Stereotactic Radiosurgery

14   Stereotactic Radiosurgery


Ricky Medel, Brian Williams, and Jason P. Sheehan




Tumors in and around the sella turcica represent some of the most challenging clinical entities that clinicians have dealt with over the past century. Nearly 100 years after Harvey Cushing’s landmark work, The Pituitary Body and Its Disorders: Clinical States Produced by Disorders of the Hypophysis Cerebri,1 pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and other, rarer tumors of the parasellar and sellar region remain difficult to cure with microsurgical techniques alone. In fact, Harvey Cushing recognized the difficulties of conventional surgical approaches for treating intracranial tumors. Cushing and colleagues used a device called a radium bomb to deliver single-session, focused radiation to intracranial tumors.2,3 At the time, the understanding of radiobiology and dosimetry was rather simplistic. Nevertheless, Cushing recognized the need for neurosurgeons to use radiation as an adjunct to the scalpel for treating intracranial tumors.


In 1951, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was described by Lars Leksell as the “closed skull destruction of an intracranial target using ionizing radiation.”4 Leksell treated the first patient with a pituitary adenoma to undergo surgery with the gamma knife in 1968. Since that time, SRS has been used to treat thousands of patients with sellar and parasellar tumors. Radiosurgery can be used as an upfront treatment or to achieve control of recurrent or residual tumor.


Great attention and effort in the field of SRS have been placed on the preservation of surrounding neuronal, vascular, and hormonal structures. Refinement of the radiosurgical technique for parasellar and sellar tumors has been achieved through advances in radiobiology, neuroimaging, medical physics, and engineering. In this chapter, we review the role of SRS for the two most commonly treated tumors types in the parasellar and sellar region: pituitary adenomas and meningiomas.


images Radiosurgical Devices and Techniques


SRS involves focusing a high dose of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding structures significant doses of radiation. Radiosurgery is usually delivered in a single session but may be delivered in up to five sessions.5 It uses a steep falloff of the radiation dose to the surrounding tissues. Patients are immobilized with rigid frames fixed to the skull or other immobilization devices (eg, aquaplast masks or bite blocks). Radiosurgery is imageguided and generally achieves submillimeter accuracy. Integrated imaging may be used to further track and compensate for potential sources of error.


There are several types of radiosurgical delivery devices, including the gamma knife, modified linear accelerators (LINACs), and proton beam units. Single-session radiosurgical doses for nonfunctioning adenomas are typically 12 to 18 Gy, and 15 to 30 Gy for functioning adenomas. Radiosurgical doses for World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningiomas are typically 12 to 18 Gy. For multisession radiosurgery, these doses may be divided into two to five sessions or fractions.


Gamma knife radiosurgery involves the use of multiple isocenters of varying beam diameters to achieve a dose plan that conforms to irregular three-dimensional volumes. The number of isocenters varies based upon the size, shape, and location of the adenoma. In the current version of the gamma knife, each isocenter is comprised of eight independent sectors. Beam diameters for the current Gamma Knife Perfexion unit vary from zero (ie, blocked) to 16 mm in diameter.


Linear accelerator (LINAC)–based radiosurgery (eg, CyberKnife, Novalis Tx, Trilogy, Axesse) uses multiple radiation arcs to crossfire photon beams at a target.6 Most systems use nondynamic techniques in which the arc is moved around its radius to deliver radiation that enters from many different vantage points. Technical improvements with LINAC-based radiosurgery include beam shaping, intensity modulation, minileaf collimation, and onboard computed tomography or fluoroscopic imaging.


Proton therapy is a method of external beam radiotherapy; it has been adapted as a radiosurgical tool for intracranial pathology. It takes advantage of the inherent superior dose distribution of protons compared with photons that is a consequence of the Bragg peak phenomenon.7 Currently, there are a few centers where this treatment is available in the United States and abroad. The number of such centers is likely to increase in the coming years as compact proton units are developed and proton beam technology is applied to more types of intracranial and extracranial disease.


images Radiosurgery for Pituitary Adenomas


Pituitary adenomas are the most common intrasellar neoplasms and are found in 10 to 27% of the general population.8,9 Microadenomas (<1 cm) may be discovered incidentally during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or may be diagnosed when a patient has symptoms of hormone hypersecretion. Macroadenomas may be diagnosed as a result of mass effect inducing hypopituitarism, elevation in prolactin, or a neurologic deficit (eg, cranial nerve dysfunction). The distribution of functioning and nonfunctioning microadenomas is equal. Among macroadenomas, nonfunctioning lesions occur with greater frequency (~80%).8 Patients with pituitary adenomas often present with headache (40–60%), visual disturbance, hypopituitarism, or, less frequently, apoplexy.8,9 Surgical intervention is currently the mainstay of treatment for nearly all lesions except prolactinomas. Patients with large or invasive lesions often require additional therapeutic modalities, and radiosurgery is an important part of their treatment.9


Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas


Growth control following microsurgical resection will be achieved in 50 to 80% of patients with macroadenomas.10 Radiosurgery provides an excellent therapeutic option for those with continued growth or evidence of recurrence. Worldwide, more than 11,000 patients have been treated, with the published literature supporting effective control of tumor growth and low rates of complications.10


Twenty-seven series were identified comprising 1009 patients with nonfunctioning adenomas1035 (Table 14.1). Follow-up (mean/median) ranged from 16.2 to 64 months, with an average rate of growth control of 96.8% (range, 92.2–100%; Fig. 14.1). The dose given to the tumor margin ranged from 12.3 to 26.9 gray (Gy). Neurologic deficits were uncommon (average, 4.0%; range, 0–17.6%), as was hypopitutarism (average, 6.4%; range, 0–40%). Pollock et al,29 in their series of 62 patients, reported a rate of 27% experiencing new anterior pituitary deficiencies. There was no substantial difference in the dosimetry between those with and without hypopituitarism after radiosurgery; a median margin dose of 16 Gy was used in that series. However, they did demonstrate a significant relationship with the volume of the lesion treated; patients with a tumor volume of 4.0 cm3 or less had a 5-year risk for developing a new hormonal deficit of 18%, whereas those with lesions larger than 4.0 cm3 had a 5-year risk of 58% (P = 0.02). At our institution, we reported 90% tumor control in a series of 100 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.22 Tumor control was reduced when the margin dose to the tumor was less than 12 Gy. These data provide a basis upon which to provide patients with advice regarding the risks of intervention.


Secretory Pituitary Adenomas


Cushing Syndrome

In 80% of cases, endogenous Cushing syndrome results from hypersecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), usually secondary to a pituitary corticotrope adenoma.36 Although surgical resection remains the primary treatment for ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas, invasion of the surrounding dura and/or cavernous sinus or the presence of a lesion undetectable on MRI makes surgical cure improbable. In these situations, radiosurgery serves as an invaluable adjunctive modality. What defines “cure” in Cushing syndrome remains the subject of some controversy. In 2003, the Endocrine Society published a consensus statement regarding the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, including the criteria for establishing biochemical remission or cure.37 The guidelines were updated in 2008, and both versions suggest the use of morning postoperative serum cortisol levels.36 Very low levels, less than 2 mcg/dL, predict a low rate of recurrence (~10% in 10 years). Most series use either mean serum free cortisol (5.4–10.8 mcg/dL), midnight salivary cortisol (normal, –4.2 nmol/L), or a urinary free cortisol (UFC) within the normal range. Nevertheless, there is significant variability in the exact testing and levels used to define biochemical remission.


images


Fig. 14.1 A 41-year-old man who presented with a recurrent, nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. (A) The patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery in which 15 Gy was delivered to the tumor margin. (B) One and one-half years later, the pituitary adenoma has decreased substantially in size.


images



A review of the radiosurgical literature revealed 36 studies comprising 671 patients with Cushing disease treated with radiosurgery, in most cases as an adjunct to operative resection1116,18,21,23,24,27,3133,3859 (Table 14.2). Most used 24-hour UFC or serum cortisol to assess remission. However, the criteria for defining remission were not reported for all series. The average rate of endocrine remission was 54.6%, with a range from 0 to 100% over a follow-up period (mean/median) from 16.2 to 94 months. In our experience, endocrine remission of Cushing disease was achieved on average ~12 months after SRS.45 The rates of new neurologic deficit, including visual deterioration, were low (average, 2.5%), with some form of new anterior pituitary deficiency occurring in 23% of patients (range, 0–68.8%). Emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up, late recurrence was also demonstrated in several series, with rates as high as 20%.45,56


Nelson Syndrome

In some patients, Cushing syndrome remains refractory to surgical resection and radiation therapy of pituitary lesion. In these patients, bilateral adrenalectomy remains a therapeutic option to induce remission of hypercortisolemia. Although this procedure is effective, Nelson syndrome is a well-described complication, occurring in up to 23% of patients.60 Characterized by elevated ACTH levels, hyperpigmentation, and progressive and often invasive tumors, this syndrome presents a therapeutic challenge of its own.


images



As opposed to the literature regarding the radiosurgical treatment of other pituitary adenomas, that for the use of radiosurgery in Nelson syndrome is fairly sparse. Ten series encompassing 94 patients have been published 32,43,47,49,6166 (Table 14.3). Over an average follow-up period (mean/median) ranging from 18 to 84 months, normalization of ACTH occurred in only 24.3%; however, a significant reduction in hormone levels was more frequent. Control of tumor growth was achieved in the majority of cases (range, 82–100%). Overall, the paucity of literature prevents strong conclusions from being drawn, but it appears as if good tumor control with a reduction in ACTH levels is achievable with radiosurgery for patients with Nelson syndrome.


Acromegaly

Acromegaly occurs with a prevalence of ~60 per million and has significant associated morbidity and mortality (hypertension, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, and sleep apnea), with a standardized mortality ratio of 1.48.67 Surgical resection is widely considered to be the first-line therapy; however, like patients with Cushing disease, those with invasion of surrounding structures (eg, the dura or the cavernous sinus) are unlikely to be cured. Although there exists some variation in the definition of biochemical cure, most consider a growth hormone (GH) level below 2.0 ng/ mL to be appropriate because it has been associated with a reversal of the morbidity and mortality of the disease.68


This GH level should occur with an insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) level that is within the normal range for age and gender.


Forty-one series have been published comprising 1596 patients with acromegaly over a follow-up period (mean/median) ranging from 16.2 to 102 months 1116,18,21,24,26,27,3133,40,43,46,49,50,52,53,5658,66,6981 (Table 14.4). The rates of endocrine remission ranged from 0 to 100% (average, 43.8%). Several factors contributed to this considerable variation, including variation in the definition of remission, use of somatostatin analogues both during treatment and follow-up, and differences in treatment parameters. Radiosurgery was associated with a low incidence of adverse effects, with a reported 1.5% of patients developing new neurologic deficits, primarily changes in visual acuity or extraocular motility. Additionally, an average of 9.8% of patients developed some form of pituitary dysfunction following SRS. Of note, radiosurgically induced endocrine remission appears to occur later than in Cushing disease. Our center observed a mean time to endocrine remission of ~24 months after radiosurgery, compared with 12 months for a similarly treated cohort of patients with Cushing disease.82 This and similar findings of a differential response of secretory pituitary adenomas to radiosurgery warrant further investigation in terms of the underlying radiobiology and ways to augment the effects of radiosurgery on more resistant types of secretory pituitary adenomas.52


Prolactinoma

Prolactinomas are the most common secretory pituitary adenomas and account for 44% of all pituitary microadenomas in autopsy series.83 Unlike with other adenomas, observation is within the management paradigm, and when treatment is indicated, medical therapy remains the first line choice for most patients with prolactinomas. Concerning the definition of biochemical cure, most consider it to be a gender-appropriate normalization of serum prolactin levels. However, some studies have demonstrated that treatment may disrupt the pituitary stalk, leading to elevation in prolactin levels and falsely lowered rates of cure.44


images


images



A review of the literature revealed 32 radiosurgical series including 765 patients with a prolactin-secreting adenoma 1118,21,23,24,27,32,33,35,40,43,46,49,50,52,53,56,57,66,70,8489 (Table 14.5). Biochemical cure was realized in 30.8% of patients overall (0–83.3%) over a follow-up period (mean/median) of 19.5 to 75.5 months. Growth control rates were substantially better, with many achieving rates of 90% or greater. Here, as with other secretory adenomas, the use of medical therapy both during treatment and through follow-up had an effect on outcomes. The rates of adverse events remained low, with a mean of 2.1% (range, 0–9.1%) developing new neurologic deficits and 7.5% having some form of new pituitary dysfunction (range, 0–28%).


Biochemical Remission and Late Recurrence

Given the morbidity associated with hypersecretory lesions, radiosurgical intervention would ideally yield hormone normalization within a period of time similar to that seen after surgical extirpation.90 Unfortunately, the period during which remission can occur is longer and demonstrates considerable variation, with reports of occurrence ranging from 3 months to 8 years.31,55,79


Concerning factors influencing remission, several groups have performed investigations designed to determine what if any variables may be used to predict or alter the efficacy of radiosurgery. Pollock et al79 evaluated 46 patients with GH-secreting adenomas and identified two significant associations in both univariate and multivariate analysis. A preoperative IGF-1 level greater than 2.25 times the upper limit of normal was significantly associated with lower rates of biochemical cure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–6.9), with this finding supporting the earlier reports by Castinetti and colleagues,71 who identified a significant association between preoperative GH and IGF-1 levels and rates of remission.


The perioperative use of suppressive medications was also found to have an influence on remission (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.4–13.2).79 In patients with IGF-1 levels less than 2.25 times the upper limit of normal and those who were off somatostatin agonists at the time of radiosurgery, the rates of biochemical remission exceeded 80%. A similar finding was demonstrated by Landolt et al,91 who showed that the remission rates fell from 60% to 11% for those using octreotide in the perioperative setting. Mechanisms underlying this result include a decreased radiosensitivity of tumor cells secondary to decreased cell division. Additionally, octreotide may act as a free radical scavenger, thereby decreasing the damage incurred by DNA following exposure to ionizing radiation. Importantly, this result is not exclusive to acromegaly. Landolt and colleagues87 found a nonsignificant trend toward worse outcomes in patients treated with radiosurgery for prolactinomas while on dopamine agonists. Pouratian89 et al, in their analysis of 23 patients with refractory prolactinomas, demonstrated a significant increase in the rates of remission for those patients off dopamine agonists at the time of treatment. We observed a similar improvement in endocrine remission in patients with acromegaly taken off pituitary-suppressive medications at the time of radiosurgery.82


There remains some controversy, however, as the literature has not been entirely consistent across series.53,69,71,79,87,91 Two other groups analyzed remission rates after radiosurgery in the setting of somatostatin agonists, without an identifiable effect on outcome.69,71 Several issues are postulated to account for this variability. First, the definition of cure is not entirely consistent across series, with some accepting GH values of less than 5 ng/mL.50,72 Second, the rates of follow-up are inconsistent. Pollock et al79 demonstrated that remission continued to occur for up to 5 years following radiosurgical treatment, whereas in the report by Castinetti and colleagues,71 44% of their patient population received the final endocrine evaluation less than 36 months following treatment. Despite inconsistent data, it is the practice at our center to discontinue the use of suppressive medications for 6 to 8 weeks around the period of radiosurgery, with the exact duration contingent on the specific pharmacokinetics of the specific substance used.


The rates of biochemical remission vary broadly across series, and one may note from the previously quoted results that a differential sensitivity to radiosurgery has been demonstrated for specific types of secretory pituitary adenomas.17,32,52 In general, Cushing syndrome demonstrates the highest average rates of biochemical remission, followed by acromegaly, prolactinomas, and Nelson syndrome. This finding has been attributed to patient selection, tumor volume, radiation dose delivered, use of suppressive medications, and duration of follow-up.17,52 In an attempt to control for such confounding variables, Pollock et al52 reviewed a retrospective series of 46 patients similar in terms of the above-mentioned aspects. This analysis revealed an 87% remission rate for Cushing disease versus 67% for acromegaly and 18% for prolactinomas (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.1–18.2; P = 0.04). Importantly, although only 18% of patients in this series with prolactinomas met the criteria for remission, the majority (82%) demonstrated symptomatic improvement. Concerning prolactinomas in particular, radiation-induced damage to the pituitary stalk may yield mild elevations of prolactin, resulting in falsely lowered rates of remission.52 Although this supports the hypothesis that radiosensitivity varies with hormonal product, the etiology of this disparity remains obscure.


Over all, few cases of recurrence following documented biochemical remission are reported.45,53 However, in these series, rates of up to 20% have been reported. This again serves to accentuate the necessity of long-term radiographic and endocrinologic follow-up after any therapeutic intervention for secretory pituitary adenomas.


Adverse Events

Adverse events following radiosurgery for a pituitary adenoma remain uncommon, with hypopituitarism occurring the most frequently. On average, 6 to 23% of patients develop some form of anterior pituitary deficiency subsequent to treatment. This has been correlated with the tumor volume; those with a tumor volume of 4.0 cm3 or less have a 5-year risk of 18%, versus 58% for those with larger lesions.29 The incidence of postradiosurgical hypopituitarism is also likely to be related to the preradiosurgical status of the normal pituitary gland, type and timing of prior treatments, radiosurgical dose per volume delivered to the normal gland, and rigorousness and length of the follow-up assessment period. A safe radiosurgical dose or dose per volume below which hypopituitarism will not occur is unlikely to exist. However, a lower dose achieved in part through a steep gradient index is intuitively pleasing in terms of minimizing the risk for hypopituitarism.


images



The second most common side effect includes neuropathies of cranial nerves II, III, IV, V, and VI, which occur in 2% or fewer of all patients. Greater conformality and shielding strategies serve to minimize this risk.92 Other rare side effects include radiation necrosis of the adjacent parenchyma,32,52,53,57 internal carotid artery stenosis,53,93 and secondary tumor formation.94 Concerning radiosurgically induced neoplasia after the treatment of a pituitary tumor, no cases have been reported to date. Nevertheless, one must always be cognizant of this potential, especially when using radiosurgery in younger patients.


images Radiosurgery for Sellar and Parasellar Meningiomas


Meningiomas are common intracranial lesions, and although they are generally histologically benign, resection of skull base lesions can be associated with significant morbidity.95109 Given the intimate relationship of the sellar and parasellar region to critical neurovascular structures, tumor control and preservation of neurologic function have become the goals of therapy. Previously, external beam radiotherapy was the adjuvant treatment of choice following surgical resection. However, more recently, radiosurgery has replaced this modality and has even become an acceptable primary therapy in certain cases.


Tumor Control


For WHO grade 1 meningiomas, SRS results in control rates ranging from 86 to 100%,110138 with a recent series demonstrating 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates of 95% and 69%, respectively139 (Fig. 14.2; Table 14.6). Variability in tumor and treatment characteristics and the duration of follow-up are all partially responsible for the differential outcomes reported. Specific variables that have demonstrated statistical significance in predicting tumor control include tumor volume and patient age at the time of treatment, with a younger age portending a more favorable outcome. In our experience at the University of Virginia, those lesions larger than 5 cm3 had an average peripheral dose of 12.7 Gy, compared with 15 Gy for smaller tumors (P < 0.001).139 This finding serves as an impetus for cytoreductive surgery before radiosurgical therapy. When the sellar or parasellar meningioma is adjacent to critical, radiation-sensitive structures such as the optic apparatus despite maximal safe resection, multiple-session radiosurgery with LINAC-based systems or the Gamma Knife eXtend may achieve a high rate of tumor control and maintain neurologic function.140


As with pituitary adenomas, WHO grade 1 meningiomas are slowly progressive lesions, and long-term follow-up is necessary to adequately characterize treatment outcomes. There is evidence suggesting that meningiomas followed for longer periods of time will either progress or decrease in size, whereas tumors with shorter follow-up remain constant in size.22,139


images


Fig. 14.2 A 36-year-old woman presented with worsening headaches and extraocular dysmotility. (A) Axial and (B) coronal postcontrast MR images of the brain revealed a left parasellar tumor consistent with a meningioma. The patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery with a dose of 14 Gy to the tumor margin. (C,D) One year after radiosurgery, the patient’s tumor was markedly smaller. In addition, her headaches and extraocular dysmotility resolved.


images



For patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas, SRS affords a much lower rate of tumor control.141144 In one study by Kano and colleagues, a margin dose exceeding 20 Gy to WHO grades 2 and 3 meningiomas was found to yield a higher chance of tumor control.141 In general, SRS, like other treatment tools including resection, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, offers a reasonable but far from perfect rate of local and distant tumor control for WHO grades 2 and 3 meningiomas. A higher margin dose should be delivered to the tumor during radiosurgery whenever possible.


Adverse Events


Cranial neuropathies were the most frequently observed adverse event (0–10%). These typically were secondary to tumor progression rather than to radiation-induced damage.110138 This compares favorably with the reported range of 18 to 41% following microsurgical resection.95–109,145 Factors demonstrating an association with cranial neuropathy were those one would expect to be associated with tumor progression (larger volume, lower peripheral dose, and longer follow-up). In the series by Williams et al,139 only tumor progression demonstrated significance on multivariate analysis, and 79% of patients who developed a new neurologic deficit did so in this setting. Contrary to what was demonstrated for pituitary adenomas, hypopituitarism was an infrequent finding.


images Conclusion


SRS has come to occupy an important role in the management of patients with parasellar and sellar tumors. Radiosurgery can be used after resection in patients with substantial residual tumor or tumor recurrence. It can also be used as an upfront treatment for some patients. Long-term tumor control is typically afforded by radiosurgery for those with pituitary adenomas and benign meningiomas. Neurologic function is generally preserved or improved, even when a tumor in the cavernous sinus is treated. Delayed tumor progression or radiation-induced complications are rare. However, lifelong follow-up of patients is generally recommended.


References


  1. Cushing H. The Pituitary Body and Its Disorders: Clinical States Produced by Disorders of the Hypophysis Cerebri. J. B. Lippincott Company; 1912
  2. Seymour ZA, Cohen-Gadol AA. Cushing’s lost cases of “radium bomb” brachytherapy for gliomas. J Neurosurg 2010; 113(1):141–148
  3. Schulder M, Loeffler JS, Howes AE, Alexander E III, Black PM. Historical vignette: The radium bomb: Harvey Cushing and the interstitial irradiation of gliomas. J Neurosurg 1996;84(3): 530–532
  4. Leksell L. The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand 1951;102(4):316–319
  5. Barnett GH, Linskey ME, Adler JR, et al; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurolofical Surgeons Washington Committee Stereotactic Radiosurgery Task Force. Stereotactic radiosurgery—an organized neurosurgery-sanctioned definition. J Neurosurg 2007;106(1):1–5
  6. Friedman WA, Foote KD. Linear accelerator radiosurgery in the management of brain tumours. Ann Med 2000;32(1):64–80
  7. Chen CC, Chapman P, Petit J, Loeffler J. Proton radiosurgery in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2007;23(6):E5
  8. Dekkers OM, Pereira AM, Romijn JA. Treatment and follow-up of clinically nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(10):3717–3726
  9. Vance ML. Treatment of patients with a pituitary adenoma: one clinician’s experience. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16(4):E1
  10. Höybye C, Rähn T. Adjuvant gamma knife radiosurgery in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas; low risk of long-term complications in selected patients. Pituitary 2009;12(3):211–216
  11. Pan L, Zhang N, Wang E, Wang B, Xu W. Pituitary adenomas: the effect of gamma knife radiosurgery on tumor growth and endocrinopathies. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;70(Suppl 1):119–126
  12. Feigl GC, Bonelli CM, Berghold A, Mokry M. Effects of gamma knife radiosurgery of pituitary adenomas on pituitary function. J Neurosurg 2002;97(5, Suppl):415–421
  13. Hayashi M, Izawa M, Hiyama H, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):111–118
  14. Inoue HK, Kohga H, Hirato M, et al. Pituitary adenomas treated by microsurgery with or without Gamma Knife surgery: experience in 122 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):125–131
  15. Izawa M, Hayashi M, Nakaya K, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2000;93(Suppl 3):19–22
  16. Kajiwara K, Saito K, Yoshikawa K, et al. Imageguided stereotactic radiosurgery with the CyberKnife for pituitary adenomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005;48(2):91–96
  17. Kobayashi T. Long-term results of stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas. Specific strategies for different types of adenoma. Prog Neurol Surg 2009;22:77–95
  18. Lim YL, Leem W, Kim TS, Rhee BA, Kim GK. Four years’ experiences in the treatment of pituitary adenomas with gamma knife radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;70(Suppl 1):95–109
  19. Liscák R, Vladyka V, Marek J, Simonová G, Vymazal J. Gamma knife radiosurgery for endocrine-inactive pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007;149(10):999–1006, discussion 1006
  20. Losa M, Valle M, Mortini P, et al. Gamma knife surgery for treatment of residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas after surgical debulking. J Neurosurg 2004;100(3):438–444
  21. Martinez R, Bravo G, Burzaco J, Rey G. Pituitary tumors and gamma knife surgery. Clinical experience with more than two years of follow-up. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;70(Suppl 1):110–118
  22. Mingione V, Yen CP, Vance ML, et al. Gamma surgery in the treatment of nonsecretory pituitary macroadenoma. J Neurosurg 2006;104(6):876–883
  23. Mitsumori M, Shrieve DC, Alexander E III, et al. Initial clinical results of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42(3):573–580
  24. Mokry M, Ramschak-Schwarzer S, Simbrunner J, Ganz JC, Pendl G. A six year experience with the postoperative radiosurgical management of pituitary adenomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):88–100
  25. Muacevic A, Uhl E, Wowra B. Gamma knife radiosurgery for non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2004;91:51–54
  26. Muramatsu J, Yoshida M, Shioura H, et al. Clinical results of LIN-AC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 2003;63(5):225–230
  27. Petrovich Z, Jozsef G, Yu C, Apuzzo ML. Radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2003;14(1):147–166
  28. Picozzi P, Losa M, Mortini P, et al. Radiosurgery and the prevention of regrowth of incompletely removed nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2005;102(Suppl):71–74
  29. Pollock BE, Cochran J, Natt N, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: results from a 15-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70(5):1325–1329
  30. Sheehan JP, Kondziolka D, Flickinger J, Lunsford LD. Radiosurgery for residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 2002;97(5, Suppl):408–414
  31. Shin M, Kurita H, Sasaki T, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2000;93(Suppl 3):2–5
  32. Voges J, Kocher M, Runge M, et al. Linear accelerator radiosurgery for pituitary macroadenomas: a 7-year follow-up study. Cancer 2006;107(6):1355–1364
  33. Witt TC, Kondziolka D, Flickinger J, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary tumors. In: Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger J, eds. Gamma Knife Brain Surgery. Karger; 1998:114–127
  34. Wowra B, Stummer W. Efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a quantitative follow up with magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis. J Neurosurg 2002;97(5, Suppl):429–432
  35. Yoon SC, Suh TS, Jang HS, et al. Clinical results of 24 pituitary macroadenomas with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41(4):849–853
  36. Biller BMK, Grossman AB, Stewart PM, et al. Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(7):2454–2462
  37. Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB, et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88(12):5593–5602
  38. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Dufour H, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery is a successful adjunctive treatment in Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2007;156(1):91–98
  39. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Morange I, et al. Longterm results of stereotactic radiosurgery in secretory pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94(9):3400–3407
  40. Choi JY, Chang JH, Chang JW, Ha Y, Park YG, Chung SS. Radiological and hormonal responses of functioning pituitary adenomas after gamma knife radiosurgery. Yonsei Med J 2003;44(4):602–607
  41. Degerblad M, Rähn T, Bergstrand G, Thorén M. Long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery to the pituitary gland in Cushing’s disease. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1986;112(3):310–314
  42. Devin JK, Allen GS, Cmelak AJ, Duggan DM, Blevins LS. The efficacy of linear accelerator radiosurgery in the management of patients with Cushing’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2004;82(5–6):254–262
  43. Ganz JC, Backlund EO, Thorsen FA. The effects of gamma knife surgery of pituitary adenomas on tumor growth and endocrinopathies. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993;61(Suppl 1): 30–37
  44. Höybye C, Grenbäck E, Rähn T, Degerblad M, Thorén M, Hulting AL. Adrenocorticotropic hormone-producing pituitary tumors: 12- to 22-year follow-up after treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 2001;49(2):284–291, discussion 291–292
  45. Jagannathan J, Sheehan JP, Pouratian N, Laws ER, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma knife surgery for Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg 2007;106(6):980–987
  46. Kim SH, Huh R, Chang JW, Park YG, Chung SS. Gamma knife radiosurgery for functioning pituitary adenomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):101–110
  47. Kobayashi T, Kida Y, Mori Y. Gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of Cushing disease: long-term results. J Neurosurg 2002;97(5, Suppl):422–428
  48. Laws ER, Reitmeyer M, Thapar K, Vance ML. Cushing’s disease resulting from pituitary corticotrophic microadenoma. Treatment results from transsphenoidal microsurgery and gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurochirurgie 2002;48(2–3 Pt 2):294–299
  49. Levy RP, Fabrikant JI, Frankel KA, et al. Heavy-charged-particle radiosurgery of the pituitary gland: clinical results of 840 patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1991;57(1–2):22–35
  50. Morange-Ramos I, Regis J, Dufour H, et al. Gamma-knife surgery for secreting pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(5):437–443
  51. Petit JH, Biller BMK, Coen JJ, et al. Proton stereotactic radiosurgery in management of persistent acromegaly. Endocr Pract 2007;13(7):726–734
  52. Pollock BE, Brown PD, Nippoldt TB, Young WF Jr. Pituitary tumor type affects the chance of biochemical remission after radiosurgery of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 2008;62(6):1271–1276, discussion 1276–1278
  53. Pollock BE, Nippoldt TB, Stafford SL, Foote RL, Abboud CF. Results of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: factors associated with endocrine normalization. J Neurosurg 2002;97(3):525–530
  54. Seo Y, Fukuoka S, Takanashi M, Sasaki T, Suematsu K, Nakamura J. Gamma knife surgery for Cushing’s disease. Surg Neurol 1995;43(2):170–175, discussion 175–176
  55. Sheehan JM, Vance ML, Sheehan JP, Ellegala DB, Laws ER Jr. Radiosurgery for Cushing’s disease after failed transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2000;93(5):738–742
  56. Tinnel BA, Henderson MA, Witt TC, et al. Endocrine response after gamma knife-based stereotactic radiosurgery for secretory pituitary adenoma. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2008;86(5):292–296
  57. Wan H, Chihiro O, Yuan S. MASEP gamma knife radiosurgery for secretory pituitary adenomas: experience in 347 consecutive cases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009;28:36
  58. Witt TC. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14(5):e10
  59. Wong GK, Leung CH, Chiu KW, et al. LINAC radiosurgery in recurrent Cushing’s disease after transsphenoidal surgery: a series of 5 cases. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46(6):327–330
  60. Nagesser SK, van Seters AP, Kievit J, Hermans J, Krans HM, van de Velde CJ. Long-term results of total adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease. World J Surg 2000;24(1):108–113
  61. Mauermann WJ, Sheehan JP, Chernavvsky DR, Laws ER, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma knife surgery for adrenocorticotropic hormone-producing pituitary adenomas after bilateral adrenalectomy. J Neurosurg 2007;106(6):988–993
  62. Petit JH, Biller BMK, Yock TI, et al. Proton stereotactic radiotherapy for persistent adrenocorticotropin-producing adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(2):393–399
  63. Vik-Mo EO, Oksnes M, Pedersen P-H, et al. Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery of Nelson syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2009;160(2):143–148
  64. Wolffenbuttel BH, Kitz K, Beuls EM. Beneficial gamma-knife radiosurgery in a patient with Nelson’s syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1998;100(1):60–63
  65. Pollock BE, Young WF Jr. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas after prior adrenalectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;54(3):839–841
  66. Laws ER Jr, Vance ML. Radiosurgery for pituitary tumors and craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1999;10(2):327–336
  67. Melmed S. Medical progress: Acromegaly. N Engl J Med 2006;355(24):2558–2573
  68. Growth Hormone Research Society; Pituitary Society. Biochemical assessment and long-term monitoring in patients with acromegaly: statement from a joint consensus conference of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the Pituitary Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89(7):3099–3102
  69. Attanasio R, Epaminonda P, Motti E, et al. Gamma-knife radiosurgery in acromegaly: a 4-year follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88(7):3105–3112
  70. Castinetti F, Morange I, Dufour H, Regis J, Brue T. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly. Pituitary 2009;12(1):3–10
  71. Castinetti F, Taieb D, Kuhn J-M, et al. Outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery in 82 patients with acromegaly: correlation with initial hypersecretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90(8):4483–4488
  72. Fukuoka S, Ito T, Takanashi M, Hojo A, Nakamura H. Gamma knife radiosurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2001;76(3–4):213–217
  73. Ikeda H, Jokura H, Yoshimoto T. Transsphenoidal surgery and adjuvant gamma knife treatment for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 2001;95(2):285–291
  74. Jagannathan J, Kanter AS, Olson C, Sherman JH, Laws ER Jr, Sheehan JP. Applications of radiotherapy and radiosurgery in the management of pediatric Cushing’s disease: a review of the literature and our experience. J Neurooncol 2008;90(1):117–124
  75. Jezkova J, Marek J, Hana V, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegaly–long-term experience. Horumon To Rinsho 2006;64(5):588–595
  76. Kobayashi T, Mori Y, Uchiyama Y, Kida Y, Fujitani S. Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for growth hormone-producing pituitary adenoma: is the disease difficult to cure? J Neurosurg 2005;102(Suppl):119–123
  77. Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 1998;88(6):1002–1008
  78. Losa M, Gioia L, Picozzi P, et al. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma [see comment]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(7):2546–2552
  79. Pollock BE, Jacob JT, Brown PD, Nippoldt TB. Radiosurgery of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: factors associated with biochemical remission. J Neurosurg 2007;106(5):833–838
  80. Thorén M, Rähn T, Guo WY, Werner S. Stereotactic radiosurgery with the cobalt-60 gamma unit in the treatment of growth hormone-producing pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery 1991;29(5):663–668
  81. Vik-Mo EO, Oksnes M, Pedersen P-H, et al. Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 2007;157(3):255–263
  82. Jagannathan J, Sheehan JP, Pouratian N, Laws ER Jr, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegaly: outcomes after failed transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 2008;62(6): 1262–1269, discussion 1269–1270
  83. Klibanski A. Clinical practice. Prolactinomas. N Engl J Med 2010;362(13):1219–1226
  84. Pan L, Zhang N, Wang EM, Wang BJ, Dai JZ, Cai PW. Gamma knife radiosurgery as a primary treatment for prolactinomas. J Neurosurg 2000;93(Suppl 3):10–13
  85. Jezková J, Hána V, Krsek M, et al. Use of the Leksell gamma knife in the treatment of prolactinoma patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;70(5):732–741
  86. Kim MS, Lee SI, Sim JH. Gamma knife radiosurgery for functioning pituitary microadenoma. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):119–124
  87. Landolt AM, Lomax N. Gamma knife radiosurgery for prolactinomas. J Neurosurg 2000;93(Suppl 3):14–18
  88. Ma ZM, Qiu B, Hou YH, Liu YS. Gamma knife treatment for pituitary prolactinomas. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2006;31(5):714–716
  89. Pouratian N, Sheehan J, Jagannathan J, Laws ER Jr, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma knife radiosurgery for medically and surgically refractory prolactinomas. Neurosurgery 2006;59(2):255–266
  90. Jagannathan J, Smith R, DeVroom HL, et al. Outcome of using the histological pseudocapsule as a surgical capsule in Cushing disease. J Neurosurg 2009;111(3):531–539
  91. Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, et al. Octreotide may act as a radioprotective agent in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85(3):1287–1289
  92. Jagannathan J, Yen C-P, Pouratian N, Laws ER, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a comprehensive review of indications, techniques and long-term results using the Gamma Knife. J Neurooncol 2009;92(3):345–356
  93. Lim YJ, Leem W, Park JT, Kim TS, Rhee BA, Kim GK. Cerebral infarction with ICA occlusion after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma: a case report. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72(Suppl 1):132–139
  94. Loeffler JS, Niemierko A, Chapman PH. Second tumors after radiosurgery: tip of the iceberg or a bump in the road? Neurosurgery 2003;52(6):1436–1440, discussion 1440–1442
  95. Al-Mefty O, Smith RR. Surgery of tumors invading the cavernous sinus. Surg Neurol 1988;30(5):370–381
  96. CioffiFA, Bernini FP, Punzo A, Natale M, Muras I. Cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1987;30(2):40–47
  97. Cusimano MD, Sekhar LN, Sen CN, et al. The results of surgery for benign tumors of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1995;37(1):1–9, discussion 9–10
  98. De Jesús O, Sekhar LN, Parikh HK, Wright DC, Wagner DP. Long-term follow-up of patients with meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: recurrence, progression, and quality of life. Neurosurgery 1996;39(5):915–919, discussion 919–920
  99. DeMonte F, Smith HK, al-Mefty O. Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1994;81(2):245–251
  100. Heth JA, Al-Mefty O. Cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14(6):e3
  101. Kim DK, Grieve J, Archer DJ, Uttley D. Meningiomas in the region of the cavernous sinus: a review of 21 patients. Br J Neurosurg 1996;10(5):439–444
  102. Klink DF, Sampath P, Miller NR, Brem H, Long DM. Long-term visual outcome after nonradical microsurgery patients with parasellar and cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2000;47(1):24–31, discussion 31–32
  103. Knosp E, Perneczky A, Koos WT, Fries G, Matula C. Meningiomas of the space of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1996;38(3): 434–442, discussion 442–444
  104. O’Sullivan MG, van Loveren HR, Tew JM Jr. The surgical resectability of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1997;40(2):238–244, discussion 245–247
  105. Sekhar LN, M⊘ller AR. Operative management of tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1986;64(6):879–889
  106. Sekhar LN, Patel S, Cusimano M, Wright DC, Sen CN, Bank WO. Surgical treatment of meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: evolving ideas based on a ten year experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1996;65:58–62
  107. Sekhar LN, Pomeranz S, Sen CN. Management of tumours involving the cavernous sinus. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991;53:101–112
  108. Sekhar LN, Sen CN, Jho HD, Janecka IP. Surgical treatment of intracavernous neoplasms: a four-year experience. Neurosurgery 1989;24(1):18–30
  109. Sindou M, Wydh E, Jouanneau E, Nebbal M, Lieutaud T. Long-term follow-up of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus after surgical treatment alone. J Neurosurg 2007;107(5):937–944
  110. Chang SD, Adler JR Jr. Treatment of cranial base meningiomas with linear accelerator radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1997;41(5):1019–1025, discussion 1025–1027
  111. Chang SD, Adler JR Jr, Martin DP. LINAC radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;71(1):43–50
  112. Chang SD, Doty JR, Martin DP, Hancock SL, Adler JR. Treatment of cavernous sinus tumors with linear accelerator radiosurgery. Skull Base Surg 1999;9(3):195–200
  113. Chen JC, Giannotta SL, Yu C, Petrovich Z, Levy ML, Apuzzo ML. Radiosurgical management of benign cavernous sinus tumors: dose profiles and acute complications. Neurosurgery 2001;48(5):1022–1030, discussion 1030–1032
  114. Duma CM, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Harsh GR IV, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cavernous sinus meningiomas as an addition or alternative to microsurgery. Neurosurgery 1993;32(5):699–704, discussion 704–705
  115. Friedman WA, Murad GJ, Bradshaw P, et al. Linear accelerator surgery for meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2005;103(2):206–209
  116. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Koike J, Iizuka H, Ishii D. Long-term outcomes of gamma knife surgery for cavernous sinus meningioma. J Neurosurg 2007;107(4):745–751
  117. Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ishiguro T. Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2003;52(3):517–524, discussion 523–524
  118. Johnson MD, Sade B, Milano MT, Lee JH, Toms SA. New prospects for management and treatment of inoperable and recurrent skull base meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2008;86(1):109–122
  119. Kida Y, Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, Oyama H, Niwa M, Maesawa S. Radiosurgery of cavernous sinus meningiomas with gamma-knife. No Shinkei Geka 1996;24(6):529–533
  120. Kimball MM, Friedman WA, Foote KD, Bova FJ, Chi YY. Linear accelerator radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009;87(2):120–127
  121. Kuo JS, Chen JC, Yu C, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for benign cavernous sinus tumors: quantitative analysis of treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 2004;54(6):1385–1393, discussion 1393–1394
  122. Kurita H, Sasaki T, Kawamoto S, et al. Role of radiosurgery in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;96(5):297–304
  123. Lee JY, Niranjan A, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2002;97(1):65–72
  124. Liscák R, Simonová G, Vymazal J, Janousková L, Vladyka V. Gamma knife radiosurgery of meningiomas in the cavernous sinus region. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141(5):473–480
  125. Malik I, Rowe JG, Walton L, Radatz MW, Kemeny AA. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2005;19(1):13–20
  126. Maruyama K, Shin M, Kurita H, Kawahara N, Morita A, Kirino T. Proposed treatment strategy for cavernous sinus meningiomas: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 2004;55(5):1068–1075
  127. Nicolato A, Foroni R, Alessandrini F, Bricolo A, Gerosa M. Radiosurgical treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: experience with 122 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002;51(5):1153–1159, discussion 1159–1161
  128. Nicolato A, Foroni R, Alessandrini F, Maluta S, Bricolo A, Gerosa M. The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53(4):992–1000
  129. Pamir MN, Kiliç T, Belirgen M, Abacioglu U, Karabekiroglu N. Pituitary adenomas treated with gamma knife radiosurgery: volumetric analysis of 100 cases with minimum 3 year follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007;61(2):270–280, discussion 280
  130. Pendl G, Schröttner O, Eustacchio S, Ganz JC, Feichtinger K. Cavernous sinus meningiomas—what is the strategy: upfront or adjuvant gamma knife surgery? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998;70(Suppl 1):33–40
  131. Pollock BE, Stafford SL. Results of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with imaging defined cavernous sinus meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62(5):1427–1431
  132. Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Utter A, Giannini C, Schreiner SA. Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55(4): 1000–1005
  133. Roche PH, Régis J, Dufour H, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2000;93(Suppl 3):68–73
  134. Shin M, Kurita H, Sasaki T, et al. Analysis of treatment outcome after stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2001;95(3):435–439
  135. Spiegelmann R, Nissim O, Menhel J, Alezra D, Pfeffer MR. Linear accelerator radiosurgery for meningiomas in and around the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 2002;51(6):1373–1379, discussion 1379–1380
  136. Tishler RB, Loeffler JS, Lunsford LD, et al. Tolerance of cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27(2):215–221
  137. Villavicencio AT, Black PM, Shrieve DC, Fallon MP, Alexander E, Loeffler JS. Linac radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143(11):1141–1152
  138. Ziyal IM, Sekhar LN, Salas E. Radiosurgery: an effective treatment for cavernous sinus meningiomas? Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999;9(2):107–115
  139. Williams B, Yen CP, Starke R, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for parasellar meningiomas: long-term results including complications, predictive factors, and progression free survival. J Neurosurg 2010; in press
  140. Adler JR Jr, Gibbs IC, Puataweepong P, Chang SD. Visual field preservation after multisession cyberknife radiosurgery for perioptic lesions [reprint in Neurosurgery 2008;62(Suppl 2):733–743; PMID: 18596432]. Neurosurgery 2006;59(2):244–254
  141. Kano H, Takahashi JA, Katsuki T, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2007;84(1):41–47
  142. Rosenberg LA, Prayson RA, Lee J, et al. Long-term experience with World Health Organization grade III (malignant) meningiomas at a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74(2):427–432
  143. Huffmann BC, Reinacher PC, Gilsbach JM. Gamma knife surgery for atypical meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2005;102(Suppl):283–286
  144. Harris AE, Lee JY, Omalu B, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. The effect of radiosurgery during management of aggressive meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2003;60(4):298–305, discussion 305
  145. Landeiro JA, Ribeiro CH, Lapenta MA, Flores MS, Lopes CA, Marins J. Meningiomas of the cavernous sinus: the surgical resectability and complications. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001;59(3-B):746–753

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 8, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access