Abstract:
This chapter aims to provide a holistic view of the management of the chronic problems of individuals with nervous system impairments, with consideration given to the effects of aging and compensation over time. Movement emerges from the interaction among the individual, task, and environment, with several variables and degrees of freedom. Therefore physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) need to examine and address multisystem impairments and contributions to movement while appreciating the changing dynamics of a highly complex movement system influenced by aging superimposed on the body system impairments and functional limitations from an existing central nervous system dysfunction.
Keywords:
adaptation, aging, chronic impairments, fatigue, health promotion, postpolio syndrome
Objectives
After reading this chapter the student or therapist will be able to:
- 1.
Analyze how the aging process may affect people with lifelong functional limitations and challenges in life participation.
- 2.
Analyze the unique challenges faced by people with chronic motor impairments such as those associated with cerebral palsy, developmental disabilities, postpolio syndrome, spinal cord injury, and traumatic or acquired head injury during the aging process.
- 3.
Evaluate this population of patients/clients with sensitivity and skill, incorporating precautions and effectiveness of interventions.
- 4.
Provide a framework for the examination process for individuals with chronic conditions.
- 5.
Present holistic intervention considerations for individuals with chronic motor impairments.
- 6.
Identify gaps in knowledge and research in the management of aging individuals with chronic neuromuscular conditions.
- 7.
Appreciate the complexity of examination, evaluation, and management of the aging patient with chronic motor impairments.
Improvements in health care delivery, research, medicine, nutrition, and knowledge of health and physical activity have resulted in a new challenge for health care professionals—a growing population of individuals who have sustained an initial injury to the central nervous system (CNS) with resulting secondary impairments and functional limitations and who are now experiencing the added effects of aging.
The aging process typically leads to gradual physiological changes in muscle strength, flexibility, and joint mobility, and changes in balance and endurance. Physical activity and a healthy lifestyle have been shown to address age-related changes by delaying the decline and deterioration; however, age-related changes such as osteoarthritis and vascular changes are still likely to occur to varying degrees despite a healthy lifestyle. Healthy but sedentary older individuals report more problems in activities of daily living (ADLs) than do those who continue to be physically active and who previously had an active lifestyle.
To compound the aging process, chronic diseases (multimorbidity or comorbidity), disability, and frailty are common issues that are on forefront of health prevention and rehabilitation. While multimorbidity, disability, and frailty have considerable similarities and have been used interchangeably at times, these terms are conceptually distinct.
Broadly, the presence of a number of health conditions is common among many of the definitions of multimorbidity, but the cut-off point, or the minimal number of conditions, is inconsistent. No consensus on the definition of multimorbidity currently exists. Broadly, multimorbidity has been defined with the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases, while others have specified a number of chronic diseases that constitute multimorbidity. Frailty, a clinically recognizable geriatric syndrome of increased vulnerability from age-associated declines in function and reserve across multiple systems, results an increased risk of physical decline with aging and or further health stressors. , The overlap among frailty, multimorbidity, and disability is conceivably seen in the initial description of the frailty phenotype by Fried and colleagues. , , Since then, evidence has shown that these entities are interrelated but are distinct from each other. , ,
In an otherwise relatively healthy aging adult, the development of multimorbidities or frailty, coupled with decreased physical activity, may lead to limitations on activity and community participation. Consider that in an individual with a preexisting chronic nervous system condition and functional limitations, the aging process may present new or additional losses of components of functional activities and participation in an already taxed body—a new challenge to the individual who may have had the opportunity to successfully participate in life activities after the CNS injury. Individuals with existing disabilities undergo a similar aging process; however, the typical changes associated with aging are superimposed on the body system problems and functional limitations caused by the initial CNS injury.
In the realm of chronic problems in life participation, individuals who had polio in their younger years give clinicians an enlightening example of the chronic interaction among neurological impairments, recovery, activity limitations and participation restrictions, effects of aging, and health care. As a chronic condition, individuals who dealt with polio can teach therapists to reconsider and reevaluate their approach to individuals who are now aging and likely experiencing new activity limitations, impairments, and ineffective postures and movement. The challenges of aging with chronic body system impairments are encountered by individuals who acquired CNS insult at birth (developmental conditions such as cerebral palsy [CP; see Chapter 10 ]) and those who acquired injury through disease or trauma sometime in the life-span development process (those who have post-polio syndrome [PPS], traumatic brain injury [TBI], multiple sclerosis [MS], and spinal cord injury). This chapter focuses on aging with chronic CNS conditions in the latter classification.
The discussion of aging with chronic disease brings several questions to the forefront:
- •
What is the course of age-related medical conditions common in individuals with chronic impairments?
- •
Do age-related conditions vary among the developmental/genetic diseases or among conditions occurring at one point during the life-span?
- •
What is the prevalence and/or incidence of secondary medical conditions in individuals with chronic impairments?
- •
Have specific treatment protocols for health provision for this population been identified?
- •
What is the state of dissemination of information related to aging and health to people affected by these conditions?
- •
How has the effect of aging with chronic body system problems changed the ability of these individuals to participate in life, as well as their perceived quality of life?
As an emerging population, individuals with chronic impairments have not been on the receiving end of much research. Much of what is known about nervous system disorders is in the pediatric realm and in the initial stages of care immediately after the initial injury or diagnosis. Only recently have studies begun to look at the health care implications of aging with chronic conditions. Therefore definitive answers to the questions posed previously are still nonexistent or in the early stages of conception. Based on a review of existing literature, the consensus appears to be that there is a dearth of definitive information on the health status and effect of age-related processes among individuals with chronic conditions from developmental or genetic disorders, or from disease or injury sustained at one point in the life-span, such as TBI or MS. Moreover, there is agreement that further evidence-based research is needed in this emerging population.
This chapter aims to provide a holistic view of the management of the chronic problems of individuals with nervous system impairments, with consideration given to the effects of aging and compensation over time. Movement emerges from the interaction among the individual, task, and environment, with several variables and degrees of freedom. Therefore physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) need to examine and address multisystem impairments and contributions to movement, while appreciating the changing dynamics of a highly complex movement system influenced by aging superimposed on the body system impairments and functional limitations from an existing CNS dysfunction.
Diagnoses with underlying chronic consequences
Developmental conditions
With increasing life expectancy, mainly as a result of innovations in health care, a unique group of individuals with chronic conditions are subject to age-related changes. Individuals with developmental disabilities constitute a growing segment of the aging society. This is a broad topic, in part because of the many conditions that are categorized as developmental disability. According to the Developmental Disabilities and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 developmental disabilities are severe, chronic functional limitations attributable to mental or physical impairments or a combination of both, that manifest before age 22 years and that are likely to continue indefinitely. These result in substantial limitations in three or more of the following areas: self-care, receptive and expressive language, learning, mobility, self-direction, capacity for independent living, and economic self-sufficiency. These individuals also have a continuous need for individually planned and coordinated services. The definition envelops a wide range of conditions leading to significant and lifelong disabilities. This group includes those with genetic and neurological conditions, which includes CP.
The question of whether unexpected changes among people with neurodevelopmental disabilities occur as they age and how these changes compromise functioning with progressive aging is of massive importance with the emergence of a population of individuals with developmental disabilities with increased life expectancy and concurrent increase in age-related diseases. According to Heller the number of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities aged 60 years and older is projected to nearly double from 641,860 in 2000 to 1.2 million by 2030 owing to increasing life expectancy and the aging of the baby boomer generation. With the aging of adults with developmental and genetic disorders, a new societal issue looms, as individuals with developmental disabilities have a lifelong need for external support. Much is unknown about the long-term effects of aging and maturation in adults with these conditions.
Adults with several types of developmental disabilities have life expectancies similar to those of the general population, excluding adults with particular neurological conditions and with more severe cognitive deficits. Recent studies show the mean age at death ranges from the mid-50s for adults with severe disabilities to the early 70s for those with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities.
Concurrent with an increased life-span, some evidence exists that certain individuals with developmental disabilities have experienced an increase in age-related diseases. Of the limited information available, research has shown that aging affects certain genetic and neurologically based intellectual and developmental disabilities that may increase the risk of age-related pathologies and lead to an increased occurrence of coincident conditions. Among several developmental conditions, Down syndrome (DS) has been the subject of a substantial body of research. DS is known for resulting in advanced aging, which includes a higher risk for Alzheimer’s disease and select organ dysfunctions.
CP is considered a life-span disability, and evidence exists that adults with CP lose functional abilities earlier than individuals who are able-bodied. In addition, evidence is also increasingly pointing to specific age-related outcomes such as the effects of deconditioning, limitations with performance reserve, and possibly a shorter life-span. In adults with CP, secondary conditions commonly described in research primarily are related to the long-term effects on the musculoskeletal system, such as pain, degenerative joint disease, and osteoporosis. , , Secondary impairments in CP can progress subtly and may not appear until late adolescence or adulthood. Age-related health conditions are also seen in other genetic and neurological disorders as the affected individuals age. However, the nature of these risks lacks extensive substantiation in the literature.
Overall, knowledge of adult health issues for adults with developmental disabilities is limited. Several reasons contribute to the lack of knowledge. Limited health care programs exist for this population, likely because this is an emerging population. Most of the existing literature deals with pediatric domain issues rather than dealing with age-related issues. Although these individuals were likely seen by therapists for various functional limitations throughout their lives, the professional training that health care providers have received regarding the care of these individuals has focused on early childhood and school-aged children. As a result, many adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities have difficulty accessing appropriate health care information regarding secondary conditions resulting from their specific disabilities. Moreover, in general, older individuals with developmental disabilities have more difficulty in finding, accessing, and paying for high-quality health care. Communication difficulties also limit the understanding of the experiences of aging adults with developmental disabilities. Evidence exists, however, showing that obesity and inactivity are more common in individuals with developmental disabilities than in the general population. Bazzano and colleagues identified several reasons for this health discrepancy, including individual and community factors, physical challenges, segregation from the community, lack of accessible fitness facilities and developmentally appropriate community programs, and cognitive deficits.
Given trends of increasing survival and longevity observed among individuals with developmental disabilities, it is sensible to consider a more in-depth look at the aging process among a variety of neurodevelopmental conditions and the need for a holistic approach. Although some literature exists regarding life-span changes with these disorders, particularly DS and CP, there is lack of confirming evidence for most of these conditions. Horsman and colleagues advocate for research on the expectations regarding aging for adults with CP, including preventive measures to lessen the effects of secondary impairments. This recommendation applies to developmental life-span conditions and other chronic conditions that are subject to age-related changes that may be magnified or made worse by existing impairments and limitations. Evidence-based research is necessary to better understand the long-term effects of aging on adults with developmental and chronic conditions. The challenge then is to provide a holistic examination that involves a multisystem approach and to provide appropriate referrals as necessary to address the multiple needs of individuals with developmental disabilities.
Acquired neurological conditions: Spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, postpolio syndrome
In the realm of management of chronic movement dysfunction, PPS—the late effects of polio—becomes a model case for other chronic neuromuscular conditions. There is much to learn from the complex nature of the late effects of polio and the effects of aging on an already stressed system. The cause must be briefly discussed to further understand the possible effects of aging. PPS can affect polio survivors years after recovery from the initial polio infection and is characterized by multifaceted symptoms that lead to decline in physical functioning. PPS manifests with progressive or new muscle weakness or decreased muscle endurance in muscles that were initially affected by the polio infection and in muscles that were seemingly unaffected; generalized fatigue; and pain. The exact cause of PPS remains unknown on the basis of review of the literature. Although it is not clear what exactly causes the new symptoms, there appears to be a consensus that insufficient evidence implicates the reactivation of the previous poliovirus. Underlying causes have been proposed in a variety of hypotheses from several authors, with aging playing a key role.
The suggestion that aging contributes to PPS is supported in the literature. , , By the fifth decade of life, loss of anterior horn cells begins, and by age 60 years the loss of neurons may be as high as 50%. Age-related changes superimposed on the already limited motor neuron pool after polio appear to be important factors in the development of PPS. With the effects of the normal aging process, the remaining anterior horn cells are further reduced to a point at which the deficits caused by the initial insult cannot be overcome. The loss of even a few neurons from a greatly exhausted neuronal pool potentially results in a disproportionate loss of muscle function. , The loss of motor neurons from aging alone may not be a considerable factor in PPS because studies have failed to link chronological age and the onset of new symptoms. Rather, it is the length of the interval between the onset of polio and the appearance of new symptoms that seems to be more critical.
Another plausible hypothesis alludes to overuse and fatigue of the already weakened muscles as a factor in the development of new muscle weakness. , , A study by Trojan and colleagues provides support to this hypothesis. Their results suggest that length of time since acute polio, joint and muscle pain, physical activity, and weight gain are factors associated with PPS. Years of overuse after recovery from polio causes a metabolic failure leading to an inability to regenerate new axon sprouts. The exact cause of degeneration of axon sprouts is not known. Evidence to support this hypothesis can be inferred from muscle biopsies, electrodiagnostic tests, and clinical response to exercise. McComas and colleagues suggested that neurons that demonstrated histological recovery from the initial virus were possibly not physiologically normal and were potentially vulnerable to premature aging and failure.
Other proposed hypotheses include the persistence of dormant poliovirus that was reactivated by unknown mechanisms, an immune-mediated response, hormone deficiencies, and environmental contaminants. Another hypothesis points to the loss of anterior horn cells during the initial polio as a factor. , Findings from Trojan and colleagues support the hypothesis that the severity of the initial motor unit involvement, seen as weakness in acute polio, is critical in predicting PPS. Individuals at greatest risk for PPS had severe attacks of paralytic polio, although individuals with milder cases also had symptoms. These hypotheses have not been completely examined, and currently the evidence is not strong enough to support any one possible cause. Clinically it is difficult to assume that only one factor causes symptoms. The chronicity of the disease lends weight to the possibility that more than one factor contributes to the individual’s symptoms.
Medical practitioners must consider the effects of existing comorbidities and aging in the examination and management of PPS. The complexity and nonspecificity of symptoms warrant consideration of all possible contributors to the symptoms of PPS. Based on the recent literature, there appears to be some confusion regarding terminology pertaining to PPS. Compounding the general symptoms are the common problems in aging: decreasing muscle strength and endurance, joint problems, and a myriad health deficits leading to functional losses. Physiological aging, overuse, and comorbidities play contributory roles in disrupting the state of stability after the initial infection.
McNaughton and McPherson state that the simple descriptive labels “late problems after polio” and “of late deterioration after polio” are less limiting and do not imply a direct link with the previous polio diagnosis. Post-Polio Health International uses the terminology “late effects of polio and polio sequelae” as the most inclusive category. Late effects of polio and polio sequelae pertain to health problems that are a result of chronic impairments from polio and may include degenerative arthritis from overuse, bursitis, or tendinitis. A subcategory under this heading is “PPS leading to decreased endurance and decreased function.”
Currently no definitive test exists in the literature to diagnose the late effects of polio or PPS. It remains a diagnosis of exclusion, and as such, the diagnostic process for PPS is challenging and may be long. Halstead and Gawne identified cardinal symptoms of PPS as new or increased muscle weakness, fatigue, and muscle and joint pain with neuropathic electromyographic changes in an individual with a definite diagnosis of polio. Diagnostic electromyography (EMG) may be required or used when the muscle pattern or history is atypical.
The criteria most commonly used for establishing a medical diagnosis of PPS were developed by Halstead and is recommended by the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) , :
- 1.
A confirmed history of paralytic polio in childhood or adolescence
- 2.
Partial to complete muscle strength and functional recovery after the acute paralytic poliomyelitis
- 3.
A period of at least 15 years of neurological and functional stability
- 4.
Gradual or sudden onset of two or more new health problems: muscle weakness or abnormal muscle fatigability with or without generalized fatigue, muscle atrophy, weakness in the limb(s), or muscle and joint pain.
- 5.
Symptoms persist for at least 1 year
- 6.
No other medical conditions to explain these new health problems
Dalakas identified additional inclusion criteria in the diagnosis: residual asymmetrical muscle atrophy, with weakness, areflexia, and normal sensation in at least one limb and normal sphincteric function and deterioration of function after a period of functional stability unexplained by primary or secondary condition.
Several individuals who recovered from polio during the early epidemics were encouraged to exercise for years and to use heroic compensatory methods for function. An exhaustive regimen of daily stretching and strengthening, demanding compliance from individuals and their support systems, was strongly encouraged. Orthotics and assistive devices were promoted as a means toward independent mobility. The outcomes of rigorous training were individuals who adapted and compensated with their remaining capabilities. Compensations include use of muscles at high levels of their capacity, substitution of stronger muscles with increased energy expenditure for the task, use of ligaments for stability with resulting hypermobility, and malalignment of the trunk and limbs. With the late effects of polio or a diagnosis of PPS, many of these individuals may have extreme difficulty dealing with these new problems because of the attitude of “working hard” to reeducate weakened muscles and compensate for loss of function after the initial diagnosis. The new symptoms of PPS, which limits their motor function and likely impairs established personal and societal roles, require that they not work hard or overexert themselves. These two approaches are contradictory and can leave an individual frustrated and confused over therapeutic recommendations.
Spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury
For people with SCI and TBI, a trend is seen toward increasing awareness on the effects of aging on the functional status of this group. Owing to medical advances, patients are now living 20 to 50 years past their time of injury. Numerous studies have been done describing quality-of-life issues for people with TBI; however, those studies seldom look specifically at changes in functional levels or what can be done to ameliorate the declines.
Signs of “premature aging” in multiple organ systems in people with SCI have been supported in literature. In a review of 92 studies by Jensen and colleagues, the findings indicated several salient points about the aging adult with SCI: many secondary health conditions occur with aging, many at higher rate compared to the typical population; pain, bowel and bladder impairments, muscle spasms, fatigue, esophageal symptoms, and osteoporosis are the most common conditions reported; and several chronic health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, bone mineral density loss, fatigue, and respiratory complications or infections, occur with higher frequency in older individuals or those with longer SCI duration compared with younger individuals or those with shorter SCI duration.
McColl and colleagues, studying the impact of aging on people after SCI, echo the major categories of problems related to aging, such as musculoskeletal problems and joint, sensory, and connective tissue changes; chronic urinary tract infections; heart, respiratory, and other chronic diseases; secondary complications of the initial lesions, such as syringomyelia; and problems related to social and cultural acceptance and access or barriers. Evidence on specific age-related changes is presented in the section on examination.
Decreases in perceived health status and in functional abilities with increases in additional assistance for ADLs have been documented for aging individuals with SCI. In a study of 150 people aging with an SCI, nearly 25% reported decreases in the ability to perform functional activities that they had been able to handle after the acute rehabilitation phase. The subjects who reported decreases in functional ability were generally older (45 years compared with 36 years) and had longer postinjury periods (18 vs. 11 years). The most common symptoms reported by the individuals with decreases in functional status were related to fatigue, pain, and muscle weakness. The ADLs reported to be more difficult were transfers, bathing, and dressing. To maintain their functional levels, those with declines in functional ability reported needing additional equipment.
The need for further assistance with ADLs was echoed in a study by Gerhart and colleagues of individuals with SCI 20 years after the initial injury. The study showed that 22% of the subjects reported an increased need for support with ADLs. Compared with a general group of nondisabled men and women aged 75 to 84 years in which 78% of the men and 64% of women did not need help with ADLs, the population of people with SCI needed increasing support to remain independent, and the need for help occurred at a younger age. On average, those with quadriplegia required more help with ADLs around the age of 49 years, whereas those with paraplegia were able to maintain their functional level until age 54 years. The groups showing functional decreases reported greater fatigue, increased muscle weakness, pain, stiffness, and weight gain. Other studies support the findings that 5, 10, and 15 years after the initial SCI, an association with the need for additional help with increasing age existed.
Liem and colleagues, referencing an international data set of people with SCI, investigated a subset of 352 people at least 20 years after their injury. Increased help with transfers and housework were needed by 32% of the subjects, compared with their functional abilities at acute hospital discharge. With increasing age, women had a higher incidence of reported musculoskeletal impairments, which may have been related to biomechanical differences between men and women (e.g., 40% lower upper body strength).
In addition to the need for ADL support, neurogenic bowel and bladder symptoms also worsen with age in some people with SCIs. With changes in general health status, polypharmacy, decreased activity, and poor nutritional patterns, bowel problems (particularly constipation) become more of an issue. Although constipation seems like a minor issue relative to paralysis, those with SCIs report significant abdominal distention and pain, an increased incidence of perineal and sacral skin breakdown, and in some cases autonomic dysreflexia. In addition to the discomfort of chronic bowel dysfunctions, the required bowel care programs may take more time, which can lead to increased psychosocial issues associated with anxiety about bowel accidents in social and work situations. Additionally, these programs may take time away from social activities for both the person with an SCI and the caregiver. For those with continuing bowel problems that interfere with life and work activities, a colostomy may be an option that increases independence from caregiver support during the bowel program. Another complicating factor related to bowel dysfunction is the typical treatment for pain complaints. Because the origin of pain is often illusive, the most common treatment involves oral medications rather than referrals for therapeutic interventions. Pain medications, especially opioids, increase gastrointestinal difficulties in nondisabled populations, and the problem for patients with SCI is compounded.
Charlifue and colleagues, drawing on the National Spinal Cord Injury Database of 7981 individuals with SCIs that occurred from 1973 to 1998, found a slight decrease in perceived health status the longer one lived after SCI. Evidence was also found that those injured later in life had a higher number of rehospitalizations after injury than those injured at a younger age. Despite palpable problems with the statistical issues within the sample, the study clearly indicated that the best predictor of a complication is a previous history of that complication. On the basis of their results, Charlifue and colleagues suggest that prevention of complications is the best approach to improve quality of health and quality of life for people aging with SCI.
In addition to many multisystem impairments that occur in this population, a recent study confirmed a high occurrence of cardiovascular risk factors among older adults with long-term SCI. In 123 older adults (mean age: 63 years) with SCI with a mean time of 24 years since injury, the median number of risk factors was 3. The presence of these risk factors in individuals with existing disabilities can pose additional consequences to their health and must be addressed.
Across the literature, a call for further research and a need for longitudinal studies is a consistent recommendation. Research is needed to help understand when problems are most likely to emerge in the aging process, to identify modifiable factors can be targeted in this population, what prevention strategies may be efficacious, and to develop and test the efficacy of interventions to address and potentially prevent secondary health conditions.
Individuals with TBI are often neglected by professional health care and insurance providers after the acute rehabilitation period. According to Levin, before 1980, individuals with brain injuries were considered “dead on arrival.” People who would have died from the TBI several decades ago are now living into old age and are coping with the changes caused by the aging process superimposed on their physical limitations and cognitive problems. Of great concern is the possible relationship between a history of brain injury and increased cognitive changes along the dementia continuum. Cognitive decline in the nondisabled population is a problem, but the additive effect for a person with a previous TBI may seriously impair the person’s coping mechanisms when dealing with his or her own health and self-care needs. TBI was found to be an independent significant risk factor in developing dementia even in mild TBI. A meta-analysis in 2017 of 32 studies showed that head injury was associated with increased risks of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Further, recent TBI with loss of consciousness acquired in older adulthood has been associated with an increased risk for mortality.
Extensive work has been done on rehabilitation programs and quality-of-life issues related to head injury and, to a lesser extent, cerebral vascular accidents. Unfortunately, the focus of rehabilitation after a TBI has been on the acute and rehabilitation stages of treatment and not the chronic problems that follow this group of patients into their older years. As with other chronic conditions, few patients see a therapist after they are discharged from rehabilitation unless they have new acute events such as musculoskeletal problems or a medical condition that causes a change in functional status.
Although TBI is a lifetime disability, little attention has been paid to the needs of aging people with a TBI who may have recurring needs for physical and cognitive rehabilitation and retraining over the life-span. Individuals who sustain a TBI later in life years will likely have different needs from those injured at a younger age. In a study on the effect of age on functional outcome in mild TBI, Mosenthal and colleagues found that those injured later in life (after age 60) had longer inpatient rehabilitation periods and lagged behind younger patients in functional status at the point of discharge; however, similar to the younger individuals who sustained a head injury, the over-60 individuals showed measurable improvement during the 6-month study period. Therefore aggressive management of older patients with TBI is recommended, and older patients may require continuing management owing to the overlying issues of the aging process. This is echoed in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus document on the treatment of people with TBI, which suggests that specialized interdisciplinary treatment programs need to be put in place to deal with the medical, rehabilitation, family, and social needs of people with TBIs who are over the age of 65 years. The document also concludes that access to and funding for long-term rehabilitation is necessary to meet long-term needs; however, it recognizes that changes in payment methods by private insurance and public programs may jeopardize the recommendations.
Although the authors of the NIH document recognize the need to deal with the aging processes associated with TBI, there continues to be a lack of services and trained professionals available, especially at the community level. As with the SCI population, work is now being done to investigate the relationships among TBI, aging, and health. Breed and colleagues found that older individuals with TBI were more likely than their age-matched nondisabled peers to report metabolic, endocrine, sleep, pain, muscular, or neurological and psychiatric problems. Their findings support those of Hibbard and colleagues and Beetar and colleagues, which suggest that medical personnel need to be prepared to treat a broad range of health issues in the aging TBI population. Fewer of the studies on long-term outcomes and issues in TBI extend to the 10- and 15-year postinjury periods that have been examined for patients with SCIs. In studies 5 years after the initial TBI, improvements in physical and social functions were noted in most areas for at least the first 2 years after injury, with the exception that those with a history of alcohol or drug abuse did less well. One could assume that continued abuse of alcohol or drugs would bode ill for individuals aging with a TBI. In one study of 946 children and adolescents who sustained a TBI, Strauss and colleagues found that patients with severe and permanent mobility and feeding deficits had higher mortality rates, with a 66% chance of surviving to age 50 years. In contrast, survivors with fair or good mobility had a life expectancy only 3 years shorter than that of the general population. However, because both severely and mildly injured individuals with a TBI can live well into and beyond their 50s, the impact of aging on the physical and cognitive deficits must be dealt with assertively to prevent superimposed disability.
Because aging individuals with an SCI or a TBI may have health problems similar to those of any aging population, primary impairments in muscle strength and endurance may be magnified. Therefore individuals with these chronic conditions who make repeat visits regarding medical problems such as musculoskeletal, cardiac, respiratory, and renal diseases should be referred for a comprehensive therapy examination and program that focuses on education, lifestyle changes, and health and wellness promotion interventions.
Examination of individuals with chronic impairments
The National Council on Aging (NCOA) approximates 80% of older adults have at least one chronic disease and 77% have at least two. The statistics on chronic disease continue to grow with a current estimate of approximately 45% or 133 million of all Americans having at least one chronic disease. Conditions are diverse and may be related to trauma or chronic conditions such as MS. Trends of increasing survival and longevity are now being observed among individuals with chronic conditions as they experience aging processes. Given the huge financial, human resource, and health costs of chronic disease, it is timely to consider how to manage individuals with chronic impairments.
Examination of individuals with chronic impairments and disabilities is challenging to say the least. Not only are the impairments and activity limitations diverse, but the combinations of these impairments and limitations are many and unique to each individual owing to societal, personal health, environmental, and psychological considerations. Moreover, the effects of aging will likely affect individuals differently depending on existing impairments, functional limitations, current health status, and each individual’s attitude toward health and maintaining their functional status and lifestyle. This entails a more thorough, methodical, multisystem examination with a meticulous health interview and wellness model.
Examination: Systems model
Aging with existing neuromuscular disorders, be it from a late-onset pathology or from a developmental condition, is a challenge for both the individual and the health care professional. There is a small body of literature on the later-life complications of early-onset acquired disabilities. Several problems may result from complex interactions among physical, medical, environmental, behavioral, and psychosocial factors.
Aging may confound late-onset symptoms or magnify the deficits from the initial CNS insult. With the trend of increasing longevity and survival rates from improvements in health care, it is necessary to look at how the health care provider approaches the examination of individuals with chronic impairments and activity limitations. As individuals with chronic neuromusculoskeletal impairments age, there will be an increasing number of comorbidities, and sorting out the cause of each new symptom will be increasingly complicated.
Bottomley identifies essential components of a comprehensive geriatric assessment as psychosocial, functional, mental, and social health elements. These components are applicable to individuals with chronic neuromuscular impairments, who with aging are experiencing new symptoms or a magnification of preexisting impairments. Box 35.1 shows a sample examination template for this population.
Examination: Systems model
- •
Examination guidelines, include nutritional and sleep screen
- •
Movement observation
- •
Health history
- •
Systems review
- •
Tests and measures
- •
Musculoskeletal: strength, range of motion, power, and muscle length
- •
Balance and coordination
- •
Pain
- •
Tone
- •
Cardiovascular and pulmonary function
- •
Integumentary
- •
Cognition and mental function
- •
Mobility
- •
Posture
- •
Sensory deficits
- •
Sleep
- •
Temperature intolerance
- •
Psychosocial considerations
- •
Functional assessment
- •
Challenges of examination of individuals with chronic conditions
Assessment of individuals with chronic nervous system conditions is challenging because of the diversity of impairments, the nonspecific nature of symptoms, and the complex interaction of several factors, including the heterogeneous effects of aging. Depending on their underlying health conditions, individuals with chronic conditions may have higher risks than others of developing preventable health problems. In comparing nondisabled individuals with people with disabilities, Iezzoni and O’Day found that the latter group is much more likely to have higher obesity and overweight rates and higher rates of depression, anxiety, and stress. Of adults with major physical and sensory impairments, 27% are obese, compared with 19% of those without major impairments. Of individuals with major difficulties in walking, 34% reported frequent depression or anxiety, compared with 3% among those without disabilities. Information on predisposition to conditions such as these is important for the health care provider during the health interview and examination process.
The examination of individuals with chronic impairments presents a different challenge than examining patients or patients with acute diagnoses. For both cohorts, the task of the health care provider is to determine the effect of the active pathology on the varied systems and function. However, for the individual with chronic impairments, an added challenge exists: the impact of the active pathology can be seen with the underlying preexisting deficits in function and/or impairments that may leave the individual with a narrow margin for health.
Individuals with developmental and genetic disabilities and with conditions acquired through diseases or trauma sometime in the life-span have activity limitations and participation restrictions that are diverse and unique to each individual. Therefore some individuals may have higher risks than others of developing certain preventable health problems or may be more susceptible to developing secondary conditions owing to the long-term effects of the primary impairments from the original health condition.
The absence of specific medical diagnostic tests adds to the dilemma, as does the continuing uncertainty of the underlying cause and the lack of curative intervention. Health care professionals’ limitations in knowledge of age-related medical disorders that are common in people with these conditions, including the prevalence and incidence of medical conditions with neurodevelopment disabilities also add to the complexity. Box 35.2 provides several important pointers for examining this population of patients and patients.
- •
Comprehensive: A systems approach to address the number, complexity, and diversity of the deficits is a must. Essential components are physical, functional, mental, and social health.
- •
Interdisciplinary: Consideration for the functional, medical, vocational, and psychosocial issues warrants a coordinated evaluation of a team versed in addressing the unique needs of individuals with chronic neuromusculoskeletal conditions and disabilities.
- •
Patient/client-centered: Factors that influence performance, such as fatigue, must be considered during the examination. Recognition of the individual’s and family’s values and goals is essential.
- •
Thorough: Assessment may take several hours and extend for two to four visits , to better integrate the evaluation process and allow the patient to fully participate, contend with the recommendations, and engage in long-term management.
The individual with chronic impairments who is currently facing an active pathology likely has adapted to his or her existing system impairments and activity limitations. Depending on their underlying health conditions, some individuals with chronic conditions may have higher risks than others of developing preventable health problems. Thus from an examination viewpoint, the critical task of the health care provider is determining what new changes to the individual’s current abilities and disabilities have been brought on by the active pathology. These changes will likely affect the current functional abilities (e.g., mobility, ADLs), as will preexisting system impairments such as deficits in strength and endurance, pain, and so on. Regardless of the level of deficit, these individuals have some prior knowledge of deficits that affect function, which may help or may hinder their willingness to participate.
On the other hand, for the patient/client who has been otherwise healthy and functional and now has an acute diagnosis, active pathology may bring on impairments and limitations that are “new” experiences to the individual. The level of education should thus be adapted to the individual, and education performed on a case-by-case basis.
Moreover, the psychosocial aspect of a new pathology and its effect on function may be very different in an individual who has dealt with chronic impairments and limitations versus one who has been active up until the disease process. As with the level of education, the health care provider’s approach to a patient/client should always be professional and respectful, with open lines of communication and active listening.
PTs may develop diagnostic focuses based on movement dysfunction, activity limitations, and impairments, different from those by OTs. These variances depend on the functional activity limitations identified by the patient and the professional. ,
It is critical for the clinician to examine all possible contributors to symptoms reported by the individual with chronic impairments. A thorough review of systems may identify symptoms that are related to the primary medical diagnoses, but equally important, it may identify symptoms that are associated with one or more existing comorbidities that have developed over time since the initial nervous system insult.
Health history
Therapists typically collect health history information as part of a comprehensive examination. The history information along with the symptom investigation and review of systems and physical examination will provide guidance in the differential diagnosis process and in the choice of examination and intervention techniques.
The information from the history will be useful in determining the possible cause of current difficulties or symptoms for which the patient/client is now seeking intervention ( Box 35.3 ). Fatigue or pain may be present from unnecessary and inefficient movement strategies or from high levels of activity. Information on the habitual sleeping, sitting, standing, and walking postures along with ineffective use of devices may alert the clinician to possible factors contributing to the patient’s current symptoms or difficulties.
- •
Demographics, include body mass index
- •
Growth and developmental history (particularly in those diagnosed with developmental disabilities and those with acquired diagnoses such as polio in childhood or spinal cord injury as an adolescent)
- •
Past medical-surgical history: Include information on interventions and outcomes from initial diagnosis
- •
Family medical history: Critical in ruling out possible contributors to symptoms such as pain from rheumatoid arthritis; critical for possible genetic contributor to original diagnoses
- •
Social and vocational history: Include work status, modifications to work or home environment, and support system
- •
Living environment: Include adaptive equipment, modifications done or necessary to home
- •
General current health status: Include nutritional and sleep information
- •
Current functional status, activity level, and perceived quality of life
Systems review
A systems approach to the examination is essential because individuals with chronic conditions have a multitude of possible impairments with superimposed age-related conditions. This situation is best illustrated when examining individuals with PPS. The patient presentation in this condition is a complex interaction of all systems along with the effects of aging, previous interventions, and environmental, psychosocial, and medical aspects of care. The initial diagnosis of polio, which is critical in the diagnostic criteria, will need to be established. This may be difficult because approximately 10% to 15% of individuals who were believed to have or were diagnosed with polio did not have it, and some individuals with mild weakness were diagnosed as having nonparalytic polio. ,
Chapter 7 of this text discusses the review of systems as a vital component in the PT’s role in medical screening and differential diagnosis. OTs are responsible for this same vital component. Possible multisystem involvement warrants review of all systems to determine if current problems are associated with existing comorbid conditions or occult disease or are indeed late manifestations of the initial disease process, as in the case of polio.
Providing further substantiation for the need for a methodical and multisystem approach are findings of high rates of secondary conditions related to obesity and inactivity common in individuals with developmental disabilities. These secondary conditions include type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome, diagnoses that affect multiple systems. Individuals with developmental disabilities also have four to six times the preventable mortality of the general population. , As therapists are entering into the decade of becoming primary care providers, anyone with a preexisting functional problem may walk into a PT or OT clinic searching for help. The importance of medical screening cannot be overemphasized.
The nonspecificity of symptoms seen in individuals with chronic movement dysfunction lends credibility to the need for review of all body systems. Fatigue, for example, a symptom frequently seen in individuals with chronic conditions such as MS and PPS, among others, is associated with several systems, such as endocrine, nervous, psychological, and cardiopulmonary.
Tests and measures
Through system assessment by the PT and/or OT, each individual with chronic movement problems should have an opportunity to participate in development of a unique clinical profile. This profile should reflect the strengths and limitations of that individual. Simultaneously these data should aid both the patient and the therapist in identifying realistic treatment goals and selecting the most appropriate intervention strategies. The choice of outcome measures will depend on the individual’s current functional skills, the medical status, and the desires and expectations of the individual. Because the severity of symptoms is variable and nonspecific, the clinician is strongly urged to perform a thorough examination and take into consideration factors that may influence performance specific to that individual’s functional impairment problems, such as fatigue and pain.
Critical to the examination process is the determination of secondary conditions. Secondary conditions have been defined as injuries, body system impairments, functional limitations, or disabilities that occur as a result of a primary condition or pathology , as well as physical problems that were caused by small insults to one of the body systems not related to the primary condition. Musculoskeletal problems account for many of these secondary conditions; thus the musculoskeletal examination is of critical importance in individuals with developmental disabilities. Gajdosik and Cicerello outlined numerous conditions that may affect the adult with CP; some can lead to significant loss in function and pain from complications such as fractures and osteoporosis. Other musculoskeletal conditions, including scoliosis, subluxations, dislocations, patella alta, foot deformities, pelvic obliquities, and contractures, further complicate the life progression of an adult with developmental disabilities. Frequently these chronic conditions may have their origins in childhood, but because of the lack of sensory awareness may go undetected until later adolescence, adulthood, or well into advancing age when the body no longer has the ability to compensate for these abnormal biomechanical forces. Furthermore, as the aging process progresses, less regeneration of damaged tissue occurs, leading to greater cumulative trauma in joints and other load-sensitive structures. Again, these conditions need to be closely monitored over time to ensure appropriate intervention, optimizing an individual’s function and minimizing damage to various tissues.
Fatigue
Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms reported by individuals with chronic conditions such as PPS and MS. Movement and performance of daily activities are more energy-consuming for individuals with disabilities and may cause greater fatigue. Evidence also points to individuals with disabilities aging faster than those without disabilities; cardiovascular data from individuals with SCI indicate that people with SCI may age faster than those without SCI. , Cook and colleagues identified the lack of age-specific general population norms as an obstacle in the understanding and estimation of the influence of aging on the fatigue of individuals with neuromuscular conditions.
It is likely that an earlier increase in fatigue with age might be observed in other chronic neuromuscular conditions; however, the effects of chronological age on fatigue in individuals with disabilities are not entirely clear. In a recent study, Cook and colleagues assessed fatigue and age in four clinical populations of individuals with PPS, SCI, MS, and muscular dystrophy (MD), comparing self-reported fatigue experience in different age cohorts with age-matched, US population norms. A total of 1836 surveys were used in data analysis.
The authors concluded that individuals with disabilities reported higher levels of fatigue than the general US population, regardless of age or disability type. Interestingly, the authors noted that the causes of fatigue likely vary by disability type—that is, MS, PPS, and MD are more likely to cause fatigue through a combination of central neurological processes, the effect of sleep disorders such as periodic limb movements (PLMs), or increased physical effort, whereas in SCI fatigue may be a side effect of medications or result from sleep disorders.
Results revealed not only that individuals with disabilities have a higher risk of experiencing fatigue than those without disabilities, but also that the risk for increased fatigue, compared with normative values, increases with age. The reported mean fatigue levels were the highest observed in older PPS age cohorts among the disability samples. In the MS group, fatigue was higher than in any other clinical group except PPS. The highest fatigue reported in the MS sample was in the 35- to 44-year-old age cohort, with lower fatigue in older cohorts except for those 75 years of age and older, but the older group had a small sample size. In the SCI group, peak reported fatigue was in the 55- to 64-year-old age cohort. The results for the SCI group younger than 55 years old were very similar to those for the general population.
In the general population, very little change in fatigue levels for most adults was found moving from young (65 years) to middle (75 years) old age, whereas in the disability samples the authors saw a slight but consistent increase toward greater fatigue at this point in the life-span. This increase in fatigue could be associated with current physical decline associated with disease progression. The authors concluded that more research is needed to determine the specific effects of fatigue on the functioning of people aging with disabilities and to further explore interventions that may shield against or reduce any negative effects that occur.
Bruno and colleagues state that fatigue has been identified as the most commonly reported, most debilitating, and least studied symptom in the postpolio sequelae. Generalized fatigue is typically described as overwhelming exhaustion or flulike aching accompanied by marked changes in level of energy, endurance, and mental alertness. The lack of energy with minimal activity is often described as “hitting a wall,” thus the term “polio wall.” Polio survivors differentiated between the fatigue associated with weakness and a “central fatigue” that leads to attention and cognitive problems. Severe fatigue affects not only physical function but mental function as well—hence the controversial suggestion that the fatigue associated with postpolio is caused by impaired brain function rather than the diffuse degeneration of motor units and motor junctions.
Descriptors for fatigue associated with PPS are significantly different. The fatigue of PPS may not appear at the time of the activity, and recovery does not occur with typical rest periods. It has also been described as a sudden and total wipeout. In a few instances headaches and sweating appear, suggestive of autonomic nervous system overload. Fatigue commonly occurs in the late afternoon or early evening. Fatigue that tends to last all day is atypical in PPS and should alert the therapist to consider other possible diagnoses.
Similar to the fatigue of PPS, MS fatigue profoundly disrupts multiple aspects of general well-being. Krupp reported that 67% of individuals with MS reported fatigue as a major limiting factor in their social and occupational responsibilities compared with no reports in healthy adults. The fatigue of MS is unique in that it is exacerbated by heat, as are many MS symptoms. Fatigue may be acute, chronic, or intermittent or persistent, whether related to a specific diagnosis such as MS, CP, or polio or having no relation to the initial medical diagnosis. It is necessary to consider the role of other symptoms related to the specific medical diagnosis during the examination of fatigue.
The evaluation of fatigue includes the various factors that can induce or worsen fatigue. The history and examination also are used to assess for new medical diagnoses or the possibility of infection, an impending relapse, heat exposure (in the case of MS), and side effects from medications.
Differential diagnoses for fatigue are extensive and may include disorders of several systems, including psychological, cardiopulmonary, neurological, and endocrine disorders, and medication use. Specific conditions that may cause fatigue include depression, myasthenia gravis, hyperparathyroidism, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, cancer, and infections. Numerous medications commonly used in symptom management can cause fatigue, including antispasticity agents, tricyclic antidepressants, and β-blockers. The challenge is to differentiate the fatigue caused by typical activities from the fatigue of chronic conditions.
Pain
Individuals with chronic diseases often have pain as a common symptom, most likely from long-term atypical biomechanical forces on joints and muscles or from long-standing disease processes. Many developmental disabilities have a component of disordered movement, from hypomobility in the case of DS to hypermobility in the case of spastic CP. These abnormal joint stresses and strains cause long-term damage to the musculoskeletal system. , , The natural degradation of joint structures with aging coupled with weakness and atypical ground reaction forces leads to higher incidence of musculoskeletal pain.
Pain that occurs with chronic conditions may be muscular, joint-related, or both. The source of pain needs to be considered because pain may limit the individual’s functional abilities and lead to further decline. Muscle pain is often described as a deep, aching pain similar to the pain experienced during the initial infection. The pain is frequently aggravated by physical activity, stress, and cold temperature. Pain is unusual in that it does not occur at the time of activity but rather 1 to 2 days after a precipitating event.
Joint pain in itself usually results primarily from long-term microtrauma from abnormal biomechanical forces. An example might be the overuse of the shoulder girdle muscles and joint from a lifetime of use of Lofstrand crutches to compensate for lower-extremity impairments after polio. Joint pain is frequently associated with physical activity but is rarely associated with inflammation. Interventions are complicated by the presence of osteoporosis, lack of compensatory substitutions to rest the injured part, and, often, poor response to exercise. Failing joint fusions, uneven limb size, progressive scoliosis, poor posture, and abnormal mechanics may also contribute to pain.
Although pain is not a hallmark of many chronic conditions such as DS and MS, it may occur in some individuals with long-term impairments and thus should be part of a comprehensive examination. Pain frequently associated with MS is related to postural problems and inefficient use of muscles and joints to compensate for loss of function or spasticity.
More than 65% of individuals with PPS have reported neck, shoulder, and back pain radiating to the hip and leg. This pain is expected because the incidence of major postural abnormalities and gait deviations is also high, as shown in Table 35.1 and Box 35.4 .
Posture | Abnormal Deviation | No. | % |
---|---|---|---|
Sitting ( n = 111) | Absent lumbar curve Forward head (loss of cervical curves) Uneven pelvic base a Structural scoliosis | 64 50 29 38 | 54 45 26 34 |
Standing ( n = 76) | Absent lumbar curve Uneven pelvic base a Weight bearing on stronger leg | 52 40 29 | 68 53 38 |
Walking ( n = 76) | Abnormal gait deviations Major lateral trunk oscillations Obvious forward lean | 76 33 40 | 100 43 53 |
- •
Fatigue
- •
Pain
- •
Respiratory complaints
- •
Sleep disorders
- •
Depression
- •
Falls
- •
Musculoskeletal conditions
- •
Cardiovascular dysfunction
- •
Diabetes
- •
Bladder dysfunction
- •
Integumentary impairments
Differential diagnosis for acute muscle and joint pain includes consideration of chronic musculoskeletal conditions leading to wear and tear and disorders with significant muscle or joint manifestations. The list is extensive and may include osteoarthritis, tendinitis, bursitis, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and polymyalgia rheumatica. The challenge is determining whether muscle or joint pain occurs from long-term wear and tear or from an acute or exacerbating occurrence.
Strength
Examination of strength is another critical component of the examination of individuals with chronic impairments. Long-standing weakness is an expected occurrence from decreased physical activity common in individuals with disabilities and chronic diseases. Strength deficits may result from several causes other than disuse, such as upper motor neuron weakness, fatigue, compensatory movements, pain, or spasticity. It is likely, however, that aging individuals with chronic conditions have adapted to the initial weakness associated with their diagnoses, as in the case of people with SCI or PPS who have led productive and functional lives since the initial diagnosis or acute onset.
Typical aging involves the losses of muscle strength, loss of power, and sarcopenia—processes that may intensify or build on the initial losses of strength. Delineation of weakness from age-related processes versus weakness as part of the disease process or that from lack of physical activity common in people with chronic impairments is difficult if not impractical from both research and clinical perspectives. Too many variables need to be controlled and accounted for unless specific muscle groups were examined initially and the findings well documented, which may have been the case for people with PPS. Many individuals with PPS have extreme difficulty dealing with these new problems because they were taught that hard work was the only way to correct physical problems that followed acute polio. These new problems, which also limit motor function, require that these individuals not work hard. These two concepts are contradictory and can leave an individual frustrated and confused over therapeutic recommendations.
Manual muscle testing of the entire body, although time-consuming, may be necessary to determine the muscular involvement. Muscle testing, however, may not always reveal the full extent of muscle involvement, and functional assessment may provide a better picture of individuals’ potential and true difficulties. Performance and participation in daily activities will provide a better picture of a person’s strengths and impairments. Therefore current functional activities are critical in determining whether current mobility difficulties are related to the aging process, represent an exacerbation of initial disease processes such as in PPS, or are signs and symptoms of new medical concerns.
Weakness and Postpolio syndrome.
Weakness may occur in both previously affected and clinically unaffected muscles; however, it is primarily prominent in muscles most severely affected in the initial infection. It is typically asymmetrical and may be proximal, distal, or patchy. Weakness is primarily observed in repetitive and stabilizing contractions rather than with single maximum efforts. The decreased ability of the muscles to recover rapidly after contracting may be a factor. Recovery of quadriceps muscle strength after fatiguing exercise was significantly less in symptomatic PPS subjects compared with asymptomatic and control subjects. Overuse of muscles in relation to their limited capacity has long been associated with these new problems. New weakness and atrophy have been attributed to metabolic overload of the giant motor units, with more pruning of muscle fibers than axon sprouting. ,
New muscle involvement may also cause signs and symptoms such as muscle fasciculations, cramps, atrophy, and elevation of muscle enzymes in the blood. Yet many of these physical signs and symptoms are also present in other neuromuscular problems such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Fasciculations occur at rest and during contraction and tend to persist even when muscle pain and fatigue have been resolved. Muscle cramps are common in fatigued muscles and are alleviated by decreased activity. The new weakness may or may not be accompanied by atrophy. New postpolio muscular atrophy of muscles is sometimes reported. It is very noticeable when it occurs in the gastrocnemius or the anterior tibialis owing to the effect on everyday ambulation. Elevation of muscle enzymes, indicative of muscle damage, has been found in individuals with PPS and has been related to the intensity of work. , ,
Gross muscle testing may mask the true involvement because several muscles that were initially believed to be uninvolved were truly subclinically affected by polio. The pattern of definitive manual test findings (spotty, flaccid, and asymmetrical paresis or paralysis) is also used to confirm the initial polio diagnosis.
Several polio survivors are able to function at high levels of activity with few strong muscle groups as a result of the random, diffuse nature of the motor deficits and the body’s ability to compensate with uncommon muscle and joint function. This delicate balance may be maintained for years, and a disruption from late-onset weakness of a significant muscle group can lead to disproportionate functional losses.
Superimposed pathological problems have been proposed as a possible cause of the later exhibition of new signs and symptoms in postpolio survivors. Several conditions may contribute to weakness, including arthritis, fibromyalgia, deconditioning from disuse, and coronary heart disease.
Range of motion and muscle length
Limitations in joint motion from muscle contractures and from shortening of ligamentous joint structures are common in individuals with chronic disabilities. Likewise, hypermobile joints may also result from compensatory techniques forcing more mobility. An evaluation of the individual’s activity levels and goals is vital before intervening with muscle and joint deficits. In some instances, during the convalescent stage of the initial diagnoses, as in polio or SCI, selective tightness was allowed to give some stability to joints with paralyzed muscles. In addition, the body may develop useful contractures to maintain or regain function. The presence of spasticity, particularly in severe cases, may have also contributed to the development of contractures in older adults with CP, SCI, MS, or TBI. Before making attempts to stretch contractures, therapists should carefully evaluate the functions that may be lost if gains in range of motion (ROM) are achieved. Equally important is to evaluate what functions would be gained and what the cost would be. Consider that after 20 to 40 years these contractures resist any significant elongation, and aggressive intervention may cause more harm and loss of function.
Box 35.5 lists the secondary conditions that may develop in an individual with CP. These impairments not only cause pain but also limit mobility and interfere with performance of ADLs and leisure activities. Thus a thorough evaluation of musculoskeletal status and periodic monitoring are imperative to maintaining quality of life and social participation for these individuals.
Pathological conditions
Fractures
Osteoporosis
Cardiovascular disorders
Degenerative joint disease
Spinal cord compression
Dental problems
Seizures
Pulmonary dysfunction
Impairments
Constipation
Contractures
Depression
Emaciation
Obesity
Incontinence (bowel and bladder)
Pain
Ulcers
Dysphagia
Gastrointestinal problems
Low self-esteem
Nerve entrapments
Overuse syndrome
Balance problems
Functional limitations or activity restrictions
Inability to indicate toileting needs
Dependence on others for activities of daily living
Limitations in mobility
Difficulties using public transportation
Disabilities or limitations in life participation
Difficulties living independently
Limited recreational opportunities
Problems with social relationships and intimacy
Social isolation
Difficulty with role as patient when medical professionals fail to make accommodations for treatment
Underemployment
Tone
Examination of tone is a focal component of the examination of individuals with chronic neuromuscular conditions. This group of individuals may demonstrate a wide range of tone deficits from hypotonia seen with DS, to hypertonicity seen in people with TBI, SCI, MS, or CP, to a mixed type with episodes of high and low tone.
Spasticity can interfere with mobility and may coexist with weakness. It may cause pain and atypical postures, predispose the individual to contractures (particularly those with severe spasticity), and interfere with hygiene and self-care. On the opposite end of the tone spectrum, people with DS have hypotonia that may or may not limit mobility. Tone deficits in DS are not a primary limiting factor to mobility and physical activity, as the characteristic finding of marked hypotonia tends to gradually diminish with age.
Cognitive function
Cognitive deficits may be a major disabling feature in genetic and developmental conditions such as DS and CP. Similarly, cognitive dysfunction may be a key symptom in chronic conditions such as MS, TBI, and SCI. The degree of cognitive deficits affects not only health management, but also the long-term planning for aging processes in people with chronic disabilities and conditions. The need for lifelong external support is a considerable issue for those who are unable to independently care for themselves as they age. The degree of cognitive deficits in this population may range from memory deficits to mental retardation; the degree of cognitive and perceptual deficits determines participation in functional activities and self-care, mobility, compliance, and even health status.
Standardized outcome measures exist to measure cognitive impairments; the examiner is cautioned to consider the validity and reliability of outcome measures for specific populations before use. The reader is referred to chapters discussing specific diagnoses for detailed outcome measures. Because cognition is multidimensional, examination for deficits will need to be directed at different components of cognition. Screening may be as simple as a three-item recall or short questions determining the ability to follow commands, attention, level of consciousness, orientation, judgment, construction, and higher memory function.
Mobility and posture
In individuals with chronic impairments, addressing inefficient alignments and postures is of critical importance, particularly if this area was not addressed early in their care. The dire effects of such malalignments and compensations described in the following paragraphs eventually affect functional abilities.
Asymmetrical or abnormal gait patterns, crutch walking, and propelling manual wheelchairs for several decades are frequently the major sources of the pain, weakness, and fatigue in people with chronic movement dysfunctions after a medical problem such as TBI, SCI, CP, PPS, or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The incidence of pain in a group of 114 patients with confirmed PPS increased from 84% in those who were ambulatory without orthotics to 100% in those who used crutches or wheelchairs for locomotion. A high prevalence of osteoarthritis in patients with PPS was documented in the hand and wrist by radiography. More than twice the number of subjects with PPS had osteoarthritis of the wrist or hand than would be expected in a healthy population of the same age. The risk factor was significantly increased with lower-extremity muscle paralysis and use of assistive devices.
In an electromyographic study of walking in patients with PPS, Perry demonstrated overuse and substitution activity of the vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, and gluteus maximus muscles when the soleus is nonfunctional. Such substitution and overcompensation in the long term, however, lead to microtrauma of ligaments and joint structures and exhaustion of neuromuscular units.
In addition to sitting in poorly supporting chairs, sofas, auto seats, and wheelchairs, the individual with chronic impairments may have trunk muscle paresis or asymmetries of the pelvic base and may spend up to 16 h/day in the seated position. The typical posture is slumped, hanging on posterior vertebral ligaments with loss of lumbar and cervical curves. Neck, shoulder, and back pain are therefore commonly reported.
Levels and types of mobility will be diverse in individuals with chronic neuromuscular impairments. Mobility may range from independent ambulation to gait with an assistive device all the way to wheelchair dependency, depending on existing impairments and cognitive function. Thorough examination should determine the current mobility levels and possible modification needs depending on new impairments or functional limitations. It may be necessary to include a seating examination in people who are wheelchair dependent or sit for the majority of the awake hours.
Balance and coordination
Deficits in balance and coordination in individuals with chronic conditions predispose these people to falls and limit safe mobility. As individuals with these conditions age, typical age-related changes in balance may add to the existing deficits and magnify functional limitations and impairments. Coordination and balance deficits need to be examined under functional conditions and in the context of the individual’s daily activities. Standardized outcome measures are also available to objectively measure impairments; however, the reliability and validity of such measures in specific populations may be deficient. The use of outcome measures may provide a multidimensional look into deficits and provide objective baseline measures to track progress with intervention as well as progression of the movement dysfunction.
Environmental temperature intolerance
Consideration for the effects of heat and/or cold may be necessary when working with individuals with chronic diseases, and the examination must include a component of temperature intolerance. Two specific diagnoses embody this phenomenon: PPS for cold intolerance and MS for the negative effects of environmental heat.
Regulation of body temperature is often a problem for individuals with MS (see Chapter 17 ). Earlier, it was noted that a feature of fatigue unique to MS is that the fatigue is exacerbated by heat. Other MS symptoms may also be aggravated by heat. The Uthoff phenomenon is an adverse response to external heat, causing fatigue or deterioration of symptoms; it often occurs with exercise. Specific recommendations for cooling during exercise intervention may be necessary to counteract the deleterious effects of heat. It is important that the examiner meticulously determine during the health interview the symptomatic effects, if any, of increased temperature in the aging individual with MS.
Sensory deficits per se are not hallmark features of polio; however, cold intolerance is a commonly reported late-onset symptom. Involved extremities in individuals with PPS are frequently abnormally cold as a result of sympathetic nerve cell involvement leading to decreased vasoconstriction and venoconstriction with heat loss to the environment. The impairment may become worse with PPS. Environmental adaptation can create an easy solution to this problem as long as the individual with PPS is aware first of the problem and second of the adaptations necessary to avoid thermoinstability within the extremities. Preventing versus responding to the inadequate vasoresponse to cold empowers the individual to develop environmental control.
Sleep disturbances
It is common knowledge that older individuals report and manifest sleep disorders. , Thus this impairment certainly can be associated with aging individuals with chronic movement dysfunction. Disturbances in sleep are a common symptom in people with chronic neuromuscular diseases. Sleep deprivation is a contributing factor to fatigue in individuals with MS. Similarly, more than 50% of individuals with PPS have been found to have sleep disturbances. These disturbances may be caused by pain, stress, hypoventilation, or obstructive apnea. Bruno proposed a high incidence of abnormal movements in sleep in nearly two thirds of polio survivors, with 52% reporting sleep disturbance caused by these movements. All seven of subjects with PPS in the study demonstrated abnormal movements in sleep. The author points to the importance of eliminating sleep disorders as a cause of fatigue before the diagnosis of postpolio sequelae is made, particularly because it remains a diagnosis of exclusion.
In addition to the typical symptoms of muscular weakness, pain, and fatigue associated with PPS, some individuals also develop sleep disorders such as PLMs. PLMs in sleep are repetitive episodes of muscular contractions with durations of 0.5 to 5 seconds; frequencies of five or more per sleep hour are deemed pathological. The association of PLMs with insomnia or daily sleepiness suggests the diagnosis of PLM disorder. Whereas PLM has been related to the pathophysiology of PPS, the occurrence of PLM in PPS is not well known. In a recent retrospective study of 99 patients with PPS, researchers assessed the frequency of PLMs during sleep, including other sleep-quality variables such as total sleep time, efficiency of sleep, apnea-hypopnea index, and awaking index. Sixteen patients showed a PLM index that was considered pathological. The authors concluded that a close relationship between PLM and PPS exists; however, the prevalence of PPS with or without PLM and its combination with apnea-hypopnea is not clearly established, a finding in agreement with the conclusions of Jubelt and colleagues. ,
A thorough history and review of systems including a sleep history may reveal the potential causes and guide the therapist in the clinical decision making process for referral and consultation. Sleep apnea, which occurs frequently in polio survivors, and other sleep disorders, including abnormal movements in sleep, may be revealed with specific questioning, triggering the referral process. The therapist plays a role when the sleep disorder is associated with the area of pain management.
Life-threatening conditions
Limited knowledge exists of adult health issues for older individuals with developmental disabilities. Secondary medical conditions warrant further examination, particularly in aging adults with chronic conditions. Acute onset of new symptoms may suggest exacerbation of disease or decreased functional reserves or may arise from long-standing effects of impairments from the initial disease process.
In the case of PPS, bulbar muscle dysfunction may also result from the new weakness. Life-threatening conditions such as hypoventilation, dysphagia, sleep apnea, and cardiopulmonary insufficiency require management by medical specialists. , , These problems occur in people with previous bulbar poliomyelitis who may or may not be using ventilatory assistance and in those with severe kyphosis or scoliosis. Respiratory failure may occur primarily in individuals with residual respiratory insufficiency and minimal reserves.
Functional assessment
Performance in functional activities often provides a better picture of the losses stemming from chronic impairments. Decreases in strength are not usually revealed in a single-effort maximum contraction such as required in the manual muscle test. Resistive force during testing is a necessary element for two grades, 5 (normal, “N”) and 4 (good, “G”), whereas the other four grades are nonresistive and mostly nonfunctional, and few examiners are now tested for reliability. In a 1-year follow-up using quantitative muscle force testing, no differences were found in muscle strength, work capacity, endurance capacity, or recovery from fatigue of the quadriceps in either asymptomatic or symptomatic groups with PPS. Nevertheless, there is at best a slow decline in functional ability, which patients may describe as loss of muscle strength. Clinically, individuals seeking therapy report functional loss or limitation more easily than a specific loss of muscle strength.
Functional assessment of individuals with chronic movement limitations provides a more practical and clearer picture of the abilities and limitations related to the initial condition or stemming from new impairments. Functional activities are visible and reportable performances of relevant tasks in the context of the individual’s culture. Functional tasks imply a specific goal and can range from simple to complex activities. In functional motor performance, the specific task and environmental context is as important as the individual functional movement (refer to Chapter 8 ). Consideration for these factors is necessary during examination. Detailed functional assessment is outlined by Howle and Zabel.
Functional limitations are difficulties in performing specific tasks. Difficulty in performing daily tasks including mobility and transfers may stem from overuse of muscles and joints that are already performing beyond their typical use, pain, fatigue, muscle weakness, weight gain, cognitive impairments, and decreases in functional endurance, among others. It can be logically inferred that individuals living with chronic movement impairments will reach a tipping point at which the performance of current activities will be hindered, or the way activities are performed will require modification.
Decreases in functional activities over time for varied chronic conditions , , have been documented in the literature. As early as 5 years and up to 20 years after the initial SCI, individuals have reported decreases in functional activities and increased need for assistance with ADLs. An association with the need for increasing support with advancing age in individuals with SCI is seen in the literature.
According to Agre and Rodriguez, postpolio survivors with significant weakness perform daily activities at a different level of effort than other individuals; muscles of polio survivors may have to work near maximal effort during activities that individuals without polio can execute at relatively lower levels of effort. Individuals with PPS commonly report difficulty in walking, stair climbing, and dressing. Westbrook described a 5-year follow-up study examining physical and functional abilities and health status of 176 individuals with PPS. During the course of the study, most subjects reported increases in muscle weakness, muscle and joint pain, and changes in walking. Notably, the participants reported more difficulty in four of the eight daily living activities (stair climbing, walking on level surfaces, transfers in and out of bed, and meeting the demands of home or work). Most of the participants (87%) also reported problems in meeting the demands of their job and completing household tasks. Clearly, the ability to perform motor tasks essential to completing one’s goals and desires is multifactorial. Therefore functional limitations are usually related to a combination of systems impairments.
In people with PPS, to determine whether the cause of the new weakness is overuse or possibly disuse, a detailed assessment is required of home, work, recreational, and community activities. This paradigm of multidimensional assessment is applicable to all individuals with chronic movement problems. If the patient is merely asked what his or her activity level is, the response may lead to assumptions that weakness is from disuse. With specific questioning, one usually finds that the patient is doing an extraordinary amount of physical activity. It is vital to establish a total picture of the patient’s activities in sitting, standing, walking, lifting, carrying, climbing stairs, using a telephone or a computer, and performing daily activities such as self-care and home management.