Nerve Transfers: Indications and Techniques

Chapter 198 Nerve Transfers: Indications and Techniques



Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) produce psychologically and functionally devastating handicaps afflicting, generally, a subset of young, healthy males in the prime of life. Seventy percent are caused by motor vehicle accidents, of which 70% are due to the use of two-wheelers.1 The disease burden is estimated to be about 2162 cases per annum in the United States; costs of treatment amount to about $34,733 per capita.2 It is prudent to mention at the outset that the management of traumatic BPI requires a complex multidisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeons, orthopedists, plastic/hand surgeons, neurologists, neuroradiologists, neurophysiologists, physiotherapists, and pain specialists.


Surgical repair for BPI involves either neurolysis (scar release) that may be external, internal, or both; nerve grafting using devascularized, vascularized, or pedicled nerve cables to bridge defects; or nerve transfers where healthy functioning donor nerve is coapted directly onto a damaged recipient nerve.



Nerve Transfers (Neurotizations)


Specifically, nerve transfers involve re-assigning an “expendable” or redundant working nerve, part of a nerve (fascicle), or a nerve branch (donor) to a more important, nonfunctioning nerve (recipient).


The use of and enthusiasm for nerve transfers have increased dramatically in the past two decades largely due to the creative contributions of innovators such as Drs. Christophe Oberlin and Susan Mackinnon. The introduction of a fascicular transfer by Oberlin et al. (1994)3 for upper trunk injuries catalyzed the transformation. This procedure introduced the concept of fascicular transfer by using functioning ulnar nerve fascicles supplying the flexor carpi ulnaris to be selectively transferred onto the nerve to biceps with excellent results.35


The new era of nerve transfer has created a major controversy in brachial plexus surgery now—the role of nerve grafts versus nerve transfers in postganglionic injuries. This issue remains largely unresolved. The advantages and disadvantages of performing nerve transfers over nerve grafts are listed in Tables 198-1 and 198-2. As can be seen, the advantages of performing nerve transfers may outweigh those of brachial plexus nerve grafting. In fact, in the event of patients sustaining panplexal nerve injuries secondary to multiple root avulsions, nerve transfers may be the only viable form of repair.


TABLE 198-1 Advantages of Performing Nerve Transfer versus Nerve Graft




















Nerve Transfer Nerve Graft
A distal procedure performed close to the motor point of muscles. This decreases the time to reinnervation. The direct repair is at a single suture line. This improves reinnervation as well. Performed at the site of injury, typically proximally, and thus more anatomical. These are also more physiologic and make relearning when muscle power returns easier.
Surgical dissection occurs in uninvolved pristine tissue. These repairs make available more donor motor axons as nerve stumps are typically largest proximally.
Directed (selective) neurotization makes targeting motor recipient axons easier as it is closer to the motor end plate. As the entire cut surface is coapted with the injured stump, sensory reinnervation is also a possibility.
Is the only procedure possible after nerve root avulsion. Grafts enable entire motor groups to recover as opposed to single targeted muscles.
Can be performed with minimal technology.

TABLE 198-2 Disadvantages of Performing Nerve Transfer versus Nerve Graft
























Nerve Transfer Nerve Graft
Involves some loss of existing function, by definition. Typically requires use of nerve grafts, e.g., non-degenerated sensory nerves like the sural. The harvest has cosmetic and functional sequelae.
Requires muscle re-education that can hamper autonomy because of co-contractions. Has to be performed at the site of injury. Dissection is more difficult, especially in the presence of a concomitant vascular repair.
Number of available donor nerves is limited especially in patients with panplexal injuries. Cannot be performed in patients with root avulsive injuries.
Number of available motor axons is necessarily limited. Directed (motor donor to motor recipient) repair is seldom possible, especially when the loss of length is high. All proximal components of the brachial plexus are mixed sensorimotor.
Longer grafts should be vascularized as free grafts may fibrose secondary to ischemic injury.
Grafts require axonal sprouts to cross two suture lines. This further delays repair. If the distal suture line scars densely, the entire repair may fail here.
Grafts ideally require the use of intraoperative sensory and motor-evoked potentials to determine the viability of the donor nerve stump (especially proximal cervical nerves) even if it appears structurally intact. These have several technical and observer-dependent confounding factors.


Indications




1. “Irreparable” nerves that are avulsed from the spinal cord.


Preganglionic injuries are not amenable to any other form of repair as the motor axon has been physically disconnected from the neuronal cell body across the intervertebral foramen. Reconnection via axonal regeneration is not physically possible. In such patients, motor end plate degeneration starts at the time of injury and may be irreversible after 12 to 18 months.6,7 To beat the biological clock, it is imperative to operate as soon as possible and transfer viable axons to as close to the motor end point as possible. This is the procedure of choice in this form of injury.


2. More rapid or reliable recovery of motor function.


Most experts have now begun to recognize that nerve transfers allow a faster and perhaps more reliable way of regaining function even in postganglionic injuries bucking the previous trend of using proximal nerve grafts (Table 198-3).


3. To power free-functioning muscle transfers (FFMT).


Free-functioning muscle transfer is a reliable way to reconstruct the damaged upper extremity by moving a functioning muscle with its nerve and blood supply to another location where it can subserve a new function. This can occur after a successful nerve repair and anastomosis of the artery and vein have been accomplished. This microsurgical technique therefore does not have a time window like typical nerve reconstruction. Most commonly, FFMTs have thereby been performed for delayed cases to provide elbow flexion (such as in neglected injuries or those with poor or incomplete recovery). FFMTs in this setting can augment motor function. The native anatomy of the transferred muscle/tendon unit (gracilis, for example) has important features which allow FFMTs to achieve more distal function, ordinarily unachievable with standard techniques of nerve reconstruction (e.g., recovery of prehension of the hand in patients with flail limbs). The nerve supply is relatively close to the muscle and the tendon is long (and can be prolonged). This technique then can also be incorporated into an armamentarium in combination with other nerve techniques in the early setting.


TABLE 198-3 Commonly and Uncommonly Performed Nerve Donors/Transfers































Recipient Nerve Common Donor Nerves Uncommon Donor Nerves
Suprascapular Spinal accessory
C5 nerve
C6 nerve
C4 nerve
C7 nerve/middle trunk
Phrenic nerve
Contralateral C7
Dorsal scapular
Axillary Triceps branch of radial
Medial pectoral
Motor intercostals
Thoracodorsal
Contralateral C7
MCN, biceps, or brachialis branch Ulnar nerve fascicle
Median nerve fascicle
Motor intercostal
Medial pectoral
Thoracodorsal
Spinal accessory
Phrenic
Contralateral C7
Hemi-hypoglossal
Median Sensory intercostals
Contralateral C7
Ulnar nerve fascicle
Brachialis branch of MCN
Supinator/ECRB branch of radial
Radial Motor intercostals
Proximal branches of radial
Contralateral C7
Dorsal scapular nerve
Median nerve branches
Ulnar nerve Brachialis branch of MCN
Anterior interosseous
Contralateral C7

ECRB, extensor carpi radialis brevis; MCN, musculocutaneous.




Principles


Some basic principles must be respected while performing nerve transfers. These include the following:



TABLE 198-4 Characteristics of Ideal Donor



























Pure Motor or sensory.
Example: Medial pectoral nerve (motor); sensory intercostal nerves.
Adjacent Minimal donor dissection required to gain length.
Example: Double fascicular transfer for elbow flexion.
Expendable Unlikely to affect donor function.
Example: Intercostal nerve transfer.
Uninjured Donor fascicle muscle groups must have at least grade 4/5 MRC power.
Example: Spinal accessory transfer is contraindicated when shoulder function is poor.
Remote From zone of injury (dissection is easier).
Example: Oberlin’s transfer in upper trunk injury.
Proximate To motor point so reinnervation is faster and likely better.
Example: Triceps to axillary nerve transfer.
Adequate Diameter mismatch is prevented.
Example: Three motor intercostals are used to neurotize the nerve to biceps.
Educatable Same muscle compartment is ideal, as relearning and subsequent autonomy are better and faster as antagonistic co-contractions do not occur.

MRC, Medical Research Council.


TABLE 198-5 Fascicular Anatomy of Major Nerves











































Nerve Donor/Recipient Fascicular Anatomy
CC7 Donor Posterior division has 2x motor axons.
Median (axilla) Recipient Lateral root is mainly sensory.
Median (arm) Donor FCR/FDS fascicle is medial.
Median (arm) Recipient Posterior fascicle (AIN).
Anterior fascicle (PT, FCR).
Middle fascicle (FDS, thenar, sensory).
Median (forearm) Donor Terminal AIN branch to PQ.
Nerve to biceps Recipient Lateral in musculocutaneous nerve.
Nerve to brachialis Donor/recipient Lateral to LABC.
Suprascapular Recipient Lateral within upper trunk.
Ulnar (arm) Donor FCU fascicle is posteromedial.

AIN, anterior interosseous nerve; CC7, contralateral C7; FCR, flexor carpi radialis; FCU, flexor carpi ulnaris; FDS, flexor digitorum superficialis; LABC, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve; PQ, pronator quadratus; PT, pronator teres.




Surgical Anatomy


The brachial plexus is formed by the ventral rami of the fifth to eighth cervical and the first thoracic nerve roots. It is essential to remember that the nerves emerge between the scalenus anterior and medius (interscalene triangle) to form trunks in the supraclavicular fossa. The divisions of the brachial plexus are retroclavicular while the cords are infraclavicular and named as such in relation to the axillary artery.



Supraclavicular Exploration


The key muscles for the supraclavicular exploration of the brachial plexus are the omohyoid (deep to which lies the fat pad covering the plexus) and the scalenus anterior (deep to which lie the nerves). The latter is often difficult to identify especially when there is extensive scarring. They are then identified indirectly as the structures that lie beneath the phrenic nerve. The phrenic nerve may be identified visually as the only neural structure (other than the nerve to subclavius) that passes from lateral to medial in the root of the neck (Fig. 198-1). If scarring is extensive, blind neural stimulation using 0.1–2 mA of current may provoke capnographic changes if not frank diaphragmatic contraction that may guide the surgeon to the approximate location of this key structure before sharp dissection is commenced.8 The phrenic nerve can then be traced back to the C5 nerve via its contribution to the former. From here, the C5 nerve can then be traced to the upper trunk. Proximal and distal dissection allows identification of C6 and the divisions of the upper trunk. The suprascapular nerve is the key target in this exploration and can be found superior, lateral, and posterior to the upper trunk. Its direction confirms its identity. It parallels the omohyoid and runs posteriorly obliquely to the scapular notch. In the event of a complete rupture of the C5 and C6 nerves, the distal components of the plexus can be found near, behind, or even below the clavicle.



The spinal accessory nerve can be identified by exposing the lateral aspect of the supraclavicular incision. The nerve can be identified reliably a few centimeters above the clavicle on the anterior surface of the trapezius at its medial border. Other smaller, mostly sensory nerves frequently seen in this location represent neural elements of the cervical plexus. These may produce weak contractions of the trapezius. In contrast, direct stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve produces powerful trapezius contraction.


Care has to be taken, during dissection, not to injure the lymphatic duct on the right and the chyle carrying thoracic duct on the left side. These elements are at risk during medial dissection such as with exposure of the lower trunk elements.



Infraclavicular Exploration


The key muscle in the infraclavicular exploration of the brachial plexus is the pectoralis minor. This may be approached either through the preferred corridor offered by the deltopectoral groove or a transpectoralis major (muscle splitting) exposure. The pectoralis minor is identified as the musculotendinous structure passing inferomedially from the coracoid process of the scapula to the third–fifth costochondral junctions. This anatomy also helps the surgeon to define ribs and the underlying intercostal nerves with a number. Division of the pectoralis minor muscle reveals the cords, terminal branches, and axillary vessels within the axillary sheath. Fat can treacherously encase these structures, especially the axillary and cephalic veins. Due care must be taken while retracting the pectoralis minor as the medial and lateral pectoral nerves arborize in the adjacent fat planes when penetrating this muscle.


The key neural structure to be identified here is the median nerve, which is characterized by a Y-shape at its take-off from both the lateral and medial cords. The median nerve helps navigation. The lateral root of the median nerve enters the lateral cord. The lateral cord can then be followed distally into the musculocutaneous nerve. Its medial root can be traced proximally into the medial cord and the medial cord can be traced to the ulnar nerve in the arm which lies in the biceps–triceps groove. The proximal median nerve is at first lateral to the brachial artery and crosses it ventrally in the mid-arm to gain its medial relation. At this point, the ulnar nerve, which lies medial to the brachial artery in the upper arm, begins descending posteriorly to eventually penetrate the medial intermuscular septum and pass behind the medial epicondyle.


It is important to realize that the musculocutaneous nerve provides its first branch to the coracobrachialis muscle and then penetrates this muscle. This must not be mistaken for the nerve to the biceps which is given off its lateral aspect in the mid-arm (typically 12 cm distal to the acromion). The nerve to the brachialis is given off further distally (approximately 17 cm distal to the acromion) and typically lies lateral to the terminal branch, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve.9 The former is a pure motor branch, while the latter is a sensory nerve. The authors verify the nature of both these terminal divisions by tracing the brachialis branch until it arborizes on the muscle surface. A variation that has to be considered is the low take-off of the musculocutaneous nerve from the median nerve. This is important to consider especially when the median nerve is being considered as a donor for a simultaneous nerve transfer.



Anterior and Posterior Approaches for the Suprascapular and Axillary Nerves


The suprascapular and axillary nerves can be approached either anteriorly or posteriorly. The suprascapular nerve is typically identified in the supraclavicular dissection. Occasionally it can be identified and dissected further distally in the infraclavicular region. It lies lateral to the cords/divisions. It runs near the coracoid process as it heads toward the suprascapular notch.


A separate posterior incision can be done along the lateral aspect of the scapular spine. The trapezius can be elevated from the scapular spine or its fibers split in line with their course. The atrophic suprapinatus can be mobilized inferiorly. The shiny transverse scapular ligament can be seen and divided. The suprascapular nerve is deep to the ligament. This posterior approach can be used if a second site of injury is suspected or if a distal nerve transfer is performed (distal spinal accessory nerve to the distal suprascapular nerve).


The infraclavicular exposure allows anterior exposure of the axillary nerve. It can be located superior and lateral to the posterior cord at the level of the humeral head. For identifying the posterior cord, the axillary artery has to be mobilized, generally ventrally and laterally off the axillary vein. This is a delicate procedure and the access is made more difficult by the operating depth or by previous vascular injury and/or repair. The conjoined tendon can be taken down from the coracoid to allow more lateral and distal exposure, that is, more removed from the typical vascular injury. The conjoined tendon would need to be reapproximated at the end of the case.


A posterior approach allows easy dissection of the axillary nerve in the quadrangular space formed laterally by the long head of the triceps, medially by the proximal humerus, superiorly by the teres minor and inferiorly by the teres major. The axillary nerve here, follows the posterior circumflex humeral artery, and splits into the anterior and posterior divisions. The anterior division is generally targeted as it supplies the anterior and middle deltoid. The posterior division innervates the less important posterior deltoid and also gives rise to the superior lateral cutaneous nerve of the arm, which need not be reinnervated. The importance of the superior lateral cutaneous nerve of the arm lies in that it can be used, when traced retrogradely from the skin incision, for navigating to the posterior division and thereon to the anterior division of the axillary nerve. Sometimes, a combined anterior and posterior approach may be required to satisfactorily visualize the axillary nerve in its entirety or to find a healthy recipient nerve (the pull through procedure). The radial nerve exits the axilla inferior (more inferiorly) to the axillary nerve. It courses through the triangular space formed by the teres major superiorly, the long head of the triceps inferomedially and the shaft of the humerus laterally.



General Principles: Surgical Technique




Technique of Nerve Coaption


First we prepare all of the donor and recipient nerves or fascicles and clip them with redundancy to green backgrounds, once transected, to ensure high visibility. Then we perform all of the microsurgery of the various nerves. We trim back on the recipient so that its length is as short as possible so as to minimize reinnervation time to the end organ. A repair with tension is avoided. The repair is tested in the maximum anticipated range of joint movements in all directions. Diameter mismatches are avoided wherever possible and selective neurotization is practiced when it is not. Donor and recipient nerve fascicles are further skeletonized and soft tissue is denuded at the coapting ends to prevent scar formation. The fascicular ends are finally sectioned using an ultrafine diamond knife. Coaption is then carried out using interrupted, nylon, monofilament 9-0 sutures passed through the epineurium of adjacent fascicles. An operating microscope with twin mobile opposable eyepieces is used so that two surgeons can operate simultaneously. Frequent heparinized saline flushes ensure adequate visibility at the time of coaption. Typically, two diametrically opposite sutures are used with three throws each. The initial knot is tensioned gradually so as to just appose the cut sections of the participating fascicles without buckling them. Knots are initially cut long so as to rotate the line of coaption to look for any unevenness. If the suture line is uneven or buckled, more sutures or else release of existing sutures and redo may be preferred as this is the most vital part of the operation. Once the suture line is observed to be satisfactory, we place a bivalved nerve tube of an appropriate diameter to protect the repair. This is then cemented in with the use of tissue adhesive.9

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 16, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Nerve Transfers: Indications and Techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access