Assessment of Tics and Comorbid Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms



Dean McKay and Eric A. Storch (eds.)Handbook of Assessing Variants and Complications in Anxiety Disorders201310.1007/978-1-4614-6452-5_5© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013


5. Assessment of Tics and Comorbid Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms



Katharina Kircanski , Tara S. Peris2 and John Piacentini2


(1)
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA

(2)
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA-Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

 



 

Katharina Kircanski



Abstract

Tics are commonly associated with obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCSs). A common challenge is accurately assessing the distinctiveness of these symptom domains. This chapter covers interview, clinician-administered, and self-report methods of assessing each condition, and approaches for distinguishing between the diagnoses. Special attention is given to assessment of a prominent symptom of tics, premonitory urges, which represents an important feature in distinguishing these conditions.


Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is frequently associated with tic disorders including Tourette syndrome (TS), chronic tic disorder, and transient tic disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). The overlap between conditions is substantial, with 20–38% of children with OCD reporting comorbid tics, and 20–60% of youth with tic disorders meeting diagnostic criteria for OCD (Goodman, Storch, Geffken, & Murphy, 2006; Pauls, Alsobrook, Goodman, Rasmussen, & Leckman, 1995; Swedo, Rapoport, Leonard, Lenane, & Cheslow, 1989). Likewise, 21% of adults with OCD report clinical or subclinical tic disorder symptoms at some point across the lifespan (Richter, Summerfeldt, Antony, & Swinson, 2003), and approximately one-third to one-half of adults with TS will experience OCD or subclinical obsessive–compulsive symptoms in their lifetime (Bloch et al., 2006; Leckman, Pauls, & Cohen, 1995). A primary source of these high rates of comorbidity appears to be shared genetic underpinnings between OCD and tic disorders, and these disorders also have common epidemiological and phenomenological characteristics (Grados et al., 2001; Pauls et al., 1995; Pauls, Towbin, Leckman, Zahner, & Cohen, 1986). For example, both disorders are characterized by repetitive behaviors, a typical onset between childhood and young adulthood, and a fluctuating and shifting symptom course (Steingard & Dillon-Stout, 1992). Regardless of source, the frequent co-occurrence of OCD and tic disorders coupled with the high rates of distress and impairment associated with each condition underscores the importance of systematic and thorough assessment of tics and related features in any individual presenting with signs of OCD.

Whereas establishing the presence or absence of a tic disorder in patients with OCD is often relatively straightforward, differentiating comorbid tics and compulsions can prove more challenging. This chapter begins with an overview of tic disorder nosology, clinical features, and phenomenology. This is followed by a more in-depth discussion of empirically supported assessment methods for tic disorders and a brief review of assessment methods for OCD (see Chap. XX, for a more complete discussion). The chapter then proceeds to differential diagnosis and strategies for distinguishing between tics and comorbid obsessive–compulsive symptoms.


Overview of Tic Disorders



DSM-IV-TR Nosology


Clinical interviews and observations are the primary tool for establishing a tic disorder diagnosis, as there is no specific medical test presently available for tics. Current DSM-IV-TR nosology includes four diagnostic categories across the tic disorder spectrum: Tourette’s disorder (DSM-IV-TR term for TS), chronic motor or vocal tic disorder, transient tic disorder, and tic disorder not otherwise specified (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). TS is generally considered to be the most severe diagnosis and is characterized by at least a 12-month history of frequent tics, including multiple motor tics and at least one vocal tic, although they need not occur simultaneously. The tics must not be attributable to other factors such as a stereotypical movement disorder, a general medical condition, a known central nervous system disease (e.g., Huntington’s chorea), or substance intoxication. Chronic motor or vocal tics involve at least 12 months of frequent motor or vocal tics, respectively. Transient tic disorder, considered less severe, is characterized by mild tics that are present for at least 4 weeks but less than 12 months. Tics must begin prior to age 18 in order to meet criteria for each of these diagnoses. Finally, tic disorder not otherwise specified captures other clinically significant tic symptoms that do not meet criteria for one of the aforementioned diagnoses (e.g., insufficient duration of symptoms).


Clinical Features, Course, and Prognosis


Tics are defined as “sudden, rapid, recurrent, non-rhythmic, and stereotyped” motor movements or vocalizations (American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 108), which draw on one or more muscle groups, mimic the experience of normal behavior, and are experienced as outside volitional control (Leckman, King, & Cohen, 1999). Within this relatively broad definition, tics may be categorized along various dimensions including type (motor or vocal), complexity (number of muscle groups involved), and degree of interference in functioning (none to severe). For example, simple motor tics involve isolated muscle groups in single anatomical locations and manifest as quick and meaningless muscle movements, such as eye blinking, nose twitching, facial grimacing, head jerking, and shoulder shrugging. Complex motor tics involve multiple muscle groups and manifest as slower and more purposeful movements, such as hand gestures, touching objects, touching self, bending, jumping, leg kicking, and hopping. Simple vocal tics comprise relatively quick and inarticulate sounds such as sniffing, coughing, grunting, and throat clearing. Finally, complex vocal tics comprise more intelligible vocalizations such as syllables, words, phrases, animal sounds, repetitions of others’ or own words, and speech atypicalities (Piacentini, Pearlman, & Peris, 2007). There is great inter-individual variability in tic symptom topography, as well as the degree of interference or impairment in functioning caused by tics (Kircanski, Woods, Chang, Ricketts, & Piacentini, 2010). Within individuals, symptom fluctuation is also typical (Coffey, Biederman, Geller, et al., 2000), and symptom exacerbation is often observed in response to physiological stressors (e.g., illness) and psychosocial stressors (e.g., peer and family conflicts) (Piacentini et al., 2007).

Transient tics are common in very young children, affecting around 12–18% of 5–7-year olds, while the prevalence of TS in the community is estimated at 0.6%, and the prevalence of chronic tic disorder is approximately 1–2% (Scahill, Sukhodolsky, Williams, & Leckman, 2005). The gender distribution of TS follows a 3:1 male to female ratio (Singer, 1994; Zohar et al., 1999), and tics appear to be more common among European Americans than African Americans or Latinos (Freeman et al., 2000; Zohar et al., 1999). In addition to co-occurring most frequently with OCD, tic disorders are also often comorbid with non-OCD anxiety disorders (Coffey, Biederman, Smoller, et al., 2000) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Zohar et al., 1999).

Tics typically emerge in early childhood, often beginning with simple movements of the head and face (Leckman, 2003; Leckman, Bloch, Scahill, & King, 2006). The average age of onset of tics (ages 5–7; Leckman, Bloch, King, & Scahill, 2006 precedes the typical age of onset of obsessive–compulsive symptoms (ages 8–11; Hanna, 1995; Piacentini, Bergman, Keller, & McCracken, 2003; Rapoport, Swedo, & Leonard, 1992) and the median age of onset of OCD (age 19; Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, & Walters, 2005). The developmental course of tics may involve a rostral-to-caudal progression of increasingly complex motor tics (Leckman, Zhang, & Vitale, 1998). Tics typically peak in middle childhood and may markedly reduce or disappear in adulthood (Leckman, 2003; Leckman, Bloch, Scahill, et al., 2006 studies demonstrate that approximately 25% of children diagnosed with TS will experience moderate to severe tics into young adulthood (Leckman et al., 1998).


Phenomenology


Many individuals describe an urge or sensation immediately before the occurrence of a tic, referred to in the literature as a premonitory urge (Banaschewski, Woerner, & Rothenberger, 2003; Leckman, Walker, & Cohen, 1993). Performance of a tic may serve to satiate or at least temporarily quiet this premonitory urge (Bliss, 1980; Himle, Woods, Conolea, Bauer, & Rice, 2007; Leckman et al.). Conversely, attempts to resist performance of a tic may intensify the premonitory urge. The relationship between premonitory urge and tic has been likened to that between obsessions and compulsions in OCD (e.g., Shapiro & Shapiro, 1992), and in some cases, differentiating a tic urge from an OCD-related obsession can be quite difficult. The presence of premonitory sensations distinguishes tic disorders from other movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea, and hemiballismus (Scahill, Leckman, & Marek, 1995). Importantly, however, there are developmental differences in the ability to report on tic behavior, and younger children may be less able to perceive or describe sensory or volitional aspects of their tic experiences (Banaschewski et al.; Woods, Piacentini, Himle, & Chang, 2005).


Assessment of Tic Disorders


A comprehensive assessment of tic disorders should involve evaluation of multiple domains: diagnosis of both tic and potential differential disorders, tic symptom profile, functional impact, and treatment history. The assessment of tics can be complicated by their multifaceted and fluctuating nature, and as such, numerous measures have been developed to aid in the evaluation process.


Clinical Interviews


In addition to establishing a diagnosis, a clinical interview with the patient and collaterals (e.g., spouse, parent, and teacher) is one of the most valuable strategies for assessing various features of tic disorders. A thorough clinical interview should begin with gathering of general information regarding age of onset, course of symptoms, and family history of tic disorders. Additionally, information regarding the topography, frequency, intensity, and stability of initial tics is useful.


Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Leckman et al., 1989)


The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) is perhaps the most widely used semi-structured clinical interview for tics and can be administered in approximately 15–30 min. The YGTSS is also flexible in its ability to gather comprehensive, concurrent data across the spectrum of tic disorder diagnoses. The first part of the measure is the tic symptom checklist which includes 46 tic disorder symptoms, including 12 simple motor tics (e.g., eye blinking), 19 complex motor tics (e.g., facial expressions), 7 simple vocal tics (e.g., coughing), and 8 complex vocal tics (e.g., words), with 4 of these items designated on the instrument as “other” symptoms. Next, the actual tic severity scale is comprised of ten items assessing tic number, frequency, intensity (noticeability), complexity (purposefulness), and interference with intended actions separately for the motor and vocal tics identified using the tic symptom checklist. Each of these items is scored on a 5-point Likert scale to yield parallel Motor and Vocal Tic Severity scores ranging from 0 to 25 and which can be summed to yield a Total Tic Score ranging from 0 to 50. Last, an overall tic-related impairment scale is scored from 0 (no impairment) to 50 (severe impairment causing severe disability and distress).

Factor analyses of the YGTSS Total Tic score items have demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity and inter-rater reliability in mixed child/adult samples (Leckman et al., 1989) and in child/adolescent samples (Storch et al., 2005; 2007; Walkup, Rosenberg, Brown, & Singer, 1992). Several studies have also demonstrated associations between total tic score items and other clinical characteristics, including positive correlations between YGTSS tic severity and school impairment, thought problems, aggressive behavior, delinquent behavior, and lower social competence (Zhu, Leung, Liu, Zhou, & Su, 2006) between YGTSS tic complexity and lower functional competence even when controlling for psychiatric comorbidity (Himle et al., 2007), and in children ages 10 and older, but not younger, between YGTSS tic severity, complexity, number, and interference and experience of premonitory urges (Woods et al., 2005). A YGTSS Total Tic score of 15 or greater is typically used to indicate clinically significant tic disorder, although mean pre-treatment scores from published clinical trials typically range from approximately 20 to 28 points (Leckman et al.; Piacentini et al., 2010; Scahill, Leckman, Schultz, Katsovich, & Peterson, 2003).


Self-report Inventories


Several available self-report inventories of tics are easy to administer and can provide useful snapshots of tic number and frequency. These measures are generally less informative with regard to tic duration and impairment and interference from tic symptoms.


Yale Tourette Syndrome Symptom List-Revised (Cohen, Detlor, Young, & Shaywitz, 1980)


The Yale Tourette Syndrome Symptom List-Revise (TSSL-R) assesses multiple motor and vocal tics, separated into simple and complex, which the patient rates as present or absent on each day over the previous week. For each tic that occurred, the patient rates the severity of that tic on a 6-point rating scale for each day. As the psychometric properties of the TSSL-R have not been adequately evaluated, this measure should serve as an adjunct to the clinical interview and should be interpreted cautiously (Kompoliti & Goetz, 1997).


Hopkins Motor/Vocal Tic Scale (Walkup et al., 1992)


The Hopkins Motor/Vocal Tic Scale (HMVTS) assesses the severity of motor and vocal tics over the previous week using a 5-point rating scale. The last item on the scale is a global rating of current severity across tic symptoms. This scale should be completed separately by the patient/parent and clinician. The HMVTS has been shown to correlate highly with the total motor and total vocal tic subscales of the YGTSS, although more rigorous analyses of its psychometric properties have not been conducted (Walkup et al., 1992).


Parent Tic Questionnaire (Chang, Himle, Tucker, Woods, & Piacentini, 2009)


The Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ) comprises 14 motor tics and 14 vocal tics, which the parent rates as present or absent along with their frequency, intensity, and controllability for the child patient. The PTQ is scored by calculating and summing weighted scores for each tic, with the weights being a product of tic presence/absence (1/0), frequency (1–4 Likert scale), and intensity (0–8 Likert scale). Weights for each tic thus range from 0 (absent) to 32 (maximum frequency and intensity). Motor and vocal tic subscale scores are computed by summing the weighted scores within each category. An overall tic score is computed by summing the motor and vocal tic subscale scores. Initial analyses of the PTQ’s psychometric properties have indicated strong correlations between PTQ scores and YGTSS subscale scores (r  =  0.59–8.83 for presence/absence, r  =  0.30–0.58 for frequency, and r  =  0.58–0.79 for intensity) (Chang et al., 2009). The PTQ has also shown high test–retest reliability over 1- and 2-week intervals (r  =  0.71–0.89) and sensitivity to treatment-related change (Piacentini et al., 2010). An adult version, the Adult Tic Questionnaire (ATQ), is a recently developed ­self-report measure of tic severity that parallels the PTQ in format and content. Psychometric studies of the ATQ are currently underway.


Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (Woods et al., 2005)


The Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS) is a child self-report measure of the severity of premonitory urge experiences. The PUTS contains nine items that are rated on a 5-point scale anchored by “not at all true” and “very true” and summed to yield a total score. Premonitory urge descriptions on the PUTS include primarily sensory experiences, although they also include the experience that something is not “just right” and that something is not complete, before performing a tic. Therefore, as will be described below, the clinician must distinguish these premonitory urge experiences from obsessions associated with OCD. During an assessment of premonitory urges, it can be helpful to obtain information about the location and intensity of these experiences using depictions of the human figure (both dorsal and ventral views) (Leckman et al., 1993). The PUTS has evidenced good internal consistency and good test–retest reliability at 1- and 2-week intervals (r  =  0.79–0.86). The PUTS total score has also been shown to correlate with YGTSS total tic score (r  =  0.31) and YGTSS subscales of number (r  =  0.35), complexity (r  =  0.49), and interference (r  =  0.36). Given the difficulties younger children may have in the perception or articulation of premonitory urges, the PUTS appears most appropriate for use with patients ages 10 and older. The use of the PUTS with adult patients is less widespread and has yet to be validated (Thomalla et al., 2009), although adults may be more adept at describing premonitory sensations during the clinical interview. Further exploration of psychometric properties of the PUTS for adult samples is needed.


Direct Observations


It is often helpful to include a measure of tic symptoms that, unlike clinical interviews and self-report inventories, is not reliant upon patient report. Direct observation procedures allow the clinician to obtain a more objective measure of tic expression. Recent research has shown that brief (e.g., 5-min) clinic-based observations can be stable and as informative as home-based observations (Himle et al., 2006). However, as tics are believed to be temporarily suppressible, and the expression of tics in a laboratory or clinical setting may not fully capture patients’ tic experiences in daily life, observational procedures should be regarded as a supplement to rather than a replacement of more traditional assessment procedures.


Frequency Measures


Direct observation typically involves video recording of the patient while sitting in an observation or therapy room. The most common observational scoring procedures involve either counting each tic occurrence over a given time interval (e.g., frequency count; Chappell et al., 1994) or counting the number of set-length time intervals during which a tic was observed (e.g., partial interval [PI] scoring; Woods, Miltenberger, & Lumley, 1996). The frequency count method may be useful for less frequent tics, whereas the PI method may be useful for more frequent tics. Regardless of scoring method used, the procedure typically begins with operationally defining each tic to be scored. PI scoring entails the clinician separating an observation period into smaller intervals (e.g., thirty 10-s intervals for a 5-min observation period) and then noting whether tics were present or absent during each interval. The percent of intervals in which tics were present comprises the tic score. Both the frequency count and PI methods appear to provide incremental data above and beyond the clinical interview and self-report and have been demonstrated to be temporally stable and sensitive to change (e.g., Himle et al., 2006).


Rush Videotape-Based Tic Rating Scale (Goetz, Tanner, Wilson, & Shannon, 1987) and Modified Rush Videotape-Based Tic Rating Scale (Goetz, Pappert, Louis, Raman, & Leurgans, 1999)


The Rush observational protocol involves overt video recording of the patient from a full-body perspective and a head/shoulders perspective. Using the original Rush scoring system, the videotape is subsequently scored for distribution of motor tics, frequency, and severity. The assessment of tic distribution includes 11 areas of the body (eyes, nose, mouth, neck, shoulders, arms, hands, trunk, pelvis, legs, and feet). Frequency is measured using discrete trial recording, and severity is scored using a 6-point rating scale for motor tics, vocal tics, and the most severe tic. Using the modified Rush scoring system, tics are subsequently rated on five 5-point scales of location (motor tics only), frequency, and severity (motor tics and vocal tics). The clinician sums these ratings to arrive at a global tic severity score. The modified scoring system allows for comparisons across tic domains, which enhances its utility as a measure of change in tic symptoms (Goetz et al., 1999). The relative complexity of the Rush and Modified Rush procedures may serve to limit their utility in most clinical settings.


Review of OCD and Its Assessment


This section briefly reviews diagnosis, phenomenology, and assessment of OCD. Please see Chap. XX for a full discussion of OCD and its assessment.


Diagnosis


OCD is characterized by obsessions and/or compulsions that are distressing, time consuming (take more than 1 h/day), or cause clinically significant impairment (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Obsessions are recurrent, persistent, and distressing thoughts, images, or impulses. Compulsions are repetitive behaviors or mental acts performed in response to obsessions in order reduce distress or avoid perceived harm. The majority of adolescent and adult patients view their symptoms as excessive, although this insight may not be present in younger patients.


Clinical Features, Course, and Prognosis


As with tics, the topography of OCD symptoms is quite diverse. Common obsessions involve excessive concern about germs, contamination, and illness (Moore et al., 2007), fears harm to self or others, preoccupations with symmetry, moral and religious obsessions, intrusive sexual thoughts, and superstitious obsessions (Geller et al., 2001; Swedo et al., 1989). Common compulsions involve excessive and/or ritualized washing, checking, counting, touching, ordering, arranging, confessing, seeking reassurance, and mental rituals such as praying (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; Piacentini & Langley, 2004). Compulsions may be performed to alleviate anxiety, discomfort, disgust, or the sense that something is not “just right” (Leckman, Walker, Goodman, Pauls, & Cohen, 1994). As noted later in this discussion, the internal, sensory quality of the “just right” triggers may appear similar in nature to the premonitory urge for tics, a feature that requires careful differential diagnosis.

Although typical age of onset of OCD is from 8 to 11 years (Hanna, 1995; Piacentini et al., 2003; Rapoport et al., 1992), onset can occur as young as 2–3 years (Garcia et al., 2009; Freeman et al., 2003; Freeman, Garcia, & Coyne, 2008). Gender distribution tends to follow a 3:2 male to female ratio until adolescence when the distribution levels out (Swedo et al., 1989). OCD tends to be chronic, with 40% of children and adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria up to 15 years after initial identification and 20% exhibiting subclinical symptoms (Leonard et al., 1993; Stewart et al., 2004).


Assessment



Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Goodman, Price, Rasmussen, Mazure, Fleischmann, et al., 1989; Goodman, Price, Rasmussen, Mazure, Delgado, et al., 1989)


The Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a semi-structured clinical interview that has shown good reliability and validity in adult clinical samples and has demonstrated utility in assessing OCD severity and change over time. The interview contains separate sections for obsessions and compulsions, and within each section, includes a symptom checklist along with rating scales corresponding to symptom frequency/duration, interference, distress, resistance, and control. Obsessions and compulsions receive separate scores from 0 to 20, for a total Y-BOCS score ranging from 0 to 40.


Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Scahill et al., 1997)


The Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (C-YBOCS) for use with children and adolescents is parallel to the Y-BOCS for adults. Also similar to the Y-BOCS, the CY-BOCS has demonstrated good reliability, validity, and utility in assessing system severity and change (Scahill et al., 1997). Storch et al. (2004) found moderate correlations between CY-BOCS scores and measures of depression, aggressive behavior, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, but not clinician ratings of tics or self-reports of general anxiety.


Comorbid Tic Disorders and OCD



Establishing Comorbidity


Differential diagnosis between tic disorder and OCD should begin with assessment methods and measures, such as those described above, which are sufficient to detect the presence or absence of each condition. In addition to a comprehensive assessment, particular attention to aspects of symptom presentation can be useful in establishing the presence versus absence of each disorder. As noted above, complex and seemingly ritualistic tics typically emerge later in the course of tic disorders, following the onset of simple tics, and are rarely the only tics present for a given patient. If, following a comprehensive assessment, these types of behaviors appear to be the only discernible symptoms, the clinician may question the presence of a tic disorder and whether these behaviors are better conceptualized as compulsions (Woods et al., 2008). Likewise, subjective anxiety and threat-related cognitive content are likely to accompany at least some obsessive–compulsive symptoms. If a patient exhibits only brief and purposeless repetitive behaviors in the absence of any cognitive or affective precursors, the clinician may consider whether tic disorder may be a more appropriate diagnosis.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 22, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on Assessment of Tics and Comorbid Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access