Tetsuya Tsukahara, Giuseppe Esposito, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Gabriel J.E. Rinkel and Luca Regli (eds.)Acta Neurochirurgica SupplementTrends in Neurovascular Interventions201410.1007/978-3-319-02411-0_13
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The Role of MCA-STA Bypass Surgery After COSS and JET: The European Point of View
(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
(2)
Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
Abstract
The results of the previously published Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) and the Japanese EC-IC Bypass Trial (JET) seem to influence the position towards surgical treatment for ischemic cerebrovascular disease (Ogasawara and Ogawa, Nihon Rinsho 64(Suppl 7):524–527, 2006; Powers et al., JAMA 306:1983–1992, 2011).
The goal of this article is to give the European point of view after COSS and JET on behalf of the Cerebrovascular Section of the European Association of Neurological Surgeons (EANS).
Keywords
EC-IC bypassSTA-MCA bypassCerebral revascularizationCOSSJETEANSHistorically, the EC-IC Bypass Trial published in the 1980s failed to demonstrate a benefit of superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass in more than 1,300 patients suffering from symptomatic internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease [1]. In the following years, the study was widely criticized, predominantly due to (1) the large number of patients operated on at participating centers who were not included in the study (selection bias), and (2) the lack of patient selection based on hemodynamic assessment [2, 6]. Subsequently, in the 1990s the analysis of hemodynamic impairment to predict the risk of stroke became more important and it was recommended to identify candidates for bypass surgery according to hemodynamic criteria.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

