Violence Prevention and Control: A Public Health Approach



Violence Prevention and Control: A Public Health Approach


Stephen W. Hargarten

Ann Christiansen



Violence (homicides and suicides, assaults and parasuicide) poses a significant public health problem in the United States. Other sections and chapters of this book describe more thoroughly the complex challenge of violence and the clinical role that emergency psychiatrists have in working with people who are at risk for becoming violent either toward themselves or others. This chapter provides an overview of the unique role that emergency psychiatrists, as members of the health care community, have in preventing and controlling violence both at an individual and population level.

The World Report on Violence and Health, published by the World Health Organization (WHO), describes violence as a complex problem with multiple factors that influence whether an individual is prone to act in a violent manner (1). These factors can be biologic, social, cultural, economic, and political. This understanding of violence is similar to the biopsychosocial model put forward by Engel to describe the role of biologic, psychological, and social factors and their influence on human behavior and disease (2). With regard to violence, WHO uses an ecologic model for understanding these factors and how they overlap to influence an individual’s behavior (Fig. 40.1). At one level, the model describes how biology and personal history influence individual behavior, including demographics, impulsivity, educational attainment, and substance abuse, as well as prior history of aggression and abuse. On another level, the ecologic model describes how close relationships with family, friends, intimate partners, and peers might increase or decrease the risk of being a victim or perpetrator of violence. This risk depends on one’s exposure to violence, especially in the case of partner violence and child maltreatment, and for young people the acceptance or approval of violence by friends. A third level is the community where those relationships occur. Potential risk factors at the community level include high incidence of unemployment, transient neighborhoods, and population density, to name a few. The fourth level of this model describes the broad societal factors whereby violence is either encouraged or inhibited. Examples of the risk factors at a societal level include the availability of weapons and the social norms surrounding their use. Other social factors include the social and economic policies that result in inequities between different population groups (1).






Figure 40.1 • Ecologic Model for Understanding Violence.

The authors wish to thank Rachel Glick and Jon Berlin for their helpful comments and review of this chapter.

Traditionally, the responsibility for preventing and controlling violence has fallen on the judicial, law enforcement, and correctional systems. The health care field has been largely responsible for the medical and mental health treatment and care of individuals after an event or, ideally, the mental health treatment of individuals at risk of violence prior to an event. With expanding knowledge regarding the multifaceted risk factors and prevention strategies for violence, the World Health Organization states that those in the health care community have a special role in preventing and controlling violence, and that this role would ideally be in collaboration with public health practitioners, researchers, law enforcement, those involved in the judicial system, and others. Those in the health care field have a unique perspective regarding violence because of their close proximity to the treatment and care of those who are potential and actual perpetrators and victims of violence. Health care personnel have access to data and information to assist with research and prevention strategies, as well as communicating to other stakeholders and policy makers
about the burden of violence. Additionally, health care personnel have access to personal stories from their patients to accompany statistics and data, which can be a powerful advocacy tool for resources, laws and regulations, and broader social and community change (1).

The purpose of this chapter is to describe more thoroughly the public health approach to reducing violence and the opportunities that emergency psychiatrists have in using its tools to prevent and control violence for both individuals and populations.


PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH FOR REDUCING VIOLENCE

The public health approach is an important strategy to apply to violence prevention and control because it provides a systematic method for identifying and addressing a specific health issue. The public health approach uses tools such as surveillance, epidemiologic analysis, intervention design, and evaluation. These tools can then be used to focus on recognizing the underlying risk and protective factors for health issues, identifying strategies to address these factors, and evaluating the impact that those strategies have made to reduce the biosocial disease burden—in this case, violence.

The science of injury control and prevention builds on the public health model and is based on the understanding that injury is a disease rather than the result of fate or random occurrences (3,4). The fundamentals of injury control and prevention are constructed from the public health triad of host (individual), agent or vector (e.g., kinetic energy from a car or gun), and environment (physical or socioeconomic). Injury control and prevention is the scientific discipline of understanding what prevents or attenuates the transfer of energy to the host, which can happen by separating the host from the agent through modification of the environment, equipping the host with protections against the agent, or eliminating or modifying the vector that transmits the energy (5,6,7,8). William Haddon developed a two-dimensional approach to injury analysis by dividing the public health triad of agent, host, and environment into three phases: preinjury, injury, and postinjury (9). This phase-factor matrix has become the scientific underpinning of injury control and prevention. Any injury event can be broken down into the component factors of Haddon’s matrix, allowing specific interventions to target specific factors and phases (10).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Violence Prevention and Control: A Public Health Approach

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access