Terminology

Adult patients presenting with spinal deformity in the absence of previous surgery, trauma, or syndromic or neuromuscular causes are classically placed into one of two categories. The first main category of adult scoliosis involves patients who previously possessed a spinal deformity at a much younger age in the form of infantile, childhood, or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Such patients become symptomatic during adulthood likely from a progression of these curves with or without superimposed degenerative changes. The second major category of adult scoliosis involves patients without preexisting scoliosis who develop spinal deformity as a result of adult-onset degenerative changes (e.g., disc degeneration, facet joint arthropathy, osteoporosis, and vertebral body compression fractures).¹^–² This latter condition is classically referred to as de novo or adult degenerative scoliosis. Differentiating between these two is often determined based on history, symptoms, and imaging.

With regard to history, patients with preexisting curves might acknowledge the presence of their curve since adolescence or young adulthood, which may be corroborated by past photographs. In terms of presenting symptoms, patients with de novo scoliosis typically complain of low back pain, neurogenic claudication, and/or radiculopathy in keeping with most patients with degenerative spine pathology. They might also present with progressive deformity and spinal imbalance leading to severe axial back pain, but such symptoms occur more commonly in patients with preexisting scoliosis. Finally, with regard to imaging, patients with previous idiopathic curves often exhibit larger curves that span more spinal segments, often extending over the thoracic and lumbar regions. These curves may also be associated with significant rotational components. With de novo patients, curves more commonly center on the lumbar region, focally span fewer segments, involve listhesis or focal rotation of one vertebral body over another, and involve degeneration of the lumbosacral junction. Although these generalizations are associated with each type of adult scoliosis, such characteristics are not specific (Table 185-1). For the remainder of the chapter, a general view of de novo scoliosis is discussed.

Table 185-1 Factors that Help Differentiate De Novo or Adult Degenerative Scoliosis from Preexisting Idiopathic Scoliosis Presenting in the Adult

Factor	De Novo or Adult Degenerative	Previous Idiopathic Curve
History of previous curve	No	Yes
Age	60s	40s
Sex	Male > female	Female > male
Stenosis	Common	Uncommon
Curve magnitude	Smaller (15-50 degrees)	Larger (35-80 degrees)
Location	Lower lumbar	Thoracolumbar or lumbar
Length (in spinal segments)	<5 levels	>5 levels
L5-S1 involvement	Yes	No
Neurological dysfunction	50%-90%	7%-30%
Imbalance, coronal	No	Yes
Imbalance, sagittal	Yes	No

Clinical Presentation

In the younger populations with scoliosis, progressive deformity and cosmetic concerns are often the reasons for clinical presentation, but in the adult population, pain is the most common reason for presentation (up to 90%).³^–⁴ This latter group of patients might complain of radicular pain due to neural compression, often on the side of the lumbar concavity. However, complaints of axial pain are common, believed to result from muscle fatigue and spasm over the convexity of the curve.¹ Like younger patients with scoliosis, pulmonary compromise occurs only with severe thoracic curves (more than 80 or 90 degrees).¹ More commonly though, patients with thoracolumbar deformity with or without kyphosis complain of early satiety with eating because the rib cage can severely indent the abdomen, preventing gastric filling. When evaluating patients, surgeons must try to gain an understanding of the curve’s progression rather than assume the patient is presenting with back pain because degenerative processes have became too debilitating. For instance, a rapidly progressive curve might signify an underlying degenerative neurologic condition (e.g., spinal cord tumor, syrinx). In the absence of this diagnosis, the greatest threat to the patient’s health may be overlooked.

Radiographic Evaluation

Plain Films

Scoliosis films include three-foot (36-inch) standing posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs at the very minimum. On PA films, Cobb angles are used to measure curves in the coronal plane. First, curves should be measured so as to create the greatest curve angle, and the levels at the top and bottom of such curves should be noted. These curves are used as the foundation to define clinical curve progression. Second, the relationship of the center sacral line to C7 should be documented so as to determine the presence of coronal imbalance or trunk shift (Fig. 185-1). This line bisects a line passing through both iliac crests and ascends perpendicularly. Emami and colleagues have defined coronal imbalance as greater than 25 mm of lateral offset of this plumb line.⁵ Finally, bending films, traction films, or push-prone films can be used to explore the flexibility of the curves. Such maneuvers can help identify the primary structural curves of the scoliosis, because smaller curves can flatten out on such imaging. In addition, these images might yield information on the flexibility of such curves so that surgeons can quantify the ease or difficulty with which curves may be corrected by surgery.

FIGURE 185-1 Technique for measuring coronal balance.

(From Glassman SD, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:6 682-688, 2005.)

On the lateral films, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic parameters (especially pelvic incidence) should be measured first. Second, the C7-plumb line and/or T1 tilt should be measured to help determine the patient’s overall sagittal balance (Fig. 185-2). Such measurements are exceedingly important because multiple studies have shown that the quality of life in patients with adult degenerative spinal deformities is highly correlated with sagittal balance, both preoperatively and following spine surgery.⁶^–⁷ “Normal” sagittal balance is classically defined as a C7 plumb line that passes 2 to 4 cm posterior to the ventral S1 vertebra or 1 cm posterior to the L5–S1 disc space.⁸^–⁹ An offset of greater than 40 mm has been defined as sagittal imbalance.⁵ As with the coronal films, bending films can be taken from the lateral view. Such images are often referred to as extension films or supine films, and these can be taken with a bump under the patient’s kyphosis while lying supine. The goal is for the surgeon to estimate how much flexibility there is in the sagittal plane, once again to provide information preoperatively regarding the potential ease or difficulty the surgeon might face in the operating room during deformity-correction maneuvers.

FIGURE 185-2 Technique for measuring sagittal balance.

(From Glassman SD, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:6 682-688, 2005.)

Although all the radiographic parameters just outlined can be obtained for all patients with degenerative scoliosis, the imaging of most patients with adult deformity is focused on a lumbar rotational deformity involving a lumbar or thoracolumbar coronal curve that is hypolordotic in the sagittal plane. Such deformity is often associated with a relatively flexible thoracic compensatory curve typically less than 30 degrees.¹ In addition, rotatory subluxation or lateral translation at L3–4 and obliquity at L4–5 are the most commonly affected areas.¹ Although not necessarily obvious on plain films, it must be noted that many patients with long-standing deformities in the sagittal plane develop hip and knee flexion contractures. Such problems can limit the patient from obtaining a balanced posture (head over pelvis and over feet) even following an apparent surgical correction of spinal imbalance. In these patients, further evaluation of hip pathology may be required prior to attempting spine surgery.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

In dealing with idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents, most deformity surgeons use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans when they suspect an underlying neurologic pathology as the cause for the progressive deformity. Such consideration is clearly indicated with left-sided thoracic curves because most idiopathic curves are right-sided. Such a reversal of the normal curve pattern can signify an intrinsic spinal cord tumor, syrinx, or nonspecific compression. In addition, when there is concern for a syndromic (e.g., Chiari malformation, neurofibromatosis) or neuromuscular cause, MRI images may be essential in accurately diagnosing pathology in the neuraxis that is creating or compounding the deformity. In patients with adult deformity, however, MRI scans are routinely used. Patients in this age group are subject to neural compression with central, lateral recess, and foraminal stenosis, and disc dehydration and herniation are common. All findings are best evaluated with MRI, and thus adult patients in general should be evaluated with this imaging.

Bone Quality

Because of the high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients older than 50 years, poor bone quality can affect the surgical approach and instrumentation options.¹⁰ Although plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) imaging can help predict bone quality, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. The T-score compares the patient’s bone density to the optimal peak bone density for gender, and it is reported as the number of standard deviations below the average. A T-score greater than −1.0 is considered normal. A T-score less than −1.0 is considered osteopenia and the patient is considered at risk for developing osteoporosis. A T-score of less than −2.5 is diagnostic of osteoporosis. The Z-score is used to compare results to other patients of the same age, weight, ethnicity, and gender. It is useful to determine if there is something unusual contributing to bone loss. A Z-score of less than −1.5 raises concern that factors other than aging are contributing to osteoporosis, including thyroid dysfunction, malnutrition, tobacco use, and medication interactions. Some surgeons suggest performing this study on all women older than 50 years and all men older than 60 years who are considering surgery. However, in addition to age, risk factors for osteoporosis include history of fracture as an adult or fracture in a first-degree relative, white or Asian ethnicity, smoking, low body weight, female sex, dementia, and poor health.^1,¹¹

Classification Systems

The vast majority of study dedicated to patients with scoliosis since the 1980s has been focused on the adolescent form. Although such systems can apply to older patients who become symptomatic from preexisting adolescent idopathic curves, they are not appropriate for the classic de novo degenerative curves. Currently, three classification systems exist for adult scoliosis: the Aebi system,¹² the Schwab system,⁷ and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) system.¹³

The Aebi classification system is composed of four groups based on etiology of deformity. Type I refers to primary degenerative scoliosis (de novo scoliosis) that classically arises in the lumbar spine with an apex of deformity at L2–3 or L3–4 and results from asymmetric degenerative conditions. Type II refers to idiopathic scoliosis from childhood or adolescence that progresses in the setting of degenerative pathology. Type III is divided into two groups. Type IIIa involves secondary adult scoliosis, resulting from disease within the spine (neuromuscular or congenital cause) or from outside the spine (leg length discrepancy, hip abnormalities). Type IIIb designates deformity from bone weakness, such as from metabolic bone disease or osteoporotic fractures. Although descriptive of etiology, this classification system does not address the complex anatomy of an individual deformity and thus is not adequate for detailed surgical planning.

The Schwab classification was created following the outcomes of a multicenter, prospective, clinical series of adult patients with deformity. When correlated with clinical outcome measurements, specifically the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SRS outcome measure, three parameters were useful for classifying patients: deformity apex, lordosis, and intervertebral subluxation. In this classification scheme, patients are first grouped by apical level and assigned a specific type from I to V. A lumbar lordosis modifier based on severity is added with types A to C. Finally, a subluxation modifier based on severity is added with types 0, +, and ++. The strength of this classification scheme is that it assigns higher grades to patients with radiographic parameters associated with increased surgical rates, disability, and pain. However, a potential weakness of this system is that it is not thoroughly anatomically descriptive but rather focuses on clinical impact factors.

The SRS classification was created based fundamentally on radiographic curve type followed by the addition of three modifiers. First, the coronal curve is grouped into one of six major types based on apex location. A regional sagittal modifer exists to underscore the role that hypolordosis or kyphosis plays in relation to health status and surgical strategies in the four major regions of the spine.¹⁴ A lumbar degenerative modifier is then used to help quantify the degree of lumbar degenerative disease including loss of disc height, facet arthropathy, rotatory subluxation, listhesis, and the junctional L5–S1 curve. Finally, a global balance modifier is included to assess the overall sagittal or coronal balance via the C7 plumb line. Although this classification system may be more anatomically specific than the previously mentioned two classification schemes and has been shown to have good interobserver reliability, it generally is used as a research tool owing to its cumbersome nature.

Management

Conservative Management

The approach to patients who have adult degenerative scoliosis and present with axial pain with or without neural compression symptoms should involve the same conservative treatment as would be prescribed for similar adult patients who possess degenerative spine changes without deformity. Physical therapy, activity modification, traction, aquatic therapy, and oral medications (e.g., antiinflammatory medication, muscle relaxants, analgesics) are initially used. Second-tier treatments may include epidural steroid injections, facet injections, and selective nerve root blocks. Although the stabilizing effects of bracing can help relieve back pain, it has not been shown to prevent curve progression,¹⁵ and it may be associated with deconditioning and muscle atrophy if worn for protracted periods.

During conservative treatment, it is also essential to honestly and accurately convey the surgical risk associated with such procedures. Beyond mere operative risk, patients might possess multiple risk factors that can negatively affect their success following surgery. For instance, it has been well documented that certain conditions are associated with poor clinical outcomes,¹ including tobacco use,¹⁶ coronary or cerebrovascular disease,¹⁷ chronic pulmonary disease or asthma, diabetes,¹⁸ osteoporosis, nutritional deficiency,¹⁹ depression,²⁰ and active life stressors.²¹

Surgery

As with patients who suffer from degenerative conditions of the spine without deformity, surgery should be offered only after conservative management has failed. Controversy exists regarding the need to reduce the deformity in such patients as opposed to merely treating painful neural compression with directed decompression or fusing vertebrae in situ for degenerative instability. However, in patients with curves at risk for progression (more than 50 to 60 degrees for thoracic curves or more than 40 degrees for lumbar curves), surgical correction should be considered.¹ Korovessis and colleagues analyzed risk factors for lumbar curves and found that risk factors for progression included curves greater than 30 degrees, rotation of the apical vertebra of greater than 33%, lateral listhesis greater than 6 mm, and poor seating of the L5 vertebra over the S1 vertebra.²² Even more important, however, should be thorough assessment of preoperative sagittal balance. For this reason, many deformity spine surgeons suggest standing films for any patient being considered for a fusion involving thoracic or lumbar levels. Generally speaking, thoracic kyphosis greater than 60 degrees and the presence of any lumbar kyphosis (greater than 5 degrees) should be considered for surgical correction.¹

Spinal Balance

As stated previously, sagittal balance has been shown to be one of the most important factors associated with patient outcome following adult deformity surgery.^1,⁶^–⁷ ^,23 Although coronal balance is not nearly as important in such patients, proper balance in all planes provides an ergonomic posture, placing the head over the pelvis and over the feet. Without such balance, patients expend greater energy trying to obtain balance, which leads to muscle fatigue, strain, and pain. In addition, such imbalance can place excessive stresses on both instrumented spine segments as well as on normal, non-instrumented segments. As a result, such imbalance can lead to additional degeneration, instrumentation failure, and progressive imbalance.¹

Proximal and Distal Fusion Segments

In general, instrumentation should not terminate at or near the apical vertebra in the sagittal or coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, the apical vertebra is the vertebra at the apex of the thoracic kyphosis. In the coronal plane, the apical vertebra is at the apex of the largest coronal curve. In addition, instrumentation should extend to a neutral vertebra to balance the fixation construct within the deformity.¹ The neutral vertebra is the vertebra associated with little or no angulation or rotation at the rostral and caudal disc spaces of the curve. Many surgeons also suggest that the distal segment of a fusion should not end at the thoracolumbar junction (T11 or T12).²⁴

Patients in this population have significant disc degeneration in both degree and vastness across multiple segments of the spine. It has been shown that stopping a fusion adjacent to a severely degenerated disc, especially with subluxation or fixed obliquity, can result in poor outcomes. Therefore, when developing the construct, forethought must be given to not stopping at a severely degenerated disc. In addition, given the prevalence of degenerative changes at the L5–S1 junction, L5–S1 spondylolithesis, previous laminectomy at L5–S1, or an L5–S1 obliquity (more than 15 degrees), patients with adult scoliosis often require instrumentation to the sacrum.¹ Unfortunately, such fixation places enormous stresses on both the lumbosacral junction and the S1 pedicle screws, traditionally leading to a high failure rate of lone posterior constructs ending at S1.²⁵^–²⁶ Compounding such stress concentration is that fact that the S1 pedicles are the largest pedicles in the spine and thus the ratio of weaker cancellous bone to stronger cortical bone is decreased. For this reason, pedicle screw purchase is weaker compared to other spinal segments. In addition, fusions to the sacrum in adult degenerative scoliosis patients have been found to require more surgical procedures and have had more postoperative complications than those ending at L5.²⁶ Kim and colleagues noted a 24% rate of pseudarthrosis for fusions extending to the sacrum.²⁷

For such reasons, some surgeons suggest that fusions to the sacrum should be avoided when possible.²⁸ However, fusions ending at L5 have been associated with a 61% rate of adjacent segment disease and resultant negative impact on sagittal balance.²⁹ As a result, most deformity surgeons recommend that long posterior pedicle screw constructs should extend to the sacrum if deemed necessary but should involve a combination or all of the following to improve biomechanical stability at the lumbosacral junction: bicortical S1 pedicle screws, L5–S1 interbody support, additional sacral screws (S1 alar screws, S2 screws), and/or iliac screws.³⁰^–³¹

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue