7: Corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy

CHAPTER 7
Corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy


Suzee E. Lee and Bruce L. Miller


University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA


History and nomenclature


Corticobasal degeneration


In 1968, Rebeiz and colleagues first described three patients with a progressive movement disorder and swollen neurons with poorly staining inclusions found at autopsy, a condition they named “corticodentatonigral degeneration with neuronal achromasia” [1]. Although the authors noted neuropathological overlap with Pick’s disease, they believed that the clinical features of these patients were inconsistent with Pick’s. Subsequent groups emphasized motor features of the disease, including focal reflex myoclonus, alien limb phenomena, apraxia, rigidity and akinesia, postural–action tremor, limb dystonia, hyperreflexia, and postural instability [2, 3]. Other researchers classified these patients as a subtype of Pick’s disease, emphasizing behavioral and cognitive symptoms in addition to extrapyramidal features of the condition [4]. Over time, this disorder came to be known as corticobasal degeneration. Neuronal aggregates in CBD were shown to consist of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) [5], drawing links to other tau-associated disorders, including PSP, progressive aphasia [6], and Pick’s disease [7].


Progressive supranuclear palsy


In 1964, Richardson, Olszewski, and Steele observed a syndrome of postural instability, supranuclear gaze palsy with prominent downgaze difficulty, spastic facies, axial rigidity, and dementia with personality changes [9]. Neuropathological studies revealed “cell loss, gliosis, neurofibrillary tangles, granulovacuolar degeneration and demyelination in various regions of the basal ganglia, brainstem and cerebellum”; these pathological changes bore a striking resemblance to postencephalitic parkinsonism and the parkinsonism–dementia complex of Guam [9]. Subsequent studies confirmed the consistency of clinical findings [10, 11], and clinical consensus criteria for PSP were established in 1996 (Table 7.1) [12]. Neuronal aggregates found in PSP consist of tau protein [13], linking PSP to other tau disorders.


Table 7.1 NINDS–SPSP clinical criteria for PSP (1996).

























     I. Mandatory inclusion criteria
A. PSP possible


  1. Gradually progressive disorder
  2. Onset at age 40 or later
  3. Either vertical (upward or downward gaze) supranuclear palsy or both slowing of vertical saccades and prominent postural instability with falls in the first year of disease onset
  4. No evidence of other diseases that could explain the foregoing features, as indicated by mandatory exclusion criteria
B. PSP probable


  1. Gradually progressive disorder
  2. Onset at age 40 or later
  3. Vertical (upward or downward gaze) supranuclear palsy and prominent postural instability with falls in the first year of disease onset
  4. No evidence of other diseases that could explain the foregoing features, as indicated by mandatory exclusion criteria
C. Definite


  1. Clinically probable or possible PSP and histopathologic evidence of typical PSP
  II. Mandatory exclusion criteria


  1. Recent history of encephalitis
  2. Alien limb syndrome, cortical sensory deficits, focal frontal, or temporoparietal atrophy
  3. Hallucinations or delusions unrelated to dopaminergic therapy
  4. Cortical dementia of Alzheimer’s type (severe amnesia and aphasia or agnosia, according to NINCDS-ADRA criteria)
  5. Prominent, early cerebellar symptoms or prominent, early unexplained dysautonomia (marked hypotension and urinary disturbances)
  6. Severe, asymmetric parkinsonian signs (i.e., bradykinesia)
  7. Neuroradiologic evidence of relevant structural abnormality (i.e., basal ganglia or brainstem infarcts, lobar atrophy)
  8. Whipple’s disease, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, if indicated
III. Supportive criteria


  1. Symmetric akinesia or rigidity, proximal more than distal
  2. Abnormal neck posture, especially retrocollis
  3. Poor or absent response of parkinsonism to levodopa therapy
  4. Early dysphagia and dysarthria
  5. Early onset of cognitive impairment including at least two of the following: apathy, impairment in abstract thought, decreased verbal fluency, utilization or imitation behavior, or frontal release signs

Autopsy series highlight the clinical heterogeneity of CBD and PSP. Thus, the terms corticobasal syndrome [14] and progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome distinguish the clinically defined syndrome from the pathological entities, CBD and PSP. For the remainder of this chapter, we will use the terms CBD and PSP to refer to pathologically defined diseases and CBS and PSP syndrome to refer to the clinically defined syndromes.


Epidemiology


Typically, symptoms in pathologically proven CBD emerge between the sixth and eighth decades of life [15]. To our knowledge, the youngest patient with pathologically confirmed CBD had symptom onset at age 45 [15]. Both women and men are affected with some studies citing higher rates in women [16]. To date, there have been no population-based studies of CBD, and CBD is regarded as a rare neurodegenerative disorder, although studies have estimated of 4.9 cases per 100 000 people in the United States [17] and 1.7 per 100 000 in Japan [18a]. Mean age at onset in a series of 267 patients with CBD was 64 years with a disease duration of 6.6 years [18b].


A study from the United Kingdom found that an age-adjusted prevalence of PSP is approximately 5 per 100 000 [19, 20]. Men appear to have a slightly higher incidence of PSP. A study in the United States showed an average annual incidence rate of 5.3 per 100 000 person-years, and incidence was higher in men than women [21]. Most patients with PSP are affected in the sixth decade of life, with ages of presentation ranging from the 50s to the 60s [22, 23].


Studies of the MAPT gene (MAPT) reveal overrepresentation of the H1 MAPT haplotype in both CBD and PSP [24, 25]. Association between the H1/H1 genotypes also occurs with FTD [26, 27] and primary progressive aphasia [28]. H1/H1 is the common genotype found with near 100% prevalence in Japanese and approximately 70% in Caucasians [29, 30]. In one cohort of 64 Caucasian patients with PSP, the prevalence of the H1 haplotype was greater than 90%, with 87.5% H1/H1 and 12.5% H1/H2 [24].


Clinical features of corticobasal syndrome


In the 1980s, clinicians in the movement disorder community suggested that CBD was a progressive neurodegenerative condition characterized by asymmetric parkinsonism, apraxia, myoclonus, dystonia, and alien limb syndrome [1–3]. Clinicopathological studies eventually demonstrated that the CBS clinical syndrome poorly predicts CBD pathology [14]. Despite CBD’s initial characterization as a movement disorder, CBD also manifests frontal lobe degeneration presenting with cognitive and behavioral symptoms [8, 31], with motor symptoms sometimes emerging only during advanced disease stages [8, 32–35]. Thus, the absence of early motor findings does not exclude CBD from the picture. Moreover, features of bvFTD, nfvPPA, and CBS may overlap or evolve within individual patients throughout the disease course [33, 36]. The three main clinical presentations of CBD include a motor syndrome with prominent, early executive dysfunction, nfvPPA, and bvFTD [8]. Case studies are presented below as examples.


Correlation between CBS and CBD


Clinicopathological correlation studies attest to the significant challenges of diagnosing CBD. Autopsy studies demonstrate that the sensitivities of CBS for CBD are poor ranging from 31 to 56% [8, 32, 34, 43]. The pathologies underlying CBS are protean and include CBD, tauopathies other than CBD (including PSP, Pick’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and parkinsonism linked to tau mutations on chromosome 17 (FTDP-17)), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43) immunoreactive inclusions (FTLD-TDP), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease [38–40, 43–46]. Recent autopsy series have shown that underlying CBD pathology is found in only 35–55% of all patients who present with CBS during life [8, 38, 40, 44, 47, 48]. PSP pathology commonly manifests as CBS with one study citing nearly 50% of 21 CBS patients with PSP at autopsy [40].


Conversely, many patients with autopsy-confirmed CBD are not suspected of having the disease during life [38, 44, 47, 49, 50]. As described previously, the clinical presentations of CBD are heterogeneous and include bvFTD, nfvPPA, PSP syndrome, Parkinson’s disease (PD), AD, and occasionally posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) [8, 40, 49, 51, 52], rendering diagnosis challenging. Based on 267 pathologically confirmed CBD cases, new criteria for possible and probable CBD have been established [18b]. These 2013 criteria for possible CBD include insidious onset and gradual progression, with symptoms lasting at least 1 year, with one of four clinical syndromes (possible corticobasal syndrome, frontal behavioral–spatial syndrome or nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia, PSP syndrome) with an additional feature of CBS. The more stringent criteria for probable CBD include those for possible but also require age at onset to be greater than 50 years and no family history of similar conditions or known tau mutations [18b]. Future studies are necessary to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the new CBD criteria.


Despite attempts to characterize symptoms and signs predictive of CBD pathology, the overlap of these symptoms and signs with other neurodegenerative diseases makes pathological prediction at the bedside extremely challenging. Although cortical symptoms and signs for CBD have historically included visuospatial deficits, limb apraxia, and cortical sensory loss, these parietal lobe-associated features are not specific for CBD pathology and are common in AD [8]. Although memory and visuospatial deficits in CBS may suggest underlying AD in group studies, it remains unclear how such deficits improve diagnosis at individual patient level [8]. Motor symptoms in CBD may be absent up to 8 years after symptom onset, and motor symptoms classically associated with CBS are not exclusive to CBD pathology, presenting in similar rates in patients with CBS with underlying AD, PSP, FTLD-TDP, or mixed pathologies [8]. Quantitative eye movement studies of CBS suggested that saccadic eye movement latency is increased with relatively preserved velocity in CBD [53–57, 57a], although an eye movement study of autopsy-proven CBD suggests similar saccadic latency and velocity compared with controls, but impairments on an antisaccade task [57b]. This contrasts with the saccadic eye movement changes in PSP, in which the velocity of movements are slowed with relatively preserved latency [53, 54, 57b].


Neuropsychological testing in patients with CBS shows impairments in attention, executive function, and/or language impairments, with memory relatively less affected [8, 32, 34, 50, 58–60]. Although some studies have demonstrated that poorer performance on visual and verbal memory measures suggests underlying AD pathology in CBS [8, 46], the utility of neuropsychological testing in predicting CBD pathology remains unproven for individual patients.


Although the symptoms, signs, and neuropsychological profile described previously have been associated with CBD, they are variably present in individual patients. In patients with CBS, the presence or absence of any specific clinical sign or symptom does not reliably predict CBD pathology [8]. Furthermore, although asymmetry has been stressed as a core feature of CBD, several studies have revealed that CBD can emerge with symmetric parkinsonism and with symmetric brain degeneration [8, 61–63].


Clinical features of progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome


Progressive supranuclear palsy was first defined as a neurodegenerative syndrome consisting of supranuclear vertical gaze palsy, axial dystonia with a hypererect posture, bradykinesia, rigidity, and early falls [9]. In 1996, clinical consensus criteria for PSP syndrome defined core features as a progressive course of impairment beginning after the age of 40, with supranuclear gaze palsy, slowing of vertical saccadic eye movements, and postural instability with falls in the first year of onset (Table 7.1) [12].


Case study

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 18, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on 7: Corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access