Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms

Chapter 84 Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms



Microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms has been the historical definitive standard for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.1 Today’s surgical techniques routinely achieve complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation without compromise of the parent vessel or arterial perforators in a large number of patients. However, several risk factors may put a patient at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. These factors include the aneurysm’s size, its location, the patient’s age, and the medical condition of the patient.2 In addition, according to the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage fared better with endovascular coiling than with surgical clipping.3 To overcome some of the limitations of surgical clipping, endovascular treatments were developed. They have grown considerably over the last 15 years, since U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) in 1995.4,5 This chapter discusses the basic techniques utilized in coiling of ruptured and nonruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms. After a brief discussion of each technique, we give a short review of the results of each form of treatment, concentrating on the large reported case series. Finally, we discuss specific complications related to endovascular treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms.6,7



Conventional Coiling of a Simple Saccular Aneurysm



Technique


At our institution, all intracranial aneurysm coiling procedures are performed under general anesthesia with neurologic monitoring. An arterial line is placed in the radial artery to closely monitor the patient’s blood pressure. The anesthesiologist is aware of the need to avoid transient blood pressure spikes, especially when intubating or extubating the patient. This is particularly important in patients who have a ruptured aneurysm. The case can sometimes take a few hours; therefore, anesthesia is necessary to maintain immobility, because three-dimensional (3D) imaging and a fluoroscopic road map are very motion sensitive. A 6-French (Fr) sheath is inserted into the right common femoral artery. If balloon remodeling or additional microcatheters are needed, puncture of the left common femoral artery may be necessary. Just after the sheath is inserted in the groin, a baseline activated clotting time (ACT) is drawn. Then, 6 to 10 international units (IUs) of heparin per kilogram of body weight are given intravenously as a bolus. For patients with unruptured aneurysms, the ACT is checked every 30 minutes throughout the procedure and heparin is given intermittently to keep the ACT between 250 to 300 seconds.8 For patients with a ruptured aneurysm, 3000 IU of heparin are given after placement of framing coils; the patient is given additional heparin to maintain an ACT range of 250 to 300 seconds. A syringe of protamine is prepared in advance and readily available to be injected in case of aneurysm rupture. The usually dose is 10 mg of protamine per 1000 IU of heparin. The goal is to obtain an ACT of less than 150 seconds. Likewise, for patients with unruptured aneurysms who have been treated preoperatively with dual antiplatelet therapy, a five-pack of unpooled platelets are kept in preparation in case of rupture.


Patients who have not suffered a recent subarachnoid hemorrhage are preoperatively given 75 mg of clopidogrel (Plavix) and 81 mg of aspirin orally starting 7 days prior to the procedure to prevent thromboembolic complications. If emergent platelet inhibition is needed, the patient is loaded with a single dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel and 325 mg of aspirin. Full platelet inhibition occurs 2 hours afterward. If the procedure needs to be performed urgently, the patient may be given a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. A platelet inhibition assay is drawn for clopidogrel and aspirin prior to treatment, since approximately 25% of patients will have clopidogrel or aspirin resistance.9,10


A complete cerebral angiogram is performed prior to treatment with a 4- or 5-Fr catheter, including bilateral common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, and vertebral artery injections. Additional 3D rotational images are obtained to more accurately define the neck, dome, and size of the aneurysm. Once the diagnostic portion of the procedure is performed, the catheter is exchanged for a 6-Fr guide catheter, which is positioned as close as possible to the aneurysm. It is necessary to have a stable position of the guide catheter to be able to introduce a microcatheter safely into the aneurysm. Because of this, the guide catheter should be positioned as close to the aneurysm as possible. This gives optimal stability of the guide catheter and allows the operator to monitor the guide position on the same road map as the microcatheter during advancement of the coil into the aneurysm. New guide catheters that are more flexible, such as the Neuron (Penumbra, Alameda, CA), can be introduced farther into the intracranial circulation and can be routinely placed in the cavernous internal carotid artery or the basilar artery.11 This allows more stability in advancing devices into the intracranial circulation. This has been a major innovation in the endovascular treatment of aneurysms over the last 3 years. If additional stability is needed to treat an aneurysm, a triple coaxial system consisting of a long sheath introduced into the origin of the great vessel followed by a guide catheter through this may offer enhanced stability in advancing devices through tortuous anatomy for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. If an aneurysm cannot be treated from a femoral artery approach, a brachial, radial, direct carotid, or vertebral artery puncture is another option.1214





Coil Placement


Through the microcatheter, the platinum portion of the coil is introduced into the aneurysm sac while still on the delivery wire. In the microcatheter, the coil assumes a straight configuration; however, as soon as the coil leaves the microcatheter, it assumes the manufactured memory shape. The coil is radiopaque under fluoroscopy and is visualized under live road map as it is placed into the aneurysm sac with the neck in profile. There should be limited resistance when introducing the coil into the aneurysm sac. If there is any resistance, the coil may be oversized. It is important to not force the coil into the aneurysm sac and thus to prevent possible rupture. If the coil is correctly sized, it will readily adapt to the shape of the aneurysm. If the coil is undersized, it will not be stable within the aneurysm sac and may herniate into the parent vessel. If the coil is oversized, it will not form with the aneurysm sac and will herniate into the parent vessel. Oversizing the coil may also cause excessive pressure on the wall of the aneurysm sac, possibly risking perforation.


Before detachment of the coil, an angiogram is performed to determine how the coil is confined within the aneurysm sac and to determine whether there is compromise of the parent vessel. Movement of the coil during the angiogram may indicate that the coil is undersized and may migrate out of the aneurysm sac after detachment. If the coil appears properly sized and there is no compromise of the parent vessel, the coil is detached under fluoroscopy. The detachment wire is then slowly pulled back through the microcatheter to make sure the coil has detached from the wire and does not move.


Additional coils of various sizes and shapes are subsequently introduced into the aneurysm sac until the aneurysm sac is densely packed and no longer filling with contrast or until the microcatheter is pushed outside the aneurysm sac. The first coils used for treatment of intracranial aneurysms were made out of platinum, but there were aneurysm recurrences after treatment; therefore, bioactive coils were introduced with the goal of inducing an exuberant healing response and improved filling volume of the coiled aneurysm. The first bioactive coil was the Matrix (Boston Scientific Neurovascular, Fremont, CA), introduced in 2002. The U.S. FDA approved the Matrix coil based on equivalency with the conventional GDC coil. Four bioactive coils are now available for clinical use: the Matrix, HydroCoil (Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA), Cerecyte (Micrus, Sunnyvale, CA), and Nexus. The newer coils are manufactured so that the aneurysm sac is filled in a Russian nesting doll manner, from the periphery toward the center.15 Filling coils are placed into the aneurysm sac after the placement of framing coils; once the aneurysm is nearly densely packed, the final coils usually placed into the aneurysm sac are finishing coils.16 These coils are very short and soft. Once the aneurysm is densely packed, the microcatheter is removed slowly from the aneurysm, and a post-treatment angiogram is performed to assess the degree of aneurysm occlusion, parent vessel, and patency of the distal vasculature.


The heparin is reversed after the procedure with protamine and manual pressure, or a closure device is utilized to obtain hemostasis at the femoral puncture site.17 Pressure is usually held on the puncture site for 20 to 30 minutes after removal of the sheath if manual compression is utilized, and the leg is immobilized for 6 hours to prevent groin complications. If a closure device is utilized, ambulation can occur as early as 2 hours after placement.18,19 If there is compromise of the parent vessel, protrusion of coils, or thrombus formation during the coiling procedure, the heparin may be continued overnight with the sheath left in place. Antiplatelet therapy may also be given.


After endovascular treatment of nonruptured intracranial aneurysms, the patient is kept in the neurointensive care unit (NICU) for at least 24 hours for close monitoring of blood pressure, neurologic status, and puncture site. Subarachnoid hemorrhage patients are kept in the NICU for at least 14 days under close neuromonitoring and are prophalytically treated for vasospasm.



Results of Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Aneurysms


Two prospective randomized trials have compared outcomes of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping. The first study was performed in Finland20 and randomized 109 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were suitable for either surgery or endovascular coiling. Angiographic outcome in the posterior circulation was significantly better for endovascular coiling, whereas angiographic outcome in the anterior circulation was significantly better for surgery. Angiographic outcomes in the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery were similar in both groups. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was equivalent in both groups at 3 months. Mortality for technical reasons during surgery was twice that of the endovascular group (4% vs. 2%). One patient in the endovascular group suffered rebleeding following incomplete coiling of the aneurysm.


The second study was the ISAT,3,21 in which nearly 2000 patients predominantly from Europe and with subarachnoid hemorrhage were randomized to surgery or endovascular coiling based on judgment of the treating team. Outcome analysis on the basis of death or dependence at 2 months and 1 year based on the modified Rankin Scale score was the primary parameter of interest in the first publication in 2002. At 1-year postprocedure, 250 of 1063 (23.5%) of the endovascular patients were dead or dependent, while 326 of 1055 (30.9%) of surgical patients were dead. This represents an absolute risk reduction of 7.4% by those treated from an endovascular approach. Delayed rebleeding was more common in the endovascular group; however, several cases were due to incomplete treatments. Seizures were also less common in the endovascular group.



Results of Endovascular Treatment for Unruptured Aneurysms


The data from endovascular treatment versus surgical clipping for unruptured aneurysms do not show a clear benefit for one form of treatment versus the other. A review of modern large clipping and coiling trials for unruptured aneurysms was published in 2005.22 A majority of these trials were nonrandomized and retrospective. Adverse outcomes for endovascular coiling were estimated at 8.8% and for clipping were estimated at 17.8%. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm2 adverse outcomes were less common with endovascular treatment (9.3%) than with surgery (13.7%); however, the study was nonrandomized, and the endovascular treatment group included a higher number of elderly patients, larger aneurysms, and aneurysms within the posterior circulation. Surgical adverse outcomes in this study correlated with patient age greater than 50 years, aneurysm size greater than 12 mm, location in the posterior circulation, previous ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and symptoms of mass effect from the aneurysm. Endovascular outcomes were less influenced by these factors. Additional unruptured aneurysm trials are needed.



Coiling of Wide-Neck Aneurysms



Balloon Remodeling Technique



Sidewall Wide-Neck Aneurysm


The main feature that limits the endovascular treatment of aneurysms is the width of the neck. Other features that may limit treatment include the shape of the aneurysm. In 1992, Moret introduced the balloon remodeling technique for treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.23,24 The technique involves placing a nondetachable balloon across the neck of the aneurysm during each coil placement. The coils remain molded around the balloon after deflation of the balloon, essentially “remodeling the arterial wall.” The technique has been improved over the last 17 years with better coils and balloons. It is routinely used today to treat wide-neck aneurysms, particularly in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, thus eliminating stent placement and the use of antiplatelet agents. Most interventionalists consider an aneurysm neck to be wide when the ratio between the maximum diameter of the aneurysm sac and the size of the neck is 1 or less.


To treat sidewall wide-neck aneurysms at a location other than an arterial bifurcation, we routinely use the over-the-wire complaint HyperGlide balloon (Ev3, Irvine, CA). If distal catheterization of the neck of the aneurysm is difficult, we have utilized the less complaint gateway balloon (Boston Scientific Neurovascular) over a more torquable Synchro-14 wire (Boston Scientific Neurovascular) to perform balloon remodeling.


We prefer to perform the procedure using a 6-Fr shuttle sheath (Cook, Bloomington, IN) with a dual Y adaptor so that the microcatheter and balloon can be introduced separately. However, we have performed the procedure by puncturing both groins and introducing two separate guide catheters. With this technique, we usually introduce a 5- or 6-Fr guide catheter into the target vessel.


Under the road map, the balloon first is advanced across the neck of the aneurysm. The microcatheter is then advanced into the aneurysm. The balloon is inflated across the neck of the aneurysm, causing temporary occlusion of the neck and parent vessel. The first coil is positioned within the aneurysm sac. The balloon is deflated to test the stability of the coil within the aneurysm sac. If no movement of the coil is observed, the balloon is reinflated and the coil is detached. The coil is not detached if coil movement (meaning that the coil is not well anchored in the sac) is detected after balloon deflation. An angiogram is then performed. This is repeated multiple times until the aneurysm no longer fills with contrast or has a dense coil mass within the confines of its lumen.


The balloon acts as a temporary wall across the neck of the aneurysm, allowing coils to be deflected off the balloon back into the aneurysm sac during placement. The choice of the first coil is the most crucial decision in being able to treat a wide-neck aneurysm. The coil diameter should be large enough that it fully opposes the aneurysm wall and crosses the neck well. This provides friction between the coil and the wall, limiting migration of the coil outside of the aneurysm. The coil diameter should be the largest that will form within the aneurysm sac. The coil length should also be the longest that will fit within the aneurysm sac. This provides a large basket and allows the coils to be strongly anchored within the aneurysm sac. This also forms a bridge across the neck to help prevent additional coils from migrating into the parent vessel. The balloon occlusion should not last more than 5 minutes. The size of the balloon depends on the volume of a contrast and saline mixture introduced into the balloon; therefore, the balloon should only be inflated with the cadence syringe provided by the manufacturer. Overinflation of the balloon may cause rupture of the parent vessel or aneurysm. We feel the balloon is best inflated with a 60:40 contrast-to-saline mixture. This provides good visibility of the balloon under the road map and still leads to relative rapid deflation of the balloon. We test the balloon on the table before introducing it into the patient. We also inflate the balloon in the lower cervical carotid or vertebral artery prior to introducing into the intracranial circulation to determine whether the balloon is working properly and whether it can easily be seen under fluoroscopy. If the balloon will not deflate, the manufacturer recommends pulling negative pressure on the syringe connected to the Y adaptor. If all else fails, removing the wire from the balloon catheter will usually deflate the balloon; however, the entire system then has to be removed and prepped again prior to introducing it back into the body, because thrombus formation can occur within the balloon catheter, possibly making the balloon malfunction.





Results


Shapiro et al. in 2008 published a literature review with a meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.25 They concluded that there was no higher incidence of thromboembolic events or iatrogenic rupture with the use of adjunctive balloon remodeling compared with unassisted coiling. They also commented that balloon remodeling appears to result in a higher initial and follow-up aneurysm occlusion rates. Mu et al. successfully treated 40 wide-neck aneurysms with the HyperForm balloon remodeling technique, with only 2 failed cases, in 2008.26 Final results consisted of total occlusion in 34 cases (80.9%), subtotal occlusion in 4 cases (9.5%), and incomplete occlusion in 2 cases (4.8%). Nelson and Levy in 2001 treated 22 patients, with aneurysm occlusion on follow-up angiography at a mean of 19 months found in 17 of 20 patients.27 The other two patients died prior to follow-up. Layton et al. treated 73 of 221 aneurysms over a 3-year period with balloon-assisted coiling.28 They found no increased risk in thromboembolic complications when compared to simple coiling techniques. In conclusion, there appears to be no increased risk of complications with the balloon-remodeling technique. Aneurysm occlusion may be higher than with standard endovascular techniques; however, few studies report the results of this form of treatment.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access