Disorders of attention and memory

9 Disorders of attention and memory






Introduction


In the Introduction to this book, we explained how rehabilitation can be interpreted as a learning process; patients may need to learn (or relearn) how to carry out functional tasks, find new strategies for communication and self-care or develop more ergonomic ways for moving and handling. In order to store this information into long-term memory, the learner needs to be able to focus and maintain their attention on relevant information for long enough. However, attentional deficits are common in a number of patient groups, e.g. those with dementia or severe pain, and are widespread in people with neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury or stroke.


Given the prerequisite of attention for learning, and the finding that attentional deficits are common in a number of clinical populations, it is important that health-care professionals have a sufficient understanding of the normal function of attention, the impact of specific health conditions on this function, and the impact that attentional deficits may have on the rehabilitation process. Consider Case study 9.1.



Case study 9.1 Unilateral neglect following stroke


Around 18 months ago, Mrs C. had a severe, total anterior circulation stroke affecting her right cerebral hemisphere. Her recovery was minimal and she is now severely disabled, using a wheelchair both in- and outdoors. Due to severe hemiparesis and spasticity, she has very limited voluntary movement in her left arm and leg. She indicates that she is more or less resigned to being in a wheelchair, but is more concerned about her affected arm. She would like to regain more function in order to undertake some personal self-care tasks for which she now requires her husband’s assistance. Mr and Mrs C. own their own company and Mrs C. used to be responsible for undertaking all managerial and administrative tasks. However, since her stroke, the company has been struggling. Mrs C.’s husband is very keen for his wife to receive the best possible treatment. Mrs C.’s GP has referred her for further community-based rehabilitation.


During your first clinical examination, you observe that Mrs C. is looking slightly towards the right, away from the affected side of her body. In fact, her whole posture is asymmetrical, being inclined towards the right. When you position yourself on Mrs C.’s left hand side, she takes some time to react to you. Observing Mrs C.’s affected arm, you notice some bruising. When you point this out Mrs C. explains that her arm must have ‘got caught against the door post again’ – apparently she often bumps into obstacles that she has not noticed (although her eyesight has recently been tested and is normal for her age). She says that she has had this problem since her stroke, but that it has got better over time. However, her husband has to remind her frequently when her affected arm is in an awkward position – she herself is usually unaware of this.


Further clinical examination reveals reduced sensation and proprioception in the affected arm, especially the hand. Limited passive range of movement in all upper limb joints, and increased resistance to passive movement, particularly affecting the flexors of the wrist, fingers and thumb, is also apparent. However, there is clearly potential for increasing voluntary movement and work towards functional activity – even if dextrous tasks are unlikely to be achievable. You ask Mrs C. to what extent she involves her left hand in daily activities, to which she responds that she has become entirely right handed since the stroke.


Testing Mrs C.’s spatial perception further, you ask her to indicate the midpoint of a horizontal line, placed straight in front of her. Mrs C. indicates to the right of the actual midpoint, and repeats this on three occasions.


Taken together, it is becoming clear that Mrs C. has potential to develop some functional activity involving her affected arm, but also has a very limited awareness of her affected side. How can this latter phenomenon be explained and what are the implications for her predicted outcomes? How will Mrs C. remember to involve her affected arm in daily activity?


The case study above illustrates the importance of understanding a patient’s attentional difficulties as a result of their health condition. Clearly, the health-care professional will need to tailor their intervention strategies to their patient’s needs.


The aim of this chapter is to provide you with an understanding of attention and memory, an overview of the areas of the nervous system that are involved in these cognitive functions, and the role they play in learning. We will discuss a number of attentional and memory deficits that are common in neurological rehabilitation. At present, there are no definitive strategies for managing these, however, where possible, we will put forward some suggestions for clinical practice.



Attention



Attention described


As you are reading this, your attention may be focused on the text for some time, then shift towards your laptop as a signal indicates an incoming email. At the same time, you may be aware of a conversation between your friends, studying next to you. Then you refocus again on the text, blocking out your friends’ conversation, until a hunger pang interrupts your concentration… In the span of less than a minute, your attentional system has automatically gone through its range of functions, i.e. to:



In normal circumstances, attention operates in such an automatic manner that we hardly notice it; we effortlessly shift from one source of information to the next, as illustrated in the example above. But when asked to define ‘attention’, we may be stuck for words. The famous founder of psychology William James (1890) made the following statement about attention:



James’ interpretation of attention resembles that of a torch that illuminates certain objects and discerns them from a background of competing stimuli. In a similar vein, van Zomeren and Spikman (2003) more recently compared attention to a ‘spotlight’, which provides both intensity and selectivity.


Additionally, for this ‘spotlight’ to work, one needs to have a sufficient level of arousal, defined by Stuss and Benson (1986) as:



Taken together, attention could be interpreted as illustrated in Figure 9.1, which may help to understand the range of difficulties that patients with impaired attention may experience.




Clinical manifestations of attentional deficits


Disorders of attention are common in neurological populations (Geschwind 1982), especially in patients with head injuries and frontal lobe lesions (Hécaen and Albert 1978). Common signs and symptoms of attentional difficulties include those associated with impaired arousal, ranging from coma, drowsiness, a lack of concentration, through to hypervigilance and panic. Patients may lack a general awareness of what goes on around them, e.g. they may be oblivious to a dispute between fellow patients. Fatigue (see Chapter 14) is a common problem in patients with conditions affecting the CNS, which therapists need to take into account; sessions that may not place a notable cardiovascular or biomechanical load on patients may still induce fatigue due to attentional demands. Overall processing speed may be reduced, which may manifest itself as a learning difficulty. Patients may complain that the usual conversations with their family are too fast, and that they are unable to follow the news on TV. Attentional capacity may be more limited, restricting the amount of information they can take in. In terms of selectivity, patients may have difficulty focusing and sustaining their attention, and as a result they may be easily distracted. This can pose a particular challenge in a busy therapy department (see Clinical box 9.1), where there is a constant source of diversion in the form of other people, moving objects and – in some situations ? music. Multi-tasking, which requires attention to either be divided or switched between one task and the next, may be impossible. Some patients will stop talking when concentrating on a task, or stop practising while talking to their therapist. In terms of intensity, some patients may find it difficult to generate sufficient attention and this apparent apathy may be misinterpreted as a lack of motivation. Other patients may show perseveration, which means that they continue a task even if it has been completed, signalling difficulty with disengaging attention.



In summary, attentional difficulties are common in patients with conditions affecting their central nervous system. The next section will focus on underlying neural structures that normally support the various functions of attention.



Attention and the brain


Given the different dimensions of attention, it is perhaps not surprising that there is a range of areas within the nervous system that play a role in attention (see Kolb and Whishaw, 2009). Neuro-imaging and clinical studies have shown that the following areas play a major role:



We will now look at each of these areas in turn.



Reticular formation


The reticular formation (from the Latin reticulum: network, see Chapter 2) is an extensive neural network that connects the thalamus with the cerebrum. Its main functions include regulating the level of arousal, the sleep–wake cycle, and motor activities that involve motivation and reward. It follows that damage to this network (e.g. through a traumatic brain injury, which may cause diffuse axonal tearing) may result in abnormal levels of arousal (e.g. coma, drowsiness), disturbances in sleep–wake rhythm (e.g. the patient may be sleepy during the day, but active at night), or lack of response to incentives.



Right cerebral hemisphere


For a reason not readily understood, the right cerebral hemisphere plays a dominant role in attention. Neuroimaging studies have shown that if a person directs their attention to the left visual field, only the right cerebral hemisphere is activated. In contrast, if a person focuses on stimuli in their right visual field, both left and right hemispheres are activated. It follows that if a person sustains a lesion to the left hemisphere, their right hemisphere can continue to focus their attention on the left visual field, and compensate for the damaged left hemisphere when focusing attention on the right visual field. Thus, despite the left hemisphere lesion, there may not be a noticeable attentional deficit. But what happens when the right hemisphere is affected? The patient will still be able to direct their attention to their right visual field, but they will now have difficulty focusing on their left visual field (Fig. 9.2). This scenario is known as hemi-inattention, other terms being hemispatial neglect or unilateral neglect (see later).



Refer back to the case study at the start of the chapter: Mrs C. clearly demonstrated hemi-inattention; she lacked awareness of the affected side of her body, was positioned to the right of her midline, while the line bisection test confirmed that her midline had been displaced away from the affected side. It was as if her affected side no longer featured in her body image. Unaware of that side of space, she would then bump into obstacles. Unaware of that side of her body, she would not notice the bruises of such collisions, or the awkward position her arm may have been in.



Posterior parietal lobe


The posterior parietal lobe is especially involved in focusing attention on a particular location. Refer back to Chapter 5 on the relationship between the brain and behaviour: we saw there that the posterior parietal lobe was responsible for integrating information for planning action in user-centred space. More specifically, this part of the brain is involved in disengaging, moving and re-engaging attention to a particular location. Lesions of this part of the brain (e.g. due to a tumour or stroke) may result in unilateral neglect (i.e. having difficulty shifting attention towards the affected side). More about this syndrome will be discussed later in this chapter.



Posterior temporal lobe


Chapter 5 explained the role of the temporal lobe in object recognition. More specifically, this part of the brain is involved in focusing attention on particular features of an object. Damage to this part of the brain, therefore, often leads to difficulties recognising objects, a condition known as visual agnosia.




Clinical implications of attentional deficits


In Chapter 8, we have seen how attention is a prerequisite for learning; attention is a major control process in the passing of information through to memory – a function that will be discussed in the next section. It is not surprising, therefore, that attentional deficits can present a real bottleneck for rehabilitation. Given the complexity of attention, which comprises a number of different functions, it is not possible to provide a standard protocol for managing attentional deficits. van Zomeren and Spikman (in Halligan et al. 2003) suggest the following pointers:



Think about whether any of these pointers may help you to answer the questions in the clinical application in Box 9.1–and why they might be effective.


May 25, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Disorders of attention and memory

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access