Parents with anxiety disorders

html xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml” xmlns:mml=”http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML” xmlns:epub=”http://www.idpf.org/2007/ops”>


Chapter 13 Parents with anxiety disorders


Cathy Creswell, Peter J. Cooper, and Lynne Murray


“Anxiety disorders” (ADs) are a broad category of psychiatric disorders characterized by excessive fear, worry, or anxiety which cause significant distress or impairment in everyday life. They are among the most common psychiatric disorders, affecting over a quarter of people during their lifetime (Kessler et al., 2005). This chapter reviews the evidence concerning the psychological mechanisms by which ADs affect parenting and adjustment in children and young people, in order to guide further research in this area and inform clinical practice.


Most research in this field has focused on the impact of maternal ADs on parenting and children’s development, largely because women are at higher risk of ADs than men (Kessler et al., 2005) and tend to be the primary caregivers of children in Western cultures. Nevertheless, recent studies including fathers with ADs have found similar associations between parenting and child adjustment to those found with mothers with ADs (Aktar et al., 2013, 2014). Thus, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it would be prudent to assume that studies of “mothers” may well provide evidence relating to “parents”. However, we also consider potential gender-specific associations with parenting and child adjustment when appropriate.



Outcomes for children of parents with ADs


Offspring of parents with ADs are at increased risk of psychiatric disorders (e.g., Beidel and Turner, 1997; Merikangas et al., 1999). Specifically, these offspring have a fourfold higher risk of AD than offspring of parents with no psychiatric diagnoses, and a twofold higher risk than offspring of parents with other psychiatric (nonanxiety) disorders (Micco et al., 2009). Offspring of parents with AD may also be at somewhat increased risk of mood disorders, particularly where parents have comorbid mood disorders (Micco et al., 2009).


Most studies examining outcomes of the offspring of parents with AD have included parents with a heterogeneous group of ADs, but there is evidence of specific associations between particular parent and child diagnoses in the case of panic disorder (e.g., Biederman et al., 2004), social AD (Lieb et al., 2000), and specific phobias (Unnewehr et al., 1998). Of note, however, studies have typically included children from broad age ranges (e.g., 2 to 25 years), which is problematic as different ADs tend to occur at different ages (Kessler et al., 2005), and one AD may be a precursor to another (e.g., Biederman et al., 2007). To overcome this difficulty, in the Reading longitudinal study, we recruited mothers with social AD (n = 96), with generalized AD (n = 58), or with no history of AD (n = 94) during pregnancy. Families were then followed up as the children reached particular ages (10 days; 10 weeks; 10, 14, and 24 months; and 4–5 years), allowing direct comparisons between groups at critical points in the child’s development. It is notable that at the most recent assessment (age 4–5 years) inflated levels of internalizing difficulties and social AD (15%), specifically, were already apparent among the offspring of mothers with social AD compared to those with generalized AD (2%) and those with no history of AD (0%) (Murray et al., 2014). These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that maternal AD presents a risk of the development of AD in offspring, and that there is early diagnostic-specificity in transmission, at least in the case of social AD.



Mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of anxiety


In 2009 we proposed a model of pathways to the development of child anxiety which attempted to account for the fact that the risk of ADs is raised among offspring of parents with ADs (Murray et al., 2009). Specifically, we suggested that key mechanisms in the development of child anxiety include (1) an anxious predisposition, (2) socialization experiences (i.e., fewer opportunities to experience and develop skills in social environments or more negative social experiences), and (3) learning via anxiogenic modeling and information transfer; and that all these factors are more likely in the context of parental AD. Furthermore, we suggested that highly anxious parents may be more likely to respond to their child’s expressions of inhibition or anxiety with behaviors that reinforce child anxiety (e.g., lack of encouragement and intrusive or overprotective behaviors). This chapter provides an opportunity to reflect on the empirical status of the place of parental ADs within this model and consider future directions for research and practice.



Anxious predisposition


Twin and adoption studies demonstrate that childhood anxiety is moderately heritable (Gregory and Eley, 2007), although the magnitude of effects varies according to child sex, age, information source (i.e., parent versus child rated), and the form of anxiety. The genetic substrate of anxiety is poorly understood (e.g., Battaglia et al., 2005), yet it is likely to differ in its effects in response to interactions with environmental characteristics (e.g., Fox et al., 2005). The psychological trait most widely investigated as a potential vulnerability factor for the development of anxiety is behavioral inhibition (BI) – that is, the temperamental pattern characterized by fear and withdrawal in unfamiliar situations. BI is considered to be an early temperamental precursor of ADs, particularly social AD (e.g., Hirshfeld-Becker et al., 2008).


Studies for the degree to which parental ADs constitute a risk of BI among offspring have mostly been limited to those of parents with panic disorder and agoraphobia, and the results have been mixed, some studies suggesting that high rates of BI are accounted for by comorbidity with parental depression (Rosenbaum et al., 2000). In the Reading longitudinal study, we found no significant difference in rates of high infant irritability at 10 weeks (Murray et al., 2007) or (nonsocial) BI at 14 months of age (Murray et al., 2008) between infants of anxious and nonanxious mothers. Together, these findings fail to show a clear link between early BI and parental AD. Thus, reported associations between later BI and parental ADs may reflect offspring responses (e.g., to environmental influences associated with the parental disorder), or may occur as a result of comorbid parental conditions.


It has been suggested that biases of attention and interpretation may create a predisposition to the development of anxiety in children (Hudson and Rapee, 2004). The question of whether parental anxiety creates a risk of such biased information processing has received little examination, although there is some suggestion that offspring (aged 9–19 years) of parents with panic disorder show distinctive attentional patterns to emotional stimuli that are not accounted for by child anxiety (Pine et al., 2005). It is not clear whether these findings reflect genetic or environmental factors; however, our finding that 10-week-old infants of mothers with social AD avoid high-intensity fear faces (compared to offspring of mothers with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and nonanxious mothers) does indicate that biases in the processing of emotional stimuli may be present from a very early age (Creswell et al., 2011).


Together, these lines of evidence highlight that, while children of parents with ADs are at an inflated risk of ADs, underlying vulnerability factors have not been clearly identified.



Socialization experiences


Exposure to negative life events may play a causal role in the development of ADs (e.g., Goodyer et al., 1988). Our model suggested that parental anxiety may be associated with increased exposure to particular negative life events, and this could increase the risk of child anxiety, either directly or by diminishing the child’s sense of control (Murray et al., 2009). There has been little research examining this proposition. However, life events that are known to be more common among adults with ADs (e.g., Kessler et al., 1998; Merikangas et al., 1998), such as marital breakdown, have been found to be associated with ADs in offspring (Shanahan et al., 2008).


Furthermore, in line with suggestions by Rapee and Heimberg (1997), we suggested that anxious parents may, as a function of their own disorder, place limits on their children’s wider experiences, a limitation that could inflate apprehension, reduce opportunities to learn skills and develop independence, and create an overreliance on a limited number of adults. Again, little research has directly examined this proposal. In the Reading longitudinal study, the infants of mothers with social AD experienced less caregiving by people other than the mothers (including the father), and they were less likely to have attended nonparental group care at 10 and 14 months of age; this caregiving pattern was associated with infant sleep problems at 2 years, a potential marker of later emotional problems (Creswell et al., 2010). These preliminary findings suggest that the socialization practices of parents with AD may present a risk to child adjustment.



Anxiogenic modeling and information transfer


Learning accounts have emphasized two further, probably overlapping, routes for the development of anxiety: observation of others’ anxiety (modeling or a vicarious acquisition), and receiving information regarding the threatening nature of the environment (i.e., informational acquisition) (e.g., Rachman, 1990).



Modeling


Experimental studies have provided evidence of a causal role of parental modeling of anxious responses in the development of child fearful behaviors (e.g., De Rosnay et al., 2006; Gerull and Rapee, 2002). It seems plausible to assume that children of anxious parents have increased opportunities for vicarious learning, due to the frequent expression of anxiety by their parents. Indeed, in the Reading longitudinal study (Murray et al., 2007), mothers with social AD exhibited significantly more anxiety, engaged less with a stranger, and were less encouraging of their child’s interaction with the stranger than nonanxious mothers. Mothers with social AD were also observed to express higher levels of anxiety within a social referencing paradigm at the infant age of 10 months, a fact which itself predicted increased infant avoidance of a stranger 4 months later, particularly among high-BI infants (Murray et al., 2008). Boys also appeared more vulnerable than girls to the effects of their mother’s disorder.


Aktar et al. (2013) recently administered a similar paradigm with 122 mothers and fathers (with social AD, other ADs, or no history of ADs) and their 12-month-old infants. As in our study, parents with a prenatal diagnosis of social AD expressed more anxiety during the task than the nonsocially anxious groups. Furthermore, parental expressed anxiety was associated with greater infant avoidance among moderate to high-BI offspring. Notably, higher levels of parental expressed anxiety at 12 months by parents with social AD and comorbid ADs (the most severe group) predicted offspring fear and avoidance at 30 months (Aktar et al., 2014). The authors suggest that for offspring of severely socially anxious parents, anxious responses to social challenge may arise on the basis of their parents’ behavior at a critical point in development around the end of the first year.


Further longitudinal follow-up of the children participating in these studies will be important to ascertain whether these factors constitute risk of the development of AD in later life. Nonetheless, these findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that observed parental anxiety influences the development of childhood anxiety, and that this may be particularly the case in the context of pre-existing vulnerability (i.e., high BI).



Information transfer


Observational studies of children with ADs in conversation with their parents support the view that parental narratives can be an important influence on the development of children’s anxiety (e.g., Barrett et al., 1996; Chorpita, 1996). Few studies have investigated whether highly anxious parents convey potentially anxiogenic information to their offspring. In a preliminary investigation, with 68 mother–child (7–15 years) pairs classified according to presence or absence of maternal and child AD, mothers with ADs were observed to make more catastrophic comments in interaction with their child (Moore et al., 2004). We recently reported consistent findings from the Reading longitudinal study (Murray et al., 2014). About 2 months before the children started school, mother–child pairs were observed talking about the forthcoming transition to school, using a picture book as a prompt. Mothers with social AD expressed significantly more threat attribution and lower encouragement than mothers with no history of AD. Furthermore, children whose mothers expressed more threat were more likely to meet diagnostic criteria for social AD 4 months later. Thus, children’s exposure to negative information poses risks to their adjustment, and maternal social AD increases the risk.



Reinforcing responses to child anxious behaviors


The parenting dimensions that have most commonly been implicated in the development of child ADs are parental control and negativity. Specifically, it has been proposed that a parent’s excessive regulation of child behavior and discouragement of independence are likely to (1) communicate to the child that the world is a dangerous and uncontrollable place (e.g., Hudson and Rapee, 2004), and (2) militate against the child’s developing a sense of competence and mastery, reinforcing avoidance of challenge (Chorpita and Barlow, 1998). Cross-sectional and experimental studies have provided evidence to support this hypothesis (e.g., McLeod et al., 2007; Thirlwall and Creswell, 2010). Furthermore, parental negativity, or lack of warmth, has been held to lead the child to believe that the environment is fundamentally hostile and threatening and that outcomes will be negative, thereby contributing to the development of a sense of low self-worth and competence (Parker, 1983). Findings have been inconsistent with regard to this hypothesis (e.g., McLeod et al., 2007).


A number of theorists have suggested that parental control and, possibly, negativity are likely mechanisms by which parental AD poses a risk to offspring adjustment. Specifically, highly anxious parents may be more likely to exert excessive control over their child because of their own heightened perception of threat in their own and their child’s environment and their increased sensitivity to their child’s distress (e.g., Hudson and Rapee, 2004). Parental anxiety has also been proposed to lead to increased negativity to the child as a function of parents’ limited sense of control over their children’s anxious responses (e.g., Hudson and Rapee, 2004). There is currently little support for these proposals. In a small study by Whaley et al. (1999), maternal AD was associated with increased negativity and reduced autonomy granting; however, in an expanded version of this study, the effects appeared to be accounted for by the presence of child, rather than parental, anxiety (Moore et al., 2004). Other studies have similarly failed to find associations between parental AD and overcontrol or negativity (e.g., Gar and Hudson, 2008; Ginsburg et al., 2005); some, instead, found a lack of engagement among parents with AD (Turner et al., 2003). Overall, it appears that more involved or controlling behaviors are common parental responses to having an anxious child, possibly reinforcing child anxiety. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis revealed a weak association between parental anxiety and observations of control (d = 0.08; van der Bruggen et al., 2008), although notably stronger associations were found depending on the aspect of parental control assessed and the methodological features of the studies (d = 0.25–.49).


It is, nonetheless, possible that infant or child inhibition may provoke particular parenting styles more readily among anxious than nonanxious parents. For example, Hirshfeld et al. (1997) found that maternal criticism of the child was a function of a significant interaction between child BI and maternal status: within the group of anxious mothers, 65% of those with inhibited children were critical compared to 18% of those with noninhibited children. Similarly, Murray et al. (2008) found that mothers with social AD showed low levels of autonomy promotion (encouragement) to their infants to engage with a stranger only where the infant was behaviorally inhibited. Recent findings from our research clinic have provided consistent results. Eighty-eight children with ADs (7–12 years) were observed interacting with their mothers in a range of challenging tasks. Despite no observable differences in child anxiety and avoidance during the tasks, mothers who had an AD reported more negative expectations of their child, showed higher levels of intrusive and anxious behaviors and lower levels of warmth, and exhibited a more negative interactive tone than mothers without ADs, particularly when their children appeared anxious during the task (Creswell et al., 2013).


Together, these findings suggest that overcontrolling and, possibly, negative responses may reflect a common response to parenting an anxious or inhibited child, and that these behaviors may be especially likely to arise in parents who are themselves prone to anxiety when their child is confronted by a challenge. Only a few studies have examined whether these problematic parenting behaviors arise in particular ADs and in particular contexts. Challacombe and Salkovskis (2009) found that both mothers with OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) and those with panic disorder were less warm and autonomy promoting than nonanxious mothers during discussion tasks, with no significant differences between the two disorders. However, disorder-specific effects have been found in the case of parental social AD, with socially anxious mothers exhibiting less warmth, more criticism, and more doubts about their child’s competency than mothers with other (nonsocial) ADs specifically in situations that posed a specific challenge in relation to the anxious mothers’ disorder (Murray et al., 2012). The context-dependency of potentially anxiogenic parental responses of anxious parents has also been supported by a recent study by Stein et al. (2012). Specifically, mothers with GAD, in comparison to a healthy control group, and, to some extent, a group of mothers with major depressive disorder, were found to exhibit reduced responsiveness and vocalization with their 10-month-old infants after being primed to worry relative to their responses to a neutral prime. These findings highlight the need for carefully selected paradigms when assessing parent–child interactions in the context of parental ADs.



Implications for frameworks


Our 2009 model proposed a number of mechanisms by which high parental anxiety may increase the risk of ADs in offspring. There is clearly still a lot of work to be done. For example, the mechanisms of transmission of anxious predisposition remain unclear, and there has been little work to evaluate the role of potential socialization experiences. Nonetheless, experimental and prospective studies have supported key learning processes, such as modeling and information transfer. Finally, recent findings support the suggestion that anxiogenic parental responses (e.g., reduced encouragement of child autonomy) to child inhibition/anxiety may be more likely to occur in the context of parental AD.


Overall, the available literature presents a picture which is consistent with Goodman and Gotlib’s (1999) influential model of the intergenerational transmission of depression. Living with a parent with an AD appears not only to entail an inherited risk but also to increase exposure to potential environmental risk factors. Also consistent with Goodman and Gotlib’s (1999) model, the evidence supports a role of both parent (e.g., disorder, comorbidity, cognitions, behaviors) and child characteristics (e.g., BI, age) and their interactions). Other factors that warrant further consideration as moderators of intergenerational risk include child sex (De Rosnay et al., 2006), attachment status (Murray et al., 2014), and information processing (Pass et al., 2012). Family socioeconomic status may also moderate risk by its influence on severity of parental disorder, comorbidity, parenting responses, family disruption, and wider stressors (e.g., Merikangas et al., 1999). Few studies have considered the independent and interacting effects of behaviors by different parents. Fathers and mothers may exert similar influences on child fear learning in some situations (Aktar et al., 2013, 2014), but fathers’ parenting behaviors may play a central role in challenging children beyond their comfort zones, enabling children to face fears and develop confidence in the face of challenge (Majdandžić et al., 2014). ADs in fathers may inhibit these challenging behaviors (Bögels et al., 2008). The presence of paternal AD has also been found to influence co-parenting responses, with fathers with ADs being more likely than nonanxious fathers to be negative and dominating in family conversations. Notably, partners of fathers with ADs were also more negative in family conversations (Majdandžić et al., 2014), highlighting parents’ influences on each other’s parenting responses.


The majority of studies to date have been limited by the inclusion of predominantly affluent families of nonminority ethnicity. However, the importance of considering cultural factors is emphasized by a recent study showing that different patterns of association between parenting behaviors and child anxiety occur in Italian and British families (Raudino et al., 2013). Similarly, the impact of poverty and unemployment has received little attention in this field but is likely to bring additional risks, through, for example, associations with parental depression, substance abuse, and family disruption (Merikangas et al., 1999).


As in Goodman and Gotlib’s (1999) model, the multiple routes to the development of childhood AD and multiple moderators provide an explanation of why there is not a direct relationship between parent and child ADs. Nonetheless, a number of potential targets for prevention and treatment of child anxiety in the context of parental ADs have been identified.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 18, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Parents with anxiety disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access