DVT/PE in Cervical Surgery: Etiology, Treatment Options, and Outcomes
Winston Fong
Scott C. McGovern
Jeffrey C. Wang
As the rate of elective spinal surgeries increases, there is a growing concern about the risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this specific patient population. In the general patient population, the annual incidences of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are estimated to be 50 and 70 per 100,000, respectively (1). However, the incidence of postoperative thromboembolic disease is not as well defined after spine surgery (2). The rate of symptomatic thromboembolic disease is reported to occur in 0.3% to 2.5% (3) of elective spine surgery patients, and the rate of asymptomatic disease is thought to occur in up to 16%, depending on the detection method used (4). The literature is not specific for cervical spine surgery but typically includes all types of spinal surgery.
The occurrence of DVT is difficult to predict. Risk factors include smoking, use of oral contraceptives, malignancy, hypercoagulable states, upper abdominal/pelvic surgery, increased age, obesity, trauma, spinal cord injury (SCI), and history of previous thromboembolic disease. Increased age, intraoperative venous stasis, and postoperative immobility and convalescence place postoperative spine surgery patients at particular risk for developing DVT. However, routine screening is not recommended, as only a small percentage of DVTs are symptomatic (5).
DVT is not dangerous in itself; however, when it leads to PE, it is life-threatening. In about 20% of cases, the initial presentation of VTE is sudden death due to PE. Of those patients who suffer a massive PE, 70% die within the first hour of symptom onset (6). Thus, the best way to treat VTE is to prevent it. Prophylactic measures to prevent DVT include early ambulation, compression stockings (CS), sequential pneumatic compression devices, vena cava filters, and pharmacologic anticoagulation. The method of prophylaxis should be selected based on the individual patient and his or her specific risk factors.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Rudolph Virchow described VTE in the 1850s. The Virchow triad consists of venous stasis, intimal injury, and hypercoagulability. All three of these risk factors may be present in patients undergoing spine surgery. Venous stasis is likely to occur during surgical positioning and from the absence of active muscle contraction during anesthesia. Postoperative immobilization and convalescence also contribute to venous stasis. Vessel occlusion and subsequent intimal damage can occur from both external (inadequate padding) and internal (retractors) sources as well as from iatrogenic surgical injury. Finally, patients with systemic hypercoagulable conditions such as malignancy or the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies are predisposed to venous thromboembolic events.
INCIDENCE
The incidence of VTE depends on the specific patient population studied and their associated risk factors, as well as the detection method employed. The incidence of DVT has been shown to be as low as 1% after elective spine surgery, 30% in spine trauma patients (7), and up to 80% in patients with SCI (2). The incidence may also vary based on racial or ethnic origin. It is well documented that the incidence of DVT is significantly lower in East Asian populations compared to Western populations in reconstructive joint surgery; there is evidence to suggest that this is similarly true in spine surgery (8).
The method of detection also determines the incidence of DVT reported in the literature. In studies reporting the DVT rate based on clinical diagnosis, the pooled incidence is 1%. The overall incidence of DVT in which ultrasound is the primary method of surveillance is 3.7%. The incidence of DVT in studies that use venogram as the detection
method is 12.3% (5). While the detection rates are higher for ultrasound and venography compared to clinical examination, there is little evidence to support routine postoperative DVT screening with these methods in patients after spinal surgery (2,5).
method is 12.3% (5). While the detection rates are higher for ultrasound and venography compared to clinical examination, there is little evidence to support routine postoperative DVT screening with these methods in patients after spinal surgery (2,5).
MECHANICAL PROPHYLAXIS
CS and sequential compression devices (SCDs) are safe and effective methods of prophylaxis in elective spine surgery. Proponents of mechanical prophylaxis cite the extremely low incidence of fatal PE and the negligible morbidity associated with using compression devices. Although chemical prophylaxis is associated with a lower DVT rate, it is unknown whether or not this is clinically significant. Furthermore, use of routine chemical prophylaxis can cause bleeding complications, the most concerning of which is epidural hematoma leading to irreversible paralysis.
Ferree et al. (9) studied 86 patients undergoing spine surgery, all of whom were treated with only CS postoperatively. Five patients (6%) developed DVT, and none developed PE. Based on these findings and the potential complications of anticoagulation, they recommended mechanical prophylaxis only.
Rokito et al. (10) evaluated 329 patients and found the overall clinical incidence of DVT to be 0.3% (1 in 329). There was no PE. In a randomized segment of their study, 35 patients were treated with low-dose warfarin for prophylaxis, and 2 (5.7%) developed excessive blood loss. Given their findings, they recommended mechanical prophylaxis over chemical prophylaxis.
Smith et al. (11) evaluated 317 patients who underwent major reconstructive spine surgery (32 cervical cases) and found the overall clinical incidence of DVT to be 0.9% (3 in 317). There was one fatal PE. All cases of VTE occurred in patients who underwent ventral lumbar procedures. All patients were treated with CS and SCDs postoperatively. On the basis of their findings, they believe that anticoagulation should not be a routine form of prophylaxis after spine surgery. Several other studies support similar conclusions in patients undergoing spine surgery (12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17).

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

