Annual alcohol per capita
Prevalence of heavy episodic drinking (HED)
8.9 liters
5.7%
21.2 liters
21.5%
(i) SAMHSA
2013b
Drinking > 2x daily guidelines
High risk: W35,M50 units/week
Children aged 15 who have drunk
24%
4%
74%
31%
5%
74%
Estimated % overall users
23.2%
76.8%
Past year nonmedical use
4%
6%
Addiction disorders
As is the case for consumption, recent decades have seen rates of problematic use and addiction in women and men converge, but women are still less likely than men to have an addiction problem, and this finding is consistent across substances and behaviors (with the exception of addiction to prescription medications such as tranquilizers, sedatives and opiate/opioid painkillers, where women take more of these types of drugs, and show higher rates of problematic use). It is widely agreed that addiction problems in women are more hidden than in men, and this may be due in part to the stigma women experience, along with concerns about childcare, child protection issues, and negative attitudes from health professionals (Gilchrist et al. 2011).
Not every woman who uses alcohol or drugs will become addicted, and addiction disorders may take some time to develop. Table 15.2 summarizes the rates of various addiction disorders.
Addiction | Source | Country | Problematic use described | Estimates for women | Estimates for men |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alcohol | WHO 2014 | Southeast Asia | Heavy episodic drinking | 10.9x less likely | 10.9x more likely |
SAMSHA 2013 | USA | Binge drinking 18–25 yrs old Binge drinking 26+ yrs | 33.2% 14.7% | 45.8% 30.7% | |
McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Hazardous drinking Dependent on alcohol | 15.7% 3.3% | 33.2% 8.7% | |
All drugs | National Treatment Agency (NTA) 2010 | UK | Numbers entering treatment | 21,038 | 63,488 |
Cannabis | Degenhardt et al. 2013 | Global | Cannabis dependence | 0.14% | 0.23% |
McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Signs of dependence | 1.7% | 3.7% | |
EMCDDA 2014 | Europe | % of total number in treatment | 17% | 83% | |
Cocaine | McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Signs of dependence | 0.2% | 0.7% |
EMCDDA 2014 | Europe | % of total number in treatment | 16% | 84% | |
Tranquilizers | McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Signs of dependence | 0.3% | 0.3% |
Gambling | McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Problem gambling | 0.2% | 1.2% |
Amphetamines | EMCDDA 2014 | Europe | % total number in treatment | 21% | 79% |
Heroin | EMCDDA 2014 | Europe | % total number in treatment | 21% | 79% |
McManus et al. 2009 | UK | Signs of dependence | 0.0% | 0.3% | |
All prescription drugs | Culberson & Ziska 2008 | USA | Abuse in elderly females | 11% | – |
Prescription opiates | Back et al. 2010 | USA | Prescription opiate abuse or dependence | 0.58% | 0.74% |
Course and consequences
Addiction disorders develop over time, and those who become addicted start from the same place as those who do not, with initial use or experimentation with alcohol and drugs.
How addiction develops does not lend itself to a single parsimonious theory, and many explanations have been proposed. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss each of these in detail, but a summary of the predominant theories is given in Table 15.3, grouped into headings/categories suggested by West and Hardy (2006), and three of these theories are described in detail in Box 15.2.
Type of theory | Examples | Refs |
---|---|---|
Addiction as rational choice | Rational Informed Stable Choice models The Theory of Rational Addiction Self-Medication model Opponent Process Theory | |
Addiction as irrational choice | Expectancy Theories Skog’s (conflicted) Choice Theory Slovic’s Affect Heuristic Cognitive bias theories Behavioral Economic Theory Gateway Drug Theory The Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change Identity Shift Theory | |
Addiction as a disorder of impulse and/or self-control: a combination of conscious, automatic and semi-automatic brain processes are responsible for addiction | Disease Model of Addiction Addictive personality types Self-efficacy Theory The Abstinence Violation Effect Inhibition Dysregulation Theory Self-regulation theory Cognitive model of drug urges | |
Addiction as a learning disorder | Classical conditioning Operant conditioning/Instrumental learning theories Social learning theory Dopamine reward theory and other theories arising from the functional neurotoxicity of drugs Multiple Memory System Theory of Addiction Incentive Sensitisation Theory Theory of differential drug effects | |
Comprehensive theories of addiction | Addiction as Excessive Appetite PRIME theory |
The Opponent Process Theory of Addiction (Solomon 1980)
The transition to addiction has been described as a model of opponent processes. In this model, initial drug taking is accompanied by high levels of pleasure and low levels of withdrawal, but over time the physiological process of tolerance reduces the levels of pleasure as more and more of the drug is needed to obtain the same effect, and at the same time withdrawal symptoms increase, leading to increasing discomfort. Drug taking becomes necessary to relieve withdrawal, with little pleasure attached.
The Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (Prochaska & DiClemente 1985)
This theory (commonly also known as the Stages of Change Model) has been operationalized into a treatment model widely found in addiction services. Several stages of change are proposed, from pre-contemplation of making a change through contemplation of that change; preparation for it; action, that is, making the change; then maintenance of the new behavior. Processes of change are often represented as a circle, with individuals progressing through the stages, sometimes with backwards movements, before reaching maintenance.
Addiction as Excessive Appetite (Orford 2001)
The conceptualization of addiction as being disordered appetite allows for a consideration of several primary and secondary psychological processes, including restraint, control, cues and complex memory schemata processes. The model can incorporate other theories, such as neuroadaptation, the abstinence violation effect and conflict. Importantly, this theory was the first to propose that it is possible to be addicted not just to substances, but also to behaviors, for example, sex and gambling.
For the majority of people, and for alcohol and for the majority of illicit drugs, levels of initial consumption do not progress to addiction. However, sizeable minorities who try a substance will go on to develop a problem with that substance, and this is not something that happens overnight, it is something that takes time.
Age of onset, adolescence and young adulthood
Women tend to start using alcohol and drugs slightly later in life than men, and there are often gender differences for motivation to start using. However, to many adolescents, female and male, experimentation with mood-altering substances is attractive and behavior of peers can contribute to this. For girls and young women whose onset of drug and alcohol use is the teenage years, there are particular risks: brains and bodies are still developing and susceptible to damage and some hormones that are thought to play a role in metabolism and in developing and maintaining addiction problems may be in a state of flux. Further, young women receive confusing messages about the acceptability of alcohol and drug use. Alcohol use is more acceptable now in young women, but when women do drink, particularly younger women, there is greater censure than for men when they drink excessively, and this censure comes from both women and men (de Visser et al., 2012).
A particular harm in young people who use alcohol and drugs is risk-taking, which may manifest itself in behaviors such as driving whilst intoxicated, or result in outcomes such as accidental injury. Women are less likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors, but such behaviors do still occur (e.g., Lex et al. 1994).
Girls are more likely to smoke for reasons of appetite reduction and weight control than boys and men, and, compared to boys who smoke, tend to have stronger peer attachments; to have parents and friends who smoke; to be less committed to school; and to have less knowledge about nicotine, addiction and prevalence of smoking (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001). Escalating rates of smoking in young girls have recently been noted in Southeast Asia – whereas smoking rates for women in general are one-tenth of those for men; for 13–15 year olds, boys are only 2.5x more likely to smoke than girls (Hammond 2009).
Transition to problematic use
Although fewer women than men use drugs, alcohol and nicotine, those who do tend to have a more rapid acceleration of use than men, and this appears across drugs such as alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opiates/opioids (Brady 1999, Hernandez-Avila 2004). The transition in women from use to hazardous use to harmful use to dependence is less clear. Late 20s is often a time when women cut back on use, and both marriage and pregnancy seem to have a protective effect in reducing substance use (Leonard & Eiden 2007). Child-rearing is often accompanied by less money and less time, along with the increased responsibilities of motherhood, and these all may contribute to how mothers modify their drinking and drug-taking behavior.
Women transition to problematic alcohol use more quickly than men (Zilberman et al. 2003). The reproductive years also carry increased risks of harm for women who misuse alcohol. Alcohol misuse can disrupt the menstrual cycle and reproductive function and has been implicated in infertility and spontaneous abortion (Jones et al., 2008). Women who binge drink are more likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors, with increased risk of both sexually transmitted diseases (Thomas et al. 2001) and unplanned pregnancy (Naimi et al. 2003). There is also some evidence in young women that alcohol use by both perpetrator and victim is a risk factor for sexual assault (Abbey 2002; Mohler-Kuo 2004).
There is clear evidence of a quicker transition in cocaine use too: women begin taking cocaine earlier, then progress from initial use to dependence more rapidly than men and enter treatment earlier. They also report higher levels of craving in response to cues, and if they relapse, have longer periods of use than men (Becker & Hu 2008). These findings are supported by animal studies, where sex differences are consistently found in the area of cocaine self-administration (Roth et al. 2004).
Addiction problems are particularly concerning in women who are pregnant, as harms may be caused not only to the expectant mother, but also to the child in utero. In 2010, in the USA, 4% of women entering drug and/or alcohol treatment were pregnant (SAMSHA 2010). Specialist treatment services for pregnant women should be working together with other agencies in order to address the pregnancy, safeguarding and housing.
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) occur when alcohol, ingested during pregnancy by the mother, adversely affects the cells and organs of the unborn child in several ways, as alcohol passes through the placenta into the blood of the developing fetus. Effects can be mild or severe. They occur because of the neurotoxic and teratogenic effects of alcohol, exacerbated by the fact that the liver of the fetus is not sufficiently developed to metabolize the alcohol it receives from the mother through the placenta (Howell et al. 2006, Plant 1985, Plant & Plant 1988). In FASD, alcohol ingested by the fetus in utero results in neuropsychological deficits and behavioral features (for a full review see Mattson et al. 2011) as well as physiological impairments (Russell et al. 1991) in the child. Birth abnormalities occur most often in the children of women who drink heavily, but small amounts of alcohol might also be harmful, and in the United States advice is given that “no amount of alcohol is safe for pregnant women to drink” (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 2015). In the UK, advice remains confusing and contradictory, between total abstinence during pregnancy and small amounts. In a large part because of public health education programs, pregnant women are much less likely to drink alcohol than nonpregnant women, for example around 1 in 10 in the UK drinking in the last week, compared to 5 in 10 nonpregnant women (HSCIC 2014). In 2010, a survey indicated that 48% of women stopped drinking completely during pregnancy, and a further 47% reduced how much they drank (HSCIC 2010). However, in pregnant women who drink excessively FASD is a major of concern, and the prevalence of FASD in the United States has been estimated to be between 0.5 and 3 per 1,000 (Stratton, Howe et al. 1996), although a more recent study estimated it could be as high as 20–50 per 1,000 (May, Gossage et al. 2009).
Pregnant women who use illicit substances are also of concern to agencies and those who are receiving opiate substitution treatment have an increased risk of their baby being born with neonatal abstinence syndrome, (that is, exhibiting signs of opiate withdrawal). Women who are pregnant or who have children are often pressurized to come off methadone or buprenorphine and services can be perceived to be very judgmental. In family drug and alcohol courts (FDACs), abstinence is very highly correlated with family reunification (Harwin et al. 2014), and although no one would argue that abstinence alone necessarily equates to good parenting, it is often a prerequisite of the Court if a woman is to keep care of her children. The FDAC model has been far more successful at achieving sustained abstinence for substance-addicted parents than previous models and is currently being considered for longer-term funding and evaluation of cost-effectiveness (Advisory Council for the Misuse of Drugs 2003). Other psychosocial factors accompanying misuse also contribute and disentangling the contributions of each to those outcomes is difficult (e.g., Cleaver et al. 2011).
Smoking during pregnancy is known to contribute to poorer outcomes for offspring in a range of areas, and has been described as the most important environmental risk to an unborn child. The adverse outcomes it contributes could also be avoided with smoking cessation (Mund et al. 2013).
Women who have transitioned into cannabis misuse show increased analgesia, depression, anxiety and catalepsy compared to men. Further, they show increased sexual behavior, whereas in men the opposite is the case (Fattore & Fratta 2010).
In opiates, findings differ, although some studies do suggest that women escalate more rapidly to problematic use than men and experience addiction in a shorter period (Anglin et al. 1987, Hser et al. 1987, Greenfield et al. 2007). However, women are somewhat less likely to have injected than men, although if they do inject, they are more likely to share needles than men (24% vs. 17%) (NTA 2010), leading to increased risk for blood-borne viruses such as Hepatitis A, B and C, and HIV. Menstrual disorders have also been associated with opiate use (Busch et al. 1986) and are thought to be caused by disruption to the hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) (Vuong et al. 2010).
Nicotine is highly addictive and the transition to dependence can take as little as 3 months (WHO 2011). There is also evidence that nicotine has specific effects on sexual and reproductive health and smoking has been implicated in infertility problems, ectopic pregnancies and preterm problems including preterm delivery, stillbirth, neonatal deaths, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and lower birth weight (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001).
Addiction in middle age
Middle age is when many of the physical and psychological consequences of long-term substance misuse begin to take their toll. The contribution of alcohol to mortality and morbidity increases (Jones et al. 2008). The health risks of smoking are well documented and also begin to manifest themselves in middle age. In women, smoking is a major cause of mortality and morbidity from various cancers, coronary heart disease, stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001), and women have a 1.5-to-2-fold higher risk for lung cancer than men at the same level of tar exposure (Harris et al. 1993).
Further problems for women can occur when children grow into adults and leave the family home, and some women may question their social roles (Nolen-Hoeksema 2004). Rates of divorce and separation are higher in middle age and these are risk factors for women for alcohol misuse (Leonard & Eiden 2007).
Reproductive problems may continue in middle age. The onset of menopause is earlier in women who misuse alcohol than in women who do not (Eagon 2010) and women smokers are also at increased risk of early menopause (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001).
Addiction in the elderly
For many women, numerous challenges accompany old age: bereavement, failing physical health, depression, isolation, loneliness and poverty. Those who have developed addiction problems over the lifespan may be particularly difficult to identify in old age. Shame and stigma are particularly prevalent in this group and symptoms of, for example, alcohol dependence might be mistaken for symptoms of dementia, and vice versa (NIAAA 1998). Further, for those who take medications, there may be harmful interactive effects between those medications and alcohol. Elderly women appear to be particularly vulnerable to addiction to opioid-based painkillers, and at time of writing the CODEMISUSED project at http://codemisused.org is investigating this group in the UK, Ireland and South Africa.
For elderly women who smoke, there are increased risks of osteoporosis. Postmenopausal smoking women have lower bone density and increased risks of hip fractures than do nonsmoking women (WHO 2010).
Consequences over the life span
Although on a population level women suffer fewer harms from addiction than men, there is good evidence that women are suffering increasing addiction-related harms over the life span (e.g., Jones et al. 2008, Jones et al. 2011). This has been exacerbated by the increase in women’s use of alcohol and drugs over the past few decades, within a context of economic development and changing gender roles. A well-recognized phenomenon is that of the “telescoping effect,” when women transition to dependence more rapidly than men, and suffer greater harms more quickly and with less consumption/use than men. This phenomenon has been found in a range of addictive drugs and behaviors, including alcohol (e.g., Diehl et al. 2007) and gambling (Slutske et al. 2014).
The WHO estimates that alcohol contributes to 4% of deaths in women, compared to 7.6% in men, but women appear to be more vulnerable to alcohol-related harm than men: while intoxicated, they have higher Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) after consuming the same amount of alcohol (Nolen-Hoeksema 2004). Women also suffer memory blackouts while drinking much lower levels of alcohol than men (White et al. 2002). With longer-term, chronic alcohol misuse, women develop alcohol liver injury and cirrhosis having consumed less alcohol than men and for a shorter time, and it is suggested that, as well as body mass and composition of fat versus water, sex hormones play a part in this (Eagon 2010).
There is enormous variation from country to country. In the United States, alcohol-related deaths averaged 26,000 for women and 62,000 for men between 2006 and 2010. Rates of harms are strongly correlated with rates of consumption: in the Russian Federation, consumption is high and 6% of deaths among women are attributable to alcohol misuse (Kerr-Correậ et al. 2007). In England, alcohol contributes to 2.0% of deaths in women, compared to 4.4% in men. There are differences in causes of alcohol-attributable deaths across the life course: under the age of 25, the leading cause is intentional self-harm; between the ages of 25 and 34 spontaneous abortion; between the ages of 35–54 mental and behavioral disorders; post 55 hypertensive diseases; and over 75 cardiac arrhythmias (Jones et al., 2008).
In drug-taking populations, women may also have poorer health outcomes: Neale (2004) reports women drug takers scoring significantly lower on six out of eight health dimensions than men.
Alcohol and drugs are also significant contributors to a range of health harms; Table 15.4 lists the key harms associated with use of addictive substances.
Risk factors
Given that women as a whole consume less alcohol and overall have fewer alcohol-related harms than men, being a woman in itself could be considered a protective factor. Certain women are more vulnerable than others to addiction problems and the reasons for this can be viewed within a biopsychosocial model (Mueller et al. 2009, Knibbe et al. 2006).
Biological
Biological risk factors for women are considered in four main areas: metabolism, genes, sex hormones and neuroscience.
Women have differences in biological mechanisms relating to the metabolism of alcohol and to body water content, compared to men. This means that women are more likely to experience harm related to drinking at the same level of alcohol consumption, even controlling for body mass (Zakhari 2006). Levels of alcohol dehydrogenase tend to be lower in women, resulting in less efficient metabolism of alcohol and higher levels remaining in the bloodstream (Frezza et al. 1990). In smoking, women have greater sensitivity to the effects of nicotine at lower levels, and do not take in as much nicotine as men (Benowitz 1998). However, in pregnant women and in women taking oral contraceptives, metabolism of nicotine is much higher than in women who are not (Dempsey et al. 2002, Matta et al. 2007). Metabolic differences have also been noted in cannabis users, with women taking longer to clear tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) than men, which is thought to be related to the lipophyllic properties of THC and the greater proportion of fat in women’s bodies. In benzodiazepines, gender differences have been observed in both directions, with some linked to faster metabolism, and some linked to lower (Howell et al. 2001).
Sex hormones are also thought to contribute to risk factors for the harms associated with alcohol misuse in women (Eagon 2010). Gonadal hormones are thought to contribute to neurobiological sex differences in cannabinoid action (Fattore & Fratta 2010). In animal models, estrogen has been found to facilitate drug-seeking behavior, whereas progesterone has been found to reduce drug seeking, contributing to an increased vulnerability in females. There may also be different responses to substances at different stages in the menstrual cycle: in human studies, increased responsivity to stimulants has been observed during the follicular phase, but lower responsivity during the luteal phase (Sofuoglu et al. 1999). Other candidates for sex differences, particularly in treatment responses, are the hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA), dopamine (DA) and gamma-hydroxy-butyric acid (GABA) (Carroll & Anker 2010). Oral contraceptive pills have been noted to affect clearance rates, in both directions, of different types of benzodiazepine (Howell et al. 2001)
Recent research has started to find different associations between neurobiological processes underlying motivations for drug and alcohol use in women and men. Becker et al. (2012) propose that sex differences in brain function may contribute to different pathways to addiction for women and men. They hypothesize that more men than women begin taking drugs for sensation-seeking reasons, receiving positive reinforcement of drug taking initially in the form of euphoria (related to dopamine, norepinephrine, endogenous opioids and acetylcholine), which over time becomes negative reinforcement, leading to dysphoria and eventually to drug dependence. Women, they argue, are less likely to initiate drug use for the positive euphoriant effects. (See also Bobzean et al. 2014.)
Most studies in genetics suggest that genes play a role in alcohol misuse in both women and men, with heritability estimates in both groups clustering at around 50%. Early genetic studies suggested that alcohol misuse might be more heritable in men than in women, although more recent reviews suggest this is not the case (Plomin et al. 2008, Agrawal & Lynskey 2008). Genetic factors are thought to contribute to smoking initiation, where women have higher rates of heritability than men (66% vs. 49%) (Hamdani et al. 2006).
As with heterosexual women, there is tremendous diversity amongst lesbians. There is no single pattern of drink or drug taking amongst lesbians, although higher rates of problem drinking are often reported in lesbian women than in heterosexual women. Research into lesbians and substance misuse is lacking, and often findings for gay males have been misguidedly generalized across to lesbians (SAMSHA 2001). Heterogeneity amongst lesbians means that some may be comfortable with and public about their sexuality, for others it may be hidden. Structural heterosexism may contribute to drug and alcohol problems, reinforcing feelings of alienation and shame and individual experiences of homophobia may also contribute to these.
Particular risk factors include a high reliance on lesbian bars as a source of social support; feelings of alienation from family and friends as a result of sexuality and/or of coming out; and interactions between sexism, stress and trauma with substance misuse. Lesbians also have increased rates of sexual abuse, both as children and as adults (SAMSHA 2001).
Female-only treatment programs are more attractive to lesbians (Copeland et al. 1993) and some lesbians are unwilling to join Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous programs as they view these as being male organizations (SAMSHA 2001).
Psychological
Psychological comorbidity with use of alcohol and drugs is common and clinically important. However, there is often a lack of clarity on the direction of causation and investigating psychological factors can be further complicated by different patterns of use, with women’s use being more stigmatized and therefore more hidden (Bradly & Randall 1999).
Studies have shown the tendency for women to self-medicate with alcohol (Smith et al. 2012), and some with cocaine (Waldrop et al. 2007). The same may also be the case for opiates: rates of psychiatric comorbidity have been reported to be twice as high in women opiate users when compared to men (Brooner et al. 1997), although the problems of establishing causation remain. Smoking is thought to be used as a means of self-medication (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001) and this may be more the case in women than in men.
Depression is diagnosed more often in women than in men (Hammen 1997) and is a major comorbidity in women with addiction problems (e.g., Brady et al. 1993). Depression and anxiety are particularly prevalent in women who misuse alcohol (Nolen-Hoeksema 2004, Dawson et al. 2010), and more often a primary diagnosis than in men (Zilberman et al. 2003). Depression in young women has also been identified as a risk factor for alcohol misuse in later life (Fillmore et al. 1979). Women who have been diagnosed with alcohol use disorders and depression have been shown to have improved outcomes if treatment has a depression focus rather than a primary alcohol focus (Baker et al. 2010), underlining the strong relationship between alcohol and depression in women. Substance misuse should therefore be a consideration for clinicians examining women presenting with depression and anxiety. In cocaine users, however, women have shown the same rates of depression as men (Rounsaville et al. 1991) or lower (Griffin et al. 1989). In opiate users, the pattern appears to be similar to alcohol, with women opiate users reporting more depression than men (Brooner et al. 1997). Women who smoke tobacco are also more likely to report depression than men (US Department of Health and Human Services 2001, Perkins 1996).
Alcohol is also associated with suicide in women and men (Kaplan et al. 2013); however, consumption has been found to be a predictor in suicide rates in women aged 29 and under, but not in men of that age (Innamorati et al. 2010). Young women with alcohol use disorders have been found to be more likely to have suicidal ideation, whilst rates of adverse life events and mental health problems are associated with alcohol use disorders and suicidal ideation in young women (Agrawal et al. 2013). Suicides involving prescription painkillers in the United States are increasing at an alarming rate (McCarthy 2013), more than five-fold over 10 years.
Women with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) have higher rates of alcohol use than women without GAD and moderate anxiety increases the risk for alcohol abuse in women (Howell et al. 2001). Also, alcohol withdrawal symptoms may be difficult to differentiate from symptoms of anxiety disorders such as GAD and panic disorder.
Substance misuse in women, including alcohol misuse, is more often accompanied by eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, either in parallel, or sequentially, than it is in men. For a full review see National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (2003).
Rates of various personality disorders have also been found to be higher in women who misuse alcohol than women in the general population (Grant et al. 2004). Borderline personality disorder is more common in women who misuse alcohol than in men who misuse alcohol (Sinha & Rounsaville, 2002), but this is also the case in the general population (McManus et al. 2009). Rates of personality disorders such as anti-social personality disorder and conduct disorder have been noted to be higher in drug using women than in the general population (Lex 1994). As with other comorbidities, the direction of causation is unclear.
Although post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has historically been studied in men, women who have been subjected to partner violence have increased rates of PTSD and increased rates of alcohol misuse (Sinha & Rounsaville, 2002). There is also evidence that for some women who experience childbirth as traumatic, childbirth could be considered a stressor sufficient to meet the criteria for PTSD (Alcorn et al. 2010). Studies have found that trauma exposure and PTSD in women is more strongly associated with binge drinking when compared to men (Kachadourian et al. 2014).
Other psychological findings include that women who misuse alcohol are less likely to do so for sensation-seeking or impulsive reasons than men (Dawson et al. 2010) and that there may be neuropsychological reasons for this (Becker et al. 2012). Women also report that smoking tobacco gives them greater subjective pleasurable effects than men report (Perkins et al. 1999).
Social
Women experiencing adverse life events or family problems are known to be more vulnerable to substance misuse than men (Copeland & Hall 1992). Divorce and separation are risk factors for alcohol misuse (Leonard & Eiden 2007). It is also known that childhood sexual abuse plays a role in later substance misuse. Almost two-thirds of US women drug users in treatment reporting physical, sexual or emotional abuse in childhood (National Institute for Drug Abuse [NIDA] 1998). In Scotland nearly two-thirds of women in treatment report physical abuse and one-third report sexual abuse (McKeganey et al. 2005).
Rates of domestic violence are particularly high in women with addiction problems and often run alongside comorbid psychiatric problems, so much so that practitioners refer to addiction, domestic violence and mental health problems as a “toxic triangle” in women. Alcohol is particularly implicated in domestic violence and a myriad of studies across low- and middle-income countries consistently demonstrate a strong association between alcohol use in men and experiencing domestic violence in women. A large portion of partner violence occurs after drinking and the risks are particularly high during heavy episodic drinking (for an in-depth review see Heise 2011). See also Chapter 14.
Women with addiction problems may turn to prostitution to finance their addictions, with up to two-thirds of opiate users in one study funding their drug use in this way (Gossop et al. 1994). Sex work carries with it high risks, particularly from unsafe sex and assault, and women using cocaine have been found to be particularly likely to be exposed to violence and criminal activities (Goldstein et al. 1991). Sex workers are less likely than other women to access health services (Clements 1996), leading to poorer health outcomes. Opiate substitution treatment has shown to lead to a reduction in exchanges of sex for drugs and/or money (Gowing et al. 2006).
There is mixed evidence in women for the role of socioeconomic status and social roles in increased alcohol consumption and related problems (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2004). Traditionally, feminine traits such as nurturance appear to be protective factors against alcohol misuse, although this is the case in both sexes. Women, however, perceive greater social censure than men (Nolen-Hoeksema 2004) and, for women drug takers, stigma is known to be a particularly pertinent issue (Brown 2011). Recent decades have seen increased targeting of alcohol and nicotine advertising and branding specifically at women, from sugary alcohol drinks in pink packaging marketed as low calorie, to “light” cigarettes, smoked by two-thirds of women compared to one-half of men (Shifman et al. 2001).
Treatment
Brickman et al. (1982) described four approaches to treatment of substance use disorders. First, what they termed the “moral model,” which emphasizes punishment and incarceration; second, the “disease model,” which does not include elements of blame or coercion, but rather considers the role of genetics and biological vulnerabilities; third, the “spiritual model,” which is a recognition of the treatment power of 12-step programs and similar; and lastly the “compensatory model,” which posits that biopsychosocial risk factors vary between individuals and that treatment should also vary, based on the goals of the individual. The debate in recent years about how best to approach treatment has become less nuanced and more polarized, with discussion focusing on concepts of harm reduction, where a pragmatic approach is taken to addiction and ways in which the harms can be minimized are explored (examples include opioid substitution treatment, overdose prevention, needle exchanges, nicotine replacement therapy and controlled drinking), and on abstinence-base recovery ideas, where the end goal is no drug use. This harm reduction versus abstinence-based recovery debate has specific implications for pregnant women and women with children (see Box 15.3). There is huge heterogeneity in addiction treatment services from country to country, and even within countries, not only in their philosophical approaches to harm reduction and abstinence, but also in their service delivery.
A stepped approach to care is sometimes proposed, with the aim first of stabilizing those whose drug use is volatile, and once stabilized, offering psychotherapeutic treatments (Wanigaratne 2006). Treatment is further complicated by the high rate of comorbid psychiatric disorders found in those misusing drugs and alcohol and whether those disorders are primary or secondary to any addiction disorder – this may have particular implications for women. Furthermore, addiction is a chronic disorder with high rates of relapse, and this is reflected in the terminology often used to refer to treatment as “relapse prevention.”
In the United States in 2010, around 30% of those who enter state funded drug and/or alcohol treatment programs were women (28% in treatment for alcohol, 33% for heroin, 32–46% for cocaine, 27% for cannabis, 49–55% for tranquilizers and sedatives and 46% for opiates other than heroin) (SAMSHA 2010). Women in England come to treatment at a younger age than men (30 years, compared to 32 for men) and, on average, at an early stage in their drug-taking career (7 years, compared to 9 for men).
Much of the treatment provision for women has historically been based on research into what is effective for men (Greenfield et al. 2007, Greenfield et al. 2009). For example, in detoxification programs for alcohol, benzodiazepines are routinely prescribed to prevent seizures, yet it is not known whether there are gender differences in terms of the efficacy of these drugs (Amato et al. 2010). Women may have particular treatment needs and services are rarely designed with those in mind (Marsh et al. 2000). Increasingly, there is a realization that women may need specialist services and some service providers do indeed offer those, but these are in the minority. In particular, all-women treatment services are the exception rather than the norm and mother-and-baby treatment units are very scarce. The lack of specialist services for women may be reducing the rates of successful outcomes. Recently, more women-only treatment services have emerged, but few randomized controlled trials have been conducted, and with small sample sizes it is not possible to say with any certainty whether they are superior (Greenfield et al. 2010).
It may also be important in women to take a multi-agency approach, particularly for those women with children, coordinating support from social services, help with housing and benefits and access to mental health services as well as drug/alcohol treatment services.
Women who do come into treatment tend to be younger than men, to have had an earlier onset of drug use, to be more likely to be married and less likely to be employed (Acharyya et al. 2003). They also have more physical and psychological problems at entry than do men (Chatham et al. 1999)
Retention in treatment
The longer a person with addiction problems remains in treatment, the more likely a successful outcome, so much so that retention in treatment is measured as a treatment outcome in its own right in some countries (Marsden et al. 2008). However, treatment drop-out rates are concerningly high for both women and men, as those who leave treatment are less likely to address their addiction problems. Despite best efforts, researchers have been unable to identify clear reasons why people drop out of treatment. Although there do not appear to be gender differences in treatment retention, gender-specific factors have been identified that improve treatment retention in women, including social support, psychological functioning, personal stability, low levels of anger, belief in treatment efficacy and referral source. These run alongside factors that improve outcomes for both women and men: fewer mental health problems, less severe addiction problems and access to greater financial resources (Greenfield et al. 2010).

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

