HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The roots of the National Health Service (NHS) and the development of psychogeriatric services in the UK are discussed in Chapter 119. The evolution of psychogeriatric services has been guided by professional knowledge and opinion, by the politics of the health and social services, by financial constraints and, occasionally, by public opinion. From the inception of the NHS, which effectively antedated the beginning of provision of specialist psychogeriatric services, until the 1990s there was a consensus about how developments in services should occur in response to changing demography and epidemiology as well as advances in medical knowledge. This consensus was shattered in the UK by the imposition of the ideology of ‘market forces’. Much long-stay hospital accommodation was effectively ‘privatized’ by decisions to support patients in private nursing and residential homes from state funds and to close down as many long-stay NHS beds as possible. The ideology of market forces was also applied to local authority provision of community care. Since April 1991, psychiatric patients with social needs have been subject to a ‘care-planning procedure’ in which all parties, including social services, have to agree. In April 1993 the full implementation of the Community Care Act made local social services departments responsible for purchasing continuing nursing and residential home care, largely from the private sector and with a limited budget.
In the late 1990s, a government came to power that did not appear to share the vision of market forces as the best way to regulate the NHS. However, the internal market has crept back in England under the guise of ‘world class commissioning’ and ‘contestability’, and the NHS remains a ‘political football’. Political devolution of health care arrangements has also resulted in different patterns of service development in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. One can no longer write about ‘UK’ psychiatric services as a whole and this text mostly follows the situation in England. The professional consensus about how services should develop has been replaced by a centralized pattern of decision making and the important decisions, made at the inception of the specialty of old age psychiatry in the UK, about providing a comprehensive service for all severe mental illness in old age, whether organic or functional, have been disregarded in some areas.
THEORETICAL BASIS FOR PSYCHOGERIATRIC
The pioneers of specialist psychiatric services for old people were motivated by the increasing need for psychiatric services for the age group, consequent upon increased life expectancy, the growing knowledge base about psychiatric disorders among old people, and the success of geriatric medicine. The special needs of older people were not always recognized by the generic services. Diagnostic problems included the differential diagnosis of dementia, the association of apparent cognitive impairment with some cases of depressive illness, and the non-specific presentation of disease in old people. The multiple pathology suffered by old people led to a need for new patterns of multidisciplinary working and for close liaison with physicians in geriatric medicine and social services1–3. As in the early days of geriatric medicine, assessment and treatment in the community were emphasized not only because of ‘blocked beds’ but also because a more realistic picture of the patient’s health problems usually emerged. More recently, advances in psychosocial care4, interest in the spiritual needs of old people5 and the advent of new classes of antidepressant, antipsychotic and antidementia drugs (discussed elsewhere in this volume) have all had their impact on the organization and delivery of psychiatric services.
CARE OR TREATMENT: PRIMARY OR SECONDARY?
One of the key theoretical issues for the future development of community services is likely to be the distinction between care and treatment. ‘Care’ is a word with many connotations. Some are positive but, in the medical world at least, some are negative. For example, ‘care’ is seen as what is provided when there is no possibility of effective treatment, as in the ‘prescription’ of ‘tender loving care’ for the terminally ill person. ‘Care’ tends to be relegated to untrained (although not necessarily unskilled) workers employed by social care agencies and commissioned by social services departments, whereas ‘treatment’ is the province of highly trained personnel employed by the Health Service. The move to ‘Care in the Community’ has served to reclassify older mentally ill people, especially those with dementia, as not needing medical treatment. Thus long-term care of people with severe dementia, once shared by psychogeriatric and geriatric services within the NHS, is now provided in private institutions and is ‘means tested’, reducing the burden on the state but increasing the burden on afflicted families.
This situation is further complicated by the tendency of some health planners to equate primary care with low cost and community care, and secondary care with high cost and hospital care. Old age psychiatry services straddle the hospital–community divide and provide essentially secondary services, largely in a community setting. The new term, ‘intermediate care’, describes well some of these community services, but some who use the term believe that community psychiatric nursing services should be part of ‘primary care’, when in old age they work most effectively as part of secondary community care. Certainly, with the increasing prevalence of dementia, it is essential that primary care services and general hospital services become more proficient in recognizing and managing these conditions appropriately.
KEY COMPONENTS OF PSYCHOGERIATRIC SERVICES
Catchment Area and Comprehensiveness
Until recently, virtually all psychogeriatric services in the UK worked to a defined geographical catchment area, and the vast majority aimed to provide a comprehensive psychiatric service to all people over the age of 65 years6,7. Many services are now also trying to provide for people with early-onset dementia, although often without any dedicated resources7. In some areas, managers are seeking to save money by closing specialist wards for old people with functional mental illness and diverting those who need inpatient care onto wards designed for working age adults. Some old age psychiatrists feel they are being pushed towards developing ‘dementia only’ services.
The Multidisciplinary Team
For some this is an outmoded concept, for others an ideal that cannot be obtained, but for many psychogeriatricians it is an essential context for all their endeavours. Most multidisciplinary teams for the elderly incorporate community nurses, a social worker, one or more occupational therapists, a physiotherapist and often a psychologist

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

