84 Basilar Invagination

Case 84 Basilar Invagination


Michel Lacroix



Image

Fig. 84.1 Cervical spine imaging with (A) axial computed tomography at the level of the foramen magnum and (B) at the atlantoaxial junction. (C) T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance image (MRI) and (D) axial MRI at the level of the foramen magnum.


Image Clinical Presentation



Image Questions




Image

Fig. 84.2 Cervical spine lateral radiograph. An instrumented occipitocervical fusion with occipital screws and transarticular atlanto–axial screws is visible.


Image Answers




  1. Are there any other symptoms or signs you would like to verify?

  2. Interpret the CT and the MRI.

    • On the axial CT scan, the erosion and compression of the lateral atlantal masses as well as the penetration of the dens beyond the level of the occipital condyle in the foramen magnum are visualized. The sagittal T2-weighted MRI image of the cervical spine clearly shows some typical findings.3,4

      • The downward separation of the anterior arch of the atlas from the clivus provokes a descent of the atlas arch onto the axis body.
      • The displacement of the posterior arch of the atlas rostrally and ventrally causes a decrease in the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal.

        The inflammatory rheumatoid pannus and the resulting compression of the medulla are seen in both the axial and sagittal MRI. There is no syringomyelia or Chiari malformation. The craniometric lines3,5 in lateral view are shown in Fig. 84.3.


  3. What is your initial management?

    • Marks and Sharp2 showed in 1981 that untreated myelopathic rheumatoid patients died within 6 months of presentation. Furthermore, most myelopathic rheumatoid patients (56%, n = 18) treated with conservative measures only (collar or traction alone) also died within 6 months.2
    • Treatment should be planned immediately.

  4. What studies do you order?

    • Spinal and complete systemic workup are in order:

      • Flexion–extension cervical spine x-rays. Any increase in the atlantodental interval confirms the instability, which is consistently associated with the basilar invagination.1,3,4
      • Consider dynamic MRI in flexion and extension to identify instability and sites of compression.
      • Preoperative blood work including nutritional status (lymphocyte count and liver function tests).
      • Discontinue nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents 1 week prior to surgery. Methotrexate and steroids may be used for pain management preoperatively.
      • Cardiac status, pulmonary function assessment tests, and anesthesia consult should be obtained.

  5. What is your course of action?

    • A period of 4 to 5 days of halo traction with mild sedation and a maximum of 12 pounds of charge can reduce a basilar invagination of less than 15 mm.4
    • Traction is contraindicated in posterior occipitoatlantal dislocation or complex rotatory luxations.

  6. Describe the surgical options and select the one you would prefer.

    • Treatment should be designed depending on the presence of an irreducible versus reducible deformity.4

      • Irreducible deformity: Anterior decompression. Can be achieved through a transoral route although an endoscopic transcervical6 or transsphenoidal (unpublished) approach have also been described. The decompression is followed by a posterior fusion.
      • Reducible deformity: Posterior occipitocervical fusion. Many posterior fusion techniques have been described for reducing the basilar invagination, restoring craniospinal alignment, and establishing fixation of the atlantoaxial joint.7 The advance in osteosynthesis now allows for a solid instrumented fusion. Plates and screws at the occiput combined with C1 lateral masses and C2 pedicular screws, transarticular C1–C2 screws, or translaminar C2 screws and any combination thereof with autograft or mixed allograft fusion have achieved solid fusion.

  7. After posterior fusion, what is the natural history of the basilar invagination?

    • There is evidence in the literature suggesting the regression of the soft pannus after internal fusion.8
    • A high rate of postoperative morbidity (42%, n = 55), and both early and 6 months mortality (13% and 25%, respectively) are reported for nonambulatory patients.9
    • Significant postoperative motor recovery was observed for a patient with a posterior atlantodental interval of more than 14 mm.10
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on 84 Basilar Invagination

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access