Routine Upper Extremity, Facial, and Phrenic Nerve Conduction Techniques

10 Routine Upper Extremity, Facial, and Phrenic Nerve Conduction Techniques






Median Sensory Palmar Study (Figure 10–4)








Key Points:




A palm/wrist sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude ratio >1.6 implies some conduction block across the wrist.


It is essential to obtain a clear onset latency at both sites (electronic averaging is often helpful).


At the palm stimulation, stimulus artifact may contaminate the onset latency. It is essential to obtain a clear onset latency at both the palm and wrist sites. If palm stimulation results in baseline distortion due to stimulus artifact, the anode should be rotated until a suitable baseline is obtained.


From this study, the conduction velocities for the wrist-to-digit 3 segment and the palm-to-digit 3 segment are displayed on the machine. On some EMG machines, the wrist-to-palm segment conduction velocity is also calculated and displayed on the machine. However, if the EMG machine does not calculate the conduction velocity, it must be mathematically calculated, by subtracting the palm-to-digit 3 onset latency from the wrist-to-digit 3 onset latency. Then a conduction velocity for the wrist–palm segment (i.e., across the carpal tunnel) can be calculated by taking the distance (7 cm) and dividing it by the calculated latency. The wrist-to-palm conduction velocity (i.e., across the carpal tunnel) is normally faster than the palm-to-digit 3 segment. In carpal tunnel syndrome, there is a reversal of this pattern, with relative slowing of the wrist-to-palm segment (see Chapter 17).


Note that any distance can be used at the wrist and at the palm. However, if the palm-to-digit 3 distance is half the distance of the wrist-to-digit 3, the mathematical calculation is much simpler (see Chapter 17).


This study is also known as the median segmental sensory study, as two sensory segments of the median nerve (wrist-to-palm and palm-to-digit) are compared.



Ulnar Motor Study (Figure 10–5)










Deep Ulnar Motor Branch Study (Figure 10–8)







Key Points:



Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 31, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGY | Comments Off on Routine Upper Extremity, Facial, and Phrenic Nerve Conduction Techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access