Jordan A. Guntin, Benjamin Khechen, Brittany E. Haws, Kaitlyn L. Cardinal, and Kern Singh
8 Spinous Process Fixation Systems
8.1 Introduction
Spinous process fixation is another method utilized to provide spinal stability following interbody fusion. These devices are designed to provide additional stability through interspinous fusion.1Many interspinous fixation devices (IFDs) also provide interspinous process spacing, which can provide further decompression.1Additionally, the placement of this device only requires a single midline incision, which may make it a more expedient procedure compared to standard pedicle screw fixation. Surgical indications are presented in ▶ Table 8.1.
8.1.1 Interspinous Fixation Device Components
IFDs contain plates that clamp to the lateral aspects of adjacent spinous processes (▶ Fig. 8.1).2The clamps are often fixed to the spinous processes through the use of rivets or spiked plates. By securing segment motion posteriorly, an IFD can provide rigidity to the two adjacent vertebrae to which it is secured.2IFDs can be composed of a variety of materials, including polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium.
Table 8.1 Surgical indications for interspinous fixation devices
Indications
Posterior approach spinal fusion
Thoracic procedures
Lumbosacral procedures
Degenerative disk disease
Spondylolisthesis
Spinal fracture/dislocation
Spinal tumor
8.1.2 Outcomes
Spinous process fixation has exhibited promising outcomes with regard to its efficacy. Previous studies have demonstrated similar fusion rates when utilizing either supplemental spinous process fixation or pedicle screw fixation.1,3,4Additionally, IFDs have exhibited comparable rigidity to pedicle screws, especially in flexion–extension movements of the lumbar spine.5,6This is supplemented with evidence of reduced motion at adjacent segments, suggesting a reduced risk for adjacent segment disease when IFDs are utilized.1However, the literature is limited regarding high-quality comparative studies. Few studies have examined the complication profile of IFDs.1Furthermore, evidence regarding long-term outcomes and benefits of IFDs has not been addressed.1As such, the literature is inadequate to identify the true advantages of IFDs over other methods of fixation.
8.2 Spinous Process Fixation Systems
Table 8.2 Alphatec Spine BridgePoint® Spinous Process Fixation System
Design
Device type
Fixed
Composition
Titanium alloy
Specifications
Angulating and telescoping plates enhance device fit and promote fusion
Modular aspects and variations
Widths
Small: 35–40 mm Medium: 40–45 mm Large: 45–50 mm
Angulation
±14°
Compression/distraction
Telescoping plates provide up to 5 mm adjustment
Procedures
MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression
Radiographs unavailable
Supplemental fixation system
Alphatec Spine Illico® Posterior Stabilization System
Table 8.3 Globus Medical SP-Fix™ Spinous Process Fixation Plate
Design
Plate type
Fixed
Composition
Titanium and PEEK
Specification
Zero-step locking mechanism expedites the implantation process
Modular aspects and variations
Rod sizes
25, 30, 35 mm
Barrel heights
8–20 mm (2-mm increments)
Plate lengths
35–47 (3-mm increments), 50, 55 mm
Angulation
±15°
Procedures
MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression
Radiographs unavailable
Supplemental fixation system
Globus Medical REVOLVE® Posterior Stabilization System
Table 8.4 NuVasive Affix® II Spinous Process Plate Device
Design
Device type
Fixed
Composition
Titanium alloy
Plate lengths
35–55 mm (10-mm increments)
Specifications
One-step insertion and self-locking mechanism
Procedures
MIS TLIF, MIS posterior decompression
Radiographs unavailable
Supplemental fixation system
NuVasive Precept® Posterior Stabilization System
Table 8.5 OsteoMed PrimaLOK™ SP Interspinous Fusion System