Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to their NYU Langone Medical Center colleagues Matija Snuderl, MD, for contributing illustrated cases of cytogenetics analysis and methylation array; Cyrus Hedvat, MD, PhD, for providing an illustrated case of loss of heterozygosity analysis; and Elad Mashiach for assisting with the preparation of images and diagrams, and the editing of the chapter.
Glioma classification and grading have traditionally been based on the histomorphology of the tumors. Recent advances have identified new molecular markers with diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive (ie, therapeutic) significance ( Box 4.1 , Table 4.1 ). Since the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines in 2007, there has been a rapid expansion of molecular data on central nervous system (CNS) tumors that has improved clinicians’ diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic abilities. Although most of this information has not yet been translated into tangible clinical advances, many changes have been implemented in the revised WHO guidelines for the classification of tumors of the CNS (2016) for gliomas. This chapter reviews recently identified genetic markers that have had a significant impact on the molecular classification of gliomas. Many have been shown to be essential in better diagnosing CNS tumors, reliably determining the prognosis, and allowing better clinical management. Based on the revised WHO classification, each tumor type is discussed separately, accompanied by the relevant molecular profiles.
The National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Definitions Working Group defined a biomarker as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.” Biomarkers in gliomas have been investigated particularly for their use in identifying patients with a disease or a disease subtype (diagnostic biomarkers), stratifying the patients’ prognoses and natural history of the disease (prognostic biomarkers), and identifying patients who may achieve a particular outcome based on a particular treatment and attempting to personalize clinical treatment (predictive biomarkers). Several of the biomarkers discussed in this chapter have distinct roles as diagnostic, prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers, and these are discussed in the text and summarized in Table 4.1 and Figs. 4.1 and 4.5 .
Gene/Phenotype a | Gene Family/Alternative Name | Chromosomal Location | Driver Gene b | Typical Mutation c | Copy Number Alteration | Translocation Partner | Detection Method | Adult Glioma Tumor Type | Pediatric Glioma Tumor Type | Biomarker Clinical Utility | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chromosomal | |||||||||||
— | — | 1p/19q | — | — | Codeletion | — | FISH, LOH, MLPA, 450K-MA | OD, AOD | — | Diag, Prog, Pred (chemo + radiotherapy) | |
CIC | Transcription repressor | 19q13.2 | TSG | R215Q/W | Del | — | IHC (loss of staining), others | OD, AOD | — | Diag, Prog | |
FUBP1 | DNA-binding protein | 1p31.1 | TSG | Many | Del | — | IHC (loss of staining), others | OD, AOD | — | Diag, Prog | |
— | — | 7 or 7q | — | — | Single copy gain | — | FISH, others | DA, AA, GBM | — | — | |
— | — | 10 or 10q | — | — | Single copy loss | — | FISH, others | GBM | — | — | |
Genetic | |||||||||||
ACVR1 | RSTK | 2q23-q24 | TSG | Few | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | — | Midline HGG, DIPG | — | |
BRAF | RAF kinase | 7q34 | ONC | V600E | — | — | MS-IHC, qRT-PCR, Seq | PXA, EGBM | PA, PXA, cortical HGG | Diag | |
BRAF | — | — | — | — | Amp | KIAA1549, others | FISH, others; qRT-PCR, Seq | PA | PA, PMA | Diag | |
CDKN2A | Kinase inhibitor/p14, p16 | 9p21 | TSG | — | Del | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | PXA | — | |
CDKN2B | Kinase inhibitor | 9p21 | — | — | Del | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | PXA | — | |
EGFR | RTK | 7p12 | ONC | — | Amp | SEPT14 | FISH, others; qRT-PCR, Seq | Classic GBM | Cortical HGG | Diag | |
EGFR | — | — | — | EGFRvIII, A289D/T/V | — | — | MS-IHC, qRT-PCR, Seq | Classic GBM | — | Diag | |
FGFR1 | RTK/CD331 | 8p11.23-p11.22 | — | K656E | — | TACC1 | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | — | PA, midline HGG/DIPG | — | |
FGFR3 | RTK/CD333 | 4p16.3 | ONC | — | — | TACC3 | FISH, qRT-PCR, Seq | GBM | — | — | |
IDH1 | Dehydrogenase | 2q34 | ONC | R132H, others | — | — | MS-IHC, qRT-PCR, Seq | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | Cortical HGG | Diag, Prog | |
IDH2 | Dehydrogenase | 15q26.1 | ONC | R172K, others | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | — | Diag, Prog | |
MDM2 | Ubiquitin protein ligase | 12q13-q14 | ONC | Few | Amp | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | GBM | — | — | |
MDM4 | p53 regulator | 1q32 | ONC | Few | Amp | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | GBM | — | — | |
MET | RTK | 7q31 | ONC | — | Amp | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | GBM | — | — | |
MYC | Transcription factor | 8q24 | ONC | — | Amp | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | Astrocytoma, GBM | — | — | |
NF1 | RAS negative regulator | 17q11.2 | TSG | Many | Del | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | Mesenchymal GBM | PA, midline HGG | — | |
NOTCH1 | receptor | 9q34.3 | TSG | F357del | Amp | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | OD | — | — | |
NTRK2 | RTK | 9q22.1 | — | — | Amp | QKI | FISH, others; qRT-PCR, Seq | — | PA, non-brainstem HGG | — | |
PDGFRA | RTK/CD140a | 4q12 | ONC | Many | Amp | KDR | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | Proneural GBM | Midline HGG, DIPG | Prog | |
PIK3CA | PI3 kinase | 3q26.3 | ONC | H1047L/R/Y | Amp | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | OD, AOD, GBM | Midline HGG, DIPG | — | |
PIK3R1 | Regulatory subunit of PI3 kinase | 5q13.1 | TSG | G376R | Del | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | OD, AOD, GBM | Midline HGG, DIPG | — | |
PTEN | Phosphatase | 10q23 | TSG | R130 d /Q | Del | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | Astrocytoma, classical GBM | — | Prog | |
PTPN11 | Phosphatase | 12q24.1 | ONC | Many | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | — | PA | — | |
RB1 | Ligand | 13q14.2 | TSG | R445 d , X445_splice | Del | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | Mesenchymal GBM | — | — | |
TERT | Telomerase | 5p15.33 | — | Promoter | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | OD, AOD, astrocytoma, GBM | — | Diag, Prog | |
TP53 | Transcription factor | 17p13.1 | TSG | R273C/H/L, R248Q/W | — | — | (IHC), qRT-PCR, Seq | Astrocytoma, GBM | Midline/cortical HGG | — | |
Epigenetic | |||||||||||
ATRX | Chromatin remodeler | Xq21.1 | TSG | F2113fs | — | — | IHC (loss of staining), others | DA, AA, GBM | Cortical HGG | Diag, Prog | |
DAXX | Chromatin remodeler | 6p21.3 | TSG | — | Amp | — | FISH, MLPA, 450K-MA | — | Cortical HGG | — | |
HIST1H3B | Histone | 6p22.2 | ONC | H3.1 K27M | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | — | Midline HGG, DIPG | Diag, Prog | |
H3F3A | Histone | 1q42.12 | ONC | H3.3 K27M | — | — | MS-IHC, qRT-PCR, Seq | Midline HGG, DIPG | Midline HGG, DIPG | Diag, Prog | |
H3F3A | Histone | 1q42.12 | ONC | H3.3 G34R/V | — | — | MS-IHC, qRT-PCR, Seq | — | Cortical HGG | Diag, Prog | |
MGMT | DNA cysteine MT | 10q26 | Promoter methylation | — | — | MS-PCR, 450K-MA | GBM | — | Prog, Pred (temozolomide) | ||
SETD2 | Histone lysine MT | 3p21.31 | TSG | Many | Del | — | qRT-PCR, Seq; FISH, others | — | Cortical HGG | — | |
TET2 | Demethylase | 4q24 | TSG | Few | — | — | qRT-PCR, Seq | GBM | — | — | |
Phenotypic | |||||||||||
2-HG | 2-hydroxyglutarate | — | — | — | — | — | MRS, mass spectrometry | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | — | — | |
G-CIMP | Glioma–CpG island methylator phenotype | — | — | — | — | — | 450K-MA | OD, AOD, DA, AA, GBM | — | — |
a Gene symbols, gene families, and chromosomal locations according to the Human Genome Organisation Gene Nomenclature Committee ( www.genenames.org ) and Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer ( cancer.sanger.ac.uk ).
b Driver genes that contain driver gene mutations as defined by Vogelstein and colleagues.
c Gene mutations and copy number alterations based on the Merged Cohort of LGG and GBM (The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA], 2016) database (1102 samples) generated by TCGA Research Network ( http://www.cbioportal.org/index.do ). In addition, the translocation partners for BRAF, EGFR, FGFR1, NTRK2, and PDGFRA are listed.
Adult diffuse gliomas
Adult diffuse gliomas are infiltrating glial neoplasms that include astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. In the 2007 edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System , these entities were diagnosed and classified as grade II (diffuse) or grade III (anaplastic) based on histologic features. In cases in which a morphologic distinction between these two entities was not clear, a diagnosis of oligoastrocytoma was appropriate. Following major advances in our understanding of molecular gliomagenesis, the revised WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (2016) has refined the diagnostic criteria for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas by incorporating clinically relevant molecular information about the mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 ( IDH1/2 ), and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked ( ATRX ) genes and codeletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q. After an initial IDH mutation, oligodendrogliomas are thought to develop via subsequent telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) promoter mutations and codeletion of 1p/19q, whereas IDH -mutant astrocytomas develop with subsequent alterations of TP53 and/or ATRX. The diagnosis of oligoastrocytoma is now strongly discouraged ( Fig. 4.1 ).
Point mutations in cytosolic IDH1 and mitochondrial IDH2 most commonly by substitution of arginine to histidine (R132H) or to lysine (R172K), respectively, alter their catalytic activity such that they produce high levels of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), instead of α-ketoglutarate. The presence of 2-HG results in disruption of tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) activity, leading to aberrant histone regulation and development of the glioma–CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP).
G-CIMP is an epigenetic molecular profile that was noted and named after the observation of a subset of gliomas within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database that showed concerted hypermethylation at a large number of loci. In general, CIMP gliomas are lower-grade, often IDH -mutated, tumors. Mutation of IDH is the molecular basis for the G-CIMP phenotype. Overall, IDH -mutant, G-CIMP high infiltrating gliomas are associated with a favorable prognosis compared with IDH wild-type tumors. IDH status is an even stronger predictor of patient outcome than histologic grade in infiltrating gliomas.
IDH mutations can be detected by immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue using the IDH1 R132H mutant-specific antibody ( Fig. 4.2 A, B ). Direct Sanger sequencing, although requiring more tissue specimens, has the advantage over immunohistochemistry (IHC) of not only detecting IDH1 R132H but also detecting other noncanonical IDH mutations. This technique is highly sensitive, but is limited because the specimens must contain at least 50% neoplastic cells to ensure reliability. Another method, pyrosequencing, has a higher sensitivity than Sanger sequencing because it can detect as little as 10% mutant alleles. Moreover, clinical efforts have been undertaken to determine whether IDH mutations can be detected indirectly, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been proposed as a reliable technique to achieve this goal by detecting the levels of 2-HG.