Child and adolescent psychiatry

16 Child and adolescent psychiatry


This chapter covers those psychiatric disorders in which onset usually occurs in childhood, and also addresses the specific variations in adult disorders seen in children and adolescents. A section on child psychiatric disorder in general is followed by sections on particular disorders.



Child psychiatric disorder



Definition and classification


The ICD-10 classification of ‘Behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence’ (F90–98) is shown in Table 16.1. In general, if the criteria for one of the other ‘adult’ disorders (such as depression) are met, then such a diagnosis should be made rather than a ‘childhood-onset’ diagnosis. Recognition of different dimensions of childhood functioning has led the WHO to develop a multiaxial framework for the diagnosis of child psychiatric disorder (Table 16.2). DSM-IV-TR disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood or adolescence are outlined in Table 16.3.


Table 16.1 ICD-10 classification: F90–F98 Behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence










































































































































F90 Hyperkinetic disorders
  F90.0 Disturbance of activity and attention
  F90.1 Hyperkinetic conduct disorder
  F90.8 Other hyperkinetic disorders
  F90.9 Hyperkinetic disorder, unspecified
F91 Conduct disorders
  F91.0 Conduct disorder confined to the family context
  F91.1 Unsocialized conduct disorder
  F91.2 Socialized conduct disorder
  F91.3 Oppositional defiant disorder
  F91.8 Other conduct disorders
  F91.9 Conduct disorder, unspecified
F92 Mixed disorders of conduct and emotions
  F92.0 Depressive conduct disorder
  F92.8 Other mixed disorders of conduct and emotions
  F92.9 Mixed disorder of conduct and emotions, unspecified
F93 Emotional disorders with onset specific to childhood
  F93.0 Separation anxiety disorder of childhood
  F93.1 Phobic anxiety disorder of childhood
  F93.2 Social anxiety disorder of childhood
  F93.3 Sibling rivalry disorder
  F93.8 Other childhood emotional disorders
  F93.9 Childhood emotional disorder, unspecified
F94 Disorders of social functioning with onset specific to childhood and adolescence
  F94.0 Elective mutism
  F94.1 Reactive attachment disorder of childhood
  F94.2 Disinhibited attachment disorder of childhood
  F94.8 Other childhood disorders of social functioning
  F94.9 Childhood disorders of social functioning, unspecified
F95 Tic disorders
  F95.0 Transient tic disorder
  F95.1 Chronic motor or vocal tic disorder
  F95.2 Combined vocal and multiple motor tic disorder (Gilles de la Tourette’s syndrome)
  F95.8 Other tic disorders
  F95.9 Tic disorder, unspecified
F98 Other behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence
  F98.0 Non-organic enuresis
  F98.1 Non-organic encopresis
  F98.2 Feeding disorder of infancy and childhood
  F98.3 Pica of infancy and childhood
  F98.4 Stereotyped movement disorders
  F98.5 Stuttering (stammering)
  F98.6 Cluttering
  F98.8 Other specified behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence
  F98.9 Unspecified behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence

Table 16.2 ICD-10 Multiaxial framework


















Axis One Clinical psychiatric syndromes
Axis Two Specific disorders of psychological development
Axis Three Intellectual level
Axis Four Medical conditions
Axis Five Associated abnormal psychosocial situation

Table 16.3 DSM-IV-TR disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood or adolescence



















































































































































Learning disorders
315.0 Reading disorder
315.1 Mathematics disorder
315.2 Disorder of written expression
315.9 Learning disorder NOS
Motor skills disorder
315.4 Developmental coordination disorder
Communication disorders
315.31 Expressive language disorder
315.32 Mixed receptive–expressive language disorder
315.39 Phonological disorder
307.0 Stuttering
307.9 Communication disorder NOS
Pervasive developmental disorders
299.00 Autistic disorder
299.80 Rett’s disorder
299.10 Childhood disintegrative disorder
299.80 Asperger’s disorder
299.80 Pervasive developmental disorder NOS
Attention-deficit and disruptive behavioural disorders
314.xx Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
.01 Combined type
.00 Predominantly inattentive type
.01 Predominantly hyperactive–impulsive type
314.9 Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder NOS
312.xx Conduct disorder
.81 Childhood-onset type
.82 Adolescent-onset type
.89 Unspecified onset
313.81 Oppositional defiant disorder
312.9 Disruptive behaviour disorder NOS
Feeding and eating disorders of infancy or early childhood
307.52 Pica
307.53 Rumination disorder
307.59 Feeding disorder of infancy or early childhood
Tic disorders
307.23 Tourette’s disorder
307.22 Chronic motor or vocal tic disorder
307.21 Transient tic disorder (115) (Specify if Single episode/recurrent)
307.20 Tic disorder NOS (116)
Elimination disorders
—.— Encopresis
787.6 With constipation and overflow incontinence
307.7 Without constipation and overflow incontinence
307.6 Enuresis (not due to a general medical condition) (Specify type: Noctumal only/diurnal only/nocturnal and diurnal)
Other disorders of infancy, childhood, or adolescence
309.21 Separation anxiety disorder (Specify if Early onset)
313.23 Selective mutism
313.89 Reactive attachment disorder of infancy or early childhood (Specify type: Inhibited type/disinhibited type)
307.3 Stereotypic movement disorder (Specify if With self-injurious behaviour)
313.9 Disorder of infancy, childhood, or adolescence NOS (134)

NOS, not otherwise specified


Rutter has pointed out that the majority of child psychiatric disorder is a quantitative deviance from the norm, with suffering and/or handicap. In other words, most children show some of the ‘symptoms’ of child psychiatric disorder at some point in their development (generally at a roughly similar time). These are usually of a certain intensity and duration and resolve with appropriate environment and management (e.g. tantrums are common in two to three-year-olds but might be considered a disorder in a nine-year-old). It is important to emphasize that a deviance on its own is not sufficient to constitute a disorder: consequent suffering and/or handicap is also required (although not necessarily to the child). The example given by Rutter is of a child who has a high level of intelligence: the child is quantitatively deviant from the norm, but would not suffer unless this was out of step with social expectations, or if the child was not provided with appropriate educational opportunities.


As with all generalizations there are exceptions, both to this view of child psychiatric disorder (such as the pervasive developmental disorders, which are qualitatively different) and to the converse description of adult psychiatric disorder as a qualitative deviance (e.g. depressive disorder without psychosis may be regarded as a more severe or prolonged form of normal misery).


There is a high level of comorbidity seen in children and adolescents. This perhaps reflects the above and also the essentially descriptive nature of most diagnoses.


In child and adolescent psychiatry it is essential to have a clear knowledge of the normal development of all aspects of behavioural and psychological functioning. Detailed accounts of childhood development may be found in paediatric texts and developmental psychology books. Table 16.4 shows an outline of various developmental milestones, and includes references to various different theories of psychological development. It must be noted that these theories are ways of conceptualizing development, each designed to explain and predict, with implications for management and treatment. They are not the literal truth and are by no means mutually exclusive. Only brief outlines of the theories can be given here.



Some aspects of Freud’s psychoanalytic theory are described in Chapter 4. Erikson saw development as a series of stages or psychosocial crises that must be overcome to make proper relationships at each stage in life. The stages relate to a widening and narrowing social world (see Chapter 2).


Piaget produced a theory of cognitive development based on careful observation of a relatively small number of children. Others have subsequently refined and modified Piaget’s theory, on the basis of psychological experimentation and further observation. The sensorimotor stage (zero to two years, approximately) is a process of distinguishing the self and others through sensory inputs and motor manipulation of objects. The preoperational stage (approximately two to seven years) is a period of development of appreciation of symbols for outside objects, but the rules connecting them are primitive and developing. The child’s view of the world is very self-centred (egocentric). At the concrete operational stage (approximately seven to 12 years), categorization and development of hierarchy of concepts (e.g. volume over height) occurs. At the formal operational stage (age 12 onwards) there is even more development of the internal world, with the ability to see another’s viewpoint being developed further and hypothesizing by manipulation of internal concepts occurring.



Epidemiology






Aetiology


In child and adolescent psychiatry multifactorial aetiology is the rule. This is not simply in the sense of many factors contributing to a given predicament, but in the interaction of such factors at all levels of a child’s or adolescent’s functioning, either adding to or subtracting from the risk (Figure 16.1). Such interactions may be circular rather than simply linear. There is also a variation in effect, according to the development level of the child, the family’s stage in the life cycle and the particular resilience and vulnerability factors operating in an individual situation. Aetiological factors according to biopsychosocial level are summarized in Figure 16.2.




Level of individual self-esteem is an issue that can influence the persistence or otherwise of behavioural disturbance. A child with low self-esteem will take longer to respond to positive reinforcement of wanted behaviour, and may feel more comfortable with failure and a reputation as rather bad, to the extent of sabotaging success. (This latter point is often difficult for parents to understand, and may be seen as ‘ungrateful’.) Low self-esteem develops where there is repeated criticism or failure without balancing praise and/or success.


‘Attachment’ is an important concept in psychiatry as it encompasses both early social relationships and subsequent patterns of interaction with others. It must be emphasized that attachment is a relationship variable, not a personal characteristic. Quality of attachment to one carer does not predict type of attachment to another. The cardinal features of attachment are shown in Figure 16.3. The quality of attachments has been explored, most notably by Ainsworth, who devised an experimental procedure (the strange situation procedure) in which a child goes through a series of short separations and reunions with both carer and a stranger in an unfamiliar room. Responses were classified to produce three ‘types’ of attachment (Table 16.5).




Other researchers have questioned the utility and predictive validity of this descriptive schema, but follow-up studies have shown that those infants designated as ‘securely’ attached later show greater social competence and better peer relationships. Conversely, children reared in institutional environments who have had a lack of consistency of carers, and where emotional links may not have been encouraged, showed increased levels of emotional and behavioural disorder throughout childhood and into adulthood – in particular showing disturbed relationships. Parenting ability of adults who as children were designated as ‘insecurely attached’ was mitigated where there was a supportive spouse. In clinical practice, assortative mating (where people choose partners with similar backgrounds) may lessen the likelihood of this situation occurring. Similarly, clinical observation of families in whom there is inconsistency and neglect of parenting shows clinginess, overfriendliness and inappropriate attention-seeking in the children. Adoption studies confirm the strong influence of environment in determining levels of difficult behaviour in children.


Brief separations of children from their carers in families with healthy relationships and functioning show little persisting disturbance in the children. However, where family relationships are dysfunctional (see below) child psychiatric disorder can arise subsequently. If the change is to another family where parenting is more appropriate to the child’s need, then the child is likely to do well, despite the separation. Response to separation for hospital admission is complicated by the anxieties associated by a family with such an admission (and hence the reasons for admission). Generally, though, single short admissions have little lasting effect, whereas repeated admission does increase the risk for psychiatric disorder (although again this is confounded with the reason for such multiple admission).


Research confirms an increase in emotional and conduct disorders after divorce (particularly in boys), which usually resolves within two years, especially if discord between the parents has subsided and the quality of relationship of the child with individual parents is adequate. The structure of families is much less important than the quality of the relationships between parents and children.


All behaviour arises in the context of relationships. Taking a family perspective raises interactional issues that may be aetiologically important in a given case. Minuchin and others have described particular features of families with a child with a ‘psychosomatic’ complaint (enmeshment, rigidity, inappropriate parent–child alliances). Most papers have been descriptive of the therapeutic approaches of a particular ‘school of family therapy’, although there is considerable overlap between these. A linear view of causality is generally not helpful in considering families and the wider system: a circular model is preferable. Changes in one part of the system will require other parts to adjust to take account of this, or alternatively act in such a way to maintain the status quo. An example would be where a particular child is taking all its parent’s attention by naughty behaviour: this relieves the pressure on the siblings, who may act to ‘wind up’ the identified child if their naughtiness then appears to be reduced. There are many similar features of family systems that may trigger, maintain or predetermine a presenting complex of symptoms. Table 16.6 summarizes the areas that must be considered, though research is difficult and scanty in determining the relative importance of these different variables.


Table 16.6 Elements of family functioning

















































Interactional patterns Who is in the family?
Biological and marital relationships
Communication patterns
Hierarchical structure
Pattern of alliances
Clarity or otherwise of intergenerational boundary
Control or authority systems
Relationship with the outside world
Sociocultural context Economic status
Social mobility
Migration status
Location of the family on the life cycle Number of transitions
Requirements for adaptation
Intergenerational structure Experiences of parents as children
Influences of grandparents and extended family
Significance of symptom for the family Symbolic meaning?
Implications?
Factors rewarding or inhibiting symptom
Family problem-solving skills Family style
Previous experience

(Derived from Dare C 1985 Family therapy. In: Rutter M, Hersov L (eds) Child and adolescent psychiatry: modern approaches. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.)


Children in local authority care are at increased risk of suffering a psychiatric disorder. This factor is confounded with the reasons for the child being looked after.


Some characteristics of schools, regardless of catchment area, influence the level of child psychiatric disorder (Table 16.7). Epidemiological studies have further emphasized that there is a discontinuity between a child’s presentation in school and at home. Children spend a large part of their formative years in school. Poor relationships between home and school can be significant in maintaining an undesirable symptom complex.


Table 16.7 Features of a school associated with a lower level of child psychiatric disorder (independent of catchment population)















Culture may determine whether a behaviour is seen as handicapping, and also has some bearing on parenting style (e.g. the amount of physical chastisement that is socially permissible varies considerably). Cross-cultural studies have shown variations in level of conduct disorder and in sleep disorder, but these studies have also included some socioeconomic confounding factors.



Management



Assessment


As will be apparent from the above, a full assessment is a complex procedure, starting from the moment of consideration of the referral. The initiator of the referral is rarely the child and may often not even be the family (or alternatively may be one parent, but not the other). Other agencies that impinge on children include: education; other parts of the health service (e.g. paediatric medicine); social services; the courts; solicitors; the probation service; and so on. Determining whose idea it was to refer a child to a psychiatry service is an important first step, and will influence the approach taken.


Studies of referred populations of children show that child psychiatric disorder is not necessarily a prerequisite for a referral: the child’s symptomatology may reflect disorder elsewhere in their environment, with the child reacting normally to this. Paradoxically, nor is child psychiatric disorder a sufficient reason for referral: most children with such disorders are not seen by psychiatrists or psychiatric services. The question ‘Why now?’ or perhaps ‘What led to you being referred to us?’ usually reveals some additional stimulus, such as school complaints on a background of conduct problems, police involvement or, in the case of divorce, disputes between parents over finances. More simply, a parent may feel at the end of their tether (although additional pressures often contribute to this too).


The next question is, ‘who to invite to the assessment?’ Some idea of the child’s family context is essential, so the family is usually requested to attend. Some child psychiatric teams request prior knowledge of family compositions so as to avoid misunderstanding or extra alienation by making assumptions. It may also be important to see other, non-related, members of the household or members of other agencies working with a family.


At the first assessment appointment a considerable amount of information is required to obtain a sufficiently wide view of the presenting problem (Table 16.8). Studies suggest that an active probing style produces more detailed information than does a ‘free-form’ dialogue, but it is important to start with open questioning before proceeding to more specific queries.


Table 16.8 Information to be amassed in a child psychiatric interview























Source and nature of referral



Description of presenting complaints






Description of child’s current general functioning



Personal/developmental history







Family history

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 12, 2016 | Posted by in PSYCHIATRY | Comments Off on Child and adolescent psychiatry

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access