Gene
Pancreatic NET (%) n = 48
Intestinal NET (%) n = 68
MEN-1
44
2
DAXX
25
0
ATRX
18
0
TSC2
9
0
PTEN
7
0
PIK3CA
1
2
VHL
0
2
P53
4
0
KRAS
0
0
In the absence of known major genetic drivers of tumour growth, advances in the field of targeted therapies are mostly related to inhibition of known signalling transduction pathways involved in proliferation of tumour cells, angiogenesis and cell survival.
32.1.2 Signalling Transduction Pathways and Targets in NETs
A better understanding of the mechanisms driving secretion and tumour growth has led to the development of several targeted antitumour agents in these rare tumours. NETs express a variety of peptide receptors including somatostatin receptors (sstr) and express interferon (IFN) receptors. Inhibition of sstr and IFN signalling by somatostatin analogues and interferon-alpha is an established approach to control secretion and growth of NET. Introduced in the mid 1980s, both drug classes can be considered as the oldest targeted drugs in the management of NET (see Chaps. 28, 29, 30).
Several growth-promoting targets are expressed in NET cells [3, 4]. These comprise not only growth factor receptors but also their ligands or other molecules, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor-α (PDGFR-α), platelet-derived growth factor-ß (PDGFR-ß), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α) and TGF-ß, and their cognate receptors [5]. VEGF-driven angiogenesis may play an important role in neuroendocrine tumorigenesis and tumour progression [6]. High vascularity is however rather a feature of well-differentiated than poorly differentiated NET. The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor is frequently expressed in NET, and binding of EGF or TGF-α induces RAF/MAP-ERK signalling in tumour cells; however, mutations of the EGFR tyrosine kinase which are predictive of a response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in other types of cancers are rather uncommon in NET [7]. Activation of the IGF-1R by IGF-1 and IGF-2 plays an important role in tumour cell proliferation, and in NET cell lines (pancreatic BON cells), it has been demonstrated that IGF-1 stimulates tumour cell growth by an autocrine loop. IGF-1 also plays a role in the upstream activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [8, 9].
The protein kinase mTOR exerts a central control function integrating multiple signalling pathways in response to growth factors and intracellular signalling by nutrients. mTOR is involved in the regulation of growth-related cellular functions, and the best known function is the regulation of translation initiation [10]. Inhibiting mTOR pathway may reduce cell growth and proliferation and impair the metastatic potential of tumour cells. It also acts at the endothelial cells. In NET constitutively activated PI3K-Akt-mTOR signalling seems to be a crucial event with 75 % of NET expressing activated Akt and 45 % mTOR [11]. Loss or downregulation of the expression of PTEN or TSC2 has been reported recently in a high percentage of pancreatic NET and may lead by loss of inhibition of mTOR to overactivation of this pathway [12].
In NETs, mTOR inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors have been most extensively studied. The following sections focus on the results from clinical trials with both kinds of drugs.
32.2 Targeted Therapies in Pancreatic NET
32.2.1 Inhibitors of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Pathway
Temsirolimus and everolimus are inhibitors of mTOR structurally related to rapamycin. Temsirolimus was the first mTOR inhibitor used in NET patients in a phase II study in advanced progressive NET. The objective response rate was less than 6 % and median time to disease progression (TTP) 6 months [13]. However, a significant percentage of patients experienced disease stabilisation (~60 %) with temsirolimus, and the 1-year progression-free rate of 40 % suggests drug activity beyond the natural course of the disease.
In a phase II trial, everolimus in combination with the long-acting SSA octreotide LAR (30 mg q 28 days) led to a tumour response rate of 22 % (with a more favourable response rate in pancreatic NET compared to NET of other origins, 27 % vs. 17 %, respectively). In the majority of the patients (70 %), stable disease was the best response in patients treated with everolimus [14]. The higher remission rate in pancreatic NET might be explained by the pathophysiological findings related to mTOR pathway [12].
Antitumour activity has been confirmed with everolimus in patients with progressive metastatic pancreatic NET after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the phase II RADIANT-1 trial. 160 patients were included in two strata −/+ octreotide. The partial remission rate was low with 9.6 and 4.4 %, respectively. The rate of disease stabilisations was however high with 67.8 and 80 %, respectively. The corresponding figures for progression free survival (PFS) were 9.7 and 16.7 months [15]. Although data of this study are in favour of combination therapy of everolimus with octreotide, it remains an open issue if combination therapy of everolimus and somatostatin analogues is indeed superior to everolimus alone to inhibit tumour growth.
The benefit of everolimus in advanced pNET was confirmed in a randomised placebo-controlled phase III trial (RADIANT-3) recruiting 410 patients. PFS was 11 months with everolimus, and 5.4 months with placebo [16]. Tumour remissions occurred in 5 % of the patients. Based on these data, everolimus was approved for progressive pNET patients. A survival benefit could not be demonstrated with everolimus compared to placebo; however, there was a high crossover rate from placebo to open-label drug upon progression. Treatment is continuous oral intake of everolimus 10 mg per day. Treatment is stopped if progressive disease or intolerable toxicity occurs. Most frequently reported adverse events include stomatitis (62 %) and rash (37 %). Patients have to be followed carefully for infections (20 %) and pulmonary events (12 %), such as pneumonitis [16] (Table 32.2).
Table 32.2
Frequent side effects (>20 %) of novel targeted agents
Sunitinib | Everolimus | ||
---|---|---|---|
Adverse event | Frequency (%) | Adverse event | Frequency (%) |
Diarrhoea | 59 | Stomatitis | 64 |
Nausea | 45 | Exanthema | 49 |
Asthenia | 34 | Diarrhoea | 34 |
Emesis | 34 | Fatigue | 31 |
Fatigue | 33 | Infections | 23 |
Grey hair | 29 | Nausea | 20 |
Leucopenia | 29 | Oedema | 20 |
Hypertension | 27 | Pneumonitis, lung infiltrates | 17 |
To improve objective response rates and overcome acquired resistance to the drug, multiple combination therapies of everolimus with somatostatin analogues or angiogenesis inhibitors and dual inhibitors targeting upstream and downstream signalling of the mTOR pathway are currently under investigation. Since other treatments are available (somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy with either temozolomide or streptozotocin + 5-fluorouracil, angiogenesis inhibitors), it has still to be defined which patients will benefit most of targeted therapy with everolimus and in which sequence everolimus should be used.
32.2.2 Inhibitors of VEGF Receptor Signalling
The antiangiogenic strategies currently used in clinical practice in NET are specific monoclonal antibodies against VEGF (anti-VEGF A), such as bevacizumab and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting receptors for VEGF or PDGF expressed by tumour vessels. Further antiangiogenic drugs are evaluated in combination with somatostatin analogues (SSA), everolimus or systemic chemotherapy. SSA and everolimus also display antiangiogenic properties that include inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and inhibition of secretion of angiogenic factors such as VEGF synthesised by tumour cells or microenvironment among other mechanisms [6, 17].
32.2.2.1 Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Inhibitors
Several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been evaluated in NET, including sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib and sorafenib, all of which have activity against diverse VEGF receptors and PDGF receptors. Some have additional activity against c-kit, RET or FGFR (Table 32.3), thus blocking multiple targets involved in growth, proliferation and metastatic spread of tumour cells [18, 19, 20].
Table 32.3
Molecular targeted drugs in pancreatic NETs
Author | Drugs | Targets | Study phase | Patients (n) | Objective response (%) | PFS/TTP* (months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duran et al. [13] | Temsirolimus | mTOR | II | 15 | 10.6 | 6.7* |
Yao et al. [14] | Everolimus + octreotide | mTOR | II | 30 | 27 | 12.5 |
Yao et al. [15] | Everolimus Everolimus + octreotide (RADIANT-1) | mTOR SSTR-2/SSTR-5 | II | 115 45 | 9.6 4.4 | 9.7 16.7 |
Yao et al. [16] | Everolimus vs. placebo (RADIANT-3) | mTOR | III | 207 203 | 5.0 2.0 | 11.04 4.6 |
a | Everolimus vs. everolimus + bevacizumab | mTOR VEGF | II | 138 | Results pending | |
a | Everolimus vs. everolimus + pasireotide (COOPERATE-2) | mTOR SSTR-1, SSTR-2, SSTR-3, SSTR-5 | II | 160 | Results pending | |
Kulke et al. [18] | Sunitinib | VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2; PDGFR, c-kit | II | 66 | 17 | 7.7* |
Raymond et al. [21] | Sunitinib vs. placebo | VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2; PDGFR, c-kit | III | 86 85 | 9.3 0 | 11.4 5.5 |
Hobday et al. [19] | Sorafenib | C-RAF, B-RAF, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-β; c-kit | II | 41 | 10 | –
![]() Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel![]() Full access? Get Clinical Tree![]() ![]() ![]() |