The Role of BCNU Polymer Wafers (Gliadel) in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma




The 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU; carmustine) polymer wafer (Gliadel) was developed for use in malignant glioma to deliver higher doses of chemotherapy directly to tumor tissue while bypassing systemic side effects. Phase III clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas demonstrated a small, but statistically significant, improvement in survival. However, the rate of complications, including an increase in cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypertension, has limited their use. This article reviews the current data for use of BCNU wafers in malignant gliomas.


After surgical removal, direct delivery of anti neoplastic agents to the tumor site is the oldest strategy of adjuvant cancer therapy. Brachytherapy, the direct delivery of radiation via an encapsulated source, was first used at the turn of the twentieth century to treat a wide variety of cancers. It was not commonly used to treat brain tumors, however. In the 1950s and 1960s systemic chemotherapies became available, but were quickly found to be ineffective against gliomas. The inability of most drugs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and the subsequent dose-limiting systemic toxicity when attempting to reach therapeutic drug levels in brain led clinicians to revisit the concept of local drug delivery.


Clinicians used intracarotid injection, direct application of drug to the cavity, and diffusion via semipermeable silastic rubber membranes with drugs, such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and methotrexate. These proved largely ineffective and no better than systemic administration, probably because the drugs had little activity against glioma.


In the mid-1970s, the nitrosoureas, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU; carmustine) and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU; lomustine), were introduced and had moderate efficacy against gliomas. Unfortunately, doses that produced response rates as high as 50% caused significant leukopenia or thrombocytopenia, as well as a non–dose-related pulmonary fibrosis. The half-life of BCNU is only 15 to 30 minutes, but patients may need six weeks or longer between doses to allow adequate bone marrow recovery. Attempts to deliver BCNU intra-arterially and by direct injection into the postresection surgical cavity yielded results no better than systemic therapy. Patients who received intra-arterial BCNU had an increased risk of blindness.


In the late 1970s, Langer and Folkman demonstrated that polymers could provide a sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. This mechanism could theoretically deliver chemotherapy beyond the blood-brain barrier. The initial polymers were nonbiodegradable and the rate of drug release slowed with time, making them unattractive for use in brain. In the 1980s, completely degradable polymers became available and were rapidly incorporated into surgical practice, in the form of absorbable sutures. The newer polymers work by surface erosion, with the layers being resorbed one after the other, analogous to peeling layers from an onion, and allowing more constant drug delivery. Ultimately, these polymers were used to create the Gliadel wafer.


Animal and pharmacokinetic studies


Tamargo and colleagues published the first paper using BCNU-embedded wafers in 1993. Rats with intracranial 9L gliosarcomas implanted with the wafers had 2- to 3-fold longer survivals than those treated with intraperitoneal BCNU injections. They tested 2 different polymer bases using this model, ultimately choosing polifeprosan 20 (copolymer of 1,3-bis( p -carboxyphenoxy)propane and sebacic acid in a 20:80 M ratio) because it better protects BCNU from degradation before it is released.


The initial pharmacokinetic studies on BCNU wafers were performed in rabbits, using radiolabeled BCNU. Grossman and colleagues demonstrated that BCNU was distributed widely in the brain ipsilateral to the implants, at distances up to 12 mm from the wafers. Follow-up studies in monkeys measured the drug concentration at the site of implantation on day 1 at 3.5 mmol/L, decreasing to approximately 1.0 mmol/L at a distance of 3 mm from implantation. Seven days postimplant, only the area within 0.5 mm had a concentration greater than 1 mmol/L. The inhibitory concentration of BCNU on human glioma lines in vitro has been reported as from 15 to 300 μmol/L, implying that the area adjacent to the implant receives well in excess of the therapeutic drug levels for at least 7 days. Further studies in monkeys demonstrated the safety of BCNU wafers with radiation therapy, and allowed for human trials to begin.




Human trials with single-agent BCNU wafers


The initial trials of single-agent BCNU wafers are summarized in Table 1 .



Table 1

Human trials using single-agent BCNU wafers





















































Phase Reference Patients Design Result Conclusions
I–II Brem et al, 1991 21 recurrent malignant glioma Single-arm, dose escalation Wafer with 3.85% BCNU (7.7 mg) chosen for phase III; higher dose group had lower survival Safe and well tolerated without systemic side effects
I Brem et al, 1995 22 new glioma (21 glioblastoma multiforme) Single-arm, historical control Median survival was 42 wk Safe to use in combination with XRT, but 10/22 patients had an SAE
III Brem et al, 1995 222 recurrent glioma Double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-mo survival of 56% vs 47% ( P = .061)
Median survival increased by 8 wk
Marginal change in survival. Placebo patients received no active treatment other than XRT
III Westphal et al, 2003/2006 240 new malignant glioma Double-blind, placebo-controlled Median survival 13.8 vs 11.6 mo ( P = .017) Effective, but the placebo arm got no treatment other than XRT. Higher rate of cerebral edema, CSF leaks
III Valtonen et al, 1997 32 new malignant glioma (planned 100) Double-blind, placebo-controlled Median survival 58.1 vs 39.9 wk ( P = .012) Trial stopped early because of wafer shortage; again, randomized to no active treatment after XRT
I Olivi et al, 2003 44 recurrent malignant glioma Single-arm, dose escalation Wafer with 20% BCNU loading was maximum tolerated dose Can use higher concentrations of BCNU in implanted wafers

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SAE, severe adverse event; XRT, conventional radiation therapy.


A phase I to II trial in patients with recurrent glioma identified the 3.85% BCNU wafer as the most effective, based on survival from the time of implantation. The higher-dose group (6.35%) did not have more side effects, but overall survival was lower, possibly because it contained 100% glioblastoma (GB) patients. In the 2 lower-dose cohorts only 60% of patients had GB. The 3.85% wafer was chosen for use in subsequent trials, although there was no apparent difference in toxicity. The phase III trial enrolled 222 patients with recurrent glioma, randomizing them to active or placebo wafers. This trial demonstrated an increased overall survival of 8 weeks ( P = .061) and led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve Gliadel (3.85% BCNU wafer) for use in recurrent malignant glioma in 1996.


A phase I safety study of the BCNU wafer in combination with radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioma was run concurrently with the phase III trial for recurrence. The study demonstrated an increased median survival compared with historical controls, but also showed a higher rate of severe adverse events compared with earlier trials, which included seizures, intracranial hypertension, and neurologic decline in the postoperative period. The phase III trial for newly diagnosed glioma had a lower complication rate than observed in the Phase I trial, but remained concerning. Five percent of patients in the BCNU group had cerebrospinal fluid leaks and 9.1% of patients had intracranial hypertension. Although there was a statistically significant improvement in survival in both the recurrent and up-front trials, it is important to note that patients in the placebo arms did not receive treatment after radiation therapy until they had recurrent tumor Standard practice at the time would likely have followed radiation with chemotherapy. This makes the modest results somewhat difficult to interpret (see Table 1 ).




Human trials with single-agent BCNU wafers


The initial trials of single-agent BCNU wafers are summarized in Table 1 .



Table 1

Human trials using single-agent BCNU wafers





















































Phase Reference Patients Design Result Conclusions
I–II Brem et al, 1991 21 recurrent malignant glioma Single-arm, dose escalation Wafer with 3.85% BCNU (7.7 mg) chosen for phase III; higher dose group had lower survival Safe and well tolerated without systemic side effects
I Brem et al, 1995 22 new glioma (21 glioblastoma multiforme) Single-arm, historical control Median survival was 42 wk Safe to use in combination with XRT, but 10/22 patients had an SAE
III Brem et al, 1995 222 recurrent glioma Double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-mo survival of 56% vs 47% ( P = .061)
Median survival increased by 8 wk
Marginal change in survival. Placebo patients received no active treatment other than XRT
III Westphal et al, 2003/2006 240 new malignant glioma Double-blind, placebo-controlled Median survival 13.8 vs 11.6 mo ( P = .017) Effective, but the placebo arm got no treatment other than XRT. Higher rate of cerebral edema, CSF leaks
III Valtonen et al, 1997 32 new malignant glioma (planned 100) Double-blind, placebo-controlled Median survival 58.1 vs 39.9 wk ( P = .012) Trial stopped early because of wafer shortage; again, randomized to no active treatment after XRT
I Olivi et al, 2003 44 recurrent malignant glioma Single-arm, dose escalation Wafer with 20% BCNU loading was maximum tolerated dose Can use higher concentrations of BCNU in implanted wafers

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; SAE, severe adverse event; XRT, conventional radiation therapy.


A phase I to II trial in patients with recurrent glioma identified the 3.85% BCNU wafer as the most effective, based on survival from the time of implantation. The higher-dose group (6.35%) did not have more side effects, but overall survival was lower, possibly because it contained 100% glioblastoma (GB) patients. In the 2 lower-dose cohorts only 60% of patients had GB. The 3.85% wafer was chosen for use in subsequent trials, although there was no apparent difference in toxicity. The phase III trial enrolled 222 patients with recurrent glioma, randomizing them to active or placebo wafers. This trial demonstrated an increased overall survival of 8 weeks ( P = .061) and led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve Gliadel (3.85% BCNU wafer) for use in recurrent malignant glioma in 1996.


A phase I safety study of the BCNU wafer in combination with radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioma was run concurrently with the phase III trial for recurrence. The study demonstrated an increased median survival compared with historical controls, but also showed a higher rate of severe adverse events compared with earlier trials, which included seizures, intracranial hypertension, and neurologic decline in the postoperative period. The phase III trial for newly diagnosed glioma had a lower complication rate than observed in the Phase I trial, but remained concerning. Five percent of patients in the BCNU group had cerebrospinal fluid leaks and 9.1% of patients had intracranial hypertension. Although there was a statistically significant improvement in survival in both the recurrent and up-front trials, it is important to note that patients in the placebo arms did not receive treatment after radiation therapy until they had recurrent tumor Standard practice at the time would likely have followed radiation with chemotherapy. This makes the modest results somewhat difficult to interpret (see Table 1 ).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 12, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on The Role of BCNU Polymer Wafers (Gliadel) in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access