Fig. 27.1
Survival rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Kaplan-Meier curves showing mortality over 4 years of follow-up. Reproduced by permission of Neurology [14]
Table 27.1
Potential reasons for the obesity-stroke paradox
A. Protective cytokines |
B. Greater metabolic reservoirs |
C. Increased muscle mass |
D. Nonpurposeful weight loss meaning cachexia |
E. Attenuated response to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system |
F. Earlier symptom detection due to better medical consciousness |
G. Inadequate measure of body composition |
Fig. 27.2
Multiple biases in obesity-stroke paradox
Conclusion
In conclusion, although researches exploring this interesting paradox have been emerged in multiple disease categories, the exact patho-mechanisms were not still identified yet. While the “paradox in stroke” seems to be a fascinating hypothesis, it might be a mere epiphenomenon or a transitional process toward disastrous clinical outcomes. Therefore, in considering unconfirmed limitations, physicians should carefully apply this hypothesis until more research is accumulated.
Suggestions from Current Clinical Practice Guidelines
It is strongly recommended that active or passive smoking should be avoided in stroke patients. Regarding alcohol drinking, drinking greater than two drinks per day should be avoided. In terms of obesity, beneficial impact of weight reduction in obese stroke patients has not been explored, but weight reduction is still being recommended in body mass index ≥ 25 mg/m2.
References
1.
2.
Kirtane AJ, Martinezclark P, Rahman AM, et al. Association of smoking with improved myocardial perfusion and the angiographic characterization of myocardial tissue perfusion after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:321–3.CrossrefPubMed