The Psychiatric Emergency Assessment of the Geriatric Patient
Joseph S. Goveas
Harold Harsch
THE GERIATRIC CARE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES
The medical structure that provides care to older adults in the United States can be divided into the acute care system and the long-term care system. Medicare has provided the funding for the majority of acute care and rehabilitation needs for adults older than 65. Long-term care (LTC), however, is funded primarily by the Medicaid program and private resources. Fewer than 5% of individuals older than 65 are in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), yet a much larger number are part of the LTC system in the United States (an estimated 1.3 million vs. 5 million) (1).
Emergency room physicians, both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists, need to understand the levels of care this system offers to appropriately accept and return individuals to these facilities. SNFs are the most familiar to physicians. They provide care to the older adult who requires at least 7 hours a week of skilled nursing care. Although often understaffed, SNFs have a registered nurse and nursing aides available 24/7. Community-based residential facilities (CBRFs), in some areas called group homes, provide care to five or more adults unable to live independently by providing supervision and supportive services. Usually they are licensed by the state; some cater to specific populations, such as those requiring dementia care. Often different licensure levels exist, which separate CBRFs by the type of resident they can admit (e.g., ambulatory, nonambulatory, mentally capable of responding to a fire alarm or not). A nurse might be on call, but CBRFs generally use nonmedical personnel, with at least one staff member being present 24/7.
The phrase assisted living is used to describe a number of housing types and service arrangements. In most states, these are not licensed. Some provide personal services for extra cost (e.g., bathing assistance, medication monitoring). Mostly they are an apartment-like arrangement in which a nurse might be available for several hours during the day, and a manager might or might not be there overnight, with a nurse on call.
Behavioral emergencies in these facilities are always difficult but become even more so at night or over the weekends during periods of reduced staffing. SNFs can give as-needed medication and provide some short-term acute monitoring for a resident. CBRFs usually can give as-needed medication but rarely have the staff to provide extra monitoring for individuals. Assisted living is best thought of as a nonmedical housing situation with no monitoring available.
These differing levels of service must be taken into account when emergency departments (EDs) consider disposition decisions. Behavioral stability is a must for assisted living, whereas the SNF could have a resident return if he or she is somewhat better but still requires extra observation. It is frustrating for physicians when some long-term care facilities refuse to allow a resident to return from the ED or psychiatric emergency service (PES). However, if a facility feels it cannot deal with the older adult because of behavior, it is probably safer for the patient if he or she is not returned to that placement from the ED or PES. This chapter discusses the issues of geriatric behavioral assessment, acute treatment, and possible hospitalization.
EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT OF THE OLDER ADULT
In 2005, elderly individuals constituted 15.4% of total ED visits. In fact, increasing trends in ED visit rates were noted for individuals 65 years
and older (up by 26%) from 1993 to 2003, and were the highest among all age groups (2). Obtaining the geriatric history and the mental status is a time-intensive process because older patients rarely present with a single well-defined diagnosis and often experience multiple, comorbid medical and neurologic illnesses. However, the goals of a geriatric psychiatric evaluation in the ED are to complete a rapid assessment, investigate for underlying medical disorders, establish a provisional diagnosis and differential diagnosis, establish the patient’s cognitive and functional capacity, provide emergency treatment, and arrange an appropriate disposition in a short period of time. Although ED personnel are proficient in medical history taking and performing a physical examination, they are often not trained in recognizing common psychiatric manifestations in the elderly, including psychosis, depression, suicidality, behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and alcohol or drug intoxication and withdrawal. Also, appropriate medical evaluation is crucial in the free- standing PES because life-threatening medical emergencies can be easily misdiagnosed as mental disorders when the geriatric patient predominantly presents with psychiatric signs. A thorough evaluation is often compromised because of the need for rapid screening in the medical or psychiatric ED, which amplifies the risk for potential misdiagnosis and erroneous disposition planning.
and older (up by 26%) from 1993 to 2003, and were the highest among all age groups (2). Obtaining the geriatric history and the mental status is a time-intensive process because older patients rarely present with a single well-defined diagnosis and often experience multiple, comorbid medical and neurologic illnesses. However, the goals of a geriatric psychiatric evaluation in the ED are to complete a rapid assessment, investigate for underlying medical disorders, establish a provisional diagnosis and differential diagnosis, establish the patient’s cognitive and functional capacity, provide emergency treatment, and arrange an appropriate disposition in a short period of time. Although ED personnel are proficient in medical history taking and performing a physical examination, they are often not trained in recognizing common psychiatric manifestations in the elderly, including psychosis, depression, suicidality, behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and alcohol or drug intoxication and withdrawal. Also, appropriate medical evaluation is crucial in the free- standing PES because life-threatening medical emergencies can be easily misdiagnosed as mental disorders when the geriatric patient predominantly presents with psychiatric signs. A thorough evaluation is often compromised because of the need for rapid screening in the medical or psychiatric ED, which amplifies the risk for potential misdiagnosis and erroneous disposition planning.
The psychiatric evaluation should be modified to accommodate the needs of the geriatric psychiatric patient as outlined in Table 28.1. New-onset psychiatric symptoms in the elderly that trigger an ED visit should prompt the physician to assess for precipitating factors. Environmental and physical factors such as recent losses, relocation, changes in support networks, separations, recent change in medications, and various medical illnesses (ranging from urinary tract infection to recent diagnoses of potentially life-threatening illnesses) can be associated with the onset of an anxiety, affective, cognitive, or psychotic symptomatology. Also, new-onset psychosis can result from an undiagnosed dementia or acute delirium. A careful review of prescription and over-the-counter medications is essential because polypharmacy is common. A review of the medicine containers and a double-check between the written schedule and the pill containers should be performed. This might expose prescription drug noncompliance or overuse. Screening for alcohol, street drug, and prescription and over-the counter drug misuse or abuse in a geriatric patient is essential in the ED or PES but is often overlooked. Therefore, when suspicion arises, a blood alcohol level and urine toxicology screen should be obtained. Suicide risk assessment is a critical part of the ED geriatric psychiatric evaluation because suicide is more frequent in the elderly population compared with their younger counterparts. Moreover, approximately three fourths of elderly patients who commit suicide have seen a physician in the previous month, and over one third within the week of their suicide (3).
TABLE 28.1 Evaluation of the Geriatric Patient in the Emergency Department | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive evaluation is mandatory for all geriatric patients presenting to the ED. In general, an abrupt onset of cognitive impairment or a sudden decline in cognition and functional status from the baseline is highly indicative of an acute illness. Early detection of cognitive impairment in the elderly may aid medical and psychiatric differential diagnosis and result in requesting necessary laboratory and imaging studies and appropriate consultation (4,5). The most widely used cognitive screening instrument is the Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE). The expert consensus panel for treatment of behavioral emergencies has endorsed the MMSE as the preferred cognitive instrument in ED settings (6). The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), a brief screening instrument that is highly sensitive and specific for delirium, can be effectively administered by nonpsychiatrically trained ED staff. Functional assessment will provide the physician an understanding of how much care or supervision the patient requires upon discharge from the ED. Various scales have been developed for this purpose (7).
Most geriatric assessments in the ED or PES should include interviewing the significant other. The geriatric patient may not be a reliable historian as a result of cognitive and behavioral disturbances, and the collateral history will provide further insight into the patient’s condition. If the significant other is the caregiver, the ED staff will need to assess for caregiver burden and his or her health and ability to care for the patient. A systematic diagnostic approach as outlined in Table 28.1 and careful differential diagnoses will facilitate appropriate dispositional planning and treatment.
ACUTE BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCES
Psychosis
Older adults frequently experience paranoia and other psychotic symptoms. Psychotic manifestations in the elderly can be divided into early-onset (symptom onset earlier in life that continues through late life) and late-onset psychosis. The etiologies of late-onset psychosis include dementia with psychotic features, and non-dementia-related psychotic disorders such as geriatric mood disorders, delusional disorder, late-onset schizophrenia, and psychotic disorders secondary to medications and delirium. Late-onset psychosis is commonly associated with structural brain abnormalities and can be the first clinical manifestation
of a medical, neurologic, or substance-induced condition and therefore warrants a thorough diagnostic workup (8). A community prevalence rate of 0.1% to 0.5% for schizophrenia is reported in patients older than age 65, making schizophrenia a rare entity. However, the prevalence of psychosis in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) ranges between 30% and 50%.
of a medical, neurologic, or substance-induced condition and therefore warrants a thorough diagnostic workup (8). A community prevalence rate of 0.1% to 0.5% for schizophrenia is reported in patients older than age 65, making schizophrenia a rare entity. However, the prevalence of psychosis in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) ranges between 30% and 50%.
Several risk factors have been implicated in late-onset psychosis. They include female gender, age-related deterioration of frontal and temporal lobes, cognitive deficits, premorbid paranoid and schizoid personality traits, visual or hearing impairment or both, polypharmacy, and illicit substance use. The ED or PES physician will need to determine whether the elderly person has early- or late-onset psychosis. Regardless of the age at onset, psychiatric and medical examinations have to be performed, and appropriate laboratory and neuroimaging studies should be part of the evaluation to rule out reversible or identifiable medical etiologies (910,11).
Agitation and Aggression
Agitation and aggressiveness are common manifestations of medical and psychiatric illnesses in a person older than 65 years and are present in approximately 60% of the hospitalized elderly. The most common causes of agitation are medical illnesses, environmental changes, dementia, and psychosis (10,12). Approximately 40% of elderly persons older than 70 presenting to the ED have an alteration in mental status, and 25% are diagnosed with delirium (13). Patients with dementia are highly predisposed to develop delirium.
Agitation is defined as excessive motor or verbal activity, and can escalate to verbal or physical aggression. Examples of verbal aggression include threats, vocal outbursts, name calling, cursing, and excessive verbalizations of distress. Examples of physical aggression include assaultiveness toward people and physical destructiveness of objects. Dementia can result in language and executive function abnormalities. Therefore, agitation may be a manifestation of anxiety or a modality of communication used by the demented elderly and can result in disruptive behaviors, fidgeting, pacing, and resisting care. Some agitated behaviors can also be repetitious (repeating sentences, questions, words, or sounds), whereas others can be socially inappropriate (sexual disinhibition, undressing or voiding in inappropriate places) (14,15).
Aggressive behaviors, regardless of the etiology, not only increase the risk of danger to the affected person and others, but also lead to increased caregiver burden, stress, and depression. The safety of the patient, caregivers, and ED personnel is a priority in management of agitation or aggression in an ED or PES setting. Treatment of agitation in the ED should combine behavioral and pharmacologic approaches. Nonpharmacologic management is recommended as the first-line approach in elderly persons presenting to the ED with agitation. These treatment strategies are most effective when (a) used as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy, (b) pharmacotherapy is contraindicated, or (c) agitation is secondary to environmental factors (14).
Show of force, an often-successful nonpharmacologic intervention for an agitated young adult, is not an effective treatment modality in the elderly. Instead, approach the agitated elderly patient slowly, provide repeated reassurance, talk slowly and in a calm tone, use simple sentences, ask simple questions, be polite, and maintain a pleasant facial expression. One may need to introduce one’s self and role routinely. Avoid complex, multistep tasks, and use eye contact. If the patient is becoming increasingly agitated, back off, reapproach, and ask permission. If the patient is paranoid, do not argue or try to reason; instead, try distracting him or her. If he or she is looking for certain objects that were misplaced, offer to help find them. Adjust the physical environment to be adaptive to the geriatric patient’s needs. If the patient is restless, holding his or her hands, providing soft music, a hand or back massage, or meaningful activities, and having a family member or caregiver in the room might be greatly beneficial. If redirection is ineffective, place the patient in a safe, quiet room with minimal sensory stimuli (14,15).
Physical restraint use in the elderly is considered an indicator of poor quality in institutional settings, and routine use of physical restraints in hospitals has been closely scrutinized by federal agencies. Increased physical restraint use in the hospitalized elderly has been associated with dementia, delirium, and prior residence in an LTC facility. In fact, individuals with cognitive impairment and ones who reside at LTC facilities


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


