Radiosurgery of the Sellar and Parasellar Region


Study

Year

Patients

Prior surgical resection, %

Radiosurgery

F/U, mo

Maximal dose, Gy

Margin dose, Gy

Tumor volume change, %

Tumor control, %

Neurologic deficit, %

New hormone deficit, %

Decreased

Unchanged

Increased

Wilson et al. [8]

2012

51


LINAC

37.2


14

91.1

8.9

0

100

6.7

0

El-Shehaby et al. [10]

2012

21

90.5

GKRS

44


12

52

43

5

95

0

14.3

Starke et al. [9]

2012

140

90.7

GKRS

60

38.6

18



10

90

0

30.3

Gopalan et al. [11]

2011

48

97.9

GKRS

95

41.3

18.4

75

8

17

83

6.3

39

Park et al. [12]

2011

125

88

GKRS

62

27.9

13

52.8

36.8

10.4

89.6

2.4

24

Hayashi et al. [13]

2010

43


GKRS

36


18.2




100

0

0

Hoybye and Rahn [5]

2009

23

100

GKRS

78

50

20

78.3

17.4

4.3

100

4.3

0

Pollock et al. [14]

2008

62

95.2

GKRS

64

34.5

16

60

37

3

97

1.6

27

Liscak et al. [15]

2007

79

85

GKRS

60

40

20

88.6

11.4

0

100

0

2.5

Mingione et al. [16]

2006

90

91.1

GKRS

44.9

41.5

18.5

65.5

26.7

7.8

92.2

0

19.7

Voges et al. [17]

2006

37


LINAC

56.6


13.4

40.5

59.5

0

100



Picozzi et al. [18]

2005

51

100

GKRS

40.6


16.5



3.9

96.1



Iwai et al. [19]

2005

28

100

GKRS

36.4


12.3




93

0

7

Losa et al. [20]

2004

52

100

GKRS

41.1

33.2

16.6

38.5

57.7

3.8

96.2

0

9.6

Muacevic et al. [21]

2004

51

100

GKRS

21.7


16.5




95

0

3.9

Petrovich et al. [22]

2003

56


GKRS

34

30a

15a



0

100



Muramatsu et al. [23]

2003

8

100

LINAC

30


15a



0

100



Sheehan et al. [7]

2002

42


GKRS

31.2

32

16.2

42.9

54.8

2.4

97.6

4.8

0

Wowra and Stummer [24].

2002

30

96.7

GKRS

57.7

28.9

16




93

0

10

Izawa et al. [25]

2000

23

69.6

GKRS

30.1


19.5

26.1



95.6

4.3

4.3

Shin et al. [26]

2000

3


GKRS

18.7


16

33.3

66.7

0

100

0

0


Mean or median values used

F/U follow-up, GKRS Gamma Knife radiosurgery, LINAC linear accelerator–based radiosurgery, mo months

aIncludes dose for other adenomas



Although the rates of neurologic deficits (mean, 1.8 %; range, 0–6.7 %) and endocrine deficits (mean, 11.3 %; range, 0–39 %) are relatively low, vision decline and hypopituitarism are the most frequently reported complications. Large tumor volume has been observed to be associated with an increased incidence of neurologic deficits and delayed hypopituitarism following radiosurgery [9, 11, 12]. In contrast, improvement in visual function with or without tumor volume reduction has been observed in other series [10, 15]. Current evidence suggests that radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent or residual disease in patients with NFAs, but continued long-term follow-up remains essential, as growth or reduction of these slow-growing tumors may not be immediately apparent [11, 16].



7.3 Cushing’s Disease


Hypersecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is responsible for 80 % of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, and pituitary adenomas are often the source of the hormone overproduction [27]. Microsurgical and endoscopic resection are the primary treatments for Cushing’s disease, but a surgical cure remains a challenge when there is tumor invasion of surrounding structures or difficult tumor delineation on imaging. Radiosurgery serves as an invaluable adjunctive treatment following resection in these circumstances. Although the updated 2008 guidelines from the Endocrine Society recommend the use of postoperative morning serum cortisol levels in establishing biochemical remission [27], there remains significant variability in the literature regarding its definition. Most studies define endocrine remission using normal serum cortisol or normal 24-h urinary-free cortisol (UFC). In a large study of 90 patients at the University of Virginia who were treated with GKRS, we have observed a biochemical remission rate of 54.4 % defined by 24-h UFC and a tumor control rate of 95.5 % [28, 29]. Table 7.2 shows a summary of radiosurgical results for Cushing’s disease from recent studies. These studies demonstrate a mean tumor control rate of 93 % (range, 77–100 %) and a biochemical remission rate of 54 % (range, 16.7–100 %), with a mean margin dose of 23.5 Gy (range, 15–35 Gy) [13, 22, 25, 26, 2846].


Table 7.2
Comparison of radiosurgical results for Cushing’s disease




























































































































































































































































































































Study

Year

Patients

Radiosurgery

F/U, mo

Maximal dose, Gy

Margin dose, Gy

Biochemical remission rate, %

Tumor control, %

Neurologic deficit, %

New hormone deficit, %

Grant et al. [45]

2013

15

GKRS

40.2


35

73

100


40

Wein et al. [46]

2012

17

LINAC

23

31.9

17.8

59


0

11.8

Sheehan et al. [29]

2011

82

GKRS

31


24a

54



22

Hayashi et al. [13]

2011

13

GKRS

36


25.2a

38

77

15.4

0

Castinetti et al. [42]

2009

18

GKRS

95.5


28.5

50

100



Wan et al. [43]

2009

68

GKRS

67.3


23

27.9

86.8


1.5

Kobayashi et al. [44]

2009

30

GKRS

64.1


28.7

35




Pollock et al. [39]

2008

8

GKRS

73

40

20

87

100



Tinnel et al. [40]

2008

12

GKRS

37

30

25

50


0

50

Petit et al. [41]

2008

33

PSR

58.5


20

52

94

0

43.8

Kong et al. [37]

2007

7

GKRS

25.4


25.1a

100


0


Castinetti et al. [38]

2007

40

GKRS

54.7


29.5

42.5


5

15

Jagannathan et al. [28]

2007

90

GKRS

36/41.3b

49

23

54.4

95.5

5.6

22.2

Voges et al. [17]

2006

17

LINAC

58.7

33.7a

15.3a

52.9

88.2



Devin et al. [36]

2004

35

LINAC

42

33.7

14.7

49

91

0

40

Wong et al. [34]

2003

5

LINAC

38

16–20

14.8–19.2

80


0

20

Petrovich et al. [22]

2003

4

GKRS

34

30a

15a

50




Choi et al. [35]

2003

9

GKRS

42.5

54.1a

28.5a

55.6

85.7

0

0

Kobayashi et al. [32]

2002

20

GKRS

64.1

49.4a

28.7a

35

100



Pollock et al. [33]

2002

9

GKRS

36/42.4b

40a

20a

78

100

11.1


Hoybye et al. [31]

2001

18

GKRS

202

71.4


44


0

68.8

Izawa et al. [25]

2000

12

GKRS

26.4


24.2a

16.7

83

0

0

Sheehan et al. [30]

2000

43

GKRS

44

47

20

63

100

2.3

16.3

Shin et al. [26]

2000

6

GKRS

88.2


32.3

50

100


16.7


Mean or median values used

F/U follow-up, GKRS Gamma Knife radiosurgery, LINAC linear accelerator–based radiosurgery, mo months, PSR proton stereotactic radiosurgery

aIncludes dose for other adenomas

bImaging follow-up/endocrine follow-up

In most series, rates of new neurologic deficits following radiosurgery are low, with an average of 2.8 % (range, 0–15.4 %), but the incidence of new endocrine deficit is higher, at a mean of 23 % (range, 0–68.8 %). These complication rates are both higher than what has been observed in radiosurgery for NFA; this difference could represent radiation damage to the normal pituitary and nerves secondary to the higher margin doses delivered to ACTH-secreting adenomas. Despite biochemical remission and hormone reduction offered by radiosurgery, late recurrence rates of up to 20 % have been reported, so long-term follow-up is very important for these patients [28, 40].


7.4 Nelson’s Syndrome


Adrenalectomy is the ultimate treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease refractory to conventional surgical, radiosurgical, and medical managements. Although definitive treatment for hypercortisolemia can be offered by adrenalectomy, up to 23 % of patients subsequently develop Nelson’s syndrome, which can lead to rapid growth of the adenoma and parasellar invasion [47]. Relatively few studies in the literature have evaluated the role of radiosurgery in the treatment of Nelson’s syndrome. In the largest series thus far, Mauermann et al. [48] observed a 90.9 % rate of tumor control and a 20 % rate of ACTH normalization in a population of 23 patients treated with GKRS. In a recent study of 22 patients treated with GKRS, Sheehan et al. [29] found the same hormone normalization rate of 20 %. Table 7.3 shows a summary of radiosurgical results for Nelson’s syndrome from recent studies. These studies show an average tumor control rate of 95 % (range, 82–100 %) and a hormone normalization rate of 30 % (range, 0–100 %), using a mean margin dose of 22 Gy (range, 12–28.7 Gy) [17, 32, 41, 4851]. Despite the low hormone normalization rates reported in the series, studies have demonstrated significant reduction in ACTH following radiosurgery [48, 50, 51].


Table 7.3
Comparison of radiosurgical results for Nelson’s syndrome




























































































































































Study

Year

Patients

Radiosurgery

F/U, mo

Maximal dose, Gy

Margin dose, Gy

Hormone normalization, %

Tumor volume change, %

Tumor control, %

Neurologic deficit, %

New hormone deficit, %

Decreased

Unchanged

Increased

Sheehan et al. [29]

2011

22

GKRS

31


24a

20






28

Vik-Mo et al. [51]

2009

10

GKRS

84

53.4

26.2

10

90

10

0

100

0

40

Petit et al. [41]

2008

5

PSR

109


20

100



0

100

0

50

Mauermann et al. [48]

2007

23

GKRS

20/50b

50

25

20

54.5

36.4

9.1

90.9

4.5

50

Voges et al. [17]

2006

9

LINAC

63.1

57.4

20

22.2

44.4

44.4

11.2

88.8



Kobayashi et al. [32]

2002

6

GKRS

64.1

49.4a

28.7a

33.3



0

100



Pollock and Young [50]

2002

11

GKRS

37

40

20

36.3

54.5

27.3

18.2

82

9.1

27.3

Wolffenbuttel et al. [49]

1998

1

GKRS

33

40

12

0

100

0

0

100

0

0


Mean or median values used

F/U follow-up, GKRS Gamma Knife radiosurgery, LINAC linear accelerator–based radiosurgery, mo months, PSR proton stereotactic radiosurgery

aIncludes dose for other adenomas

bImaging follow-up/endocrine follow-up

Common adverse effects of radiosurgery for Nelson’s syndrome include visual and hormonal deficits; recent series show the incidence of neurologic deficits to be 2.7 % (range, 0–9.1 %) and the incidence of hormonal deficits to be 32.6 % (range, 0–50 %). Current literature demonstrates that radiosurgery is effective in controlling tumor progression and reducing ACTH levels, but hormone normalization may be difficult to achieve with radiosurgery alone.


7.5 Acromegaly


Although surgical resection remains the first-line treatment in most cases of acromegaly, endocrine cure by surgery alone is unlikely, particularly for patients with tumor involvement of the dura and cavernous sinus [52]. Because complete surgical resection may not always be feasible, radiosurgery provides a viable alternative or adjunct treatment for those who cannot tolerate first-line management or who have residual disease following surgery. Radiosurgery following surgical resections achieves almost total tumor control; in contrast, the average biochemical remission rate is only 48 % (range, 17–100 %) across recent series, using a mean margin dose of 23 Gy (range, 15–35 Gy) [13, 17, 22, 23, 25, 26, 29, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 5370]. Precise criteria for biochemical remission following radiosurgery vary across case series. The most recent 2010 guidelines for remission have not been extensively validated following treatment with radiosurgery [71], and most studies define remission using a random serum growth hormone (GH) level less than 2 ng/mL, a GH level less than 1 ng/mL following an oral glucose tolerance test, or normal insulin-like growth factor-1 level adjusted for age and sex [72, 73]. In the largest study thus far, Sheehan et al. [29] reported a biochemical remission rate of 53 % in 130 patients treated with GKRS. More recently, in a smaller cohort of patients treated with GKRS, Franzin et al. [74] observed a more favorable remission rate of 60.7 %. Table 7.4 shows a summary of recent radiosurgical results for acromegaly.


Table 7.4
Comparison of radiosurgical results for acromegaly








































































































































































































































Study

Year

Patients

Radiosurgery

F/U, mo

Maximal dose, Gy

Margin dose, Gy

Biochemical remission, %

Neurologic deficit, %

New hormone deficit, %

Grant et al. [45]

2013

13

GKRS

40.2


35a

61


31

Erdur et al. [70]

2012

22

GKRS

60

47.2

23.8

54.5

0

28.6

Franzin et al. [74]

2012

112

GKRS

71


22.5

60.7

0

7.8

Liu et al. [69]

2012

40

GKRS

72


21

47.5

0

40

Sheehan et al. [29]

2011

130

GKRS

31


24a

53


34

Poon et al. [68]

2010

40

GKRS

73.8


20–35

69.2

0

11.4

Hayashi et al. [13]

2010

25

GKRS

36


25.2a

40

0

0

Iwai et al. [67]

2010

26

GKRS

84

40

20

38.5

0

8

Ronchi et al. [66]

2009

35

GKRS

114

40

20

42.9

0

50

Castinetti et al. [42]

2009

43

GKRS

99.7


25.7

41.9

5.3

21

Wan et al. [43]

2009

103

GKRS

67.3


21.4

36.9


1.9

Jagannathan et al. [65]

2008

95

GKRS

57

47

22

53

4.2

34

Losa et al. [64]

2008

83

GKRS

69

42

21.5

60.2

0

8.5

Pollock et al. [39]

2008

27

GKRS

46.9

45

20

67



Tinnel et al. [40]

2008

9

GKRS

35


25

44.4

11

22

Petit et al. [63]

2007

22

PSR

75.6


20

59.1

0

38

Pollock et al. [62]

2007

46

GKRS

63

43.5

20

50

2.2

33

Vik-Mo et al. [61]

2007

61

GKRS

66

53.4

26.5

17

3.3

13.1

Jezkova et al. [60]

2006

96

GKRS

53.7

63

32

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 11, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Radiosurgery of the Sellar and Parasellar Region

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access