Fig. 1
A two domain-model for ion concentration dynamics in the intra- and extracellular space. The ICS is represented as a cylindrical cable (I), coated by ECS (E). The geometry is specified by three parameters, where a I is the cross section area of the cable, a E is the cross section area of the ECS and O M is the circumference of the cable. The concentration of ion species k is denoted [k] n where n represents domain I or E. Ionic movement is described by the transmembrane flux density (j kM ) and the longitudinal flux densities due to electrical migration (j kn f ) and diffusion (j kn d )
2.1 Particle Conservation
We consider the continuity equations for an ion species k with valence z k in domains I and E:
with the sealed-end boundary conditions (n = I or E):
Here a I and a E are the cross sections of the ICS and ECS, respectively, and O M is the circumference of the membrane. The longitudinal flux densities are given by the generalized Nernst-Planck equation (to keep notation short, we skip the functional arguments (x, t) from here on):
where the first term on the right represents the diffusive flux density (j kn d ) and the last term is the flux density due to ionic migration in the electrical field (j kn f ). The effective diffusion constant is composed of the diffusion constant D k in dilute solutions and the tortuosity factor λ n , which summarizes the hindrance imposed by the cellular structures [2, 10]. We use , where R is the gas constant, T the absolute temperature, and F is Faraday’s constant. The formalism we derive is general to the transmembrane flux density (j kM ), as long as j kM is a local function of v M , ionic concentrations in I and E, and possibly some additional local state variables. The formalism can be combined with any external input (j kn in ) which fulfills the constraint:
as we shall explain later.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
With N ion species, Eqs. 1 and 2 (with j kn , j kM and j kn in as described above) represent a system of 2N + 3 variables which are functions of x and t. These are the 2N concentration variables ([k] n for and n = E, I), and the three additional variables ( and ) occurring in the expressions for the flux densities. We now seek to express and as functions of ionic concentrations, so that Eqs. 1 and 2 constitute a fully specified (and numerically solvable) system of equations.
2.2 Voltage Expressions
To reduce the number of independent variables to the 2N state variables ([k] n ) we use three additional constraints:
Equation 6 is the assumption that the membrane is a parallel plate capacitor. Then v M is determined by the density of charge on the inside of the membrane, which in turn is determined by the ionic concentrations:
For practical purposes, we have included a density of static charges (ρ sn ) in Eqs. 6 and 7, representing contributions from ions that are not considered in the conservation equations. If the set [k] n include all present species of ions, then ρ sn = 0.
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)