Visceral Pain Comorbidity in Headache




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
Maria Adele Giamberardino and Paolo Martelletti (eds.)Comorbidities in Headache DisordersHeadache10.1007/978-3-319-41454-6_4


4. Visceral Pain Comorbidity in Headache



Qasim Aziz1 and Maria Adele Giamberardino 


(1)
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK

(2)
Department of Medicine and Science of Aging and CeSI-Met, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti, Centro Cefalee, Ospedale SS. Annunziata, via dei Vestini sn, Chieti, 66100, Italy

 



 

Maria Adele Giamberardino



Abstract

Primary headaches and visceral pain are both very frequent medical conditions in the general population. Epidemiologic studies indicate that they very often coexist. Particularly frequent is the comorbidity between migraine and cardiac ischemic pain and between migraine/tension-type headache and functional gastrointestinal disorders, particularly irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In women, overlap exists between migraine, dysmenorrhea, primary or secondary to endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS). The pathophysiology of these frequent associations remains elusive. Comorbidity between cardiac pain and migraine is probably based on an endothelial dysfunction common to both migraine and atherosclerosis, the major cause of ischemic cardiac pain. For IBS, dysmenorrhea and IC/PBS, a common likely mechanism is that of central sensitization, present in all conditions, as testified clinically by a generalized increase in pain sensitivity not only in painful but also non-painful areas. This chapter addresses the general epidemiology of visceral pain-headache comorbidities focusing on the clinical characteristics and therapeutic challenges posed by the most frequently encountered associations.


Keywords
Visceral painMigraineTension-type headacheIrritable bowel syndromeDysmenorrheaEndometriosisMyocardial infarctionAnginaChronic pelvic painPainful bladder syndrome



4.1 Introduction


Visceral pain, especially recurrent or chronic, is a major health problem and one of the main reasons for medical consultation by the patients [85]. Primary headaches, particularly migraine and tension-type headache, also represent a significant epidemiologic problem, involving a high degree of disability [33, 37]. Comorbidity between several forms of visceral pain and headache is frequently observed, particularly with ischemic cardiac pain, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), primary dysmenorrhea, pain from endometriosis as well as interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS), although the exact figures on these co-occurrences differ in the various studies [1, 5, 12, 18, 19, 25, 36, 40, 4548, 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, 70, 78, 82, 84, 88, 91]. These associations may reflect common pathophysiological mechanisms especially as they often also involve other pain conditions, such as fibromyalgia [30, 94]. After a description of the general characteristics of visceral pain, this chapter will deal with the epidemiology of headache-visceral pain comorbidity and then focus on the available data on the most frequent of these comorbidities, highlighting for each the possible underlining mechanisms, diagnostic challenges and therapeutic implications.


4.2 Visceral Pain: Clinical Features and Pathophysiology


Visceral pain is a highly complex entity whose experience is variable in health and disease. It can occur in patients with organic disease and also in those without any readily identifiable structural or biochemical abnormality such as in the functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) [21].

Whether organic or functional, the features of visceral pain in the clinical setting are very specific and differ from those of pain arising from somatic structures [27, 28, 65]. Visceral pain also has a typical temporal evolution. In the very first phases of a visceral algogenic process, the symptom tends to be perceived along the midline of the thorax or abdomen, whatever the organ primarily involved. It is a vague and poorly localized sensation, accompanied by marked neurovegetative signs, such as nausea, vomiting, sweating or pallor and emotional reactions, such as anguish or a sense of impending death. In this phase, called “true visceral pain”, the accompanying symptoms are very similar to those commonly observed in migraine. True visceral pain is usually felt around the midline because most visceral organs are supplied with afferents bilaterally; the low density of sensory innervation of the viscera, together with the extensive functional divergence of the visceral input within the central nervous system, accounts for the poor localization and diffuse nature of the pain in this phase. The viscero-visceral convergence of sensory inputs documented among different organs at a central level also explains the relative non-specificity of visceral sensation in this phase (i.e. the difficulty in identifying its source).

At a later stage, either in the course of the same episode or in subsequent episodes, visceral pain becomes “referred” to somatic structures of the body wall, in areas that now differ according to the involved viscus, being represented by zones of the body which receive the same sensory innervation as the internal organ in question. In the phase of referral, the pain becomes sharper and better defined and localized, no longer accompanied by emotional reactions and with notable attenuation of the neurovegetative signs. Referred pain from viscera can occur in the absence of any sensory change in the tissues where the symptom is perceived (referred pain without hyperalgesia) or be accompanied by superficial and/or deep pain hypersensitivity (referred pain with hyperalgesia) as revealed by decreased pain thresholds to different stimuli in the various tissues. Numerous controlled clinical studies in patients affected with different visceral pain conditions, such as renal and biliary colic, pelvic pain in women from either primary or secondary endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome, have shown that the hyperalgesia mainly involves the muscle tissue, but can extend upwards to also affect the subcutis and skin in the most severe cases. The hyperalgesia also tends to accentuate in extent with the repetition of the visceral pain episodes and outlasts the phase of spontaneous pain, persisting for long outside the painful interval. In the area of pain referral, also sustained muscle contraction often takes place, and, in the long run, a dystrophic reaction of the muscle occurs, with reduced thickness and section area, while the subcutis undergoes thickening [10, 29, 32, 34]. Referred pain without hyperalgesia is explained by the convergence-projection phenomenon. Extensive experimental evidence documents the central convergence of visceral and somatic afferent fibres onto the same neurons, and the message from the viscera is thus interpreted by higher brain centres as coming from somatic structures because of mnemonic traces of previous experiences of somatic pain. Sensitization of convergent neurons, due to prolonged/repetitive nociceptive inputs from viscera, would be responsible for the development of somatic hyperalgesia in the referred area (convergence-facilitation theory) with consequent facilitation of sensory messages coming from the somatic area of referral. Reflex arc activations (afferent branch represented by sensory fibres from viscera, efferent branches represented by sympathetic efferents towards the skin/subcutis and somatic efferences towards the muscle) would also contribute to the referred phenomena [13, 73].

Some specific visceral pain conditions are also accompanied by generalized pain hypersensitivity, testifying central sensitization [94]. It is the case of primary dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, IBS and IC/PBS, where decreased pain thresholds, especially in deep tissues (muscle), have been found not only in the referred pain area but also outside this area, in distant control areas. In contrast, other forms of visceral pain, such as urinary or biliary colic, are not accompanied by generalized hyperalgesia [32]. Although with some exceptions, it is interesting to note that the forms of visceral pain most comorbid with headache are those characterized by a tendency towards a generalized increase in pain sensitivity. This fact, together with the observation that headache at a high frequency of attacks, whether migraine or tension-type headache, is also characterized by increased pain sensitivity also in non-painful areas, points to possible common pathogenetic mechanisms at the basis of some of the most common comorbidities, mainly rooted in central sensitization processes [30, 94].

The following sections will deal with specific visceral pain-headache comorbidities and their implications for diagnosis and treatment.


4.3 Cardiovascular Pain and Headache



Pain from the heart

The most frequent cause of cardiac pain is coronary artery disease (CAD) [8, 51]. CAD represents the single highest cause of death in the USA [75]. It is prevalent in men until the age of 55, with mortality rates being fourfold to those of women. After menopause, CAD increases progressively in women [14], to reach equal distribution in the two sexes after age 65 [68]. The lower prevalence of coronary artery disease in women before menopause is commonly attributed to the protective effect of female sex hormones towards the atherosclerosis process. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between cardiovascular events, among which cardiac pain from ischemic diseases, and headache, particularly migraine. Though the results are not always homogeneous, the overall outcome of these investigations is in favour of a specific association between migraine and ischemic cardiac pain [see 82]. In a large prospective cohort study on 27,840 USA women affected with migraine (aged 45 years or older) who were free of angina and cardiovascular disease (CVD) at study entry, Kurth et al. (2006) [47] reported 580 major CVD events during a mean follow-up of 10 years. Women affected with migraine with aura (MA) had multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of 2.08 (95 % CI, 1.30–3.31; P =.002) for myocardial infarction and 1.71 (95 % CI, 1.16–2.53; P =.007) for angina, compared with non-migraine women. Migraine without aura (MO) was not associated with an increased risk of any CVD event. In contrast with previous data, in 2009 Schürks et al. [72] did not find an overall association between any migraine and myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease. In a prospective cohort study by Kurth et al. (2011) in men aged 40–84 years who were free of CVD at the beginning, 2,236 major CVD events were reported among 1,449 migraine sufferers during a mean follow-up of 15.7 years, with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95 % confidence intervals) of 1.42 (1.15–1.77; P <.001) for myocardial infarction and 1.15 (0.99–1.33; P = .068) for angina, compared to non-migraine sufferers. This particular study points to the important role of migraine as a cardiovascular risk factor in men, in particular for myocardial infarction, although the study is limited by the fact that no data are available specifically for MA, and also by the circumstance that male gender represents, per se, a risk factor for CVD [46]. A post-hoc subgroup analysis of the Women’s Health Study, which randomized 100 mg aspirin on alternate days in primary prevention of CVD among 39,876 women aged ≥45 years, showed that female patients with migraine and aura, who were assigned to aspirin, had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (RR 3.72, 95 % CI 1.39–9.95); this was evident only for nonsmokers or those affected with hypertension (P < 0.01) [45].

In 2015, Sacco et al. [70] published a meta-analysis of previous publications, performed through a PubMed and EMBASE search up to April 2014, for observational studies on the risk of any form of ischaemic heart disease in migraine sufferers, reporting in particular on the relationship between migraine and the risk of myocardial infarction. Using a random effects model to pool the effect sizes, out of 3,348 records, 15 studies (one case-control, one cross-sectional and 13 cohort studies) were identified and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated an increased risk of myocardial infarction (pooled adjusted effect estimate 1.33, 95 % confidence interval 1.08–1.64; P = 0.007) and of angina (pooled adjusted effect estimate 1.29, 95 % confidence interval 1.17–1.43; P < 0.0001) in migraine sufferers compared to non-migraine sufferers. The authors conclude that there is an association of migraine with myocardial infarction and angina.

While the association between migraine, particularly MO, and cardiac ischemic pain has been established, the possible explanation of the basis of this comorbidity remains controversial. A possible link between the two conditions has been identified in the detected higher concentrations of some serum markers in migraine sufferers vs controls, e.g. pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), which suggests a preclinical cardiac involvement in these patients and pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-1beta and IL-6 [87]. A further element is represented by the fact that migraine patients, especially those with MA, present a significant reduction of number and function of circulating endothelial progenitor cells [50] (EPCs), which appear to be involved in repair and angiogenesis of ischemic tissues [57], compared to controls and patients with tension-type headache. Thus an altered endothelial function in migraine sufferers could represent the link between migraine and the increased risk of CV events, among which cardiac ischemic pain. This altered function in migraine was also confirmed by Rodríguez-Osorio et al. [69], who analysed flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the dominant brachial artery, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels, nitric oxide stable metabolites (NOx) and EPCs in peripheral blood samples of patients with episodic migraine vs controls, during interictal periods and migraine attacks. Migraine sufferers had significantly lower levels of EPCs and higher levels of NOx, VEGF and CGRP, with higher levels of these markers reported during attacks. Furthermore EPC counts decreased as migraine progressed in time. An adverse cardiovascular profile in patients with migraine has also been put in relationship with the detection of oxidative stress in the condition, in terms of both an increase in oxidizing substances and antioxidant mechanisms [74].

Metabolic factors promoting CV risk, such as cholesterol levels, could also represent a link between migraine and ischemic cardiac events, as suggested by the results of studies assessing the Framingham risk score in migraine sufferers. The Framingham risk score evaluates the risk of cardiovascular events by combining multiple traditional cardiovascular risk factors (such as age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, smoking, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medications) into a single quantitative estimate of risk which can be used to target preventive interventions [35]. In the cross-sectional population-based HUNT study [93], which enrolled 48,713 subjects (age ≥ 20 years), in 44,098 (90.5 %) of whom parameters were assessed such as blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), serum total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to calculate the Framingham 10-year risk score for coronary death and myocardial infarction, an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile (elevated Framingham risk score) was found in migraine with and without aura as well as in non-migrainous headache. The risk was higher in MA. A very interesting result was that the Framingham risk score consistently increased with a higher headache frequency. While for MO and non-migrainous headache, the increased risk was accounted for by lifestyle factors such as low physical activity, smoking and a high body mass index, and these factors instead did not completely explain the elevated risk in MA. The specific relationship between lipid profile and migraine could account for these differences. A population-based study by Bigal et al. (2010) [7], for instance, found that all migraine sufferers were more likely to have a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia than controls, the risk being highest in MA. After adjustments for CVD risk factors, gender, age, disability and treatment, migraine remained significantly associated with myocardial infarction. A significant elevation of total cholesterol and triglycerides was also found among migraine with aura patients enrolled in the cross-sectional Epidemiology of Vascular Ageing Study [67]. A further more recent study documented a significant positive association between migraine frequency and intensity with total and LDL cholesterol, in addition demonstrating for the first time a significant reduction of these lipid parameters after effective migraine prophylaxis. The study was retrospective and involved a small sample size; therefore, the results need to be confirmed in future prospective controlled trials. In spite of these limitations, however, it strongly suggests a link between cholesterol levels and migraine severity, underlining the importance of prevention of migraine chronification also in the light of reducing an important risk factor for atherosclerosis and, consequently, cardiovascular risk and cardiac visceral pain of ischemic origin [81].

While the bulk of the studies so far carried out on the relationship between CV risk and migraine has mainly evidenced a link between MA and CV, recently growing evidence exists about a link also with migraine without aura, as suggested by the results of a study on micro RNA profile in MO patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, noncoding RNAs whose deregulation has been shown in several human diseases, including pain states and diseases associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. This study in female patients affected exclusively with MO showed that the expression of four miRNAs was significantly different in MO patients versus controls. Specifically miR-27b was upregulated, while miR-181a, let-7b and miR-22 were downregulated. Remarkably, the same miRNAs are known to be modulated in the setting of atherosclerosis and stroke in humans. This study represents a first step towards further characterization of MO diagnosis/pathophysiology, also in relation to its link with cardiovascular risk [80].

The data so far available on migraine-cardiac pain comorbidity may have important implications for therapy. On one hand, evidence about an increased risk of cardiovascular events with the increasing severity of the condition strongly suggests that an early and effective preventative treatment of migraine is a measure to also prevent/reduce the risk of cardiac pain from ischemia. On the other hand, this association also reinforces the notion of great caution when prescribing symptomatics to migraine patients, whether triptans, because of their vasoconstrictive action (though preferential at cerebral rather than cardiac level), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), whose extensive employment is also associated with an increased risk of CV events. An accurate evaluation of the global health profile of the migraine patient, with particular attention to all the other CV risk factors (smoking habits, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia) is strongly recommended towards this aim [82].

An adequate prevention of chronic tension-type headache (TTH) is also crucial. Although no specific comorbidity data have been evidenced for tension-TTH and visceral pain of cardiac origin so far, it should be remembered, here again, the potential CV risk linked to NSAIDs, which represent the typical first-line symptomatic treatment for tension-type headache. Their excessive use should therefore be prevented also in the light of effectively preventing possible CV events at cardiac level [33].


4.4 Gastrointestinal Pain and Headache


The relationship between gastrointestinal and headache manifestations is particularly strict. Headache, especially migraine, presents with a number of associated symptoms also typical of the gastrointestinal tract, e.g. nausea or vomiting. In turn, abdominal gastrointestinal pain/disturbance can be part of the spectrum of headache conditions [37, 89].


4.4.1 Headache Conditions Associated with Gastrointestinal Pain Symptoms


Under the label of Episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine (code 1.6), the most recent headache classification considers several conditions involving GI symptoms which can manifest in patients who also have migraine without and with aura or are at increased likelihood of developing either of these headache forms. Typically indicated as conditions occurring in childhood, they may also occur in adults. Recurrent gastrointestinal disturbance (code 1.6.1.) is described as “Recurrent episodic attacks of abdominal pain and/or discomfort, nausea and/or vomiting, occurring infrequently, chronically or at predictable intervals, that may be associated with migraine”. The diagnostic criteria require at least five attacks with distinct episodes of abdominal pain and/or discomfort and/or nausea and/or vomiting; normal gastrointestinal examination and evaluation; absence of any other disorder which could account for these symptoms. A first subcategory is represented by Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) (code 1.6.1.1), described as “Recurrent episodic attacks of intense nausea and vomiting, usually stereotypical in the individual and with predictable timing of episodes. Attacks may be associated with pallor and lethargy. There is complete resolution of symptoms between attacks”. The cyclic nature is the hallmark, and is predictable; episodes usually start at the same time of day, have similar duration, intensity and type of associated symptoms and prodromal phenomena are often present. The attacks are very disabling. Triggering factors are often identifiable, such as menstruation, lack of sleep, certain foods, physical exertion and stress. The clinical features of this syndrome resemble those found in association with migraine headaches, and multiple threads of research over the last years have suggested that cyclic vomiting syndrome is a condition related to migraine. Typically occurring in childhood, CVS also manifests in adults, though its prevalence in this population is at present unknown [38, 77]. Calhoun and Pruitt (2014) [11] performed an analysis of the literature, based on which they concluded that CVS likely represents a disorder on the migraine spectrum because CVS in adults is not only highly comorbid with migraine, but it responds to migraine preventives and in some cases to injectable sumatriptan even in the absence of headache. A second subcategory of recurrent gastrointestinal disturbance is abdominal migraine (code 1.6.1.2), described as “An idiopathic disorder seen mainly in children as recurrent attacks of moderate to severe midline abdominal pain, associated with vasomotor symptoms, nausea and vomiting, lasting 2–72 h and with normality between episodes. Headache does not occur during these episodes”. Pain of abdominal migraine is severe enough to interfere with normal daily activities. In young children, the presence of headache is often overlooked, and in the headache classification, it is underlined how a careful history of presence or absence of headache must be taken in these cases, and, if headache or head pain during attacks is identified, a diagnosis of migraine without aura should be considered. Most children with abdominal migraine will develop migraine headache later in life [37].


4.4.2 Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases and Headache


The frequent association of headache, particularly migraine, with symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal diseases (FGIDs) is revealed by numerous clinical observations and epidemiological studies [1, 12, 16, 48, 56]. The study by Aamodt, in particular (population-based, cross-sectional) [1], showed a higher prevalence of headache, including migraine, in subjects complaining of reflux symptoms, diarrhoea, constipation or nausea vs subjects not presenting with these symptoms. The paper by Cole et al. (2006) [16], reporting a large cohort study involving 97,593 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), showed a higher prevalence of migraine (6 %) vs healthy controls (2.2 %). However, a study of dyspeptic patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy failed to show a difference in migraine prevalence in patients with reflux-like/ulcer-like dyspepsia vs healthy controls, being higher only among those with dysmotility-like dyspepsia [56].

In 2011, Lackner et al. [49] published a study in which they evaluated 175 IBS patients (diagnosis according to Rome III criteria) (median age, 41 years; 78 % women), referred to two specialty care clinics, for IBS symptom severity, comorbidities, psychiatric profile, abdominal pain intensity, health status and quality of life. There was an average of 5 comorbidities (1 mental, 4 physical) in IBS patients, the worst QOL occurring in those with more comorbidities. Comorbidity type was strongly associated with illness burden indicators. Tension-type headache was among the most frequent comorbidities, consistently associated with greater illness and symptom burdens (QOL, mental and physical function, distress, more severe symptoms of IBS, pain). The authors conclude that comorbidities are common among patients with IBS and are associated with distress and reduced QOL. Specific comorbidities (among which tension-type headache) are associated with more severe symptoms of IBS.

More recently, Park et al. [62] evaluated the prevalence of functional symptoms (using Rome III criteria to classify FGID) in a prospective, systematically acquired cohort of migraine patients attending a teaching hospital in Korea. They aimed to clarify the relationship among these concomitant functional symptoms, psychological comorbidity and headache-related disability. In a prospective regimen, 109 migraine sufferers recruited from a headache clinic at a teaching hospital completed a self-administered survey that collected information on headache characteristics, functional gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression and headache-related disability. A total of 71 % of the patients met the Rome III criteria for at least one FGID. In patients with FGID, irritable bowel syndrome was the most common diagnosis (40.4 %), followed by nausea and vomiting syndrome (24.8 %) and functional dyspepsia (23.9 %). A specific difference among IBS subtypes in relation to the association with migraine was also found, with IBS-M (mixed, diarrhoea-constipation) being the most prevalent in migraine. Depression and anxiety scores were significantly higher in patients meeting the criteria for any FGID. The number of the symptoms consistent with FGID in individual patients correlated positively with depression and anxiety.

The authors conclude that FGID symptoms defined by the Rome III criteria are highly prevalent in migraine and that these symptoms correlate with psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety.

The mechanisms beyond the frequent association between migraine and FGIDs still need to be clarified. Possible pathways common to both may involve the brain-gut axis, neuro-immunity and neuroendocrine interactions [58, 66]. Altered serotonin signalling is also a possibility together with a genetic predisposition, since IBS and migraine show strong familial aggregation [23, 24]. Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT) gene (SERT deletion/deletion genotype) are associated with IBS, especially diarrhoea-predominant IBS [63], and SERT gene polymorphism of the variable number of tandem repeats is associated with migraine [64].

Among the various pathogenetic hypothesis for the comorbidity, however, the role of sensitization mechanisms seems particularly plausible. Although the pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain is incompletely understood, in fact, it has been postulated that peripheral sensitisation of visceral afferents, central sensitisation of the spinal dorsal horn and aberrancies within descending modulatory systems may have an important role [22]. Most patients with IBS present a generalized increase in pain sensitivity, the typical hallmark of central sensitization, similarly to patients with migraine and tension-type headache, especially with a high frequency of attacks/chronic [10, 59, 92].

The comorbidity between functional gastrointestinal disorders and headache has implications for therapy. The management of patients with functional abdominal pain requires a tailored multidisciplinary approach in a supportive and empathetic environment in order to develop an effective therapeutic relationship. In the opinion of Farmer and Aziz [22], patient education directed towards an explanation of the pathophysiology of functional abdominal pain is a prerequisite step and provides the rationale for the introduction of interventions. A similar approach is also indispensable for headache patients as a premise towards the therapeutic measures. For functional visceral pain, interventions can usefully be categorized into general measures, pharmacotherapy, psychological interventions and “step-up” treatments. Pharmacotherapeutic/step-up options include tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors and the gabapentinoids, the same class compounds used for prophylaxis in headache. Psychological treatments for FGIDs include cognitive behavioural therapy, recommended also in headache, and hypnotherapy. An integrated approach to both the headache problem and visceral pain condition in these patients is therefore highly advisable.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 25, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Visceral Pain Comorbidity in Headache

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access