The Transpetrosal Approaches
The addition of neurotologic surgical techniques in the care of skull base diseases existing at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has significantly improved rates of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical treatment.
The CVJ is a small, restricted area encased in dense bone, making access challenging. The subarachnoid space is limited and filled with cranial nerve and vascular structures that can also limit access. Surgical treatment of CVJ lesions emphasizes maximizing surgical exposure of the pathology while minimizing brain retraction. Various surgical approaches are available to deal with lesions in different locations ( Table 28.1 ) and include the transpetrosal,1–3 combined supra- and infratentorial,4,5 and far-lateral6,7 approaches. These approaches often require the combined talents of a neurosurgeon well trained in vascular techniques, a neurotologic surgeon well versed in all transpetrosal approaches, and sometimes a craniofacial surgeon well versed in skull disassembly/reassembly techniques.
This chapter details the transpetrosal approach as performed at the Barrow Neurological Institute and explains how to combine these approaches with a supra-infratentorial craniotomy or far-lateral suboccipital approach to gain even more exposure. These procedures are performed by a team and require rapid removal of the temporal bone structures so that the neurosurgical aspects of the procedure can be completed in a reasonable time. The neurotologic surgeons should maintain technical expertise either by performing these operations frequently or by dissecting anatomical temporal bone specimens frequently.
Transpetrosal Approaches
The anterior brainstem, clivus, and CVJ can be accessed through the temporal bone. The entire exposure can be obtained by removing bone without retracting the brain or brainstem. More than one approach can be used, depending on the type of lesion and the amount of space needed to work safely. At times, the sacrifice of hearing is necessary to provide adequate exposure. Very large lesions can require transposition of the facial nerve, with a corresponding temporary facial paralysis. The potential for these complications demands a detailed discussion of the risks and benefits with the patient and family members.
There are three basic types of temporal (petrous) bone dissections. The most limited dissection is the extended retrolabyrinthine technique, which removes a large portion of the temporal bone but preserves the otic capsule ( Fig. 28.1 ). This approach does not sacrifice hearing and offers limited exposure due to the overhanging semicircular canals. In comparison, the translabyrinthine technique removes more temporal bone and sacrifices hearing ( Fig. 28.2 ). The most extensive modification is the transcochlear technique, which involves maximal removal of the temporal bone, sacrifices hearing ( Fig. 28.3 ), and transposes the facial nerve. Moving through these three variations of surgical exposure gradually increases the amount of temporal (petrous) bone resection and, concomitantly, the exposure of the brainstem, clivus, and CVJ. These approaches can be combined with a supra-infratentorial craniotomy (i.e., combined approach) ( Fig. 28.4 ) as well as a far-lateral approach ( Fig. 28.5 ) if necessary to provide additional exposure of the skull base. The translabyrinthine and transcochlear approaches have the advantage of wide exposure of the cerebellopontine angle without extensive cerebellar retraction as well as access to the facial nerve in an area uninvolved with tumor.
Patient Positioning
Typically, the patient is positioned supine. The head is parallel to the floor, inclined slightly downward and flexed onto the opposite shoulder, and fixed to the operating table with a May-field three-pin head holder. A soft roll may be placed under the ipsilateral shoulder to provide support if necessary. In this position, the temporal bone can be dissected quickly and easily. Of note, the extreme rotation of the neck, which is advantageous for retrosigmoid approaches, is not necessary. Occasionally, however, the patient must be placed in the park bench position for the far-lateral position.8 The neurotologist must become facile with far-lateral positioning because the usual relationships among bony landmarks and soft tissue are altered.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


