Clinical Vignette

A 62-year-old female first noted difficulty walking over uneven ground. Progressive painless weakness developed over the course of the next 6 months; initially this affected the left leg more than the right, resulting in a number of falls. By the time she was evaluated by a neurologist, she could no longer cut her own food or clip her own finger nails. She denied any pain, sensory disturbance or change in her ability to think, speak, swallow, or breathe.

Etiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis

The cause of sporadic ALS is unknown. As with other neurodegenerative diseases, it is hypothesized that ALS may result from the dual insult of genetic susceptibility and environmental injury. Attempts to identify predisposing mutations and potential toxic or infectious agents have been unsuccessful to date.

It has been long recognized that a small percentage of patients (fALS) have an autosomal dominant pattern of Mendelian inheritance. A major breakthrough in our understanding of familial ALS took place in 1991 with the identification of cytosolic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene mutations on chromosome 21q22.11 in affected individuals in some families. This represents the most frequently identified form of fALS. SOD1 is a free radical scavenger. Recognition of the SOD1 mutation led to the hypothesis that SOD1-fALS was mediated by free radical toxicity. However, SOD1 knock-out mouse with no SOD1 protein do not develop motor neuron disease. In contrast, heterozygote mice become symptomatic and die from a paralyzing disorder. It is thought that SOD1 mutations may injure neurons through conformational changes in the SOD1 protein.

Particularly intriguing has been the recognition of the phenotypic heterogeneity in SOD1 fALS (Table 67-1). About 114 pathologic mutations have been identified within the five exons of the SOD1 gene; each of these mutations may produce a distinct phenotype. The most common mutation found in North America is an alanine for valine (A4V) substitution at codon 4; this typically produces a lower motor neuron dominant phenotype (LMN-D) with a life expectancy approximating 1 year. Table 67-1 summarizes the phenotypic heterogeneity that results from different SOD1 mutations. SOD1 mutations are not fully penetrant. It is estimated that individuals carrying the mutation have an 80% chance of developing disease by age 85 years. SOD1 mutations constitute 20–25% of all individuals with fALS. Other fALS genotypes are listed in Table 67-2. Some of these mutations produce a predominantly lower motor neuron (LMN) or upper motor neuron (UMN) disorder and more closely resemble the phenotypes of spinal muscular atrophy or hereditary spastic paraparesis, respectively.

Table 67-1 Phenotypic Variation in SOD1 fALS

Table 67-2 Current Classification of fALS

Mutations that may produce both a frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neuron disease occur on chromosomes 9p13.2-21.3, 9q21-q22, and 17q21. A recently identified fALS mutation occurs in the TAR DNA-binding protein, 43 (TDP-43) gene. Non-amyloid, structurally modified TDP-43 has been recognized as a major constituent of the ubiquitinated inclusions found in cortical neurons of patients with both sporadic (s) and familial (f) forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTD).

There are many proposed mechanisms for motor neuron death in sALS, including excitotoxicity secondary to glutamate, free radical–mediated oxidative cytotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, protein aggregation, cytoskeletal abnormalities, aberrant activation of cyclo-oxygenase, impaired axonal transport, activation of inflammatory cascades, and apoptosis. Why the motor neurons and corticospinal/bulbar tracts are vulnerable in a selective manner remains unknown. Why the disease begins focally and progresses in a regional fashion is also unknown. One putative hypothesis is that misfolded, toxic protein aggregates may proselytize normal protein in adjacent neurons, analogous to mechanisms proposed for prion diseases.

Whatever the mechanism, ALS is pathologically characterized by loss of myelinated fibers in the corticospinal and corticobulbar pathways (see Fig. 67-2) and loss of motor neurons within the anterior horns of the spinal cord and many motor cranial nerve nuclei. Even in individuals with predominantly UMN or LMN involvement clinically, pathologic involvement of both systems is seen. Patients with associated FTD have preferential lobar atrophy and neuronal loss from these portions of the brain (Fig. 67-3). As a result of anterior horn cell loss, ventral roots become atrophic in comparison to sparing of their dorsal root counterparts (Fig. 67-4). Anterior horn cell loss occurs within virtually all levels of the spinal cord with selective sparing of the third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerves, and Onuf’s nucleus within the anterior horn of sacral segments 2–4. There is also cell preservation within the intermediolateral cell columns.

Figure 67-3 Frontotemporal Atrophy.

Figure 67-4 Dorsal and Ventral Roots and Ventral Horn.

The majority of sALS patients will be found to have ubiquitinated inclusions and Bunina bodies within the central nervous system. The latter are dense granular intracytoplasmic inclusions within motor neurons considered specific for ALS. Additionally in ALS with FTD, spongiform changes of the first and second layers of the frontal cortex have been described.

Clinical Presentations

The diagnosis of ALS remains a clinical endeavor. EMG and nerve conduction studies and measurements of ventilatory capacity are routinely obtained in ALS suspects. These tests are done to provide diagnostic support for diffuse LMN and ventilatory muscle involvement respectively. Other testing is done with the primary intent of identifying or excluding differential diagnostic considerations. SOD1 mutational analysis provides diagnostic proof in patients with suggestive family histories. Although a small percentage (2%) of seemingly sALS patients will be found to have SOD1 mutations, mutational analysis is not routinely recommended in this population.

The presenting features of ALS are quite variable. Typically, the patient seeks medical care when his or her weakness begins to affect activities of daily living (Fig. 67-5). It is not uncommon for ALS to be misdiagnosed initially and the time between symptom onset and diagnosis is usually months. Unfortunately, there is a tendency to misdiagnose ALS as a potentially treatable nerve, nerve root, or spinal cord compressive syndrome or orthopedic condition. A significant percentage of ALS patients may undergo unnecessary surgeries. It should be emphasized that progressive weakness and atrophy in the absence of pain and sensory symptoms rarely represents a surgically treatable condition.

Figure 67-5 Motor Neuron Disease: Early Clinical Manifestations.

The exclusive motor involvement and the chronologic course serve to distinguish ALS from other neurologic disease. Simultaneous involvement of both UMNs and LMNs and progression both within and outside of the originally involved regions is necessary for a definite clinical diagnosis. LMN involvement may be documented by clinical, electrodiagnostic, or pathologic (muscle biopsy) means. UMN involvement is currently defined by clinical criteria alone. Classic ALS is usually an easy diagnosis for an experienced neurologist. Diagnosis may be delayed in patients with limited clinical evidence of the LMN or UMN involvement, slow disease progression, and confounding neurologic signs from unrelated problems such as sensory loss from mononeuropathies, radiculopathies, and polyneuropathies.

The signature of anterior horn cell loss is painless weakness and atrophy, hypoactive or absent deep tendon reflexes, and fasciculations. Atrophy is best appreciated when it is focal, in contrast to normal muscle bulk elsewhere. It may be difficult to distinguish atrophy from LMN disease resulting from the atrophy of disuse, particularly in the elderly. Suppressed deep tendon reflexes may also be difficult interpret as they may represent a normal variant. In ALS, muscle weakness due to LMN dysfunction occurs in a segmental (myotomal) distribution and spreads in a regional fashion. As an example, a patient with ALS and hand weakness may have all hand muscles innervated by C8–T1 roots affected. Weakness occurring in a nerve distribution should lead to consideration of a different disorder, for example, multifocal motor neuropathy.

Fasciculations seen in many muscles in multiple limbs are ominous and are strongly suggestive of a motor neuron disease. Fasciculations that occur infrequently, or repetitively in one area, are more likely to have a benign origin, particularly in the absence of weakness or atrophy. The absence of fasciculations does not eliminate ALS. They may not be readily visible because of prominent subcutaneous tissue. Physicians often initially recognize fasciculations, although the patient in retrospect may recall that they were present for some time. Muscle cramping is a common, albeit nonspecific, manifestation of motor neuron disease. The initiation of cramps during manual muscle testing is common in ALS.

What constitutes clinical signs of corticospinal or corticobulbar tract pathology may be more ambiguous. Spasticity represents a definite UMN sign; Babinski signs if unequivocal are confirmatory of UMN disease. Unfortunately, Babinski signs may not be elucidated in many ALS patients as a result of LMN toe extensor weakness. The Hoffman sign is generally indicative of UMN involvement of the arms, particularly if asymmetric. Hyperactive deep tendon reflexes, particularly with sustained clonus, indicate UMN involvement. The term relative UMN sign has been used to describe the presence of a deep tendon reflex in a weak and atrophic muscle. Reflex spread also implicates UMN disease; finger flexion (C8) occurring in response to brachioradialis tendon percussion (C6), and activation of the contralateral thigh adductors when the insertions of the ipsilateral thigh adductors are percussed (crossed adduction) are two notable examples of this phenomenon. Motor impairment in UMN disease typically results in slowness and incoordination. UMN weakness occurs in a specific pattern: the elbow, wrist, and finger extensors are weaker than their flexor counterparts in the upper extremity whereas conversely, hip and knee flexors and foot dorsiflexors and evertors are weaker in the lower limb.

Tongue atrophy, fasciculation, and weakness are perhaps the most frequently occurring and recognized manifestations of LMN involvement of cranial nerves. It is important to observe for fasciculations when the tongue is relaxed on floor of the mouth (Fig. 67-6). Tremulousness of the tongue with attempted protrusion may be readily misinterpreted as representing fasciculations. Weakness of both facial and jaw muscles may occur in ALS but they are usually subtle. Weakness of neck extension and neck flexion is common in ALS, and head drop may be a rare presenting feature (Fig. 67-7). Neck drop is commonly associated with posterior neck discomfort and is typically relieved when the neck is supported. Notable for their absence are ptosis and ophthalmoparesis, and symptoms related to sight, hearing, taste, smell, and facial sensation.

Related posts:

Wilson Disease Major Depression Other Autoimmune CNS Demyelinating Disorders Parkinson Disease Cranial Nerve II Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join