Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis


1. Speech

 4

Normal speech

 3

Detectable disturbance

 2

Intelligible without repeating

 1

Speech with non-verbal communication

 0

Loss of useful speech

2. Salivation

 4

Normal

 3

Slight but definite excess of saliva

 2

Moderate excessive saliva, minimal drooling

 1

Marked excessive of saliva, some drooling

 0

Marked drooling, requires constant tissue

3. Swallowing

 4

Normal eating habits

 3

Early eating problems, occasional choking

 2

Dietary consistency changes

 1

Needs supplemental tube feeding

 0

Nil orally

4. Handwriting

 4

Normal

 3

Slow or sloppy, all words legible

 2

Not all words legible

 1

Able to grip pen but cannot write

 0

Unable to grip pen

5. Cutting food & handling utensils

 4

Normal

 3

Slow & clumsy but no help needed

 2

Can cut most foods, although clumsy & needs some help

 1

Food must be cut by someone else

 0

Needs to be fed

6. Dressing & hygiene

 4

Normal

 3

Independent but decreased efficiency

 2

Some help with closures & fasteners

 1

Provides minimal assistance to caregiver

 0

Unable to perform any task

7. Turning in bed

 4

Normal

 3

Slow & clumsy

 2

Can turn alone with difficulty

 1

Can initiate but cannot turn or adjust sheets

 0

Total dependence

8. Walking

 4

Normal

 3

Early ambulation difficulties

 2

Walks with assistance

 1

Non ambulatory, functional movement

 0

No purposeful leg movement

9. Climbing stairs

 4

Normal

 3

Slow

 2

Mild unsteadiness/fatigue

 1

Needs assistance

 0

Cannot do

10. Dyspnea

 4

None

 3

Occurs when walking

 2

Occurs when eating, bathing or dressing

 1

Occurs at rest

 0

Considerable difficulty

11. Orthopnea

 4

None

 3

Some difficulty, does not routinely use more than two pillows

 2

Needs extra pillows to sleep

 1

Only sleeps sitting up

 0

Unable to sleep

12. Respiratory insufficiency

 4

None

 3

Intermittent use of non invasive ventilation

 2

Continuous use of non invasive ventilation at night

 1

Continuous use of non invasive ventilation day & night

 0

Mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy



Variants of ALS include primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), in which clinical signs are confined to upper motor neurons, and progressive muscle atrophy, in which signs are confined to the lower motor neuron. Diagnostic criteria for PLS require the presence of signs for a minimum of 3 years. These ALS variants can be difficult to diagnose in the early stages, and prognosis is generally better than in typical ALS.

Restricted forms of ALS have also been described including flail arm and flail leg syndromes, and monomelic disease. The former two are more common in men, and may carry a better prognosis that typical ALS.

Other variants include bulbospinal muscular atrophy (Kennedy’s disease). This X-linked disorder is due to an expansion of trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor. The clinical features include slowly progressive lower motor neuron signs in bulbar and proximal limbs. Up to 50 % of cases have gynaecomastia; Progression is usually slower than in typical ALS. Nerve conduction studies can be helpful as, in contrast to ALS, the sensory nerve action potentials may be absent in Kennedy’s disease (Table 8.2).


Table 8.2
Variants of ALS/MND







































Disease

Clinical features

Other comments

Median survival

ALS

Both upper and motor neurone signs in multiple spinal segments

Most common adult-onset form of motor neuron disease

Three to five years

Primary lateral sclerosis

Upper motor neuron signs only

Many patients eventually develop clinical or electrophysiological signs of LMN involvement. ALS develops in up to 77 % within 3–4 years

For those who remain with a diagnosis of PLS, median survival = 20 years or more

Progressive muscular atrophy

Lower motor neuron signs only

Variable evolution to ALS

Five years. A subset survive 20 years or more

Progressive bulbar palsy

Speech and swallowing affected initially due to LMN involvement of CN IX, X, XII

Symptoms include dysarthria, dysphagia, and dysphonia. Aspiration pneumonia is usually the terminal event

Two to three years

Bulbospinal

Muscle atrophy (Kennedy’s disease)

Speech and swallowing affected, proximal limbs

X-linked recessive inheritance pattern

Pure lower motor neuron condition due to trinucleotide repeat in androgen receptor

Ten years or more


CN cranial nerves, UPM upper motor neuron, LMN lower motor neuron

The majority of ALS patients die from respiratory failure. Prognostic indicators include time from first symptom to diagnosis (longer duration carries a better prognosis), presence of executive impairment (poorer prognosis), bulbar or respiratory onset disease (poorer prognosis) older age of onset (poorer prognosis), marked weight loss (poorer prognosis) and presence of pure upper or pure lower motor syndromes (better prognosis) (Table 8.3).


Table 8.3
Prognostic indicators







































Poor prognostic indicators

Short interval between first symptom & diagnosis

Bulbar onset disease

Respiratory onset disease

Malnutrition

Rapidly progressive decline in ALSFRS

Presence of executive impairment

Familial disease (some SOD1 mutations)

Hyperlipidemia

Increased homocysteine

Vital capacity <50 % of normal

Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure <40 cm H2O

Good prognostic indicators

Long interval between first symptom and diagnosis

Lower limb onset

Flail arm/flail leg syndrome

Upper motor neuron predominant disease

Lower motor predominant disease

Familial disease (some SOD1 mutations)

Age of onset <50 years


8.2.1 Discussing the Diagnosis


Once the diagnosis has been established, the patient should formally meet with an experienced doctor who has been involved in the care, to discuss the outcome of the investigations. Specific techniques should be used as outlined in Table 8.4, including the provision of a quiet space and adequate time to discuss the diagnosis. The patient should be accompanied by a close friend or family member. The level of information the patient has about the disease should be explored. Some patients have specific concerns including a fear of choking to death; reassurance can be provided about these and other anxieties relating to the progress of the disease. Despite the inevitable decline associated with the condition, it is important to convey hope when disclosing the diagnosis. Positive prognostic aspects of the disease can be emphasized, and the likelihood of new therapeutics in the form of future clinical trials discussed. Patients should be provided with a follow up appointment within 2–4 weeks of diagnosis. Some patients seek a second opinion. This should be facilitated.


Table 8.4
How should a physician tell the patient that they have ALS




























































Task

Recommendations

Location

Off the ward, in a quiet room

Not as an outpatient clinic

Participants

Senior clinician

Patient

Family member

Nursing staff

Breaking the news

Ask what the patient/family knows about their condition

Approach the diagnosis with sensitivity

Use diagrams to help explain the concept of upper & lower motor neurons

Be honest about prognosis

Acknowledge the distress that the diagnosis causes

Allow plenty of time for questions

Allow time for reflection

Hope and reassurance

Provide hope: up to 10 % of patients survive for >10 years

Identify positive prognostic indicators

Explain that support is available, and that the patient and family are not alone

Reassure that as the condition progresses, interventions can help to maintain independence, quality of life and dignity

Reassure that decline occurs gradually

Provide information about voluntary organizations

Discuss likely opportunities to participate in research and clinical trials

Honesty

Be honest but empathic

Communication

Simple language, no jargon



8.3 Epidemiology


The incidence of ALS/MND in Europe is approximately 2 per 100,000 and the overall lifetime risk is approximately 1:350. In populations of non-European or mixed ethnicity, current evidence suggests that the frequency of ALS is lower. While the reasons for this difference remain unclear, preliminary evidence suggests that genetic admixture may be protective. Careful evaluation of populations over a long period of time has indicated that the adjusted age-specific incidence of the disease is not increasing.

ALS is more common in males than females by a ratio of 1.2–1.5 to 1. This disparity is mostly due to the increased frequency of spinal onset alS in men. In contrast to Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease, the risk of developing ALS peaks between the ages of 50–75, and declines thereafter. This suggests that ALS is not a disease of ageing, but a disease for which age is one of a number of risk factors.

As ALS is a rare disease, environmental factors that confer increased risk have been difficult to identify. Case controlled studies seeking to establish exposure risks are often inadequately powered and confounded by methodological errors. High incidences of ALS in Guam and the Kii Penninsula in Japan have been associated with cyanobacterial neurotoxins including BMAA, although definitive evidence in this regard is lacking, and more recent evidence from Kii also suggests the presence of a genetic founder effect. Clustering of ALS has been identified in certain occupations including Italian soccer players. The factors that lead to this apparent increased risk remain to be determined. Other environmental factors that have been associated with ALS have included smoking, exposure to pesticides and organic toxins, and electromagnetic radiation. With the exception of smoking, definitive evidence of risk remains to be established and will require large unbiased population-based case controlled studies for confirmation.


8.4 Genetics


ALS is frequently described as being either familial or sporadic. A total of 22 genes and loci of major effect have been identified, (Table 8.5) and the majority of these are autosomal dominant in inheritance pattern. Of these, the hexnucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72 accounts for over 50 % of known familial ALS in populations of European extraction, and up to 8 % of apparently sporadic disease. This variant is rare in other populations. The C9orf72 repeat expansion is associated with a distinct ALS phenotype with prominent cognitive and behavioural impairment, and with higher rates of neuropsychiatric conditions in kindreds of those affected. The pathogenesis of C9orf72 repeat related disease has not been established, but is thought to relate in part to aberrant RNA transcription with accumulation of sense and antisense RNA foci, coupled with proteins expressed by repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. Sense and anti-sense RNAs are thought to accumulate in nuclear foci, and RAN proteins are thought to form cytoplasmic aggregates in neurons.


Table 8.5
Known genes associated with ALS



























































































Gene

Functional significance

Oxidative stress

SOD1

Cytoplasmic Antioxidant Soluble form may become neurotoxic

HFE

Regulator of iron metabolism

Cytoskeleton, microtubule, axonal transport

MAPT

Microtubule protein disruption Involved in other neurodegenerative diseases

NEFH

Neurofilament protein, mutations alter axonal transport

PRPH

Intermediate filament, transgenic mice develop motor neuron degeneration

Prophillin

Cytoskeleton dynamics

TubA4A

Microtubular function

Peripherin

DCT1

Disruption in dynein/dynactin complex alter axonal transport, produce phenotype in mice

KIFAP3

Kinesin associated protein, modulates survival

Metabolism

PON 1–3

Paroxonases are important detoxifying enzymes. Association in five different populations, but different haplotypes implicated in different ancestral populations

Progranulin

Gene of major effect in FTD. Coding variations associated with ALS in some populations, similar in function to angiogenin

DNA/RNA repair

ANG

RNA ribonuclease and hypoxia responsive agent; overlap in function with VEGF & progranulin

APEX

FUS

RNA regulation

SMN1, SMN2

Affects RNA splicing, gene of major effect in spinal muscular atrophy

TDP-43

RNA regulator

ELP 3

RNA polymerase

C9orf-72

RNA regulation, RNA transcription

TAF 15

EWSR1

Senetaxin

RNA processing

Excitotoxicity

UNC13A

FTD

Proteostatic

VCP

CHMPT2
 

Ubiquilin 2

Autophagy

Optineurin (OPTN)

Vesicular transport

Sequestosome (SQSTM)

Vesicular transport

Mutations in superoxide dismuatase (SOD1) account for up to 15 % of familial ALS, and up to 5 % of apparently sporadic disease in some populations. However as is the case for the C9orf72 variant, mutations in SOD1 are population specific, occurring with low frequency in familial and sporadic disease in The Netherlands and Ireland, and with higher frequency in Italy and the USA.

Mutations in two different DNA/RNA binding proteins, TDP-43 and FUS/TLS account for a further 10–15 % of familial ALS in some populations. Both TDP-43 and FUS code for proteins involved in gene regulation including transcription, RNA splicing, RNA transport, and translation, and in the regulation and processing of small regulatory RNAS (microRNAs). Of the currently known genes, only C9orf-72 SOD1, TDP-43, and FUS mutations occur with sufficiently high frequency in European populations to warrant diagnostic testing. The remainder have been described in small numbers of kindreds are often associated with unusual phenotypes.

While there is currently no accepted definition of familial ALS, up to 85 % percent of people diagnosed with ALS have no family history and are classified as having sporadic disease. The frequency of familial disease can be under-estimated by the late onset of disease phenotype, incomplete penetrance, and small kindreds. Moreover, family aggregation studies have identified an overlap between ALS, FTD and other neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric conditions. While a proportion of these families are associated with the repeat expansion on C90rf72, some repeat-negative kindreds also exhibit prominent aggregation of neuropsychiatric disease, suggesting the presence of other gene variants with phenotypic pleotropy.

Population-based studies of “at risk” genes that increase disease susceptibility suggest that up to 17 % of those with ALS carry an “at risk” variant, although the relative contribution of each identified gene rarely exceeds an odds ratio of 2.0, and in most cases the mechanism by which the risk is conferred remains to be elucidated.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in ALS have been relatively disappointing to date, primarily because of small sample size (5000 patients, 15,000 controls). Increasing the sample size to over 15,000 patients have shown to increase the number of ‘hits’ substantially in other diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Schizophrenia. A combined GWAS for ALS has included over 16,000 patients and 25,000 controls is being analysed. However increased international collaboration coupled with the combination of detailed clinical phenotyping with next generation whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics technology is likely to provide a wealth of new information about ALS pathophysiology (www.​ProjectMine.​com). This in turn will provide exciting new avenues for developments in disease therapeutics.


8.4.1 Genetic Testing


Because most ALS is thought to be non-familial, there is currently little advantage in testing sporadic individual patients for known gene mutations, with the possible exception of the C9orf72 repeat expansion. In general, genetic testing should only be undertaken in known familial disease, where the presence of mutations in known genes might accelerate the diagnostic process. Expert genetic counseling is recommended prior to testing. Presymptomatic genetic testing should only be performed in first degree adult blood-relatives of patients with a known gene mutation. As many mutations in ALS are incompletely penetrant, the identification of a mutation in an asymptomatic relative cannot accurately predict development of the disease. Testing should be performed on a strictly volunteer basis and should following extensive genetic counseling. However, with the advent of new therapeutics including anti-sense therapies for SOD1 – and C9orf72 –related disease, there may be a case in future for identifying pre-symptomatic carriers of known pathogenic variants.


8.5 Overlap Syndromes


Up to 13 % of patients with ALS have fronto-temporal dementia (FTD), and up to 30 % of those with FTD have neurophysiologic evidence of anterior horn cell degeneration (see Chap.​ 6). A smaller percentage (2–5 %) of patients with ALS have evidence of other forms of dementia including features of Alzheimer’s disease. Patients with ALS are more likely to have a family history of neurodegenerative disease – this is driven in part by the C9orf72 repeat expansion. Occasional patients with extrapyramidal syndromes and anterior horn cell degeneration have been reported and a small minority of ALS patients are ataxic. Rarely, Huntington’s disease can present with amytrophy (see Chap.​ 8).


8.6 Diagnostic Criteria


Formal diagnosis of ALS is based upon clinical criteria that include the presence of upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) signs, progression of disease, and the absence of an alternative explanation. There is no single diagnostic test that can confirm or entirely exclude the diagnosis of motor neuron disease.

The El Escorial criteria were developed in 1990 by the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) for research and clinical trial purposes. These guidelines were subsequently revised in Airlie House in April 1998 (Table 8.6).


Table 8.6
EL Escorial and Airlie house criteria for diagnosis of ALS





































The presence of:

 (a) Evidence of LMND degeneration by clinical, electrophysiological or neuropathological examination

 (b) Evidence of UMN degeneration by clinical examination; and

 (c) Progression of the motor syndrome within a region or to other regions, as determined by history or examination;

and:

The absence of:

 (a) Electrophysiological and pathological evidence of other disease processes that might explain the signs of LMN or UMN degeneration; and,

 (b) Neuroimaging evidence of other disease processes that might explain the observed clinical and electrophysiological signs.

El Escorial criteria

 Definite ALS: UMN and LMN signs in three regions

 Probable ALS: UMN & LMN signs in at least two regions with UMN signs rostral to (above) LMN signs

 Possible ALS: UMN & LMN signs in one region, UMN signs alone in two or more regions, or LMN signs above UMN signs

 Suspected ALS: LMN signs only in two or more regions

Airlie house (modified) criteria

 Clinically definite ALS: clinical evidence alone of UMN & LMN signs in three regions

 Clinically probable ALS: clinical evidence alone of UMN and LMN signs in at least two regions with some UMN signs rostral to (above) the LMN signs

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 11, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access