Mechanism of DBS: Inhibition, Excitation, or Disruption?



Fig. 2.1
Proposed mechanism underling effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS dissociates input and output signals in the stimulated nucleus, resulting in disruption of abnormal information flow through the cortico-basal ganglia loop in the pathological conditions. GABA gamma-aminobutyric acid, GABAA GABAA receptor, glu glutamate (Modified from Chiken and Nambu (2014) with permission)



STN-DBS may also block transmission of abnormal signals through the STN. Maurice et al. (2003) examined the effects of STN-DBS on cortically evoked responses in SNr neurons of normal rats. Cortically evoked early and late excitation was abolished or largely reduced during STN-DBS, whereas cortically evoked inhibition was preserved, suggesting that information flow through the hyperdirect and indirect pathways was blocked by STN-DBS without interrupting the direct pathway. The response patterns of SNr neurons during STN-DBS were similar to those of GPi neurons during STN blockade by muscimol injection in normal monkeys (Nambu et al. 2000). Thus, it is rational that STN-DBS has similar effect to the lesion or chemical blockade of the STN. In PD, due to the loss of dopaminergic modulation, the information flow through the striato-GPi direct pathway is suppressed, whereas the information flow through the striato-GPe indirect pathway is facilitated, resulting in akinesia. Both STN-DBS and STN lesion may block information flow through the STN and normalize the balance between inhibitory inputs through the direct pathway and excitatory inputs through the hyperdirect and indirect pathways to the GPi, leading to the effective alleviation of akinesia. Similar ideas of functional disconnection of the stimulated elements have been proposed by other research groups (Anderson et al. 2006; Deniau et al. 2010; Moran et al. 2011).



2.6 Other Components to Be Considered


It is also probable that STN-DBS induces dopamine release through excitatory glutamatergic STN-SNc projections. STN-DBS induced dopamine release by activation of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons in rats (Meissner et al. 2003) and pigs (Shon et al. 2010), although it did not increase the dopamine level in the striatum of human patients (Abosch et al. 2003; Hilker et al. 2003). DBS may also affect neurons whose axons pass close to the stimulating site. A modeling study showed that clinically effective STN-DBS could activate the lenticular fasciculus, a part of GPi-thalamic fibers, by the current spread in addition to STN neurons themselves (Miocinovic et al. 2006).

Nonneuronal glial tissues should also be taken into account as a possible mechanism for the effectiveness of DBS. DBS induced glutamate and ATP release from astrocytes (Fellin et al. 2006; Tawfik et al. 2010). Thalamus-DBS induced an abrupt increase in extracellular ATP and adenosine (Bekar et al. 2008). ATP and glutamate released from astrocytes triggered by DBS may modulate neuronal activity in the stimulated nucleus: A1 receptors activation by adenosine depressed excitatory transmission in the thalamus and alleviated tremor in a mouse model (Vedam-Mai et al. 2012; Jantz and Watanabe 2013).


2.7 Conclusion


DBS has a variety of effects on neurons in the stimulated nucleus of the cortico-BG loop, through transmitter release, orthodromic activation of efferent axons, antidromic and orthodromic activation of afferent axons and direct stimulation of passing axons close to the stimulating electrode. The total effects may vary depending on the composition of neural elements in the stimulated nucleus and be more complex than originally expected. However, a common key mechanism should underlie the effectiveness of DBS: DBS dissociates input and output signals in the stimulated nucleus and disrupts abnormal information flow through the cortico-BG loop in the pathological conditions (Fig. 2.1). The proposed mechanism may well explain the paradox that DBS produces similar therapeutic effects to lesion or blockade of the target nucleus. Understanding the exact mechanism of DBS will lead us to better therapeutic options including improvements and upgrading of DBS.


References



Abosch A, Kapur S, Lang AE, Hussey D, Sime E, Miyasaki J, Houle S, Lozano AM (2003) Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease does not produce striatal dopamine release. Neurosurgery 53:1095–1105PubMed


Anderson ME, Postupna N, Ruffo M (2003) Effects of high-frequency stimulation in the internal globus pallidus on the activity of thalamic neurons in the awake monkey. J Neurophysiol 89:1150–1160PubMed


Anderson TR, Hu B, Iremonger K, Kiss ZH (2006) Selective attenuation of afferent synaptic transmission as a mechanism of thalamic deep brain stimulation-induced tremor arrest. J Neurosci 26:841–850PubMed


Aziz TZ, Peggs D, Sambrook MA, Crossman AR (1991) Lesion of the subthalamic nucleus for the alleviation of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced parkinsonism in the primate. Mov Disord 6:288–292PubMed


Bar-Gad I, Elias S, Vaadia E, Bergman H (2004) Complex locking rather than complete cessation of neuronal activity in the globus pallidus of a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated primate in response to pallidal microstimulation. J Neurosci 24:7410–7419PubMed


Bekar L, Libionka W, Tian GF, Xu Q, Torres A, Wang X, Lovatt D, Williams E, Takano T, Schnermann J, Bakos R, Nedergaard M (2008) Adenosine is crucial for deep brain stimulation-mediated attenuation of tremor. Nat Med 14:75–80PubMed


Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C, Hoffmann D, Gao DM, Hommel M, Perret JE, de Rougemont J (1991) Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. Lancet 337:403–406PubMed


Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gross C, Hoffmann D, Benazzouz A, Gao DM, Laurent A, Gentil M, Perret J (1994) Acute and long-term effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 62:76–84PubMed


Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D, Hoffmann D, Limousin P, Gay E, Payen I, Benazzouz A (1996) Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 84:203–214PubMed


Benazzouz A, Gross C, Féger J, Boraud T, Bioulac B (1993) Reversal of rigidity and improvement in motor performance by subthalamic high-frequency stimulation in MPTP-treated monkeys. Eur J Neurosci 5:382–389PubMed


Bergman H, Wichmann T, DeLong MR (1990) Reversal of experimental parkinsonism by lesions of the subthalamic nucleus. Science 249:1436–1438PubMed


Bergman H, Feingold A, Nini A, Raz A, Slovin H, Abeles M, Vaadia E (1998) Physiological aspects of information processing in the basal ganglia of normal and parkinsonian primates. Trends Neurosci 21:32–38PubMed


Beurrier C, Bioulac B, Audin J, Hammond C (2001) High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol 85:1351–1356PubMed


Boertien T, Zrinzo L, Kahan J, Jahanshahi M, Hariz M, Mancini L, Limousin P, Foltynie T (2011) Functional imaging of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 26:1835–1843PubMed


Boraud T, Bezard E, Bioulac B, Gross C (1996) High frequency stimulation of the internal Globus Pallidus (GPi) simultaneously improves parkinsonian symptoms and reduces the firing frequency of GPi neurons in the MPTP-treated monkey. Neurosci Lett 215:17–20PubMed


Brotchie JM, Mitchell IJ, Sambrook MA, Crossman AR (1991) Alleviation of parkinsonism by antagonism of excitatory amino acid transmission in the medial segment of the globus pallidus in rat and primate. Mov Disord 6:133–138PubMed


Brown P (2007) Abnormal oscillatory synchronisation in the motor system leads to impaired movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:656–664PubMed


Chiken S, Nambu A (2013) High-frequency pallidal stimulation disrupts information flow through the pallidum by GABAergic inhibition. J Neurosci 33:2268–2280PubMed


Chiken S, Nambu A (2014) Disrupting neuronal transmission: mechanism of DBS? Front Syst Neurosci 8:33PubMedCentralPubMed


Chiken S, Shashidharan P, Nambu A (2008) Cortically-evoked long-lasting inhibition of pallidal neurons in a transgenic mouse model of dystonia. J Neurosci 28:13967–13977PubMedCentralPubMed


Coubes P, Cif L, El Fertit H, Hemm S, Vayssiere N, Serrat S, Picot MC, Tuffery S, Claustres M, Echenne B, Frerebeau P (2004) Electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in patients with primary generalized dystonia: long-term results. J Neurosurg 101:189–194PubMed


Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease Study Group (2001) Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 345:956–963


Degos B, Deniau JM, Chavez M, Maurice N (2013) Subthalamic nucleus high-frequency stimulation restores altered electrophysiological properties of cortical neurons in parkinsonian rat. PLoS One 8:e83608PubMedCentralPubMed


Deniau JM, Degos B, Bosch C, Maurice N (2010) Deep brain stimulation mechanisms: beyond the concept of local functional inhibition. Eur J Neurosci 32:1080–1091PubMed

Sep 24, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Mechanism of DBS: Inhibition, Excitation, or Disruption?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access