Keywords
Myotonic dystrophy, congenital myotonic dystrophy, childhood myotonic dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy type 1, myotonic dystrophy type 2, spliceopathy, antisense oligonucleotides
Clinical Presentation and Phenotypes
Brief Overview of History and Epidemiology
In 1909, Hans Steinert (Leipzig, Germany) described the typical pattern of muscle weakness and myotonia in adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Over subsequent years, clinical studies demonstrated dominant inheritance and a wide spectrum of variable multisystem manifestations (skeletal and smooth muscle, heart, brain, eyes, respiratory, gastrointestinal, immune, and endocrine systems). In 1992, researchers discovered that DM1 results from an unstable trinucleotide repeat expansion (CTG) in the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase ( DMPK ) gene located on chromosome 19q13.3. This discovery stimulated widespread DNA testing of clinically diagnosed patients felt to have Steinert’s disease. Interestingly, in 1994, clinical researchers in the United States and Germany identified kindreds of patients with dominantly inherited myotonia, cataracts, and proximal weakness without an abnormal expansion of the CTG repeat in the DMPK gene and without linkage to hereditary myotonic disorders caused by mutations of the skeletal muscle chloride or sodium channels. They proposed two names for this newly identified disorder: myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) and proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM). In 1998, genetic mapping linked both disorders to chromosome 3q21, and in 2001, researchers discovered that DM2/PROMM resulted from an unstable CCTG repeat expansion in intron 1 of the CNBP/ZNF9 gene at locus 3q21.3.
The relatively recent discoveries of the assays to identify the mutations responsible for DM1 and DM2 create a challenge to determining the exact prevalence of DM1 and DM2. DNA confirmation of DM1 has only become widely available since the mid 1990s, and for DM2 since 2003. Prior estimates of the prevalence of myotonic dystrophy relied solely upon clinical diagnosis. Study populations primarily involved symptomatic adults and probably included a mixture of patients with DM1 and DM2. Patients with minimal or no symptoms are unlikely to have participated. Within these limitations, prior studies report a range of prevalence for myotonic dystrophy of 5 to 20 per 100,000. There are clusters of higher prevalence in the Basque region of Spain, northern Sweden, Istria region of Croatia, and the Saguenay-Lac St. Jean region of Quebec, Canada (158–189 per 100,000). Few studies of the prevalence of congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1 (CDM) and childhood DM1 are available. However, a recent nationwide study of CDM in Canada calculated the prevalence to be approximately 2.1/100,000. This estimate is lower than estimates in previous non-population-based studies in Sweden, Spain, and Britain, and probably reflects a stricter definition of CDM. The definition used for CDM in the Canadian study was: symptoms of DM1<30 days after birth (hypotonia, feeding and/or respiratory difficulty, required hospitalization>72 hours) and positive DNA testing. Other reports classifying children with positive DNA testing for DM1 have defined CDM as an infant<1 year of age with symptoms consistent with DM1; childhood DM1 (ChDM) as a child between 1–10 years of age with symptoms; and older teens and adults as the adult group. More epidemiological studies are necessary in DM1 to establish the rate of appearance and progression of disease manifestations, especially in children.
Until recently no estimates of prevalence for DM2 were available. In 2011, clinical researchers in Finland published findings indicating a higher prevalence of DM2 in Europeans than most clinicians suspected. In a large study of over 5000 anonymous blood donors, they observed a higher prevalence for DM2 than DM1. The higher prevalence of DM2 identified in this Finnish population emphasizes the wide spectrum of phenotypes and points out the diagnostic challenge that exists due to the variation in different symptoms that occur in DM2. For example, clinical findings such as myotonia on physical examination or even on electromyographic testing may be absent, limiting the ability of myotonia screening alone as a means to identify individuals with DM2. Whole blood DNA testing in individuals at known risk for DM1 or DM2 or in individuals presenting with one of the common manifestations ( Tables 37.1 and 37.2 ) is needed to determine more exactly the actual prevalence of individuals with abnormal repeat expansions of DMPK and CNBP/ZNF9 genes.
Adult Onset Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) | Adult Onset Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (DM2) | |
---|---|---|
Genetics | ||
Inheritance | Autosomal dominant | Autosomal dominant |
Anticipation | Pronounced | Exceptionally rare |
Congenital form | Yes | No |
Chromosome | 19q13.3 | 3q21.3 |
Locus | DMPK | CNBP |
Expansion mutation | (CTG) n | (CCTG) n |
Location of the expansion | 3′ untranslated region | Intron 1 |
Core features: Mild to moderately affected patients | ||
Clinical myotonia |
|
|
Muscle weakness |
|
|
Muscle wasting |
|
|
Cataracts |
|
|
Adult Onset Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) | Adult Onset Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (DM2) | |
---|---|---|
Multisystem manifestations: Mild to moderately affected patients | ||
Brain |
|
|
Heart |
|
|
Respiratory |
|
|
Anesthesia |
|
|
Hypersomnia and fatigue |
|
|
Endocrine |
|
|
Gastrointestinal |
|
|
Muscle pain |
|
|
Pregnancy |
|
|
Liver |
|
|
Immune System |
|
|
Eye |
|
|
Pilomatricoma |
|
|
Mode of Inheritance and Prevalence
DM1 and DM2 are autosomal dominant. Anticipation (earlier onset of more severe symptoms in successive generations) occurs primarily in DM1 (see Figure 37.1 ). Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM) occurs almost exclusively through maternal transmission (see Figures 37.2 and 37.3 ). In contrast, both mothers and fathers with DM1 can have children with childhood onset of DM1. However, only 5–10% of DM1 patients have onset before their mid-teens. DM2 occurs neither in infancy nor childhood, although teenage onset of myotonic symptoms can occur in some DM2 patients carrying concomitant mutations in the gene for the skeletal muscle chloride channel.
Clinical Presentation and Phenotypes
Tables 37.1 and 37.2 summarize the genetics, core clinical features, and multisystem manifestations typically observed in the initial evaluation of adults with either mild or moderate signs and symptoms of DM1 and DM2. Figure 37.4 outlines the workup and Table 37.3 presents general guidelines for patient care. Childhood and infant onset symptoms occur only in DM1. Figures 37.5 and 37.6 outline the evaluation and workup of DM1 patients who present in infancy and childhood. Table 37.4 summarizes the clinical problems they often have as well as their management.