Social Representation and Imagery of Labor: Evaluation Process of the Psychosocial and Labor Vulnerability and Its Relation with Mental Health


Work accidents in Argentina

Year

Incidence rate (in thousands)

Rate losses (in thousands)

Lost labor duration (in days)

Rate of deaths (per million)

Days not worked

1996

84.3

1,701.9

20

233.2

6,173,376

1997

77.4

1,063.2

13.7

220.9

4,639,087

1998

72.9

1,067.6

21.5

223.4

7,740,303

1999

76.7

1,556.3

20.3

204.7

7,763,370

2000

77.5

1,579.1

20.4

185.9

7,771,910

2001

69.0

1,414.2

20.5

159

6,956,680

2002

62.4

1,427.1

22.9

152.1

6,381,975

2003

72.7

1,642.8

22.6

152.2

7,748,171

2004

80.2

1,913.2

23.9

150.1

10,245,610

2005

81.4

2,003.6

24.6

142.8

12,022,892

2006

80.7

2,212.2

27.4

149.1

14,765,377

2007

82.5

2,458.2

29.8

149.8

17,818,104

2008

80.6

2,455.8

30.5

123

19,012,471

2009

78.9

2,212.6

30.6

130.6

17,366,014

2010

71.3

2,206.8

31.2

138.1

17,581,681

2011

73.3

2,453.9

33.6

140.9

20,395,891

2012

69.4

2,470

35.7

147.6

21,390,013


Source Superintendence of Workplace Hazards. Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security



Given the severity of the effects of industrial accidents on worker mental health and suffering, we have to consider this not as a cold chart with numbers, but as a starting point for meditation. We can observe two key issues. The first is the magnitude of the social and health impact of accidents. The second, and this is a critical point, is the importance of state policies designed to prevent accidents and to make primary care compulsory in mental and physical health once an accident happens and the drama starts.

Observing the table above, it is possible to visualize some of the consequences of the impact of labor policies from different economic perspectives applied in Argentina. They are the neoliberal paradigm and the Keynesian paradigm, both economic prospects applied since the return of democratic governance. The first one lasted from 1988 (year of the fall of the “Plan Primavera” [Spring Plain]) until 2001, when the “exchange rate crisis” took place (also known as the “1 to 1” [1 dollar = 1 peso]). The second paradigm is applied to exit the “convertibility” and extends up to the present.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 20, 2017 | Posted by in PSYCHOLOGY | Comments Off on Social Representation and Imagery of Labor: Evaluation Process of the Psychosocial and Labor Vulnerability and Its Relation with Mental Health

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access