Reduction of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis

50
Reduction of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis


Charles C. Edwards and Charles C. Edwards II


Description


Full correction of high-grade spondylolisthesis (Fig. 50.1) is achieved through an entirely posterior approach, with or without sacral dome osteotomy, by using graduated instrumented distraction, posterior translation of the proximal spine, and flexion of the sacrum.


image

Fig. 50.1 A full-grade spondyloptosis.


Expectations


Careful preoperative planning, complete neural decompression, and the gradual application of corrective forces over time with effective instrumentation consistently yields anatomic reduction of the spine and a high rate of successful fusion without the need for anterior surgical approaches. For spondyloptosis, sacral dome osteotomy or a second stage of surgery may be necessary to limit lumbar root stretch.


Indications


High-grade spondylolisthesis and spondyloptosis.


Contraindications


Lack of Patience or Surgical Experience


This is a technically difficult and demanding undertaking even for the most experienced spinal surgeon. The surgeon cannot force reduction ahead of stress-relaxation and nerve accommodation. Hands-on training, experience with lesser slips, and a long learning curve are necessary to master the planning and reduction techniques for consistently excellent results.


Older or Frail Patients


This surgery is rarely indicated in patients over 40 or 50 years of age.


Special Considerations


Preoperative planning is essential. Standing lateral and supine flexion/extension radiographs are needed to determine the “root-lengthening limit” and for planning surgery. First, make two tracings of the flexion lateral film: sacrum and L1–L5. To simulate complete reduction, the sacrum is flexed with its long axis oriented 35 degrees from vertical. The L1–L5 tracing is then positioned with L5 reduced, L3 horizontal, and L1 vertically centered over the anterior body of S1 (Fig. 50.2). To determine how much L5 nerve root lengthening will occur with full reduction, measure the distance from the L4 pedicle (root origin) to the sciatic notch (root exit) on the pre-reduction standing lateral and postreduction lateral tracings. The difference represents expected root lengthening.


image

Fig. 50.2 Preoperative planning demonstrating the corrected position of the spine, the location of the sacral osteotomy, and measurement of the anticipated change in the L5 nerve length.


The root-lengthening limit without deficit for one stage of surgery varies between 2 and 5 cm depending on several factors. The lengthening limit is reduced (from 5 toward 2 cm) when (1) the patient is older than 20; (2) the duration of optosis exceeds 2 years; (3) the L5/S1 slip angle is greater than 50 degrees; (4) bending films demonstrate a rather fixed panlumbar lordosis; (5) there have been prior lumbosacral (LS) fusion attempts or; (6) preoperative lumbar radiculitis/radiculopathy is present. If all six predictors are negative, only about 2 cm of lengthening is safe in one day, whereas if there are no negative predictors, 5 cm of lengthening is generally possible without deficit. If reduction exceeds the root lengthening limit, there are two alternatives: (1) the reduction may be divided between two procedures a week apart, or (2) the spine is shortened by removing 0.5 to 1.5 cm from the proximal sacrum through the posterior approach.


Special Instructions, Position, and Anesthesia


Before surgery the patient practices ankle dorsiflexion for the wake-up test. An overhead traction frame is assembled over the head of the table. The patient is positioned prone with hips initially flexed 30 degrees to facilitate LS visualization and knees flexed 70–90 degrees to relax the sciatic nerve. Hips are extended later to facilitate reduction.


Tips, Pearls, and Lessons Learned


The Spondylo Construct of the Edwards Modular Spine System (EMSS) (Scientific Spinal, Baltimore, MD) is specifically designed to facilitate this operation. It allows the surgeon to move and stabilize the spine simultaneously with 6 degrees of freedom. Controlled incremental change in spine position is made possible with ratcheted rods and threaded connectors.


Difficulties Encountered


The relationship of L5 to the sacral ala and L5 transverse process changes during the reduction sequence. The L5 roots need to be checked often during reduction to ensure no compression. Reduction lengthens the L5 root, which must also be checked for excessive tightness in addition to somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP)/electromyogram (EMG) monitoring. Reduction must be stopped if there is depression of the SSEP or EMG response or excess nerve tightness to palpation. Additional sacral shortening, root decompression as it crosses the ala, or an additional stage may be needed to safely complete the reduction.


Key Procedural Steps



image

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 15, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROSURGERY | Comments Off on Reduction of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access