fashion. A therapist who works full-time at the clinic provides case management and individual and family psychotherapy and is the primary person to coordinate care with the family and community providers. The child and adolescent psychiatrist, who works at the clinic part-time, comprehensively evaluates the youth, including exploration of family system dynamics, devises the primary treatment plan, and helps advocate for services. Treatment often involves medication, along with systemic and symptom-targeted psychotherapy, and collaboration with community providers as warranted. The youth and family clinic is the only IPP clinic that is not based on specific cultural groups; therefore, translators are also relied upon as the case manager cannot provide language and cultural translation for all youth and families. A large percentage of the youth speak English, which shifts the majority of the translation challenges to communication with parents rather than the specific clinician/youth therapeutic relationship. The close collaboration between the therapist and the psychiatrist provides continuity for both the families and community partners. The primary challenge is creating the time to engage in these collaborations.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 22, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on The Intercultural Psychiatric Program at Oregon Health and Science University

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access