Fig. 1
Example of different electrodes. (a) Subdermal needles. (b) Plastic cup electrodes with metal coating. (c) Gold cup electrodes, reusable. (d) Subdermal wire electrode and needle used for insertion
Metal cup electrodes are available in both reusable and disposable varieties. The disposable type offers good-quality recording and eliminates any concern for cross infection between patients. Although the cost can be quite variable, a set of ten disposable Ag/AgCl electrodes costs approximately $5–10, compared to ten reusable gold electrodes at a cost of approximately $100. The reusable electrodes can be used repeatedly for at least 6 months and usually longer. However, they do require additional time for cleaning. In our experience, the overall cost ends up being similar, and patient safety and technician satisfaction favor the disposable electrodes.
Subdermal needle electrodes are another option for ICU EEG recording. These consist of metal (stainless steel, platinum, or others) needles that are thin, 27 gauge or thinner, and typically about 1 cm long. Patient discomfort and potential for injury to the patient and/or technologist are major concerns with their use. Another concern is that in spite of being subdermal, their impedances are actually higher than cup electrodes due to the low surface area of the needles. However, impedances are often closely matched and very stable, allowing for prolonged recording. The other main advantage is ease of application with minimal requirements for skin preparation.
Subdermal wire electrodes consist of a thin (25 gauge), Teflon-coated silver wire whose tip is exposed and coated with AgCl [1]. These are inserted under the skin using a hypodermic needle. The concerns are similar to subdermal needles; however, subdermal wires have the additional advantages of being more compatible with MRI and CT (see below) and likely safer for long-term recordings [2].
Imaging Compatibility
In the routine management of patients in the ICU, imaging studies may be frequent and many times urgent. Metal cup electrodes cause a streak artifact on CT that may obscure vital findings (Fig. 2). Additionally, most are not MRI compatible because the metal can produce heating and displacement as well as artifacts. As a result, traditional metal cup electrodes require removal and reapplication for imaging studies, which can result in scalp abrasions and discomfort. This also places an additional workload on the EEG technologist. Fortunately, there are other electrode options that are safe for use with MRI and/or CT imaging (Table 1). These include plastic electrodes with a conductive coating. They have been proven safe for use in MRI and do not produce the streak artifact on CT scans (Figs. 3 and 4) [3, 4]. Like metal cup electrodes, they require the use of a conductive gel and for long-term monitoring are typically applied with collodion. Benefits to their use include continuous recording during imaging procedures, minimizing downtime, and decreased need for repeated removal and reapplication. While allowing for minimal interruption in recording, conductive plastic electrodes still require routine maintenance to maintain high-quality signal. This includes reapplication after accidental removal and refreshing with conductive gel that may dry over the course of a 24-h recording. Subdermal needle and subdermal wire electrodes are another option to consider for imaging compatibility. Subdermal needles are thin enough to not cause artifact on most CTs; compatibility with MRI depends on needle length, with longer needles having greater concern for injury. Subdermal wires cause minimal to no artifact on CT and are compatible with MRI as well. For all types of electrodes, the length of the leads connecting the electrodes must be kept in mind; longer leads or lead that are coiled to make loops are a potential source of induced currents that could place the patient at risk while in the MRI scanner.




Fig. 2
Artifact produced on head CT by standard metal electrodes
Table 1
Imaging compatibility for different types of electrodes
CT | MRI | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Metal cup electrodes Ferrous/magnetic Noble metals | Artifact | Artifact, heating Compatible | Length of leads can be an issue for MRI |
Plastic cup/disk electrode with metal coating | Compatible | Compatible | |
Subdermal needle electrodes | Compatible | Depends on needle length | |
Subdermal wire electrodes | Compatible | Compatible | Long-term recordings |

Fig. 3
Artifact produced on head CT by conductive plastic electrodes

Fig. 4
Appearance of different electrode types on MRI
Electrode Application Techniques
As previously stated, good-quality EEG recording requires low impedance at the electrode junction. When using cup electrodes, regardless of material, technicians rub an abrasive paste to remove dirt, oils, and the outer layer of the skin, all of which contribute to skin impedance. Cup-style electrodes also typically require that a conductive paste or gel be used to facilitate transduction of ionic currents. Skin preparation and electrode application should lead to electrode impedances that meet the same standards as for routine EEG, impedances below 5–10 kΩ. Although modern EEG amplifiers can record from higher impedance electrodes, there will be some degradation in quality. Beyond the absolute value, the impedances of all the electrodes used should be similar to each other – mismatched impedances will also compromise signal quality. Impedances should be rechecked periodically as drying out of the conductive paste or loss of electrode contact with the skin can occur.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

