(1)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD, White River Junction, VT, USA
(2)
Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology & Toxicology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
Keywords
Trauma-focused therapyPresent-centered therapySupportive therapyCombined treatmentsTreating comorbid disordersTherapeutic neutralityAdvocacySecondary traumatizationCountertransferenceClinician self-careThis chapter answers the following questions:
What are the timing and priority issues related to treatment?—This section covers issues surrounding the timing of when patients seek treatment as well as priorities in PTSD treatment (e.g., psychiatric emergency, alcohol or drug abuse/dependence, comorbidity, and situational factors).
What general considerations exist for choosing a specific treatment option?—This section provides an overview of treatment considerations, such as combining treatments, comorbid disorders, and complex PTSD.
What PTSD treatment–focus issues exist?—This section covers decision making on trauma vs. supportive therapy, using combined treatments, and other issues.
What are the major personal issues for clinicians treating those with PTSD?—This section discusses therapeutic neutrality, advocacy, secondary traumatization, countertransference, and clinician self–care.
After determining that a patient requesting treatment has PTSD, there are a number of questions clinicians need to address. In most respects, these questions are no different from those about other psychiatric disorders, although the presence of PTSD sometimes raises questions about treatment timing, priorities, focus, and approach.
What Are the Timing and Priority Issues Related to Treatment?
For clinicians, global treatment issues often begin with answering the question, “Why seek help now?” and proceed to determining what issues or situations may delay or alter a typical PTSD treatment approach.
Timing Issues for Seeking Treatment
When people complain about the recent onset of intrusion, avoidance, negative mood and cognitions, and arousal/reactivity symptoms, it is usually pretty obvious why they are seeking treatment at this time and that PTSD is the first (and possibly only) order of business. On the other hand, when people who have had chronic PTSD for many years suddenly request treatment, it is usually because something has changed abruptly in their lives. This change has disrupted their equilibrium in terms of coping both with PTSD symptoms and with the demands of family, friends, work, and society.
Sometimes the precipitant is obvious; however, at other times, the clinician must take a careful history to identify the recent precipitant. For example:
A woman who was raped many years ago was recently sexually harassed or threatened.
A combat veteran who now works as a police officer has seen his partner seriously wounded in a gunfight or thought he might be killed himself in the same encounter.
A Red Cross disaster worker complains of traumatic nightmares related to an event she had not thought about for a long time. It is likely that certain specific details of a recent disaster reactivated memories of a similar event in the past, about which there remain intense, unresolved emotional feelings.
A woman who has successfully dealt with the emotional consequences of her own childhood sexual abuse begins having intrusive recollections of this traumatic experience when her adolescent daughter begins dating or becomes sexually active.
A military veteran may experience a re–exacerbation of symptoms when television coverage focuses on new military offensives (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan) or when his or her child is called up for military duty.
For older veterans, the death of an adult child (even by an illness such as cancer) may reactivate survival guilt about having outlived friends at Normandy Beach, Vietnam, or Fallujah.
Some trauma-related stimuli can be heavily disguised. Take the example of a successful business woman who has coped successfully with a sexual trauma that has caused no previous emotional difficulty. She may suddenly develop PTSD symptoms when her professional advancement seems unfairly and consistently blocked by hostile or oppressive male superiors, leaving her feeling powerless. Although the precipitating stressor is in the workplace, her nightmares are inexplicably (to her) about the sexual abuse she suffered decades earlier.
From the Patient’s Perspective
I’ve got to hand it to that therapist. She asked about everything. About how depressed I’ve been. About how hard this has been on my relationships. And about possible problems that never would have occurred to me, like drinking and such. But at the end, she decided, and I agreed, that the major problem was the PTSD and that we really needed to consider how this accident has turned my life upside down.
Priority Issues for Treatment
In the preceding examples, PTSD is clearly the first order of business, and the clinician must develop a treatment plan that addresses both the current precipitant and unresolved past traumatic issues that have become central to the current clinical problem. Sometimes, however, PTSD may not be the first order of business because other clinical issues should take priority before PTSD treatment can be initiated. Common reasons for delaying PTSD treatment include the existence of:
A psychiatric emergency (the patient is suicidal, homicidal, or otherwise so out of control that he or she needs the safety, structure, and control of an inpatient hospital setting)
Serious comorbid alcohol or other substance use disorder that must be treated before PTSD
A marital/familial/workplace crisis that demands immediate attention
In a psychiatric emergency, where the patient must be hospitalized without delay, a discharge plan can be developed that will implement PTSD treatment along with other necessary measures when the patient is ready to leave the hospital.
What General Considerations Exist for Choosing a Specific Treatment Option?
When creating a treatment plan for someone with PTSD, there are a number of factors to consider, including the following:
Combined Treatment—To provide the best possible care for patients, clinicians often combine different therapies (e.g., individual therapy and medication).
Treatment of Comorbid Disorders—Treatments may need to be chosen that address multiple disorders at the same time.
Complicated PTSD (characterized by severe, chronic PTSD with comorbid disorders, often marked by impulsivity, aggression, sexual acting out, substance misuse, self-destructive actions, emotional dysregulation, dissociation, interpersonal difficulties, and somatization) which is sometimes referred to as complex PTSD often requires a longer-term, multimodal treatment plan [1, 2].
Cross–Cultural Considerations—Clinicians need to be sensitive to cultural differences in PTSD assessment and treatment.
Recovered Memories—There are guidelines about how clinicians should address previously “forgotten” traumatic memories that patients report have been “recovered” many years later.
Safety—PTSD patients often feel that it is dangerous for them to relinquish the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral avoidance strategies they habitually use to distance themselves from intolerable intrusive recollections and arousal symptoms.
Clinicians must establish an atmosphere of trust and safety, thereby “earning the right to gain access” to carefully guarded traumatic material [27].
What PTSD Treatment-Focus Issues Exist?
Many treatments for PTSD encourage the patient to specifically remember and focus on the experienced trauma (e.g., “trauma-focused” treatment). Others encourage the patient to increase coping skills for current here-and-now stressors to improve daily functioning and decrease PTSD symptoms (e.g., “supportive therapy”). Sometimes, either psychotherapeutic approach is combined with medication. And sometimes, comorbid disorders must be treated before PTSD treatment can begin.
Trauma-Focused Therapy
Trauma-focused therapy uses the in-depth exploration of traumatic material to facilitate healing. It can be conducted in individual or group contexts with techniques that vary from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [3] to psychodynamic approaches [4, 5]. CBT approaches focus on patterns of reinforcement, learning and conditioning models, and correcting erroneous cognitions. In contrast, psychodynamic approaches focus on unconscious and conscious motivations and drives. Current evidence is much stronger for CBT than for psychodynamic treatment. The goal of both approaches to trauma-focused therapy is for patients to take control of their lives by gaining authority over traumatic memories in order to control PTSD-related thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Trauma Focus vs. Supportive Therapy
Trauma-focused treatment may not be beneficial for everyone. Most research data on trauma-focused treatments apply only to those patients who have agreed to undergo such treatment. Scientific evidence shows that trauma-focused CBT treatments (such as prolonged exposure [PE] and cognitive processing therapy [CPT]) have proven to be the most effective treatments to date. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is another trauma-focused approach in which the patient does not have to verbally recount the traumatic experience but is instructed to focus on such memories (see Chap. 4). Despite the proven efficacy of these approaches, some patients have absolutely no wish to revisit traumatic material because they:
Want to put the past behind them
Fear that they cannot tolerate the intrusive and arousal symptoms exacerbated by such memories
Stress inoculation training (SIT) is an alternative that has not been tested extensively. It is an evidence-based treatment that compares favorably with effective trauma-focused approaches but that does not require the patient to recall painful traumatic memories. Instead, SIT emphasizes anxiety management skills to enable patients to cope more effectively with current situations that are predictably exacerbated by their PTSD symptoms.
Present-centered therapy (PCT) is another non-focus treatment in which patients are actively discouraged from addressing details of the traumatic event. Instead, they are directed to discuss how their PTSD symptoms are adversely affecting their present lives with respect to marriage, social functioning, work, school, or other important current activities. Research has shown that PCT effectively reduces PTSD symptoms but not as effectively as CBT (e.g., PE therapy).
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is another non-focus treatment approach that emphasizes “mindfulness” that has been shown to be effective for depression. It is currently being evaluated as a PTSD treatment (see Chap. 4).
Most non-focus PTSD treatments are less structured and do not adhere to a psychotherapy manual as in SIT, PCT, or ACT. What they have in common is that they encourage skill building and problem solving for current issues in the patient’s life as an avenue for increasing adaptive functioning and regaining a sense of control. Supportive treatments that deliberately avoid traumatic material may be beneficial for some with PTSD, although their efficacy has not been shown to exceed that of trauma-focused CBT approaches such as PE and CPT. Currently, there are no guidelines for determining which patients will most likely benefit from one kind of therapy over the other.
An important question is whether patients can benefit from trauma-focused treatment when their lives remain dangerous because of military deployment, dangerous occupations, physical/sexual abuse, domestic violence, or otherwise unsafe living situations. Ideally, trauma-focused treatment is not provided to such patients until their lives become safer. Traditionally, present-centered and supportive therapy (see Chap. 4 ) and medication treatment (see Chap. 5 ) are generally considered better immediate options, and trauma-focused therapy is delayed until personal safety can be attained. This practice is currently being reconsidered, especially by military leaders who would like to know whether troops with PTSD can benefit from trauma-focused treatment while remaining in the war zone.
The superiority of trauma-focused treatments, especially PE and CPT, has been endorsed by all comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for PTSD treatment that have been developed (e.g., by the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the US Institute of Medicine (IOM), and jointly by the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense (VA/DoD)) [6–11].
Psychosocial treatments discussed in Chap. 4 are the following:
Psychoeducational approaches, in which patients learn about common symptoms and experiences suffered by those with PTSD.
Individual psychotherapies, which focus on PTSD symptoms through various methods, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, eye movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR), SIT, PCT, ACT, psychodynamic psychotherapy, and supportive therapy.
Group therapies, in which trauma survivors learn about PTSD and help each other with the aid of a professional clinician.
Treatments for children that are age-appropriate interventions, often extrapolated from adult treatment methods. Such treatments are provided in both clinical and school settings.
Couples therapy in which both partners are included in the treatment.
Other treatments that have not been systematically tested with PTSD patients, such as family therapy, hypnosis, and social rehabilitative therapies.
Combined Treatment
Clinicians often combine treatment methods. For example, medication combined with individual psychotherapy treatment may not only ameliorate psychobiological abnormalities associated with PTSD but also sufficiently reduce symptoms so patients can participate in trauma-focused treatment. Some patients receive individual treatment plus marital, family, or group therapy, while others may take medication as well.
Unfortunately, there are very few published studies in which combined therapy is compared with either psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy alone. One study indicates that among medication partial responders, outcomes improve significantly when prolonged exposure is later added to medication [12]. On the other hand, adding medication to CBT partial responders did not improve clinical outcomes [13]. Another study suggests that the effectiveness of PE could be enhanced if it were combined with the medication D-cycloserine (see Chap. 5) [14].
Pharmacotherapy, in which patients receive medications to help manage PTSD symptoms, is covered in detail in Chap. 5 .
When considering combined treatment, however, it is important to be selective and to recognize that many patients do not need more than one form of treatment at any one time [15]. Good clinical practice requires introducing only one therapeutic approach at a time and carefully gauging its effectiveness before combining it with another.
Treatment of Comorbid Disorders
Most patients with PTSD will have at least one comorbid psychiatric disorder; therefore, the treatment approach should seek to ameliorate both PTSD and the comorbid disorder(s), if possible.
Alcohol Drug Abuse/Dependence
It is a waste of time to initiate PTSD treatment when someone is too caught up in the addiction intoxication/withdrawal cycle to participate meaningfully in any psychotherapeutic initiative. Many clinicians refuse to work with patients if they come to appointments intoxicated or if they are unable to work in psychotherapy because of their alcohol or drug abuse/dependency. If the substance use disorder (SUD) is severely disruptive, patients may need to undergo inpatient detoxification and post-detoxification alcohol or drug rehabilitation (which often includes a commitment to attend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings) before beginning psychotherapy.
It appears that treatments that address comorbid SUD and PTSD simultaneously are preferable to addressing each problem separately. Unfortunately, simultaneous treatments are generally untested, not widely available, and challenging, as each disorder exacerbates the other [16].